Network Security Key Mismatch

Oct 24, 2011

I am trying to access the internet (Plusnet) using a laptop, via as wireless computer. All that appears on the laptop screen is "network security key mismatch. What is a security key?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Network Security Key Mismatch Error

Feb 5, 2013

I still get the "security key mismatch error" for my school and home wifi. I know the passwords i'm using are correct.I also have the fake "Intel(R) Centrino(R) Wireless-N 6150" in my Device Manager. This does not have a driver nor can Device Manager find one.I recently noticed that there are 8 Virtual Wifi Miniport Adapters. What are these and why do they exist?

View 5 Replies View Related

Network Security Key Mismatch For Every Network?

Jan 21, 2013

I had my computer in the shop for some relevant work - the system32 folder was corrupt.After this, i could not use any wifi networks. I have the correct password for two networks and get the "Network Security Key Mismatch" error whenever i try to connect.I cannot change the network settings in "manage wireless networks" because of:

1. a local wifi jammer

2. my adapter drivers not always working [URL]

3. the repairs done to my computer (i think... no networks show when the device is off and drivers working)

I also cannot alter the current router settings for either of the networks so resetting the password or "removing all wirless settings"

View 9 Replies View Related

Security Key Mismatch

Dec 14, 2012

I have a 2wire router and can currently only connect to the internet with an ethernet cable. I've screwed my settings up trying to install my new router(WHOLE 'nother post lol!) Anyway it's not taking my Security Key..that I think is the right one. If I enter a different one it doesn't say incorrect, but it says possible security key mismatch or something like that.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: Tunnel Mismatch Between A PIX 515E Version 7.2(2) - 3800 12.3(11r)?

Mar 11, 2007

I have a tunnel between a PIX 515E version 7.2(2)and a Cisco 3800 version 12.3(11r). There is a mismatch somewere in the configs but I cannot find it. I have included the configs and the syslog errors.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5000 / MTU Mismatch In Layer 2 Network?

Dec 26, 2012

I am just wondering on how mismatched MTU sizes are handled in Layer-2 networks and also inside a particular switches internal architecture.Layer 2 devices do not do fragmentation in the even of MTU mismatch. is this because Layer 2 devices do not re-write header information (like inserting destination IP and next hop MAC into the newly created frame.) i believe this is what they call per-hop behaviour? if this not the reason, then...? assuming this is the reason, let me proceed to my next question.     When we set MTU on an interface , there is no mention of direction (ingress or egress), so i take this as means in both directions. so if a jumbo frame comes in on an interface which is set to recieve jumbo frames and forwarding decision is made and the frame is scheduled to egress via an interface whose MTU is not set for Jumbo frames, will the switch drope the frame at the egress buffer? if not, this implies MTU is an ingress property(only for incoming packets). But, again if it drops the packet, then MTU shoud have been system wide or global configuration as opposed to interface level configuration (just like nexus 5000).

View 2 Replies View Related

Security / Firewalls :: Sonicwall Network Security Appliance - Receiving A Content Blocked Message?

Dec 24, 2011

I'm new to IT, and have been put in charge of managing our servers hile my boss is on vacation.We currently have a Sonicwall Network Security Appliance that handles our Firewall/VPN and have web content filtering set in place.I have a user who belongs to 2 CFS policy groups that we have set up. I've double checked with Active Directory, and he is a member of both groups.

This person SHOULD have access to Job searches/ and Restaurants,but receives a "content blocked" message on his browser.It appears to me that the settings in Sonicwall are correct, as well with AD member groups.

View 3 Replies View Related

Security / Firewalls :: Connecting To A Security-enabled Wireless Network?

Jan 19, 2013

I am trying to connect to a Security-enabled wireless netowork. I have the key. My problem is that I can't seem to figure out how to enter it. When I try to connect I open the "view available networks"window. I see the network name and it shows a strong signal (all 5 green bars).

