Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 - Clients Cannot Access Remote Site
Dec 12, 2011
I have 2 sites :
site A :
ASA 5510
VPN gateway for remote users
LAN 192.168.192.0/22
site B :
ASA 5505
LAN 192.168.208.0/22
Both sites are connected through a site to site VPN.Remote clients (AnyConnect/VPN client) can connect to Site A LAN and see machines on LAN A but cannot see Site B LAN.
Here is a part of my configuration :
On Site A (ASA 5510)
--------------------------------
name 192.168.192.0 SiteA_Internal_Network
name 192.168.208.0 SiteB_Internal_Network
name 192.168.133.0 VPNPool_AnyConnect
name 192.168.133.32 VPNPool_VpnClient
[code]....
View 9 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 20, 2013
I have a situation where I need to have remote users vpn into my ASA 5510 and then turn around and hit a site to site tunnel. Now when I am in our office I can hit the site to site vpn fine. When I am at home and vpn to the asa I can not get to the site to site resources. Do you see where my config is incorrect? result of the command: "show run"
ASA Version 9.1(1)
!
hostname xxxxx
domain-name xxxx
enable password xxxxx
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
[ code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
I have 2 site here:
site A
Cisco 891
external IP: 195.xxx.yyy.zzz
VPN Gateway for Remote users
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2011
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
I have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
I am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2011
can I configure Site-To-Site VPN and Remote Access VPN at the same time in one ASA 5510?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2013
I have an ASA 5510 8.2(5) in Site1 and a ASA 5505 8.2(1) Site2 they are setup with a site to site tunnel.Each site has VPN clients that connect and I would like to allow clients from both sides access to servers on the other side of the site-to-site tunnel.
I enabled same-security-traffic permit intra-interface I also added the remote networks to access-list that is doing the split tunneling. [code]
View 33 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2011
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2011
I have a ASA 5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.
Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.
how we immplement the same on ASA 5510.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2013
I've some strange problems with multiple ASA (NEM) VPN remote clients (v8.4.5). On the HQ I've an ASA5510 (v8.4.5) with multiple NEM's connected to it. The group policy used on the HQ is configured for split tunneling. Now here's the problem;
The remote ASA (NEM) constructs easily a VPN connection to the main location; it seems that everything works well. Traffic through most of the tunneled networks works perfectly. Traffic to certain subnets or hosts brings me into trouble, there is no traffic flowing through the tunnel at all!
When using the command "show crypto ipsec sa | i caps|ident|spi” I can see all of the tunneled subnets. The subnets that works perfecly gives me the correct "local and remote ident" output. The subnets with problems gives me wrong values in the "remote ident". The remote ident should be the IP address of the inside LAN (of the remote NEM) and not the IP address of the ouside interface (of the remote NEM). How is this posible?
Here's is the crypto ipsec sa output:
Result of the command: "show crypto ipsec sa | i caps|ident|spi"
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.200.60.0/255.255.255.0/0/0) <-- this is the good subnet of the inside interface (NEM)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.100.2.2/255.255.255.255/0/0) <-- this is the good subnet (HQ)
#pkts encaps: 54712, #pkts encrypt: 54712, #pkts digest: 54712
#pkts decaps: 31893, #pkts decrypt: 31893, #pkts verify: 31893
#PMTUs sent: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, #decapsulated frgs needing reassembly: 0
current outbound spi: A4FA947A
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2012
We have remote VPN setup with Cisco ASA 5510. By using VPN filter, I can follow the guide and make client to use all necessary server services. (dns, ssh etc). However, is there any way that allow inside server access remote VPN client's services, ex. let inside server ssh to remote VPN client? Consider remote access VPN filter ACL's syntax, I have to always let source be the "remote VPN client PC", the dest is "inside firewall server", how can I let the other way traffice going?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2012
I'm attempting to configure an for both site-to-site and remote access VPNs. The site-to-site is working fine, however when I connect using the Cisco client, after initial connection and password prompt I get a "not connected" status. The log states that a policy map match could not be found. I have successfully set the unit up for remote access with no site-to-site and ran into another host of issues when adding the site-to-site to the working remote access config, so I started over setting up site-to-site first. I've attempted this through ADSM (hate it) - the current configuration is via CLI. I'm certain I'm just missing a piece or two.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2011
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 with static IP and a Remote site with dynamic IP and i want to setup VPN between these 2 sites. i tried it many times but it doesn't come up.
I want to know how to do it?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
I configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2013
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2012
I've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic. When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
I have a ASA 5510 that has multiple site to site VPNs. I need to create an additiona site to site VPN but only allow 1 host to access and traverse the tunnel. The network is on a 192.168.5.x but the host that will need to access this tunnel needs to be on a 172.16.33.x network. I dont want any other traffic allowed to access or traverse the VPN tunnel for this host. How can I set this up?
View 33 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 at our main office that makes connection with a 5505 at our other office using site to site VPN. (works)
Now for the question,
we want to access our other office from the main office but we wont want them to have access to our servers etc. so basically we want to control them but they shouldn't have the rights to control us.
Is this possible with a site to site VPN? and how to do it.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2012
Our HQ office has an ASA 5510 with full access to internal and external IP's. We have a small group of remote users that are working from a shared office suite and they only have Internet access by way of internal default gateway. Using a VPN client is not desirable due to many other devices requiring access to HQ. Is there a way to create a site-to-site VPN from this remote office space back to HQ (ASA 5510) if they have no access to the public IP address on their end?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
I have problem with accessing servers through site-to-site vpn from ASA which makes this site-to-site vpn and has enablerd Clientless VPN.Reason why I need it / What I need to do:ASA 5510 has enabled Clientless VPN and on this portal is allowed users to go to URL of internal servers through bookmars. We are using it when somebody could not access IPSec VPN or is in internet cafe. So this user logs into clientless vpn and click on bookmark to access mail server for exmaple. But there is problem, asa cannot access this server through site-to-site VPN.
