Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 Input And Output Packet / Sec Mismatch?

Jun 7, 2012

I have a video feed coming into my 3570.  It comes in at  5 minute input rate 18777000 bits/sec, 1695 packets/sec.  However, the uplink to the router is much different, 5 minute output rate 130000 bits/sec, 28 packets/sec.  I am in a lab and about ready to go into testing phase for a  project when we discovered this problem, as this video feed is not veiwable on the other end.

Below is the config and capture from the switch.

BLOSSw1#sh int g1/0/6GigabitEthernet1/0/6 is up, line protocol is up (connected)  Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is a44c.112f.3506 (bia a44c.112f.3506)  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 4/255  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set  Keepalive not set  Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP  input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00  Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 15:16:25  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0  Queueing strategy: fifo  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)  5 minute

[code]....

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SUP-7E - Input /output Rate Not Incrementing Under VLan

Mar 6, 2013

On my SUP-7E, when I issue a " show interface vlan X "  I cannot see the expected input/rate reflecting the real rate (which should be very high).
 
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 4000 bits/sec, 2 packets/sec

(Under the physical interfaces it is ok)However on other SUP-IV I can see the real rate.
 
My questions are :
 
- Why the SUP-7E does not reflect the rate, whereas the SUP-IV does ?

- I have heard about the 'counter' command under the vlan interface to activate the rate counters. Is this command application has any side effect on the switch ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4506 Count Interface Input / Output Rate Always 0

Jan 20, 2013

Our customer get the problem that the switch count the 5mins input/output rate of connected traffic interface always ZERO.The problem only occur in the module 3,4 and 5 interface, module 2 has no problems.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catayst 4506E
12.2(52)SG
 Chassis Type : WS-C4506-E
Power consumed by backplane : 0 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------1     6  Sup 6-E 10GE (X2), 1000BaseX (SFP)     WS-X45-SUP6-E       2    48  10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45)                WS-X4548-GB-RJ45   3    48  10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45)                WS-X4648-RJ45-E    4    48  10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45)                WS-X4648-RJ45-E    5    48  10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45)                WS-X4648-RJ45-E   

[code]....+

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Packet Dropped Due To Input Queue Full On 6509

Nov 9, 2011

i have issues logging into one of our core switches.its a 6509 switch but i cannot log in remotely.when i try to console in on the console port, i cannot log in instead i get the above error message.I haven't rebooted yet but would it solve the problem as this switch is a production switch.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3845 Output Packet Drop In Some Of Interfaces

Nov 27, 2011

In my cisco 3845 router I can see output packet drop in some of the interfaces.I suspect that router is processing packet beyond its mix throughput limit. Moreover when i run show int fax/y switching command I can see packet drop by RP process.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7200 - QoS Input Policy Doesn't Classify ICMP Packet Based On DSCP

Dec 20, 2011

I have made some test and i noticed that qos input policy does not classify the icmp packet based on their dscp.The "match dscp ef" or "match precedence 5" is not working only the "match protocol icmp" shows hits.
 
We need to classify the different icmp packets based on dscp ( TOS ) for measurement purpose.CISCO 7200, 12.4.25d and 12.4.20T have a same behavior.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 Stackable Switches Models

Jun 23, 2012

I want to be sure for this before ordering: is the Enterprise-class stackable switches "WS-C3750X-48T-S" model can be stackable with "WS-C3750G-48TS" model.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3570 Express Setup Webpage Not Go Away

Oct 21, 2009

i've got a stack of 3750's configured, everything is working fine, but the web interface for the stack will only present the web based express configuration page.  I can't get it to go away.  what needs to be done to clear whatever flag or register that causes this behavior.  the cli is fine, it's not trying to force epxress setup there, only in the web interface.  will reloading the software image fix this?

View 16 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 / Multi-process OSPF Redistribution And Failover?

