My question is pretty straight forward but here is some background information. I would like my browsing traffic to funnel through my phone's 3G or WiFi connection. Is there any information out there on how to direct the browser to use the second internet connection? I was thinking about setting up a VPN using the second nic and somehow instruct the browser to use the specific proxy. I have no idea if that is even possible though.
The need for this is pretty simple. I do not want my browsing habits being logged by my company's network. Also while maintaining the current corporate connection so Outlook and RDP programs continue to function correctly.
I've been thinking about this for a while and I can't seem to find a comforting answer: Assume you have three datacenters connected over a WAN. Each datacenter has its own Internet and firewall, and each firewall has a trusted network, untrusted network (Internet), and DMZ: [code]
-DMZhostA has inbound access from the Internet over port X. -DMZhostB has outbound access to DMZhostC over port Y. -DMZhostC has outbound access to the trusted network over port Z.
If DMZhostA gets compromised from the Internet, the attacker can indirectly access the trusted network through DMZhostC, assuming the services running on the given ports are vulnerable/poorly secured.How do you track this web of access? This is a simple scenario with just three firewalls and datacenters, but it gets proportionally more complex and harder to track as the network gets larger. Manually tracking the traffic flow seems tedious, slow, and inefficient.
I am trying to pass Traffic thru the IPSEC tunnel but it does not work ([Cisco Router 892] <---> [Cisco ASA 5510] <---> [Cisco Router 892]) The Cisco ASA 5510 doesn't pass traffic UDP=500 & UDP=4500 ports...
I am fairly new to configuring ASA's. I have an ASA 5505 with one outside interface and three inside interfaces (inside1, inside2, and management). I need inside1 and inside2 to be able to talk to eachother but cannot work out how to make this happen. They are both configured to the same security level and the 'Enable traffic between interfaces with same security level' box is ticked. I have also tried adding appropriate NAT and Access rules. The packet tracer suggests the rules are correct for allowing traffic flow between interfaces but obviosly this may not be the case.
I have a 7204VXR Router, with Neflow. The collection for all interfaces is ok, but one interface (Gigabitethernet 1/0), is not showing the egress traffic in the pictures. The configuration has "ip route-cache flow", ip flow egress, and ip flow ingress set. But, is not showing the egress traffic.
I am in search of a new routers. I don't have any special task to do. Just the flow of maximum 2mb/sec data and some times video conference. However I need the Voip solution as well. I just got excited on the cisco ASA 5505 product. Can this fulfill my requirements. Can this work as the router 1841. Does this support DMVPN, SSL VPN and dynamic routing. Can I upgrade the IOS for dynamic routing purpose. Do you recommend to purchase this produe act or not instead of router ? What are the limitations of this product. If I purchase this I can use this as an router as well as strong security solution. How many ports are available for traffic flow in ASA 5505. Are all routed mode or some of them switch port.
We are facing one issue at the Customer site as Cisco 7600 series Router's having issue for reflection of traffic flow through netfluke as using by Customer to get bandwidth utilization report for our WAN links.Recently we have brought this 7606S router into production and moved some of our WAN links to this router and We are not getting proper bandwidth utilization report in netfluke after configuring netflow in this device.
HTAINCHN21XXXCR001#sh ver Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software (c7600s72033_rp-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) HTAINCHN21XXXCR001#sh run int gi1/12
I'm receiving multicast traffic (400Mbps) on port 9/38 and sending it out on port gi9/48. I'm trying to achieve that traffic will stay within the card without using the switchfabric,
I am looking for the way to define an idle timeout for specific flows on an ASA5580 by using Cisco security manager. For ex I needed to define a specific idle timeout for connections beetween specific devices (Devices in vlan1, Device2 in vlan2).To test it I did following changes by CLI and it works fine. access-list L1 extended permit ip <@IP1> <mask1> host <@IP2> class-map CM1 match access-list L1 policy-map PM1 class CM1 set connection timeout idle 02:00:00
I try do do the same configuration with CSM in order to be able to manage each changes only by using CSM.So I defined Access control list, Traffic flow and then I define timeout in CSM --> PIX/ASA/FWSM Platform --> Service Policy Rules --> IPS, QoS and Connections Rules -> connections settings -> Traffic flow idle time-out. The problem is that each time I deploy the configuration with CSM I loose the timeout config line which is the most important for my application..
We have been deploying Cisco SF200-24P switches for our systems for over a year now. They connect to a Cisco 881 router. In many cases we are also deploying Cisco AP541s.Over the last few months, on an intermittent basis, the switches will simply freeze, blocking all traffic flow. The power LED also goes dark. It appears the switch has frozen. The only thing that seems to revive the switch is a hard reboot by pulling the power cord. In the last couple of weeks, one site in particular has gone down a handful of times. That client of our is fed up. Our patience is running thin too.
I cannot see any indications in the logs to any event that might give a clue as to the problem. We definitely see this problem with the 1.2.7.76 firmware and the 1.2.9.44 (latest as of typing this). Not sure if with earlier 1.1.2 firmware.Without a fix, we likely will have to change switches and possibly vendors as we need a reliable switch.I see some vague references to a similar problem. And one reference to a SG300 series having what sounds like the same issue.
We have a pair of 6509 working in a VSS configuration (IOS 12.2(33)SX5). The 6509s connect to a pair of ASAs (7.2 code) running in an Active/Standby setup. These ASAs in turn connect to routers going to remote sites. I have configured Netflow on the following VLANS,
VLAN 10 - Servers Vlan VLAN 9 - Transit/ASA VLAN (connects ASAs to 6509s). All traffic originating from any VLAN on the 6509 crosses this VLAN in order to reach remote sites and vice versa
I configured the netflow source VLAN 11 although I am not collecing any netflow from it.Although I have been getting lots of Netflow info, I noticed that netflow for traffic originating from any user VLAN on the 6509s going to any remote site via TRANSIT/ASA VLAN(9) does not get reported, I even tested with 4 GB traffic but no result. Only reverse traffic (i.e. from remote site to user VLAN) is reported as it traverses the Transit VLAN (9).
I read somewhere that egress netflow is not supported in 6500, but isnt traffic originating from a user vlan to a remote site via the transit VLAN (9) considered ingress with respect to the transit VLAN (9)? I would like to know whether bidirectional Netflow is supported on 6500 VLANS. I have mimimum control on routers beyond the ASAs, and since these ASAs run 7.2 code netflow is not supported, and Monitoring this Transit Vlan gives me extremely useful info.
I do get netflow biderectional traffic from the Server Vlan 10, but I think it is correlated by the netflow collector from vlans 9 and 10. [code]
I've been digging into some performance issues on a LAN that has a couple of 2960s. The monitoring software I'm using has indicated a high amount of discarded outbound packets (up to 5%). The suggested resolutions were to enable flow control.
My question is does enabling flow control on all ports interrupt network traffic at all? this is a production network so I had already planned on doing it during off hours but also wanted to know if I should be prepared for any significant drop in traffic.
How to configure traffic flow between computers inside VLANs and a routed port? Here is the setup details:
1. Switch 3750-X 2. VLAN 100 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.100.1 /24) 3. VLAN 200 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.200.1 /24) 4. routed port gi1/0/48 (IP address 192.168.150.1 /24). Note: this port is directly connected to a firewall ASA 5520 port IP 192.168.150.100 /24
Ip routing is enabled on the switch and inter vlan traffic is flowing ok. I can ping the routed port gi1/0/48 from any computer connected in the VLAN 100 or 200. For example computer with IP 192.168.100.25 can ping the routed port 192.168.150.1. Switch can ping firewall port 192.168.150.100 and the 'sh ip route' command shows the network 192.168.150.0 /24 as directly connected network.
any computer in the two VLANs CANNOT ping firewall ASA port 192.168.150.100 Is it because inter VLAN routing does not work with a routed port on L3 switch? I looked up fallback bridging, but it is meant for non IP traffic.The goal is I am trying to set the ASA port as an internet gateway for VLANs.
I have two ethernet adaptors on my windows machine. OS is Win-XP.I am running ADSL broadband on LAN1 and on LAN2 I am accessing applications on our company's WAN. LAN1 is on 192.168.1.0/24 subnet and LAN2 is on 10.68.104.0/22 subnet.Accessing application through LAN2 involves DNS that is located distantly, therefore routers are also in picture.Problem is that while accessing the application that run on the network of LAN2, I have to disable LAN1. Otherwise the traffic goes on LAN1.
I have a number of sites in China, they have decent inter-country connectivity but poor connectivity when going overseas.
We have a single site in China witha dedicated 1:1 leased line that has good conectivity both inside and outside of China.