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: ACE 4710 - MSS Mismatch

Dec 5, 2011

I'm receiving a lot of these messages in a ACE4710 cluster. 192.168.100.1:80 is the VIP, 193.126.127.28:56380 is the client. Already tried to set the mss with this:
 
parameter-map type connection my map set tcp mss min 0 max 1380
 
policy-map multi-match L4_policymap
class vip_PRDWEB_http
loadbalance vip inservice
[code].....
 
But it doesn't work.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: K-value Mismatch With EIGRP On ASA5540

Mar 7, 2011

I have an ASA- 5585X (v.8.2.4) directly connected to an upstream 6509, which is running EIGRP. I configured the ASA for EIGRP with same AS# and network numbers and no auto-summary.   Here are the log messages I got:
 
Mar  8 15:11:08: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 164.72.178.28 UP on interface Vlan150 (vrf default) Mar  8 15:11:08: %PIM-5-DRCHG: DR change from neighbor 0.0.0.0 to 164.72.178.28 on interface Vlan150 (vrf default)
Mar  8 15:11:11: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 164.72.178.28 (Vlan150) isup: new adjacencyMar  8 16:16:08: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 164.72.178.25 (Vlan150) isup: new adjacency
Mar  8 16:18:54: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 164.72.178.25 (Vlan150) is down: K-value mismatch
 
I lost my SSH connection to the upstream 6509 and couldn't get it back. Luckily I didn't lose my ASDM connection to the ASA, so I disabled EIGRP and went to look at the logs on the 6509.
 
What causes a K-value mismatch, and how to I rectify the situation?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: LAG From N7k To 5508 Getting Duplex Mismatch Errors

Jun 2, 2012

Seen Duplex MisMatch errors on a N7k with a LAG going to the 5508 WLC?  WLC code is 7.0.203.0. I found a BUG that is private to Cisco ( CSCth11041 ) that looks like it, but I want to make sure.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: AnyConnect 2.5.2019 - SSL Certificate Mismatch

Sep 6, 2011

When i'm trying to connect using stand-alone Anyconnect (not through the web), I got the SSL error message "The certificate you are viewing does not match the name of the site you are trying to view" (attached).
 
The certificate I installed for the SSL connection on outside interface got Subject CN=testvpn.mydomain and Subject Alternative Name (SAN) --> DNS Name = testvpn.mydomain
 
It seems to me that instead of connecting to testvpn.mydomain, anyconnect try to connect to the its IP address. I did try to remove the IP address in Server List in the profile, but it still doesn't work.
 
If I'm using Clientless (through browser), I don't received this error which means the certificates installed correctly.
 
Is that a bug on anyconnect 2.5.2019 or is there other ways to force anyconnect to check name instead of the IP against the certficate?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 6513 - LMS 4.0.1 Link Duplex Mismatch

Sep 18, 2012

In LMS I have a 6513 with several sx 1000 interface setup for etherchannel to catalyst 3750
 
both sides are set for autoduplex but LMS reports that there is a link duplex mismatch. We just installed the latest patches for the LMS 4.0.1

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: WLC 5508 RF Grouping Mismatch?

Aug 18, 2011

I have a customer with two WLC 5508's running 7.0.116.0.  When I look at the RF Grouping I see both controllers in the 802.11b/g/n section (802.11b>RRM>RF Grouping).  However, when I check the 802.11a/n RF Grouping, I only see one controller.Both are in Group Mode = Auto.
 
I also made sure they had the same NDP settings, and they are both in Transparent mode.
 
Default 802.11a AP monitoring
  802.11a Monitor Mode........................... enable
  802.11a Monitor Mode for Mesh AP Backhaul...... disable
  802.11a Monitor Channels....................... Country channels
  802.11a RRM Neighbor Discover Type............. Transparent
  802.11a AP Coverage Interval................... 180 seconds

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: IOS 12.4 (16) / EIGRP Autonomous System Mismatch Detection?