Feb 7, 2013

I have two ospf processes running on a single 3570 edge router that has a dedicated transport circuit back to our network core. We are adding an additional "transport" only circuit into a new location that is also apart of the second ospf process backbone which will connect back to our core. There will also be a 3750 for this new circuit termination. Currently we are only redistributing ospf process 2 into ospf process 1 (1 = core backbone).

#router ospf 1
#redistribute ospf 2 subnet
 
We have no need to have ospf process 1 redistributed into the process 2 tables. That being said, when we add an additional transport ciruit, or path back to our core backbone, will this configuration present any issues with the redistribution process and failover.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6500 - Input / Output Drops

Feb 7, 2011

I have this topology in part of my networ:k
 
Cisco7200---Cisco6500---Cisco3560---LAN1
                        |
                 Cisco3560
                        |
                     LAN2
 
All devices are interconected via optical 1Gb/s links. There is no QoS implemented on any device and all VLANs are allowed on all interfaces.
Also all links are trunks (with many VLANs)
 
In LAN1 there was a layer 2 broadcast-storm and 4000packets/s was comming to rest of the network (in one particular VLAN).
 
 1) 7200 with G1 should be able to handle traffic up to 500Mb/s, but a lot of users experienced drops on traffic via 7200.
(CPU load was around 10%).
 
2) Why do I have input drops on 7200 on link toward 6500 if CPU was normal. Broadcast comming to this interfaces were cca 4kpps. But since it's destination is not on router these packets should be rejected on interface controller. Is that right? (7200 doesn't even has dot1q subinterface in that VLAN but since 6500 allow all VLANs on its trunk these packets reach 7200)
 
3) Why do I have output drops on Cisco 6500 (it is here as layer 2 device only)? It is max 160Mb/s in output direction. It has WS6724 card with DFC (there is no oversubscription).. Shouln't 6500 send traffic as fast as interface allows (up to 1Gb/s). Am I righ't?
 
4) After all how coul'd 6500 now if 7200 can't handle these traffic?Output drops should be only seen if QoS is enabled (i.e. shaping), or if there is oversubscription on the linecard?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 3570 Switches To Nexus 2232 To Migrate Server Subnets

Nov 17, 2011

I am in the process of migrating our existing server farm subnets to our new Nexus server farm and I discovered something I wasn’t expecting. My intention is to migrate our existing legacy server farm which is comprised of for paired 3750 switches off of our core 6509s and onto the Nexus and connect them to the 2232s via multi gig port-channel connections, two port channels per switch stack. 
 
NOTE this is expected to be a temporary move as next year we intend to install additional N2Ks and move servers over to these directly. But to minimize the outage/downtime it will be better to move the subnets and switchs all at once.
 
These connections would be grouped 1 gig connections as port channels, one from each switch into one of the two 2232s.
 
Problem I discovered is Cisco does not intend to have switches connected to the Nexus and it immediately disables the ports when they see BPDUs.
 
I found a config that does work and it does fail over from one port-channel connection to the other but with the limitation that when the original port channel comes back online it does not fail back over to the original one, an acceptable situation for us. But I am wondering if Cisco would support this design if we did experience issues down the road.
 
The only issue I really see is to get it to work the config is different on the two N5Ks, see the pert config below for the connections. Both are running the same OS
 
augs1-ba-ar17# sh ver
Cisco Nexus Operating System (NX-OS) Software
TAC support: [URL]

[Code].....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7200 Series Input / Output Controllers?

Mar 22, 2012

We have 7206 VXR running NPE-G1, we are looking for the GigE cards for 7200 which supports upto line rate and came across Cisco 7200 Series Input/Output Controllers The datasheet for the same doesnt say anything about line rates.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Output Drops And Input Errors On 7204 With NPE 300

May 11, 2011

My router, a Cisco 7204 with NPE 300, is experiencing output drops and input errors on a fastethernet interface. I have a 100Mbps connection with less than 15Mbps utilization at peak times.
 
FastEthernet1/0 is up, line protocol is up  Hardware is DEC21140, address is 0014.a985.1a1c (bia 0014.a985.1a1c)  Internet address is 38.102.66.134/30  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,     reliability 255/255, txload 3/255, rxload 1/255 

[Code]....

