We have a router 2911 recently purchased which supports vpn but we are not able to do vpn tunneling, So what is required to use VPN connection.
Does ios has to upgrade or some kind of license is required.If license is required then what kind of license.Router version is 15.0(1r) M15 which I found in sh version command.
I have a Cisco 2911 router that I will like to use it for setting up a site to site VPN but the router does not support VPN commands. When I issue crypto isakmp command, it says command no recognized. When I issue ipsec transform-set command, it says command not recognized. The IOS running on my router is c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T1.bin. Also see the output of my show licences features command: [code]
what can be done on this router to enable use it for setting up a VPN connection.
I recently purchased a Cisco 2911 to replace my Cisco 1711 router. I copied the configuration from the Cisco 1711 router to the Cisco 2911 router. Everything seemed to work correctly except when I VPN tunnel into the Cisco 2911 router using Cisco's VPN client version 5.0. I can ping the router LAN interface from my PC that is VPNed into the router but I can no longer ping or access the devices on the LAN side of the router as I did on the Cisco 1711 router. I don’t see errors in the log or hits blocking anything in the acls. It’s using the same configuration that I had on the Cisco 1711 router, and this did work on the Cisco 1711. The Cisco 2911 router is running IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).
Here is the VPN clinet portion of the configuration: The LAN is addressed as 192.168.0.0/24. The router LAN interface is 192.168.0.1, which I can ping and access. I can't ping or access anything on the LAN (192.168.0.0/24) beside the router.
aaa authentication login vpnclientauth local
aaa authorization network vpngroupauth local
!
crypto isakmp client configuration group remote-clients
key 6 xxxx
pool clients
[Code]....
I have the following setup where the Cisco ME 3400 provided by the ISP.
My Cisco 2911 is configured as below:
CORE_Router#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 6075 bytes
[Code].....
3 different sites which are directly/indirectly connected to cisco VPN router RV042 and we want to make a vpn between them, how can we make it
View 2 Replies View RelatedI cannot ping and end node on my system from my Cisco 2911. I've tried to configure my computer to ping the device and I am able to. It seems the difference between using my computer and the 2911 is that with my computer I am able to set the default gateway as the end node's ip.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to get a Cisco router for central point of 100 GRE tunnels and total 10G traffic coming from those tunnels. I used 6500 but its CPU became high in less than 2 G traffic. Can you identify me a suitable router for this purpose. I think the router must process the GRE in hardware.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for a device which will allow me to forward all internet bound traffic through a L2L IPSec tunnel from branches to a central hub and internet connection.
I've recently purchased a RV120W(as a test branch device) which i've tried to get working with the ASA5505 at the central site. I can get the VPN to come up but can't manage to get the internet bound traffic through it. Reading up on the issue, it looks like full tunneling or IPsec wildcard forwarding isn't supported on the RV120W and RV220W devices [URL] The source mentions that the RV0xx series supports this feature, however one of my requirements is wireless on the device.
Any device which supports this rather than just the standard split tunneling, alternatively a workaround which will allow me to use RV120Ws at branch sites? Would an SRP521 support what i'm trying to achieve?
I'm using a Netgear WGT624 Router for my firm's intranet. At home I'm using a router called NSW-R2 by Gembird..
What I want to do is connecting my PC at home (Windows XP) to my firm's intranet so I can print on my LAN Printer or edit files on my NAS.
I've heard about VPN tunnels, but I don't want to keep my firm PC on 24 hours a day. So is it somehow possible, to build a VPN or something similar by only using the Netgear WGT624 Router?
Edit/More Information: I've steup a DDNS. My Router supports Port-Forwarding. I'm currently using Remote Desktop. Both PC run Windows XP Professional.
I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
I am having one router CISCO2911/K9 (Cisco 2911 w/3 GE,4 EHWIC,2 DSP,1 SM,256MB CF,512MB DRAM,IPB). But now my management asking me to upgrade this router as CISCO2911-SEC/K9.
What will be the BOM for this up gradation.