Network:Here is quick design of my network.I don't have problem access server in VLAN 159 from VLAN 10 or 100. But I need to be able access servers in Vlan 159 from ASA 5510 which has IP address 192.168.1.4.I have this subnet which ASA belongs in BEFORE-NAT object in same place as VLAN 10, 100 are and in Site-to-Site vpn profile.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
we have a base license ASA 5510, and been trying to get ICMP working to check that we're routing and not hitting any NAT translation. We have a VLAN280 setup to ISP for VPN link to remote site and another VLAN281 for internet access for internal users.
Users can browse internet from (name _inside interface e0/1 access port) which is fine. When I do a ping to remote office through the VPN I get a response pinging from VLAN280 name VPN_Link. When I do a ping from name inside interface I don't get a response both are security level 100 with same-security-traffic permit inter-interface configured.
Config:
!
interface Ethernet0/0
speed 100
no nameif
[Code]....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2012
I have an ASA 5520 8.2(3) and allowing my remote client-to-site-vpn clients to access resources directly connected to my ASA on separate lower security interfaces (not the outside) besides just clients on my internal networks. Someone mentioned to me configuring 'VPN on a stick' however from what I've read this seems to be only applicable when it comes to split-tunneling back out the outside interface (could be off on that). Is this possible on other lower security interfaces as well, and if so what would a mock config that accomplishes that look like (acl's, nat, etc)? Also, if I want internal users to be able to connect to these remote clients once they are active, are there any nat statements necessary (such as nonatting them) or are the vpn clients just seen as internal clients from the rest of the internal network's standpoint by default?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2012
I am setting up a new remote access VPN using the traditional IPSec client via ASA 5515-X runnning OS 8.6.1(5). We require to provide each client multiple DNS suffixes, but are only to provide a single DNS suffix in the group policy.I have tested using an external DHCP server, but using our Windows Server 2008 infrastructure and Option 119 the list is not provided to clients, and I have read that Windows 7 clients may ignore this option anyway.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2011
I have a RV082 and several of my remote laptops cannot access my server using its domain name. It can be accessed using its internal ip address. The issue is that you can log onto the server using remote access and the ip however you cannot use any shortcuts using the domain name. You can see the server with the domin name however no access path is available. This is only on a few remote user laptops. Others work perfectly.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2012
I have been asked to set up remote access VPN on an ASA 5505 that I previously had no invlovement with. I have set it up the VPN using the wizard, they way I normally do, but the clients have no access to anything in the inside subnet, not even the inside interface IP address of the ASA. Thay can ping each other. The remote access policy below that I am working on is labeled VPNPHONE, address pool 172.16.20.1-10. I do not need split tunneling to be enabled. The active WAN interface is the one labeled outside_cable. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2013
I've got a Cisco 1941 setup working fine for Cisco Anyconnect. Clients can connect to local resources fine. The issue I have is I need the remote clients to access a third party IP address but to do so they must do it through the VPN. At the moment only local resources are accessed across the vpn and if they need internet they use their own internet connection they are connecting with.I've added the below to make sure traffic going to the IP is going across the VPN.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2012
Just installed ASA -5505 replaced cisco 851
My exchange server hosts remote outlook clients and remote web access
no one on the remote side can access my exchange server
internal mail flows in bound and out bound.
My iphone can not access the exchange server either.
When the Cisco 851 was online all the above worked great. Nothing changed on the remote client side just put the ASA 5505 in service.
I am new to the ASSA 5505 family. Had a reseller configure the router but unable to get them at this hour. Called Cisco support but they are closed at this time also.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
The title says VPN clients cannot access DMZ network, but that is not exactly the problem, the situation is this, a group of users are using an actual 10.x network where they have their servers and pretty much everything. The users must be relocated into a new network, the 172.16.x. In a point in time they will not have to use 10.x anymore, but meanwhile, they need access to that network.
I have an ASA 5510 as default gateway for the new network (172.16.x.x), one interface e0/0 connected to the outside (internet), interface e0/1 to the inside and other interface connected to the actual 10.x (which I call DMZ), so basically I am using the ASA as a bridge using NAT to grant access to the users in the network 172.16.x to the resources in the 10.x network while the migration is completed.
All the users must use the path to the internet thru the ASA using the NAT overload to the outside interface and I put in place a NAT policy to 10.x to allow access to the 10.x network only when the internal users 172.16.x try to reach that path and so far, everything is working just fine for the internal users.Now for some reason, when I do VPN, the VPN clients cannot reach the 10.x network, even when they are supposed to be in the internal network (because they are doing VPN right?) .
I have enabled split tunneling with NAT exempt the 172.16 network and I am not sure if that is causing the problem, because when I trace from my PC the 172.16.16.1 address using the VPN I get the proper route path, but when I try to reach 10.x, my PC is using its default gateway and not the VPN gateway which has a route to 10.x.
I’m not even sure if what I am trying to do is possible, I want VPN users to be able to access a 10.x network using NAT overload with the Interface of the ASA plugged to the 10.x network, just like the internal users are doing right now.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2012
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2012
The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
