Cisco WAN :: 6509 / Classify IS-IS Traffic With Access List?
May 16, 2012
I'm configuring Control Plane Police in a Catalyst 6509. This equipment is using IS-IS like its IGP routing protocol, and iBGP. In order to make CoPP work Im classifying the traffic entering the control plane like CRITICAL, IMPORTANT, NORMAL, UNDESIRABLE and DEFAULT. Obviously routing protocol traffic must be classified like CRITICAL. Doing so is easy to BGP because it runs over TCP/IP and I can configure the following access list to classify BGP:
ip access-list extended CP-CRITICAL-IN
remark #### CONTROL PLANE CRITICAL TRAFFIC INBOUND ####
remark #### ROUTING TRAFFIC - BGP ####
permit tcp host [BGP neighbor addr] eq bgp host [local BGP addr]
permit tcp host [BGP neighbor addr] host [local BGP addr] eq bgp
deny ip any any
But IS-IS is also a CRITICAL traffic, but IS-IS doesn't run over TCP/IP, rather it exchange its own PDUs. So, how do I classify IS-IS traffic with an access list?
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 16, 2011
I'm new to this forum and Cisco in general but I feel it may be very resourceful to me as I am a new network administrator fresh out of school for a local credit unionHere's my situation:We need to limit access to one of our servers to only 3 workstations used by our IT department. The server is on a Cisco 3560G on port 17, which is the interface I'm trying to apply a standard, basic ACL to, which looks like this:
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2012
we have two 2851's. One in Australia, one in NZ, IPsec VPN between the two.
We have multiple subnets behind the tunnels. From all the sunbets in Aus we can reach all the subnets in NZ, except for one. From NZ we can reach all the subnets in Aus. The traceroute and pings from the subnet in question in Aus goes out the internet interface of the router instead of going into the tunnel.
The subnets in question are 10.110.220/24 (Aus), 10.110.250/24 (NZ)
The access lists at both ends cover the traffic required but for some reason when leaving Australia the traffic is not captured by:
Crypto Map "AUS-SYD" 20 ipsec-isakmp
Description: Auckland VPN
Peer = 203.167.249.46
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2012
I have been trying to figure out a NAT issue on my 2811 and the inspect engine.I have 'ip inspect FW out' on my outside interface. If I turn it off, I also have to remove the access-list applying to inbound traffic on that same interface. Why is that? This whole thing centered around SIP registrations from devices on my LAN to my provider. The provieder is showing that I am registering from a high end port (1024 or something crazy). He said that it sounds like some type of SIP ALG or something on my router. For the life of me, I can't figure out what would be causing it. I am just using a standard route-map that points to the outside interface using 'overload'.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
We have a gateway on a 4503, say on port 2/1, and we only want the other devices that are plugged into the 4503 to be able to talk to the gateway and thats it. The other devices are Motorola TUT DSL devices and they plug into the 4503 directly.
Normally "switchport protected" would make this very easy to keep stuff on one port from talking to other ports but with 4500's you are not able to do that command. So we implemented a MAC Access-List Extended ACL. Here is what we did
mac access-list extended BLAH
permit #host 0000.XXXX.YYYY any
interface range fa 2/5 - 20
mac access-group BLAH out
The MAC address 0000.XXXX.YYYY is the MAC address of the gateway that is plugged into Fa2/1 and the DSL TUT devices are plugged into ports Fa2/5-20. We would think that this config would only allow devices on the TUT DSL to talk only to the Gateway but we don't really think this is happening. The TUT devices are learning about MAC addresses that are on other TUT devices.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2012
I have an ASA pair configured to replace a router that hosts a collection of IPSec Tunnels. Tunnels appear to work. I am lab'ing some additional controls that I would like to implement. On the Production Router that i plan to replace with the ASA's the current Tunnels are all wide open (all traffic allowed to pass). I was hoping to lock things down a little without having to reconfigure all of the Tunnels. My though was that an ACL on the Inside Interface blocking selected traffic Out (so into the LAN) should not impact the stability of the Tunnels but allow me to restrict some traffic from entering the LAN. One port that I was attempting to block is RDP 3389. When this ACL is applied to the inside interface it does not block Port 3389 at all. What am I missing? Is it that the trffic is being allowed because it is coming through one of my 'open' Tunnels?
