Cisco VPN :: ASA 8.2(1) / ASDM 6.2(1) - Site-to-site Connection Creation Broke AnyConnect Access
Feb 7, 2012
ASA = 8.2(1)
ASDM = 6.2(1)
Recently I used the wizard to create an IPsec site-to-site connection, which went very smoothly; however, I now noticed that when I connect via Anyconnect 2.5.0217 I cannot get to local and subnatted resources on the network.
I rolled back to saved config file, which was taken before the site-to-site vpn was created, but that did not work as well.What should I check to see why I can no longer get to different subnets after the site-to-site vpn connection.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 19, 2011
It's been a long time since I played in Cisco CLI.Using a Cisco 506 Firewall 6.3(4) PDM 1.0?Problem is I created a site to site tunnnel with a vendor and since then our remote VPN does not work. Completely times out so I am sure I broke something in the crypto map or something similar.
Tunnel is policy 10 using access-list 101
Remote VPN is Policy 20
Config Below:
: Saved:PIX Version 6.3(4)interface ethernet0 10fullinterface ethernet1 10fullnameif ethernet0 outside security0nameif ethernet1 inside security100enable password XLk0qAaMaA6kjvA6 encryptedpasswd VeCrsQbWdIFPwnny encryptedhostname RMS-DR-PIXdomain-name RMS.Localfixup protocol dns maximum-length 512fixup protocol ftp 21fixup protocol h323 h225 1720fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719fixup protocol http 80fixup protocol rsh 514fixup protocol rtsp 554fixup protocol sip 5060fixup protocol sip udp 5060fixup protocol skinny 2000fixup protocol smtp 25fixup protocol sqlnet 1521fixup protocol tftp 69namesobject-group network FTP_Clients description FTP Client PCs network-object host 192.168.xxx.xxx network-object host
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
I have a lab using ASA 5505's and 5510's, with a W2K3 Server with CA, and I'm having a bit of an issue using certificates.I have found a document for using MS certificates but is a little out dated -[URL]What I would like is an example using ASA 8.4x/ASDM 6.4x site-to-site IKEv2 using Microsoft 2003 server certificates.Also do you have to use the IPSEC template or can you use and different template like the Web Server? Because I have tried the Web server and I get the error that the "Certificate Chain is invald"
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2012
I have 2 ASA5505's connected through a site-to-site using IKEv1 and IKEv2.Recently, I ran through the wizard to configure the AnyConnect software. [code]Now, my site-to-site connection will only come up using IKEv1.Is there a way to have both the Site-to-Site and the AnyConnect VPN connections use IKEv2?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2011
I have a Cisco ASA 5502 and a Sonicwall TZ-210.The ASA is Office A and the Sonicwall is Office B.
Office A and Office B have a site to site vpn setup and people connected to either network can access resources on both networks.
people in Office A use the Cisco Anyconnect client, which is on a different subnet than the office A network, to vpn into office A. they can access resources in Office A but not Office B.
from what I can tell by looking at the split tunnel rules for the Cisso anyconnect client and the ACL’s on the ASA 5505 the Office B network is listed in the correct places.I I created an address group and had the Subnet for Office A and the anyconnect client for Office A to the group and set that as my remote network on the TZ-210 but no go…
I did some searching around on the forums and the interwebs, but all I found was Cisco to Cisco stuff when it came to the anyconnect client or site to site VPN to Sonicwall.. didn't find much on the anyconnect client over the site to site with a sonicwall.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2011
i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
We've just deployed a site-to-site VPN using a 5505 ASA on the client's site and a checkpoint Nokia FW on our site. Everything seems to be fine except that the user's connections to their file shares seem to be intermittently dropping. One minute the connection to the shares is there, next thing it's lost. There is no logic to it because no two users are experiencing issues at the same time, as a matter of fact even on the same PC where a user has access to 3 shares on 3 different servers, one could be showing as connected whereas the other two be dropping. [code]
As you can see the Duplex and Speed are set to auto, I've rectified this since then and I'm keeping a close eye on the output errors, and collisions. However, I'm afraid that this did not rectify the issue and the users are still experiencing intermittent connection dropping to their file shares over the VPN!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2011