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1941 - Output Drops Even Low Input Rate

Mar 18, 2012

I found increasing of total output drops and output queue drops even input rate was low and no qos apply on this interface. I plan to increase hold queue out for output queue.
 
Router 1941, 15.0(1)M4
Serial0/0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is WIC MBRD Serial

[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Audit All Input / Output Of Switch 1900

Jan 10, 2012

Sometimes our network lag and i thing there is a computer making this problem. i'd like to audit all input output of all port of a Catalyst 1900. all i manage to do is to enter to the console menu via Telnet.. once here, i try monitoring but i'm afraid to do a bad thing :

     Catalyst 1900 - Main Menu
 
     [C] Console Settings
     [S] System
     [N] Network Management
     [P] Port Configuration

[Code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1941 - Why 5 Minute Input / Output Rate 0 Bits

Nov 23, 2010

when i type "show interface" command on 1941 router,  shows below print. Why 5 minute input-output rate are 0 bits? Can it be a bug?
 
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
304015 packets input, 151607798 bytes, 0 no buffer

[Code].....

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2911 Forward Packet Based On Input Interface

Mar 25, 2013

I have a 2911 router connected to two different ISP. Is it posible to route traffic based on what interface the traffic came first?Lets say I have the deault route to use interface gig0/0(ISP1),  but a certain ip packet reach the router by interface gig0/1(ISP2). Is there any way (if possible without using source NAT) that I could route traffic back to that ip address using interface gig0/1. The source Ip addresses are not fixed, so I can not use Policy Based Routing.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-6148A - Port Flapping Due To MTU Mismatch?

Jun 4, 2012

We have some legacy Cisco 6513 switches with the backbone (16-port GBIC blade) MTU set to 1500.  It has a WS-X6148A-GE-TX blade as well, MTU set to 9K.
 
Now we have a customer sending MTU of 1546, their copper interface terminating on WS-6148A keeps flapping.  Does the flapping have something to do with the backbone set to 1500?  We cant set the backbone to 9K at this moment since it may be intrusive (reuire a reboot).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 Cannot Seem To Correct A Duplex Mismatch

May 14, 2012

I cannot seem to correct a duplex mismatch issue.I have a Cisco 2950 switch connected to a Cisco 2621 router.  I am running a per-interface Vlan.  I have two fastethernet ports and one NM-1E card installed on the router.  One fastethernet port is connected to my gateway router, the second fastethernet port is connected to my switch for one Vlan. The NM-1E Ethernet card is being used for the second Vlan which consists of nine IP cameras.  Though the cameras on the Vlan are working fine.Now, the NM-1E card is set to half-duplex.  I know that I should be using a fastethernet module like a 1FE 2W or a 2FE 2W card, (which I have,) but the router does not recogonize either one of these cards when they are installed, and yes, they have been confirmed as good cards.
 
Using Router-on-a-Stick configuration is out due to the bandwidth contention besides the fact that the router I am using it on will not handle this due to the flash being an older version.I have forced the switchport to half duplex, setting the speed to 10. I was getting fewer error messages at first, but they soon increased back to the frequency that they began with.I have set the switchport to duplex auto, but this failed to resolve the issue.Obviously, I cannot force the switchport into duplex full since the NM-1E interface is set to half duplex.  Can the NM-1E card be configured to full duplex?  I can't seem to find any documentation showing where it can be forced to full duplex mode.Could nine IP cameras just be too much for both the router and switch to handle?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Duplex Mismatch Between 2950 And 4503

Jul 8, 2012

I have a 4503 switch (in L2 mode) running 12.1 hooked into a C2950 running 12.1, using regular 4 pair Cat5e cables to connect between them. The 4503 has Gigabit port 2/1 trunking to the 2950's Fa port 0/13.
 
When I set the duplex mode to DUPLEX FULL and SPEED to SPEED 100 on both switches (for their trunk ports) the link fails, and my 4503 loses connectivity (since it gets it from the 2950).
 