Shouldn't IPSec Tunnel traffic be processed by the Inside Interface ACL just like all other traffic?
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 3389
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 135
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 137
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 138
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 139
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 445
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 389
access-list 145 permit ip any any
ip access-group 145 out interface Internal
This work great on a 2821 Router, but not so much on the ASA.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2007
I have an 871 setup at home with a fairly basic configuration (NAT, Firewall, EasyVPN, Wireless). What I've noticed is that for traffic going from the WAN interface (FastEthernet4), it seems to be hitting the ACL in place for NAT. My config: [Code] .......
Where 76.22.98.39 is the dynamic IP address from the cable provider. If the traffic isn't passing through the router, why is it trying to NAT it?
IOS Version is 12.4(6)T9
View 18 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2011
I have made some test and i noticed that qos input policy does not classify the icmp packet based on their dscp.The "match dscp ef" or "match precedence 5" is not working only the "match protocol icmp" shows hits.
We need to classify the different icmp packets based on dscp ( TOS ) for measurement purpose.CISCO 7200, 12.4.25d and 12.4.20T have a same behavior.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
I have the following setup, eBGP to the same ISP, iBGP inside the AS between the routers and 6509s
I would like to do the following, lets say I have 1.1.1.0.... 1.1.6.0
These are advertised by my 6509s through BGP. I would like to balance the traffic across both of the links, so inbound/outbound traffic would be
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2010
Got servers in vlan 10 ip range 10.0.0.0 and servers in vlan 20 ip range 20.0.0.0 at the same layer 3 switch. (c6509 sup720)I would like to block TCP traffic initiated from Vlan 20 to Vlan 10. But the servers in Vlan 10 needs to be able to open an TCP connections to Vlan 20 did test with the ACL thats blocking (ack/established/syn) but unable to get it to work.Or it works both directions or is works non directions.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2010
I am trying to allow telnet to port 551 but i couldn't get it to work.I am using a cisco 1720 router running on IOS 12.2.I am using the below commands to set the access list to allow access to port 551 using remote telnet to the Cisco router.hostname R1!interface ethernet0ip access-group 102 in!access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 551.After i enter the above command the router will disconnect me and i will not be able to connect to it for awhile. Once the router is up i am still unable to telnet to port 551.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2011
I have problem with traffic coming from GRE interface and going further through FWSM on the same 6509-E chassis.It's very interesting and confusing. If packets are fragmented, I can go through, however, if I use normal packets (usual ping for example) traffic goes from outside to inside and stops on it's way back.
Here is the detailed info:
WS-C6509-E with WS-SUP720-3B
FWSM HW 4.0, SW 4.1(4)
GRE is done in hardware (source is loopback interface - only one loopback per GRE tunnel).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
We are a new medical school located in PA. Just have just completed a new building and are now working on getting our network finished. Here is the situation we have a 50MB Internet Connection that comes into our network that then hits the ISPs Cisco 3750 which sends it to two of our Cisco 3750s for redundancy. From the 3750 goes into our Cisco 6509 with a FWSM module, then out from there to our distribution switches which are all Cisco 2960s.
What we would like to do is to control how much WAN connectivity each of our VRFs get. Right now we have a Faculty, Student, and Research VRF formed, and are trying to figure out the best spot where we can say Faculty gets 30MB of Bandwidth, Students gets 10, and Research gets 10. If possible would like burst capabilities.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
I would like to have a view of ip traffic on NX7000 as I am used on 6509 OIS, running the above commands: [code] Finding something like on 7000 ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2013
i recently identified all switch ports in my network on 6509 core were Transmitting Mail server Exchange traffic that was destined for Unicast NLB cluster. and it was impacting various HOST machines NIC cards/performance.After reading this article, i moved NLB CAS servers behind a dedicated cisco Switch.