im drawing a blank trying to setup a site to site connection with a 5505 ASA using ipsec and isakmp.i have the pre shared key as well as the external address of the other end of the tunnel but do not remember what the commands are to setup the crypto map and isakmp.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2011
our customer unfortunately uses a Watchguard.Finally we could establish a site-to-site vpn connection.To test if the connection re-establish again, we cleared our vpn session by "clear crypto isakmp <session id>" and after that "clear crypto sa <ip address of the peer>"After that, the session is down on our site, but the watchguard keeps the Phase I still up, either the deleting messages from our cisco are visible in the watchguard log files.Watchguard helpdesk told us, that the messages are only seen as a deletion message for Phase II, therefore Watchguard keeps Phase I up and running.Here you could see the cisco 7206 log messages aftre the clear commands:
: Nov 10 13:22:06.508 MEZ: IPSEC(delete_sa): deleting SA,
2011-11-10 13:22:06 Local7.Debug 649460013: : (sa) sa_dest= <local peer>, sa_proto= 50,
2011-11-10 13:22:06 Local7.Debug 649460014: : sa_spi= 0xEB0AE65A(3943360090),
2011-11-10 13:22:06 Local7.Debug 649460015: : sa_trans= esp-aes 192 esp-sha-hmac , sa_conn_id= 669,
2011-11-10 13:22:06 Local7.Debug 649460016: : (identity) local= <peer>, remote= <peer>
[code]....
In my opinion, it looks ok and we do not have problems with other VPN devices with this kind of tests.what could be done that the watchguard deletes Phase I, too? Or that an explicit Phase I deletion message is created and sent by our cisco 7206?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2012
I would like know is that possible to connect two 5505 ASA in site to site VPN with 1 site using ADSL pppoe connection?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2013
currently I have a Cisco 2921 router and I have one active site-to-site VPN connection through the internet.my question is; how I can create another Ipsec site-to-site VPN connection ? I have to keep the 1st VPN connection active.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2013
We have 3 sites, with a Cisco ASA 5520 at each location.
HQ (Headquarters) internal network: 172.16.110.0/24,
DR (Disaster Recovery) internal network: 172.16.120.0/24
BO (Branch Office) internal network: 172.16.150.0/24
HQ and DR have a 100Mbps permanent MPLS link between each other.Branch Office has a Site 2 Site VPN connection to HQ. If it fails, it establishes a Site 2 Site VPN connection to DR. This works perfectly.Now the routing issue... There is no route to the BO in the routing table at HQ/DR. The default gateway is used to reach the BO and that works for HQ when the VPN is between HQ/BO. If the VPN fails over to DR/BO, HQ can't reach BO anymore.I need to have some kind of conditional route injection from the ASA where the VPN is established. I was considering a tracked static route, but I was wondering if the S2S VPN itself has a functionality to do so. I thought the Reverse Route Injection was it but it's enabled on our crypto map and doesn't seem to work...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
I configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2013
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2012
I've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic. When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2011
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2013
We have a client that has a Cisco 1801W Firewall that is setup as a site to site VPN terminating to a Cisco ASA 5505. The tunnel is up and established, I can ping from both sides of the tunnel.
The problem is the clients behind the Cisco ASA (192.168.2.x) cannot reach certain ports behind the Router (192.168.1.x). The main thing we're trying to do is browse via UNC path (ex: \192.168.1.120 from a 192.168.2.x machine).
I got 3389 working after I changed the - ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.120 3389 y.y.x.x 3389 route-map DM_RMAP_1 extendable Modified the command to include the public IP instead of interface FastEthernet0
I believe it has something to do with the way NAT and route-maps are setup currently but I'm not familar enough with them to make the changes. I worked with Cisco to ensure the VPN tunnel was fine and it's something security related on the Router.
Here is the configuration (removed a few lines not necessary. y.y.x.x = WAN IP of Router x.x.y.y = WAN IP of ASA).
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 23648 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
I have a ASA 5510 that has multiple site to site VPNs. I need to create an additiona site to site VPN but only allow 1 host to access and traverse the tunnel. The network is on a 192.168.5.x but the host that will need to access this tunnel needs to be on a 172.16.33.x network. I dont want any other traffic allowed to access or traverse the VPN tunnel for this host. How can I set this up?
View 33 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2011
I have a Cisco 2911 router configured with a couple of VPN tunnels . The issue that I am having is that I cannot access the servers (WEB,EMIL) thru the tunnel . After looking around found out that adding a route-map to my static NAT rule will fix the issue . Once I do that I am able to access the serves thru the VPN but my local machines lose internet access .So I have to delete the access list The issue seems to be with the Access list 110 permit ip [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2011
How can I NAT the same set of four hosts and give them access to two different networks across an IPSEC site-to-site VPN tunnel? I'm using an ASA5520 running 8.04.
I have four hosts say: 10.240.1.1-10.240.1.4
They need access to two different networks:
205.100.150.0
140.175.200.0
I woud like to NAT them as something like:
7.5.210.1
7.5.210.2
7.5.210.3
7.5.210.4
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
I have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2011
Can I use a single Public IP address for both Internet access and site to site vpn access?If not, can I configure the RV220W as a bridge and still use it via another gateway configured for vpn passthrough as a VPN appliance/server on the LAN?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
I am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2012
Have asa 5520 ver 8.0(4) I have vpn client access created and working I have l2l vpn created and working with another set of asa The issue at hand VPN client from internet connects and authenticates, this client can access Site A's networks with no problems. However vpn client on Site A ASA can not access Networks through l2l tunnel located at Site B.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
we set up a site-to-site-vpn between a 5505 and a 5510 (both asa8.3.1). We configured both sides using the VPN-Wizard in the ASDM. When we try to ping from the network behind the 5505 (192.168.45.0/24) to any host behind the 5510 (192.168.0.0/24) the tunnel gets established but the ping doesn't get trough. After that we tried to connect via RDP to any host behind the 5510 and it worked well (same with ssh, telnet,vnc etc.). Now we want to map a network-share on a 2008-Server behind the 5510 but it's not working. In the ASDM-Log I see some "denied by inside-access in"-messages for the ports 139 and 445. Isn't it right that the whole traffic in the vpn-tunnel bypasses the acl? Even if we open both ports we can't connect to the network-share?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2012
I'm attempting to configure an for both site-to-site and remote access VPNs. The site-to-site is working fine, however when I connect using the Cisco client, after initial connection and password prompt I get a "not connected" status. The log states that a policy map match could not be found. I have successfully set the unit up for remote access with no site-to-site and ran into another host of issues when adding the site-to-site to the working remote access config, so I started over setting up site-to-site first. I've attempted this through ADSM (hate it) - the current configuration is via CLI. I'm certain I'm just missing a piece or two.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2013
I am considering to buy two RV180Ws and place them on two separate locations. But before buying I would like to make sure that the units meets my requirements. Lets call the locations A and B. I would like to connect location A with full network access to location B. But at the same time I would like to have that location B also gets full access to the network at location A.Besides this I would like to be able to connect to one of the networks from remote with my laptop.Preferably all connections should be made using IPSEC and not PPTP.I would like to know if it is possible to make such a configuration, and eventually if there is a smarter way to do e.g. only letting clients connect to location A or B and granting them access to all ressources at both location A and B from there.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2013
I am trying to configure my network so that VPN traffic is only routed to a single physical port on the RV180 or to a certain subset of devices on a network.
I have a site-to-site vpn setup in a home office and am connecting to the corporate network. The user has a couple of devices running on the home network that need access to the corporate network.
We are hoping to leave his PC accessible to his home network as well as the corporate network, but restrict other devices from accessing the vpn.
I beleive I could do it by playing with the subnet but I can't get my head around it.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 at our main office that makes connection with a 5505 at our other office using site to site VPN. (works)
Now for the question,
we want to access our other office from the main office but we wont want them to have access to our servers etc. so basically we want to control them but they shouldn't have the rights to control us.
Is this possible with a site to site VPN? and how to do it.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2012
Our HQ office has an ASA 5510 with full access to internal and external IP's. We have a small group of remote users that are working from a shared office suite and they only have Internet access by way of internal default gateway. Using a VPN client is not desirable due to many other devices requiring access to HQ. Is there a way to create a site-to-site VPN from this remote office space back to HQ (ASA 5510) if they have no access to the public IP address on their end?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2012
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies
View Related