All the sites in China have ASA5505 firewalls
One of our Citrix farms is hosted in the UK and although the main site with the leased line is fine accessing the farm the other sites are not. I would like to try and tunnel just the citrix connectivity via a VPN to the China head office then use their connection to get out to the farm.
how to tunnel all traffic but not just specific traffic over the VPN.
How to configure the 825 to block inbound traffic from a specific internet IP address ?i noticed an IP and MAC that i don't recognize that is listed as a connection to my NAS's media server ...i blocked it in the NAS configuration page, but i don't want any unsolicited traffic into my network.
I have ASA 5510 8.4 Firewall where more than 20 Site to Site VPN Clients are configured on it. how to see the traffic for one Specific Site to Site VPN.Actually this site to site vpn is always keep dropping for every minute. I'm sure its a problem at the other end.The remaining 19 VPNS are UP and working without any problem. How to see the traffic for specific vlan.More over we dont have any syslog server in our network. Is their any chance we can check the traffic on the firewall?
I am trying to find a tool that will monitor the web traffic for one specific user. If it is capable of bundling it into a report that would also be a benefit. I have searched, but not come up with much aside from broad network monitoring tools. All that is really needed is to capture all the activity from http traffic for this one specific user/PC (since she uses the same PC all the time). We have a Sonicwall NSA 2400 as our internet filter, but I was not able to locate anything on there for specific user reporting.
When pinging the public IP of ASA F3.2 from the internet a reply is never received because the default route on the 1811 points to ASA F3.1.
How do I get the replies from the 1811 to go back out the same interface from whence it entered ? I am sure the answer is policy-based routing, but not sure how to write the config.
if the firewall rules in the RVL200 work for inter LAN routing as well as LAN<->WAN? I need 2 separate networks in a house, 1 for business 1 for family, and I want to only allow my IP on network 1 (family net,10.0.0.0/24) access to network 2 (business net 10.0.1.0/24). I want this as if I change rooms were a access point for business is not available I can use the home net and specific IP to access certain business net IPs. I saw you can turn inter vlan routing on or off, but it wasn't clear on firewall rules.know of a similar router in cost but with gige instead of 100Mb ports?
Have a quick question regarding inter-vlan routing on a 3750. Overview of network is ISP --> ASA --> 3750 (acting as my core and default gw). I have 5 vlan interfaces on my 3750, all w/ 192.192.x.x subnets, a 6th w/ 192.168.100.x, and a 7th w/ 192.168.200.x. I have enabled "ip routing" on the switch and can successfully ping from subnet A to subnet B as long as both devices are using the correct DG for their vlan, which is the switch. I have a few ports that are trunked as well that go to ESX hosts which break out the vlans according to the subnet the vm should be attached to. The ASA is set to nat internal traffic for all the vlans.
Now my question: short of applying an ACL to each vlan interface to block traffic from other 192.192.x.x subnets is there a better way to accomplish this? I want my 192.168.10.x subnet to be able to reach all the subnets, but don't want 192.192.10.x to be able to talk to 192.192.20.x for example. I was thinking to create an acl like this:
access-list 120 permit ip 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 120 deny ip 192.192.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255access-list 120 permit ip any 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255
and then applying this to the interface for the appropriate vlan.
I have an RV042. I understand and have created the services I need. The documentation is just not clear on how to direct traffic for these services to a specific wan port.
Can this even be done with this router? If so, the how? Use rate control or priority? Does checking a wan port mean that it will only go through that port?
I'm trying to route all default traffic from my production environment through my ASA 5520 on the "outside2" interface.The 5520 has a site to site VPN to our DR site on the "outside/inside" interfaces via one ISP. On another ISP, interfaces "outside2/inside2" go to the internet. When I make my 3750 stack default route for the inside2 interface IP I cannot get to the internet. When it is pointed to the inside interface on my 5505, I can.
I get the following errors when I try to open google.com from a production server:Why is the 5520 trying to use the "outside" interface instead of the "outside2" interface to go out?
We have a distributed ACS 5.3 set up - a PR and DR replicating successfully.I've set up 4 remote syslog targets. 2 of them are at the same site as the PR ACS and 2 are at the same site as the DR ACS.The logging collector is set on the PR ACS.
The problem is that it "appears" that PR ACS is only sending PR ACS syslog info to one of the remote syslog targets out of the four.
The syslog target which does receive from the PR ACS is at the same site as the PR ACS.
"appears" means that some one has looked on the syslog targets to see what's been received / or not received.
I've been told that the syslog traffic for syslog targets is being received from the DR ACS. Which is strange as the PR ACS is the actual log collector (and is not at the same site as the DR ACS).
I've also got Alarm Syslog targets set up on the PR ACS , (2 are the same ip addresses used in the 4 remote syslog targets). IP addresses of the remote syslog targets have been double checked and can be pinged from each ACS (PR and DR).
I inherited a Cisco ASA 5505 and am trying to piggy back the device off of an established Network. Here is the basic layout:
192.168.10.1 (Core Router - Handles DHCP/DNS) 192.168.10.9 (ASA 5505 - Piggy backing off of Network) 192.168.40.x (ASA 5505 - VLAN)
I'm able to get onto the Internet without any problems. Devices from the 192.168.10x Network can not ping the inside VLAN1 (192.168.40.x). However, I would like traffic going from the inside VLAN to the Outside VLAN to be blocked, except for 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.9. I've tried using ACL's but end up killing my Internet connection. 192.168.10.1 is the default route and is how I get out to the Internet. Is this possible? Essentially, I'm trying to set up a small Network that guests can connect to. The idea is that they can get to the Internet, but that is it. They can't get to internal resources on the 192.168.10.x Network
Here is the config:
ASA Version 8.2(1) ! hostname ciscoasa enable password EeCsulrpu.9LalEE encrypted
I want to redirect internal web traffic (browsing) to an external web server for Web, Virus and Spyware filtering. Those externals proxies are running in 8080 port. I have one ASA firewall and a Cisco 2600 router. I was thinking in doing PBR in the router but in the next hop I can only set one IP, not an IP and a port. So how can I redirect web traffic to an external proxy listening in 8080 port?
I am facing problem with ACE configuration. I want to redirect 443 traffic to my Proxy Server. But I am not able to do this. I want to redirect only subnet 192.168.80.0/24..Then only it is working but I dont have to have this policy to be applied on all the users only one subnet I want to have under HTTPS policy.
how can I apply the policy only on specific subnet so that port 443 traffic can be redirect and rest of all subnets can go direclty to Internet.
I have an ASA 5510, with Ethernet0 connected to Internet via a T1 line, Ethernet1 connected to LAN1, and Ethernet2 connected to LAN2. LAN1 & LAN2 are independant, but share the Internet connection, via the T1 line. On LAN2, I have another router that connects to the Internet, via a Comcast line. I wish to route some of the traffic on LAN2 (10.38.77.0) to the other Router, on LAN2 (10.38.77.12) (connected to the Comcast line). I have entered the following lines:
I was asked to enable netflow in an ASA Firewall for Orion/Solarwinds server monitoration. Firewall is a 5550, with 4G RAM, and no extra modules but SSM-4GE. This firewall has 5 DMZ segments and ans specific segment for internet traffic.There are segments as unique subinterfaces in physical interfaces. Other segments as individual subinterfaces in the same physical interface (but individual VLANs)Usually firewall CPU flows between 30% to 40%. Rarely to 50%.
1 - How dangerous or risky could be implement netflow in this firewall?...This firewall is very critical for the customer. My concern is regrading CPU, traffic generated, memory, etc
2 - In a month, firewall will be migrated from 8.2 software version to 8.4 software version. Is there any incompatibility in some commands?...Would be recommended to perform netflow configuration after software upgrade?
3 - How could it be implemented for Orion monitoring, regarding each individual sub-interface (and so, each VLAN assigned)?I there any recommendation regarding configuration, best practices?
Is it possible to enable an absolute value rate limit using QOS on a HP ProCurve 5406 switch for a particular IP range on a specific port? Is there a way to configure our HP 5406 with an absolute rate limit on "WAN" port for that server's IP range? I would like to limit it to only being capable of sending 1Mbps worth of traffic over the head end at once.Everything in the documentation points towards priority queues, which as far as I can tell, isn't really what I want.Baring accomplishing this goal using rate limiting is there a better way to prevent our services from accidentally saturating this connection?i thimkong about somthing like that:
class ipv4 rate-limit-port-A1 match ip 10.136.0.0/16 any exit policy qos port-a1-ratelimit class servers-to-be-slowed action rate-limit kbps 1000 exit interface A1 service-policy port-a1-ratelimit inI'm not sure about this.
I use a router RV082 with load balancing. My problem is when I try to access a specific site, I get the error message that my IP address changes and I can not use 2 ip address. I want to specify an ip range to always use the same WAN port.