Oct 3, 2007

It is possible to detect situation when two neigbour routers involved in EIGRP routing are configured by mistake with different AS number ?I tried this situation practically. Two routers are connected together via Serial link network. One router has AS 1, other AS 10. I try to detect AS mismatch. First I check what EIGRP packet are comming debug ip packet detail show source <my neighbour IP address> destination 224.0.0.10  Ip protocol type 88. These packets are EIGRP Hello packet.

I try to go more deeply into details.debug eigrp packetsI see only ongoing EIGRP Hello packets. But I don't see any incoming packet from my neighbour (which has different AS number). It seems, because of different AS number router silently drop eigrp packet.Other debug eigrp command also doesn't show any info about AS difference.

Cisco IOS 12.4 (16)

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-6148A - Port Flapping Due To MTU Mismatch?

Jun 4, 2012

We have some legacy Cisco 6513 switches with the backbone (16-port GBIC blade) MTU set to 1500.  It has a WS-X6148A-GE-TX blade as well, MTU set to 9K.
 
Now we have a customer sending MTU of 1546, their copper interface terminating on WS-6148A keeps flapping.  Does the flapping have something to do with the backbone set to 1500?  We cant set the backbone to 9K at this moment since it may be intrusive (reuire a reboot).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Duplex Mismatch With A AIR-LAP1042 In Bridge Mode

May 16, 2013

[code] Can't find any wrong with the switch ports and AP's that can result in Duplex mismatch.The only difference I can find is the AP that is in all duplex missm. log's is used for other Mesh AP's to connect to.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 Cannot Seem To Correct A Duplex Mismatch

May 14, 2012

I cannot seem to correct a duplex mismatch issue.I have a Cisco 2950 switch connected to a Cisco 2621 router.  I am running a per-interface Vlan.  I have two fastethernet ports and one NM-1E card installed on the router.  One fastethernet port is connected to my gateway router, the second fastethernet port is connected to my switch for one Vlan. The NM-1E Ethernet card is being used for the second Vlan which consists of nine IP cameras.  Though the cameras on the Vlan are working fine.Now, the NM-1E card is set to half-duplex.  I know that I should be using a fastethernet module like a 1FE 2W or a 2FE 2W card, (which I have,) but the router does not recogonize either one of these cards when they are installed, and yes, they have been confirmed as good cards.
 
Using Router-on-a-Stick configuration is out due to the bandwidth contention besides the fact that the router I am using it on will not handle this due to the flash being an older version.I have forced the switchport to half duplex, setting the speed to 10. I was getting fewer error messages at first, but they soon increased back to the frequency that they began with.I have set the switchport to duplex auto, but this failed to resolve the issue.Obviously, I cannot force the switchport into duplex full since the NM-1E interface is set to half duplex.  Can the NM-1E card be configured to full duplex?  I can't seem to find any documentation showing where it can be forced to full duplex mode.Could nine IP cameras just be too much for both the router and switch to handle?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Duplex Mismatch Between 2950 And 4503

Jul 8, 2012

I have a 4503 switch (in L2 mode) running 12.1 hooked into a C2950 running 12.1, using regular 4 pair Cat5e cables to connect between them. The 4503 has Gigabit port 2/1 trunking to the 2950's Fa port 0/13.
 
When I set the duplex mode to DUPLEX FULL and SPEED to SPEED 100 on both switches (for their trunk ports) the link fails, and my 4503 loses connectivity (since it gets it from the 2950).
 
Here is my config from the switches (per description):
 
The 4503:
 
interface GigabitEthernet2/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,100-140

[Code].....
 
Note, this is the only mode that works (which seems to work fine, but I get TERRIBLE throughput for anything that goes over the 2950.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco :: WLC 5508 External Web Authentication Mismatch With Session Timeout?

Aug 27, 2012

For guest clients , we have configured guest vlan and applied external web authenication on WLC 5508 , the session timeout value is 2700secons . When a client open a browser to internet page , wlc will redirect to URL and get the login page . After completed the login , he can go to internet page .