Here is my config from the switches (per description):
 
The 4503:
 
interface GigabitEthernet2/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,100-140

[Code].....
 
Note, this is the only mode that works (which seems to work fine, but I get TERRIBLE throughput for anything that goes over the 2950.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stack Version Mismatch

Feb 18, 2013

I'm able to upgrade the master of a 3750 stack, but the member fails to upgrade. [code] I couldn't do rmdir flash:update unless I reload chassis... but even after reloading still cannot make the 2nd member to load with the newer IOS.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 12000 SNMP MIB OID For POS Interface Output Packet Drops

Jan 30, 2012

MIB OID and the values.also i want to know the values og output packet and output packet drops MIB OID values of POS interface on GSR router (12000).because i am getting many output packet drops on these pos interface.how do i get these values from the router.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Can Native VLan Or Duplex Mismatch

May 25, 2012

1 week ago, I got a call from a client that reported a network outage, the client told me that, 3 switch has crashed he try to console but it just hang. I ask him, did you change something? he said he didn't change anything, he just pluged a nortelswitch to the cisco switch number 9, but that switch doesn't crash like the others (3,4,8). I check the uptime, and yes the switch never been powered off..
 
   the topology look like this
 
              ____ 6500  ____
             /      /    |           
           1      2    3    4       5  ...... 9
 
 
the vlan is end to end vlan, so vlan span between all those switches. transparant. this is collapsed topology, core and distribution is the 6500 itself all of the 1-9 access switch are in the same rack, with no loopguard, and bpdu guard configured. and connected to the core using etherchannel. the problem is there is no log available to start the troubleshooting/investigation.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6506 VLAN Mismatch Error Even Though Same Config

Mar 2, 2013

I am seeing Native VLAN mismatch errors on my 6506 switches as below [code] Will it(VTP Version mismatch) be the issue for getting the VLAN Mismatch Error ?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7000 - Performance Affected By MTU Mismatch

Feb 24, 2013

Will a MTU mismatch in Nexus 7000 affect the performance ? I have a nexus 7000 at one end with MTU set to 1500 and Melanox bx5020(Storage switch) at other end with MTU set to 9600. Storage team is complaining about  performance issue related to slowness.Does MTU mismatch plays any role in slowness ??

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5000 / MTU Mismatch In Layer 2 Network?

Dec 26, 2012

I am just wondering on how mismatched MTU sizes are handled in Layer-2 networks and also inside a particular switches internal architecture.Layer 2 devices do not do fragmentation in the even of MTU mismatch. is this because Layer 2 devices do not re-write header information (like inserting destination IP and next hop MAC into the newly created frame.) i believe this is what they call per-hop behaviour? if this not the reason, then...? assuming this is the reason, let me proceed to my next question.     When we set MTU on an interface , there is no mention of direction (ingress or egress), so i take this as means in both directions. so if a jumbo frame comes in on an interface which is set to recieve jumbo frames and forwarding decision is made and the frame is scheduled to egress via an interface whose MTU is not set for Jumbo frames, will the switch drope the frame at the egress buffer? if not, this implies MTU is an ingress property(only for incoming packets). But, again if it drops the packet, then MTU shoud have been system wide or global configuration as opposed to interface level configuration (just like nexus 5000).

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 2248 / N 5596 - AA Version Mismatch

Jan 27, 2013

I have a pair of 5596 running in a vPC with Nexus 2248 connected to each N5596.  When I do the command "show fex" I get the following output on the 2nd 5596

Number    Description      State            Model            Serial    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
101         FEX101   AA Version Mismatch   N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE   SSI16390705
102         FEX102   AA Version Mismatch   N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE   SSI163704AD
122         FEX122                Online    N2K-C2232PP-10GE   SSI16370195
 
I'm running version 5.1(3)N1(1) on both of the 5K's. I have looked through all the configuration and I am not understanding why I am getting this error.  I have tried to look it up on [URL], but not having a ton of luck. 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5505 - Packet Tracer Output - Access Denied

Mar 16, 2013

I am trying to troubleshoot a problem where in one of my remote site is not able to access some networks at HQ over Site to SIte VPN ( asa 5505 at Remote and 5520 at HQ). I ran packet tracer and HQ ASA looks clean as everything came out as ALLOW. Remote site ASA packet tracer give me DROP out at Phase 9 (VPN). I am not very sure what to look in ASA for resolution now. Is it an access list that is blocking the traffice or VPN setup.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7200 - Egress Netflow V9 And Output Packet Marking Order

Aug 17, 2011

when using egress netflow (v9) and output marking.
 
The topologie : Server <-----> R1 1>-----<1 R2 2>----<2 R3
 
R2 is a 7200 with c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-15.T11.bin What I'm doing :- R2 forwards ping packets from Server to R3. When they arrive on R2, icmp packets are marked with CS3

- I change the DSCP to CS4 on R2 before forwarding packet to R3. I'm using for that an output service-policy on the R2-2 interface like this : interface ATM2/0.36 point-to-point

ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress

[Code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Duplex Mismatch Between 2960 (LANBase Image) And 6506

Jan 21, 2010

I have the following issue; I am getting a duplex mismatch between a Cisco 2960 TT-L Switch running IOS 12.2(35) LAN Base Image (Gig0/1) and a Cisco 6506 Switch running IOS 12.2(33)SXH Adv IP Services (Gig2/19).
 
I have tried several combinations of the duplex/speed settings on both sides but the only that works is setting duplex/speed AUTO on the Cisco 2960 which ends up autonegotiating to HALF duplex and 100Mbps.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack C3750G And C3750X - Major Version Mismatch

Jun 11, 2013

I'm trying to stack 3750G & 3750X. As discussed in previous threads I am aware of that the version need to match.
 
Here the switch details:
 
Switch Ports Model              SW Version                SW Image
------ ----- --------------             ----------
* 1 24    WS-C3750G-24T      12.2(55)SE7             C3750-IPBASEK9-M
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* 1 54      WS-C3750X-48      12.2(55)SE7           C3750E-IPBASEK9-M
 
I have changed the universal IOS on the 3750X to IP base..but they still wont come up as a stack. On the 3750X I don't see any log entry, on 3750G (major version mismatch).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Major Version Mismatch On Identical Switches

Apr 3, 2012

We have bought four identical 3750X switches with identical SW-images: 12.2(55)SE3          C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
 
We initially connected two switches, this resulted in forming a stack.With the other two switches we wanted to do the same thing. However, we received the following message:
 
%STACKMGR-5-MAJOR_VERSION_MISMATCH: Major Version Mismatch (Local 1 - Received 6) with neighbor-1
 
Both switches will not see each other and the output of show switch stack-ports shows only one switch and both stack ports as being Down.
 
I did some digging using the show platform stack-manager all command to find out that three of the 3750X's have the stack version number 1.45 and one has 6.45. This would obviously indicate the reason behind the mismatch, but the SW-versions on all new switches are identical!
 
Checking the CISCO site explains that mismatching of Major version is critical:
 
Major Version Number Incompatibility Among Switches

Switches with different major Cisco IOS software versions usually have different stack protocol versions. Switches with different major version numbers are incompatible and cannot exist in the same switch stack.
 
That's all I could find. Nothing about changing the major version number, so all I can suspect is that IOS version needs to be the same.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750-E - High CPU Due To ARP Input

Feb 4, 2013

my 3750-E Core Stack is connected to the Provider Router and is the DG for the internal LAN. I saw that the CPU is very high also in the night, but I found not the problem. I use an SVI to connect the provider due to HA reasons. I sniffered the network but saw no ecessive broadcaststorms. There was a PBR configured but I deleted it wihtout any success..
 
switch Version
15.0(1)SE1 
10#sh proc cpu so

[Code]......

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved