I have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOur Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies View Relatedwe have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
I am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
can I configure Site-To-Site VPN and Remote Access VPN at the same time in one ASA 5510?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
I have a ASA 5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.
Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.
how we immplement the same on ASA 5510.
I have a situation where I need to have remote users vpn into my ASA 5510 and then turn around and hit a site to site tunnel. Now when I am in our office I can hit the site to site vpn fine. When I am at home and vpn to the asa I can not get to the site to site resources. Do you see where my config is incorrect? result of the command: "show run"
ASA Version 9.1(1)
!
hostname xxxxx
domain-name xxxx
enable password xxxxx
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
[ code]....
I'm attempting to configure an for both site-to-site and remote access VPNs. The site-to-site is working fine, however when I connect using the Cisco client, after initial connection and password prompt I get a "not connected" status. The log states that a policy map match could not be found. I have successfully set the unit up for remote access with no site-to-site and ran into another host of issues when adding the site-to-site to the working remote access config, so I started over setting up site-to-site first. I've attempted this through ADSM (hate it) - the current configuration is via CLI. I'm certain I'm just missing a piece or two.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2 sites :
site A :
ASA 5510
VPN gateway for remote users
LAN 192.168.192.0/22
site B :
ASA 5505
LAN 192.168.208.0/22
Both sites are connected through a site to site VPN.Remote clients (AnyConnect/VPN client) can connect to Site A LAN and see machines on LAN A but cannot see Site B LAN.
Here is a part of my configuration :
On Site A (ASA 5510)
--------------------------------
name 192.168.192.0 SiteA_Internal_Network
name 192.168.208.0 SiteB_Internal_Network
name 192.168.133.0 VPNPool_AnyConnect
name 192.168.133.32 VPNPool_VpnClient
[code]....
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View RelatedI configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
I've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic. When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a ASA 5510 that has multiple site to site VPNs. I need to create an additiona site to site VPN but only allow 1 host to access and traverse the tunnel. The network is on a 192.168.5.x but the host that will need to access this tunnel needs to be on a 172.16.33.x network. I dont want any other traffic allowed to access or traverse the VPN tunnel for this host. How can I set this up?
View 33 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco ASA 5510 at our main office that makes connection with a 5505 at our other office using site to site VPN. (works)
Now for the question,
we want to access our other office from the main office but we wont want them to have access to our servers etc. so basically we want to control them but they shouldn't have the rights to control us.
Is this possible with a site to site VPN? and how to do it.
Our HQ office has an ASA 5510 with full access to internal and external IP's. We have a small group of remote users that are working from a shared office suite and they only have Internet access by way of internal default gateway. Using a VPN client is not desirable due to many other devices requiring access to HQ. Is there a way to create a site-to-site VPN from this remote office space back to HQ (ASA 5510) if they have no access to the public IP address on their end?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have problem with accessing servers through site-to-site vpn from ASA which makes this site-to-site vpn and has enablerd Clientless VPN.Reason why I need it / What I need to do:ASA 5510 has enabled Clientless VPN and on this portal is allowed users to go to URL of internal servers through bookmars. We are using it when somebody could not access IPSec VPN or is in internet cafe. So this user logs into clientless vpn and click on bookmark to access mail server for exmaple. But there is problem, asa cannot access this server through site-to-site VPN.
Network:Here is quick design of my network.I don't have problem access server in VLAN 159 from VLAN 10 or 100. But I need to be able access servers in Vlan 159 from ASA 5510 which has IP address 192.168.1.4.I have this subnet which ASA belongs in BEFORE-NAT object in same place as VLAN 10, 100 are and in Site-to-Site vpn profile.
i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some VPN site to site ( site B and site C connect to site A ). This subnet 10.0.56.0/28 is behind site B. Another subnet 10.0.56.16/28 is behind site C. I would like to route this 10.0.56.0/28 to reach the subnet 10.0.56.16/28. Is there any possibility to do this on ASA5520 (site A)?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a functioning site-to-site VPN between two ASA 5505 appiances. Sub-net on one side is 192.168.20.0/24 (inside I/F) and on the other side is 192.168.30.0/24 (inside I/F). VPN is built over public Internet (outside I/Fs of those two ASAs).
Now I connected another subnet on 192.168.30.0/24 - e.g. 192.168.35.0/24. Traffic from 192.168.30.0 subnet is routed to 192.168.35.0 via Gateway at 192.168.30.250 IP.
My task is to make packets from 192.168.20.0 subnet to go to 192.168.35.0 subnet and vice versa.
I setup a static route on 20.0 ASA's Inside interface as 192.168.35.0 255.255.255.0 to 192.168.30.250. I also created NAT examptions for outbound packets from 20.0 to 35.0 and inbound as well. I also added destination network of 35.0 to VPN cryptomap traffic selection (on both ASAs).
I have to set up site to site VPN with overlapped network ASA 5540 and checkpoint what is the best parctice to achive tis goal.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have ran into this problem in the past but clearly I usually change one of the remote host sub net ranges to something other than main site. Now I am in a situation that I just have to configure it this way. I just need some insight before implementation.
Inside (10.10.10.x/24) ASA5505 outside (97.65.x.x) ßà (97.664.x.x) outside ASA5505 (10.10.10.x/24)
Trying to create a site to site tunnel between each location with same sub net. I have found a lot of information about setting up this configuration with 8.3 and later but nothing for the image 8.4 and image 9.1(1) as everyone knows the ACL's and NAT statements are written differently now.
I have a 5505 connected to 5510 via a site to site VPN, the vpn has 5 subnets on the acl list at both ends, but 2 of the subnets are assigned for remote access on the main 5510, which means the flow of traffic on these 2 subnets are main to remote, but the VPN only works if the traffic starts from remote to main.
both sides are set to bidirectional and I'm not sure if this is the case for all 5 subnets has remote site always sends data to the other 3 subnets first.
here is my setup:
ASA 5505 - 192.168.3.1
PIX 501 - 192.168.1.1
PIX 501 - 192.168.1.2
The ASA and the first pix device (192.168.1.1) are connected via site-to-site VPN on the ASA side and the connection works great. I can access hosts in either direction from either network.I'm attempting to add the second pix device to the ASA's site-to-site configuration, but it's not working. I suspect it's because the devices are on the same subnet, but I'm hoing to find a workaround.When I have both PIX devices setup for site-to-site on the ASA, the VPN works only for the connection that has the highest priority. The device with the lower priority can only ping the 192.168.3.1 network, but full network connections fail.Is it possible to do this without changing the subnet on the second PIX?
I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
It's been a long time since I played in Cisco CLI.Using a Cisco 506 Firewall 6.3(4) PDM 1.0?Problem is I created a site to site tunnnel with a vendor and since then our remote VPN does not work. Completely times out so I am sure I broke something in the crypto map or something similar.
Tunnel is policy 10 using access-list 101
Remote VPN is Policy 20
Config Below:
: Saved:PIX Version 6.3(4)interface ethernet0 10fullinterface ethernet1 10fullnameif ethernet0 outside security0nameif ethernet1 inside security100enable password XLk0qAaMaA6kjvA6 encryptedpasswd VeCrsQbWdIFPwnny encryptedhostname RMS-DR-PIXdomain-name RMS.Localfixup protocol dns maximum-length 512fixup protocol ftp 21fixup protocol h323 h225 1720fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719fixup protocol http 80fixup protocol rsh 514fixup protocol rtsp 554fixup protocol sip 5060fixup protocol sip udp 5060fixup protocol skinny 2000fixup protocol smtp 25fixup protocol sqlnet 1521fixup protocol tftp 69namesobject-group network FTP_Clients description FTP Client PCs network-object host 192.168.xxx.xxx network-object host
[code]....
Remote-access users aren't able to reach our remote network through a site-to-site VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505's.
I've seen several threads about that here, I've run through the walkthrough at [URL] I've taken a stab at setting split tunnelling and nat exemption, but it seems I'm still missing something. Remote-access users can reach the main site, but not the remote site.
Remote-access (vpn-houston) uses 192.168.69.0/24.
The main site (houston) uses 10.0.0.0/24
The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24
At the main site, I have 3 5508 WLCs each part of a mobility group (wlcMain-MG). In NCS, under "System/Mobility Groups" for each controller, I see each controller listed as "local" with the other Controllers listed with the group name "wlcMain-MG". None of the SSIDs are "anchored".
I have a new site with a 2500 series WLC that I would like to push out 2 SSIDs. This site contains two customers. One customer is the Main customer with the second customer leasing space.
I have the Cust2 WLAN at the remote site set to have traffic egress out of a local interface on the 2500 WLC (this traffic is then tunnelled back to their Main location via an ASA which houses the DHCP scope for that vlan). I can connect to this SSID, obtain an IP Address off the ASA and am tunnelling without issue.
For the Cust1 WLAN at the remote site, I would like to broadcast an SSID from the Main location on those same APs which are registered to the 2500. It is my understanding, that I anchor the SSID at the Main site and identically configure the SSID at the remote site. This will allow the end user to authenticate to the RADIUS server at the Main site and be placed upon the correct vlan (we are using DOT1x and dynamic vlans).
For my test, I am starting simple. I have created a test WLAN with no authentication. At the main site, on 5508 WLC3, I have created the test WLAN, and placed the interface into a low security vlan (call it VLAN-low). I have anchored this test WLAN to that controller. At the remote site, I have created the same WLAN (but placed it into the management interface for now - the VLAN-low does not exist at the remote site) and configured that WLAN to anchor back to the WLC3 at the main site. I am unable to obtain an IP address from the remote site. I have placed the remote site WLC in the wlcMain-MG as well. How close does the code need to be on the controllers - the 5508s are at 7.0.116.0 and the 2500 is at 7.0.220.0? What could I be missing?
We have successfully establish a site-to-site vpn, but we have some difficulties when PPTP users try to access the remote network linked by this tunnel. LAN users can access the remote network without problem, but users who are connected remotly to the lan (PPTP) can't access computer on the remote network. Is there a way to allow PPTP user to access the remote network ? Adding a route ?
View 1 Replies View Related