I just moved our vpn over to using LDAP/DAP instead of the previous RADIUS we were using before. First of all, the group policy split tunnel is setup for Tunnel Network list Below Network list has a group of networks named "split-tunnel" setup with all of our internal subnets in it. Which seems to be working fine, users are hitting internal networks no problem.Where the issue lies is surfing the web while they are connected to the VPN.I think I know what one of the the issues are, I'm just not sure how to get around it. I have a proxy server setup that all domain traffic goes through say 10.20.30.40. That is obviously on our internal subnet. Our remote users has a policy on their laptops set to where if they can see/get to the proxy server then it pushes all traffic through there, however if they can not, it goes straight to the internet. That way they can still surf the web when they aren't connected to the domain network.
With the new DAP vpn policies, it seems as though they are trying to go through the proxy but failing so all http traffic is getting blocked on their computer as I can still ping say google.com...just can't open the web page.In my SALES-VPN access lists there isn't any acl that allows any traffic to 10.20.30.40(proxy server) so there isn't any reason their laptop would think it could get to it correct?I can't put an access-list SALES-VPN extended deny ip any any log critical at the end of the acl list because then it doesn't show up as an option to apply to the DAP since the acls have to be either permit or deny, not a mix.Also, if I just create an ACL access-list DENY-VPN extended deny ip any any log critical and apply it to the DAP *after* the SALES-VPN ACLs thinking all traffic would flow down as in go through all the permit acls first, and then hit the deny acl after, it just blocks all traffic.It almost seems that some traffic that isn't specifically being permitted by the permit acls is still getting through which is obviously not wanted. However, if I try to rdp into a server that isn't specifically permitted in the SALES-VPN acls it doesn't work so I'm kind of at a loss..
Is it possible to tunnel IPSec through a 6509 with an FWSM installed without the packets being interferred with?My question arises because myself and a colleague were attempting to form an IPSec tunnel in just this environment last week and no amount of resetting policies, key phrases etc would allow the tunnel to come up. The 2821 was complaining about Phase 2 not matching but the policies were definitely matching and configured the same on both ends. If there shouldn't be an issue with the 6509 and the FWSM then I will post configs from both ends. The 6509 is configured to all all ports through for the two IP addresses for now and is performing a one-to-one NAT for the PIX that is behind it.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm using an ASA5510 for remote access IP Sec VPN clients and it is configured for split-tunneling. The client computers are running Cisco VPN client software. All of the client computers running Win 7 work perfect, but the client computers running Win XP Pro cannot browse the internet, they only connect to the inside network.
1) Does XP Pro support split tunneling when using the Cisco VPN client software?
2) Does the ASA require a special config to support split tunneling with Win XP clients?
I am currently trying to configure an Easy VPN connection from an ASA 5505 to and ASA 5520. I have enabled split tunnelling and in the group policy defined the network to be tunneled but when I activate the VPN it tunnels everything from the host computer connected to the ASA 5505. I get no internet access. Have been trying to troubleshoot this for days.Hee are soe specifics, running version 8.2(5) on the 5505 and the 5520 and below is the local config on the 5505 for the Easy VPN:
vpnclient server **.***.***.**
vpnclient mode network-extension-mode
vpnclient nem-st-autoconnect
vpnclient vpngroup dbernstein-5505 password *****
vpnclient username dbernstein password *****
vpnclient ipsec-over-tcp port 10000
vpnclient enable
and the downloaded dynamic policy:
Current Server : 12.***.163.**
Primary DNS : ***.160.***.39
Default Domain : cisco.com
PFS Enabled : No
Secure Unit Authentication Enabled : No
User Authentication Enabled : No
Split Tunnel Networks : ***.160.***.0/255.255.255.0
Backup Servers : None
Can a 2504 WLC on a remote site provide guest access on one SSID, drop taht out locally on that site and provide corporate access on a second WLC that it then tunnls to a 5508 at the main corporate site ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow to successfully run the dot1q tunneling on Cat4500 with Sup7L-E? I tried that on IOS XE 3.3 and newest 3.4. It is in feature navigator but i am not able to connect two access switching using trunk - only native vlan is translated. Apparently STP BPDU frames are dropped somewhere. I have the same configuration on 3750X with ip services licence and this works well.
View 2 Replies View Relatedmy company has used Split Tunneling for all of our VPN uses, however we recently purchased 2 ASA5505s for use at various jobsites, and have been running into problems with Local Network Administrators blocking certain traffic that we need to operate. They allow full VPN connectivity to traverse their networks, so we are able to use our LAN Resources over the split tunnel no problem.
We have it set up as a Dynamic L2L Connection, and this ASA is operating flawlessly minus the traffic being blocked upstream by the network admin. Our VPN topolgy is Hub & Spoke. Below is excerpts from our config on how the VPN is set up: [code]
What we'd like to achieve is being able to pass ALL traffic (LAN & Internet) through the VPN tunnel, then be processed by the Hub ASA (192.168.9.1) on the other end. I am guessing crypto map + routing would have to be changed?
access-list to_hq extended permit ip 192.168.101.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.9.1Disable NAT on Spoke. Is this how I would go about doing this??? We need ip address dhcp setroute so our ASA can find the other end and form the VPN tunnel, and I am not sure how this would affect things. [code]
Is GRE tunneling technique for IPv6 based on RFC2473 or Cisco proprietary standard?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have some troubles configuring split-tunneling on ASA 5520.Number of remote users establish ipsec connection with ASA 5520 (in central office) using ubuntu vpnc-client.Split-tunneling is in use, to allow remote users to surf Internet using their ISP.The goal is to remove the possibility to ssh/telnet servers inside corporate LAN for remote users. [code]
There is nat enabled on interface, but there is special statement in nat0 ACL for 192.168.100.0 subnetwork access-list INSIDE_LAN_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0.The problem is that remote users can easely ssh and telnet servers in INSIDE_LAN network. Whatever i put in INSIDE_LAN_in ACL, remote users still have full access to this network. Restrictions in REMOTE_split ACL don't work either.
What is the best way to install a split tunneling on a network, I got Cisco ASA 5510 with Cisco vpn clients.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have an ASA with software version 8.2(1) and ASDM 6.2 to use the VPN. We configure the anyconnect client with split tunnels for our vendors to access internal server and have access to the other resources in the web simultaneously. Windows XP client works fine however, the Mac OS x can only access the internal resource but not the web.we need to restrict the client to access and use only specific IP and http port.have internal and external DNS that are separated by ASA5520s all VPN terminate at the DMZ with192.168.xx.0/24 IP pool?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to create a VPN and have split tunneling disabled, so that all traffic including internet traffic goes over the vpn back to the headquators and out that internet pipe or to the network. I will be using the Cisco VPN client software and connecting to a 2811 router running IOS ver 12.3(8r)T7. I am pretty new when it comes to these configurations
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 2 computers in 2 different countries. The current country of residence (France) has some Internet restrictions that I want to bypass, so I need to pass all my Internet traffic to my home computer.The home computer is on Windows XP and the connecting computer is on Windows 7 (I also have a Windows XP laptop so that's not a restriction).
I created a vlan (or vpn?) using Hamachi, to have a static IP on the home computer. So now I have a connection to my home computer. The next step would be to direct all trafic through this connection. How do I do that? I tried using the windows wizards: on the home computer (server) I created a new incoming connections thingy and on the client computer I created a VPN connection using the hamachi IP. I finally succeeded connecting the two, but nothing happens. Once I connect to the VPN, I lose Internet connection, and with it the Hamachi connection. I don't think the server passes along the client's internet...
I am running OSX Leopard 10.5 and DDWRT is running on WRT54GL v24-sp2 (08/12/10) vpn.I have an SSH tunnel set up using DDWRT. So now I can surf securely when I am in a remote location.
The problem is after I am done browsing, I can't figure out how to close out the session in a proper manner. For example, I type ssh -p 2222 -N -D 8888 and it works with no problems. However, to kill the session I have to hit "CTR" and "Z". This is not the best solution because it leaves the session and port still open. how to tear down the session without using "ps aux" and then the "kill" command?