[URL]
Now My core switch can learn mac address across its trunk port where CAS servers are connected on dedicated switch. but still i can see traffic Transmitting out to my all switch ports of same VLAN ( same as NLB VLAN).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2012
I trying configure ASN traffic load balance, but doesn't works.I have one Cisco Catalyst 6509 and onde Cisco Ace10 module, in my context "PanWEB" i have the interfaces above: [code] If i try to establish a telnet session(telnet 10.96.202.10 80) i see the SYN packet passing through the ACE and going to the real server, but, the server do not response the SYN packet. I done a capture in the server using wireshark and could see that the IP address of the destination is the VIP and not the rserver ip address , this is a problem? Why can not I have the SYN + ACK from the server?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2012
On a Catalyst 6509 switch I have configured wccp protocol in order to redirect the Http traffic to a Bluecoat SG8100. It was working fine until a new L3 interface implementation.Thereafter I was unable to redirect the http traffic due to an error reported from the Cat6509: [code] After some checks I supposed that the problem should be the UDP 2048 port connection between the Switch and the Bluecoat while the switch L3 port and the bluecoat are on the same Lan. A deep analysis found that the WCCP protocol seems to be as follow:
-Proxy address 10.64.28.240 to Switch Port 10.64.28.250 Here I Am
-Switch Port 10.64.28.250 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 I See You
-Switch Port 10.66.0.251 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 UDP 2048 packet (dropped by firewall)
It's strange to me that the first dialog is correctly handled by the correct Cat6509 interface while the UDP packets are flowing from another Vlan interface not configured with the WCCP and apparently not involved on the protocol.Last of all the WCCP is now disabled and unusable?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I'm receiving multicast traffic (400Mbps) on port 9/38 and sending it out on port gi9/48. I'm trying to achieve that traffic will stay within the card without using the switchfabric,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2012
We run a workers camp here and we currently have around 2500-3000 people using our 100MB internet pipe. We are upgrading the pipe to 200MB soon but I still would like to limit how much bandwidth everyone is using.
We allow streaming media such as Netflix, youtube, apple TV and of course .So it gets full pretty fast. We have QOS implemented although I wasn't here when it was done so I don't know a lot about it. I would like to limit IPs to a certain amount of bandwidth. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2012
I am aware that the 3750 switches are not able to support Netflows, so I have created a SPAN port and spanning traffic from a specific port. I would like to create a seperate VLAN and trunk the traffic from the SPAN port down to the 6509 switch and then capture all the traffic for that VLAN on the 6509.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
We have a pair of 6509 working in a VSS configuration (IOS 12.2(33)SX5). The 6509s connect to a pair of ASAs (7.2 code) running in an Active/Standby setup. These ASAs in turn connect to routers going to remote sites. I have configured Netflow on the following VLANS,
VLAN 10 - Servers Vlan
VLAN 9 - Transit/ASA VLAN (connects ASAs to 6509s). All traffic originating from any VLAN on the 6509 crosses this VLAN in order to reach remote sites and vice versa
I configured the netflow source VLAN 11 although I am not collecing any netflow from it.Although I have been getting lots of Netflow info, I noticed that netflow for traffic originating from any user VLAN on the 6509s going to any remote site via TRANSIT/ASA VLAN(9) does not get reported, I even tested with 4 GB traffic but no result. Only reverse traffic (i.e. from remote site to user VLAN) is reported as it traverses the Transit VLAN (9).
I read somewhere that egress netflow is not supported in 6500, but isnt traffic originating from a user vlan to a remote site via the transit VLAN (9) considered ingress with respect to the transit VLAN (9)? I would like to know whether bidirectional Netflow is supported on 6500 VLANS. I have mimimum control on routers beyond the ASAs, and since these ASAs run 7.2 code netflow is not supported, and Monitoring this Transit Vlan gives me extremely useful info.