We find the iPhone and ipad clients will get the login page again ahfter ~ 5 mins , it is mismatch with session timeout value 2700 sec (45 mins) .

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 5508 / NCS Prime 1.3 Controller Audit Status Mismatch?

May 14, 2013

When performing an audit from NCS Prime 1.3 on our 5508 controllers (500 lic)  we are getting mismatch messages from many of our 3602i AP's that say the following...
 
(Type)Configuration Name     Audit Status              Attribute           Prime Infrastructure Value     Controller Value
 (AP APname, Interface) 802.11a/n     Mismatch     Spectrum Intelligence      true                                       false
  
These AP's are not configured as Spectrum Intelligence on the controllers, rather as local. It seems that NCS believes that they are supposed to be SI. We have refreshed the config from controller many times but this does not change. The 5508's run v.7.2.111.3 Is there a change I can make on NCS or otherwise to make this mismatch go away? Is this a bug? It is not causing any problems (that we can see) but as most would rather not have these mismatches.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stack Version Mismatch

Feb 18, 2013

I'm able to upgrade the master of a 3750 stack, but the member fails to upgrade. [code] I couldn't do rmdir flash:update unless I reload chassis... but even after reloading still cannot make the 2nd member to load with the newer IOS.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Magic Number Mismatch / Bad Mzip File - Catalyst 3560

Jul 21, 2012

I was trying to upgrade my 3560 in the lab and I think I might have bricked it. I tried to load up IOS image c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE5.bin so I would have SSH support. I originally was running c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin and now I can't get either to load, I get the error message 'magic number mismatch: bad mzip file'.I've formatted the switch and attempted to load the 122-55.SE5.bin image and got the error message above. In hope I could revert back to my old IOS I tried to load up the 122-25.SEE2.bin image but got the same error message! I've verified that the image was indeed on the flash. I'm at a loss here because I know both images are valid. I've tested them both on my other 3560's.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Can Native VLan Or Duplex Mismatch

May 25, 2012

1 week ago, I got a call from a client that reported a network outage, the client told me that, 3 switch has crashed he try to console but it just hang. I ask him, did you change something? he said he didn't change anything, he just pluged a nortelswitch to the cisco switch number 9, but that switch doesn't crash like the others (3,4,8). I check the uptime, and yes the switch never been powered off..
 
   the topology look like this
 
              ____ 6500  ____
             /      /    |           
           1      2    3    4       5  ...... 9
 
 
the vlan is end to end vlan, so vlan span between all those switches. transparant. this is collapsed topology, core and distribution is the 6500 itself all of the 1-9 access switch are in the same rack, with no loopguard, and bpdu guard configured. and connected to the core using etherchannel. the problem is there is no log available to start the troubleshooting/investigation.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 Input And Output Packet / Sec Mismatch?

Jun 7, 2012

I have a video feed coming into my 3570.  It comes in at  5 minute input rate 18777000 bits/sec, 1695 packets/sec.  However, the uplink to the router is much different, 5 minute output rate 130000 bits/sec, 28 packets/sec.  I am in a lab and about ready to go into testing phase for a  project when we discovered this problem, as this video feed is not veiwable on the other end.

Below is the config and capture from the switch.

BLOSSw1#sh int g1/0/6GigabitEthernet1/0/6 is up, line protocol is up (connected)  Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is a44c.112f.3506 (bia a44c.112f.3506)  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 4/255  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set  Keepalive not set  Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP  input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00  Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 15:16:25  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0  Queueing strategy: fifo  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)  5 minute

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6506 VLAN Mismatch Error Even Though Same Config

Mar 2, 2013

I am seeing Native VLAN mismatch errors on my 6506 switches as below [code] Will it(VTP Version mismatch) be the issue for getting the VLAN Mismatch Error ?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7000 - Performance Affected By MTU Mismatch

Feb 24, 2013

Will a MTU mismatch in Nexus 7000 affect the performance ? I have a nexus 7000 at one end with MTU set to 1500 and Melanox bx5020(Storage switch) at other end with MTU set to 9600. Storage team is complaining about  performance issue related to slowness.Does MTU mismatch plays any role in slowness ??

