Cisco VPN :: 1841 - Unable To Connect Office Network To HQ Via Site To Site VPN
Feb 23, 2012
I am try to setup my office network to able to connect to one of my customer HQ via site to site VPN. I am using Cisco 1841 router to do the job.
The problem that I am facing now is no able to connect my other PC in office to the remote site.
show crypto isakmp sa
IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
dst src state conn-id status
202.x.x.x 175.x.x.x QM_IDLE 1001 ACTIVE(code)
View 9 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 23, 2012
I want to implement site to site vpn among our Head Office and Barnch routers (300 Sites).Head Office Site I have a cisco 7200 Router Im going to terminate the VPN conection on that.Branches we are having cisco 1841 series routers. They all are capable of working with VPN.In the present it is act like a EazyVPN Server for selected sites(30 sites).Is there any license limitations in Cisco 7200 Router ?Can I run both Site to site VPN and Eazy VPN Server together ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2013
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2013
I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2011
I'm getting a Cisco 1841 router to do a site-to-site VPN. I'd like to know what's the minimum IOS software feature set required for site-to-site VPN?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2013
I have 2 Cisco routers , 1841 and 2811 , I need to setup site to site VPN , but i dont now some how it just does not seems to be working ,
Find attached the Configuration along with the
<----- 172.31.1.0/24----- DG:172.31.1.1>Cisco 2811<Dialer1 -----//Internet//----------Dialer1>Cisco1841---< DG:10.236.5.254-------------- 10.236.5.0/24--->
Find attached command executed on each router in the below order
1) show ver
2) Show run
3) show logging
4) show crypto ipsec sa
5) show crypto isakmp sa
Debugging enabled on routers are
1)Debug Crypto Isakmp
2) Debug Crypto Ipsec.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
The problem I am having is very strange and I have tried to upgrade the IOS on the 1841 to solve the problem but no luck. The issue is when I enable Zone Based firewall security on of the 1841 routers two VPN site-to-site tunnels stops working. If I turn off CEF (no ip cef) then the traffic for both tunnels works. Someone told me that the Zone Based firewall must have a match for the VPN traffic and I created that with ACL 160 and 161 but it did not solve the problem.
Current IOS is below.
Cisco IOS Software, 1841 Software (C1841-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 11-Sep-12 23:58 by prod_rel_team
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2011
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2012
Using the Cisco Configuration Professional software I have created a site to site VPN connection (between a cisco 1841 and 1811).The tunnel appears to be up as far as the routers are concerned, but I am unable to ping anything on the remote networks. I thought route maps may have had something to do with this but I cant see what is worng with them.Just so you know, the 1841 device already has a functioning VPN tunnel to another site. The peers I am concerned about are 141.0.59.x and 109.238.78.x.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
I am in the process of setting up a site to site VPN connection with a Cisco 1841 with the AIM-VPN-SSL-1 module and an NEC IX2015. We are using a GRE tunnel with IPSec.The problem we are having is the NEC router will not repsond to ICMP packets (and there isn't a way to make it respond). Will this cause any problems with the tunnel?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2012
Is there a guide to set up a site to site VPN using 1841.
I have 3 points, 1 1841, 1 pix 506e and 1 ASA 5500. I need a good guide/manual to set up this. I would like to connect to any of the points, and be able to see all the infrastructure.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
i have 2 routers both 1841's and am trying to get a simple static vpn up and running. Now One router is at our main location (ill call it router a) and the remote location (ill call it router b). Both have internet connectivity that works, can ping router a from b and b to a. Now on router b side when i run show crypto isakmp sa on router b i get the following:
SBOneonta#show crypto isakmp sa
IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
dst src state conn-id status
72.43.229.138 66.194.51.66 MM_NO_STATE 0 ACTIVE (deleted)
72.43.229.138 66.194.51.66 MM_NO_STATE 0 ACTIVE (deleted)
72.43.229.138 66.194.51.66 MM_NO_STATE 0 ACTIVE (deleted)
[code]....
i72.43.229.138 is the router and the other ip is i have no idea! its no where in the config, but that shows me this router is trying to do something. Now on router a when i run the same command i get this:
show crypto isakmp sa
dst src state conn-id slot status
a whole lot of nothing! now i have been working on this for a few days now and i cant understand why i cant get this simple vpn tunnel to work! I have debuging on both routers, router a shows nothing period for vpn traffic, router b shows a connection from the 66.194.51.66 which again i have no idea who or where this ip is and its not in the config any where.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2011
I have an 1841 that I set up to do site to site VPN between my company's network and an external network. This has a backup connection point. All works well including automatically failing over to the backup site.
We also want to be able to VPN remotely to our company's network using the same 1841.I have tried many different ways to configure this, but the best I had resulted in an external VPN request taking down the site-to-site link.
Is this possible? Our internet connection is through an ADSL router set up with pasthrough, then into the Cisco 1841 which does the dialer PPPOE authentication.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2011
How many site-to-site VPN can we establish in Cisco router 1841. When we start 1841 we get the message that VPN Module 1. What is the meaning of it, does it mean that we can establish only one VPN. How about the limitation of GRE VPN Tunnel.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2012
I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2013
We have a client that has a Cisco 1801W Firewall that is setup as a site to site VPN terminating to a Cisco ASA 5505. The tunnel is up and established, I can ping from both sides of the tunnel.