I do get netflow biderectional traffic from the Server Vlan 10, but I think it is correlated by the netflow collector from vlans 9 and 10. [code]
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2012
I am attempting to block all FTP traffic on port 21 from the servers in my network, and only allow FTP from one server to go out.
I have created the following ACL
access-list 101 Permit ip any any
access-list 101 Permit 21 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 any
access-list 101 Deny 21 any any
and have applied it to my truck VPN that goes up to my firewall
int Vlanxxx
ip access-group 101 out
But when i test ftp is still allowed by all servers.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2011
How to implement mac access-list in 881 and 892 router ? As you now that we can get additional switch-port in the same router but I can't see the function in this router. I guess the switch port must function like the catalyst 2960 switch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2011
I'm creating an access-list that will contain all networks and host that will be redistribute into EIGRP.Till now, this access-list contains 72 entries but this number can increase anytime.
I'm using a 3750-x layer 3 switch, and I'm wondering how big this access-list can be, regarding CPU and memory utilization and performance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2011
we installed a cisco router in a school with two vlans (VLAN 1 & VLAN 2) VLAN 1 is for teachers and Admin and VLAN 2 is for students. We want so that VLAN 2 shouldn't be able to access any device in VLAN 1 but VLAN 1 should be able to access all devices in VLAN 1 & 2
VLAN 1 192.168.11.0/24
VLAN 2 192.168.12.0/24
I am using VLAN interfaces. I know we have to use some access lists but if i apply
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.255 any
access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
With this access list two subnets can not access each other. How these access list should look likes ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2011
I was reviewing some old configs at work today and noticed somthing weird in the access-lists. What is this?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2013
Creating an Access Control List
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
so far i also knew that if u assign an access-list to an interface:
for example:
int vlan1
ip access-group 150 in
and the access-list does not exist in the configuration it will block everything meaning it will be an implicit deny empty access-list but lately i've noticed on new routers that its different,if i assign an acl to an interface where the acl doesnt exist in the configuration it acts as permit all,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2011
this is a project and my configred file:I can't config access list according to the project.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
How to apply access list on Vlans ?
my Scenario is
13 Vlans in cisco 3560 switch (Vlan 10,20,30........ 130)
vlan 10 ---- ip range 192.168.10.0/24 interface vlan 10 ip add : 192.168.10.1
vlan 20 ---- ip range 192.168.20.0/24 interface vlan 20 ip add : 192.168.20.1
here i want to block vlan 10 access to vlan 20 i created extended access list deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
and applied in interface vlan 10 as out now i cant able to access any host in vlan 20 (host 192.168.20.1) but i can able ping vlan 20's gateway 192.168.20.1
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
I have a question about access-lists on ASA: (5520 running 8.4)Often I want to permit all traffic from networks behind an interface (let's say DMZ in this example) to Internet, but NOT to internal networks. Then I first configure a Deny from DMZ to all internal network and then a Permit to ANY. If I forget the first Deny I will allow all traffic also to my internal networks. Is it possible to configure an access-list that permit all traffic from a network to all networks that are reachable via a given interface? In this example: Permit all traffic from DMZ to all networks that are reachable via the Outside-interface? This should permit traffic to Internet and deny traffic to internal networks in one statement.If I specify the outside-interface as the destination only traffic to the interface itself will be allowed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2012
I reported a really strange issue on a Cisco Router 3945. Here below info about release software used: [code] Please look at a brief extract of router running configuration file: [code] It’s an easy configuration of Extended ACL and the application on an Ethernet interface. The expected result is:
- The interface works properly (because access list is permitting every kind of data traffic in input)
- Checking “show access-list 180”, the counter of matched packets increments for all the packets that are forwarded inside the fa0/0/1.
But actually the Fastethernet 0/0/1 drops all the packets as if all the packets don’t match with access list (And this behavior is really incredible). The interface couldn't be used anymore because any kind of data traffic is denied.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2008
how to perform port security or mac access-list on LAN ports of router 861 or 881.There are commands access-list 700-799 , but I don't know how to apply that access list on configured vlan or particular port.
View 1 Replies
View Related