I've an ASA 5505, running at ASA 8.2(2). I'm using ASDM 6.2(5).ASA is set up with Split Tunneling and it works perfectly.However, for a few users, I want all traffic, including Internet traffic, routed through the ASA.The spesific users IP address at internet should then be the same as ASA Outside address, not the client local address.The question is therefore:How to simple override the split tunneling at user level?Alternatively set up an "tunnel all" group policy for the specified users?
View 19 Replies View RelatedMy cisco router (2600XM) is connected with the core switch with the vlan 6, behind the core switch there are many vlans and a mac web server (also DNS and DHCP). I am using remote access VPN with split tunneling (i would like to keep it instead of Dynamic interface). I can connect to the VPN and ping the cisco router, the core switch and the web server (by using telnet from the router to the switch and then to the mac but i can't access directly from the VPN client) but from the web server i can't ping the VPN client.I tried many things such as, adding the 192.168.1.0 to the access list for the intersting traffic or allow the tcp port 8080 but i think my mistake is related to the routing and NAT but i can't figure it.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have several RV082 routers in production, most of them on IPv4-only access. I want to roll out IPv6 on all these networks and have set up a test environment for this.I did start with a factory-defaulted router with a fixed public IPv4 address. IPv4 network access does work as expected.With the 6to4 option disabled, the RV082's IPv6 routing table contains several entries for local addresses, but not public ones, as expected. When enabling the 6to4 transition function as described in SBKB article #567, three new entries are created: [code]
With the router's diagnostic ping function I can ping the next 6to4 relay on IPv4 (192.88.99.1) and IPv6 (2002:c058:6301::). But I cannot ping that next hop address given as default route (::c058:6301).The RV does advertise routes with the correct 6to4 prefix on the LAN side, and the clients connected to it configure themselves with appropriate addresses. However I was unable to ping any IPv6 both in the 2002::/16 as well as in the 2000::/15 range from any system on the RV's LAN side. When trying to add a static route which routes the 2000:: prefix with prefix length 15 to next hop 2002:c058:6301:: with metric 1, I keep getting the message "Please input IPv6 Address with correct format!"could there something wrong with this default route? How can it be changed? And what is the problem with the route I am trying to add?
I have a cisco 2821 router. I currently have it setup to accept vpn connections from a cisco client which uses the 172.16.4.0 subjet for vpn connections. I also have nat overload setup for my local lan of the router so my internal servers on the 172.16.3.0 subnet can reach the internet. Every thing works great for that setup.However I have tried several methods I found for split tunneling and they have weird problems with the nat overload in place. If I take away nat overload the split tunneling works. If I take away split tunneling the nat overload works. I can't seem to get them to work at the same time.Config is below. This is the vpn/nat overload config with no split tunnel.
Current configuration : 2236 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
[code]....
I have a ASA 5510 configured for IPSec remote access VPN.It works nicely and can see the private LAN behind the ASA.My problem is that I have other networks connected to this ASA via site-to-site tunnels that I would like to open up to remote access.
I have added these networks to the split-tunneling ACL's and added NAT exemptions for those networks.This doesn't seem to work.
Is it possible to do dot1q-tunneling on the new Cisco Calalyst 2960 Compact series switches? I know that the 3560 series support it, but im unable to find any information about the 2960C series, personally i doubt it as the standard 2960 series don't support it.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to implement over an ethernet link L2 tunnel because I want to isolate another VLANs domain.On the first side I can use the command : sw mo dot1q-tunnel on a new C4503 on the other side I cannot configure the command : sw mo dot1q-tunnel.
the other side is an old C4503 we upgrade the flash with a compact flash to upgrade to a new IOS v15 but the command doesn't exist also.I red the cisco feature navigator feature and I am sure the dot1Q-tunnel is available on my image : cat4500-ipbasek9-mz.150-2.SG.binso I don't know why I can use it.
I am trying to configure L2TP Client-Initiate Tunneling on a cisco 1941 with C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(2)T0a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).
I have two 1941 and trying to tunnel the VLAN's across a point to point T1 connection. The reason for this is because one of the vlans on the remote end needs to be in a DMZ. The problem that I am having is that is allows me to setup the l2tp class but the pseudowire-class command is not available. Is there somthing I am missing? According to Feature Navigator L2TP Client-Initiate Tunneling is available in the IOS I am using