The problem is the clients behind the Cisco ASA (192.168.2.x) cannot reach certain ports behind the Router (192.168.1.x). The main thing we're trying to do is browse via UNC path (ex: \192.168.1.120 from a 192.168.2.x machine).
I got 3389 working after I changed the - ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.120 3389 y.y.x.x 3389 route-map DM_RMAP_1 extendable Modified the command to include the public IP instead of interface FastEthernet0
I believe it has something to do with the way NAT and route-maps are setup currently but I'm not familar enough with them to make the changes. I worked with Cisco to ensure the VPN tunnel was fine and it's something security related on the Router.
Here is the configuration (removed a few lines not necessary. y.y.x.x = WAN IP of Router x.x.y.y = WAN IP of ASA).
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 23648 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2012
I have a dynamic VPN site to site between ASA 5510 vs C880 with segment 172.23.191.0/25 for ASA side and some host in C880 side (e.g. 128.1.100.211, 128.1.115.181, 128.1.104.212) . The VPN is up, but only have communication with a host (128.1.115.181).
In the logs appears the next message when I try communication for all aother IP in the policy map configuration: IKE Initioator unable to find policy: Intf Inside, Src: 172.23.191.87, Dst: 128.1.115.182..ONLY WHEN I PINGING FROM SOME HOST IN C880 SIDE (e.g. 128.1.100.211) the communication is successfull.
What happen with this VPN, because I need to pinging from C880 IP host to ASA segment for establish communication?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2012
I am configuring Site-to-Site VPN with another company. I already make a couple of tunnels but with this one I have a problem. They I already using on their side my local network 192.168.10.0/24 (server is 192.168.10.10) so we need to use imaginary network 172.16.0.5 as server address. Now I need to do NAT 172.16.0.5 to 192.168.10.10 but I am not so good in that.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2012
I am unable to ping any device on the internal lan from the opposite side of the tunnel. However, the tunnel connects successfully. I have the firewall disabled on both routers. Site A is using 192.168.3.1 and Site B is using 192.168.4.1. Any thoughts on why I cant ping one router from the other?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2012
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2012
The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2011
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2011
I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2011
Remote-access users aren't able to reach our remote network through a site-to-site VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505's.
I've seen several threads about that here, I've run through the walkthrough at [URL] I've taken a stab at setting split tunnelling and nat exemption, but it seems I'm still missing something. Remote-access users can reach the main site, but not the remote site.
Remote-access (vpn-houston) uses 192.168.69.0/24.
The main site (houston) uses 10.0.0.0/24
The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2011
I have a site-to-site VPN already established, everything is working as it should. I'm trying to block the remote network from accessing our network since we only need to access theirs. I'm sure this is something very easy to implement with an ACL but I'm not sure where this rule needs to go. The VPN is on ASA 5505.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
we set up a site-to-site-vpn between a 5505 and a 5510 (both asa8.3.1). We configured both sides using the VPN-Wizard in the ASDM. When we try to ping from the network behind the 5505 (192.168.45.0/24) to any host behind the 5510 (192.168.0.0/24) the tunnel gets established but the ping doesn't get trough. After that we tried to connect via RDP to any host behind the 5510 and it worked well (same with ssh, telnet,vnc etc.). Now we want to map a network-share on a 2008-Server behind the 5510 but it's not working. In the ASDM-Log I see some "denied by inside-access in"-messages for the ports 139 and 445. Isn't it right that the whole traffic in the vpn-tunnel bypasses the acl? Even if we open both ports we can't connect to the network-share?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2012
I have the following VPN site-2-site configuration.The trouble I'm having is host 172.168.88.3 in site A is not able to ping 172.168.200.3 in site B and visa versa. Think I have added the static routes and ACLs correctly on the 3560 switches (acting as gateways) and both PIX's to access the internal networks. Host 172.168.9.3 can ping 172.168.200.3 fine.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2012
I just get it that I can make a VPN Site-to-Site IPSec. But if I try to send a ping from one PC (network 1) to the other PC (network 2) it failed.
PC (Network 1) <ASA5505> Switch <ASA5510> PC (Network 2)
between the two ASA I have a funkctional VPN IPSec tunnel, but I can`t get access from one to theother network.
That are the access-list on the ASA5505:
asa5505#
access-list cached ACL log flows: total 0, denied 0 (deny-flow-max 4096)
alert-interval 300
access-list Inside_ICMP; 4 elements
[Code].....
View 19 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2012
I've spent 2 days already trying to get 2 ASA 5505's to connect using an IPSec vpn tunnel. I cannot seem to figure out what im doing wrong, im using 192.168.97.0 and 192.168.100.0 as my internal networks that i'm trying to connect over a directly connected link on the outside interfaces with 50.1.1.1 and 50.1.1.2 as the addresses (all /24). I also tried with and currently without NAT enabled. Here are the configs for both ASA's, the vpn config was done by the ASDM, however i have also tried the command line apporach with no success. I have followed various guides to the letter online, starting from an empty config and from factory default. I have also tried the 8.4 IOS. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2012
I have a problem trying to connect a VPN site to site between a FWASA 5515X - ASA5510. [code] The configuration in the 5510 its the old one that i been using with a firewall 5505.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2011
I have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.
View 3 Replies
View Related