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 2248 / N 5596 - AA Version Mismatch

Jan 27, 2013

I have a pair of 5596 running in a vPC with Nexus 2248 connected to each N5596.  When I do the command "show fex" I get the following output on the 2nd 5596

Number    Description      State            Model            Serial    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
101         FEX101   AA Version Mismatch   N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE   SSI16390705
102         FEX102   AA Version Mismatch   N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE   SSI163704AD
122         FEX122                Online    N2K-C2232PP-10GE   SSI16370195
 
I'm running version 5.1(3)N1(1) on both of the 5K's. I have looked through all the configuration and I am not understanding why I am getting this error.  I have tried to look it up on [URL], but not having a ton of luck. 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3945e / Client DH Key Range Mismatch With Maximum Configured DH Key On Server

Jan 19, 2012

what this syslog message means?  Being getting this on my 3945e series routers.  My gut tells me they are caused by our Security guys scanning my routers with invalid login attempts.
 
%SSH-3-DH_RANGE_FAIL: Client DH key range mismatch with maximum configured DH key on server

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Duplex Mismatch Between 2960 (LANBase Image) And 6506

Jan 21, 2010

I have the following issue; I am getting a duplex mismatch between a Cisco 2960 TT-L Switch running IOS 12.2(35) LAN Base Image (Gig0/1) and a Cisco 6506 Switch running IOS 12.2(33)SXH Adv IP Services (Gig2/19).
 
I have tried several combinations of the duplex/speed settings on both sides but the only that works is setting duplex/speed AUTO on the Cisco 2960 which ends up autonegotiating to HALF duplex and 100Mbps.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack C3750G And C3750X - Major Version Mismatch

Jun 11, 2013

I'm trying to stack 3750G & 3750X. As discussed in previous threads I am aware of that the version need to match.
 
Here the switch details:
 
Switch Ports Model              SW Version                SW Image
------ ----- --------------             ----------
* 1 24    WS-C3750G-24T      12.2(55)SE7             C3750-IPBASEK9-M
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* 1 54      WS-C3750X-48      12.2(55)SE7           C3750E-IPBASEK9-M
 
I have changed the universal IOS on the 3750X to IP base..but they still wont come up as a stack. On the 3750X I don't see any log entry, on 3750G (major version mismatch).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Major Version Mismatch On Identical Switches

Apr 3, 2012

We have bought four identical 3750X switches with identical SW-images: 12.2(55)SE3          C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
 
We initially connected two switches, this resulted in forming a stack.With the other two switches we wanted to do the same thing. However, we received the following message:
 
%STACKMGR-5-MAJOR_VERSION_MISMATCH: Major Version Mismatch (Local 1 - Received 6) with neighbor-1
 
Both switches will not see each other and the output of show switch stack-ports shows only one switch and both stack ports as being Down.
 
I did some digging using the show platform stack-manager all command to find out that three of the 3750X's have the stack version number 1.45 and one has 6.45. This would obviously indicate the reason behind the mismatch, but the SW-versions on all new switches are identical!
 
Checking the CISCO site explains that mismatching of Major version is critical:
 
Major Version Number Incompatibility Among Switches

Switches with different major Cisco IOS software versions usually have different stack protocol versions. Switches with different major version numbers are incompatible and cannot exist in the same switch stack.
 
That's all I could find. Nothing about changing the major version number, so all I can suspect is that IOS version needs to be the same.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG500 LACP Trunk Mismatch Native Vlan On Individual Ports

Jan 22, 2013

I have just configured up a sg500 with a lacp trunk to an upstream switch.
 
I am getting native vlan mismatch on the individual ports of the lacp team.
 
24-Jan-2013 12:54:48 %CDP-W-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch detected on interface gi1/1/24.
24-Jan-2013 12:57:35 %CDP-W-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch detected on interface gi1/1/48.

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved