Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 Stackable Switches Models
Jun 23, 2012I want to be sure for this before ordering: is the Enterprise-class stackable switches "WS-C3750X-48T-S" model can be stackable with "WS-C3750G-48TS" model.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches Etherchannel To Core Switches
Nov 18, 2011If I have two stackable switches one switch uplinks to one 6509 core switch and the other connection uplinks to another 6509 core switch, and also the other stackable switch does not connect to the core switches. Because I am using hsrp and also we are not using vss then one uplink to the core is not in used only ones is so then how does creating an etherchannel between does two uplinks to both core switches benefit me in anyway such as more bandwith and using both uplinks at the same time or I'm I wrong?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches
Nov 14, 2011If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 3570 Switches To Nexus 2232 To Migrate Server Subnets
Nov 17, 2011I am in the process of migrating our existing server farm subnets to our new Nexus server farm and I discovered something I wasn’t expecting. My intention is to migrate our existing legacy server farm which is comprised of for paired 3750 switches off of our core 6509s and onto the Nexus and connect them to the 2232s via multi gig port-channel connections, two port channels per switch stack.
NOTE this is expected to be a temporary move as next year we intend to install additional N2Ks and move servers over to these directly. But to minimize the outage/downtime it will be better to move the subnets and switchs all at once.
These connections would be grouped 1 gig connections as port channels, one from each switch into one of the two 2232s.
Problem I discovered is Cisco does not intend to have switches connected to the Nexus and it immediately disables the ports when they see BPDUs.
I found a config that does work and it does fail over from one port-channel connection to the other but with the limitation that when the original port channel comes back online it does not fail back over to the original one, an acceptable situation for us. But I am wondering if Cisco would support this design if we did experience issues down the road.
The only issue I really see is to get it to work the config is different on the two N5Ks, see the pert config below for the connections. Both are running the same OS
augs1-ba-ar17# sh ver
Cisco Nexus Operating System (NX-OS) Software
TAC support: [URL]
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Are Non-S 2960 Switches Stackable
Jul 5, 2012Are the non-S series 2960 switches stackable or are they only able to be uplinked?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches Uplink
Nov 14, 2011If I have two stackable switches one that connects to the 6509 core switch and the other switch does not, do I have to uplink the switch to the other switch so that switch has route to the core switch or because the switches are daisy chain there is not need to cable one switch to to the other switch connected to core switch?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 3750 Stackable Switches
Nov 13, 2011If I have two switches in a stack can both stack able switches be connected to a core switch through gbics or just only one switch can be connected to the core and the other switch connects to the other stack able switch through an Ethernet port which uses as a gateway to the core switch?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X / IP Base And IP Services Stackable Switches?
Aug 16, 2012I'm building a wired closet to aggregate user's connections, Im planning to have 5x 3750X stacked switches and there is a need to run EIGRP, I'm thinking to order one switch with IP service image while the rest will run IP base image, is it workable scenario and what are the drawbacks of such combination of images ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Stackable Switches Instead Of One 4500 Series?
Dec 11, 2011I have a design for my infrastructure and i'm thinking to choose 4 or 5, or more, 2960 series in a stack mode instead of one 4500 series?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Feature Request For 3750s And Other Stackable Switches?
May 6, 2013can you stack a 3750 switch over fiber.....the answer is no, but the virtual switching supervisor 720-10G for the 6500 can create one virtual switch using two 6500s...
how can we get cisco to come up with a way for access switches to be stacked over fiber similar to above supervisor? i know of few of my site that would benefit from this...maybe they can come up with a vss appliance, similar to a media converter, to convert stackwise over fiber...then of course, you would need the same appliance on the other end....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X Building IP Base And Services Stackable Switches
Jul 30, 2011I'm building a wired closet to aggregate user's connections, Im planning to have 5x 3750X stacked switches and there is a need to run EIGRP, I'm thinking to order one switch with IP service image while the rest will run IP base image, is it workable scenario and what are the drawbacks of such combination of images ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 Input And Output Packet / Sec Mismatch?
Jun 7, 2012I have a video feed coming into my 3570. It comes in at 5 minute input rate 18777000 bits/sec, 1695 packets/sec. However, the uplink to the router is much different, 5 minute output rate 130000 bits/sec, 28 packets/sec. I am in a lab and about ready to go into testing phase for a project when we discovered this problem, as this video feed is not veiwable on the other end.
Below is the config and capture from the switch.
BLOSSw1#sh int g1/0/6GigabitEthernet1/0/6 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is a44c.112f.3506 (bia a44c.112f.3506) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 4/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive not set Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 15:16:25 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3570 Express Setup Webpage Not Go Away
Oct 21, 2009i've got a stack of 3750's configured, everything is working fine, but the web interface for the stack will only present the web based express configuration page. I can't get it to go away. what needs to be done to clear whatever flag or register that causes this behavior. the cli is fine, it's not trying to force epxress setup there, only in the web interface. will reloading the software image fix this?
View 16 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3570 / Multi-process OSPF Redistribution And Failover?
Feb 7, 2013I have two ospf processes running on a single 3570 edge router that has a dedicated transport circuit back to our network core. We are adding an additional "transport" only circuit into a new location that is also apart of the second ospf process backbone which will connect back to our core. There will also be a 3750 for this new circuit termination. Currently we are only redistributing ospf process 2 into ospf process 1 (1 = core backbone).
#router ospf 1
#redistribute ospf 2 subnet
We have no need to have ospf process 1 redistributed into the process 2 tables. That being said, when we add an additional transport ciruit, or path back to our core backbone, will this configuration present any issues with the redistribution process and failover.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4948 Supported Stackable?
May 23, 2012MAC Support: 16000
Backplane: 18Gbps
Forward: 28Gbps
VLAN's: 4000 (q-in-q support)
Jumbo Frame Supported
Supported 8000 static routing
!Supporting Stack!
Cisco 4948 supporting stackable? which product do you recommend to these criteria?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4900M Switch Stackable
Feb 2, 2012Would like to know if the Cisco Catalyst 4900M Switches are stackable?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG500-28 Stackable Switches And NIC Teaming
Apr 17, 2012Am looking into using stacking and NIC teaming to create redunancy for user access to servers. What I am thinking is getting 2 SG500-28 switchs and configuring them in a stack that appears as one logical switch. Now on the servers I would configure 2 NICs to be a team so they appear as 1 logical interface, perferably in an active/active configuration using LACP. In this NIC team take 1 team member to switch A and the other to switch B, so each team member is on seperate switches.
Givent the scenario:
1) Will that work with the 500 series switchs? Reason for the switches is their price point is perfect for my client.
2) Besides the stack link will there also need to be a LAG between the switches or does the stack link do data traffic also?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Decipher Differences Between Two Models Of 1921?
Mar 7, 2013I am trying to decipher the differences between the two models of the 1921 router. One has an IP Base IOS and the other has a Security IOS. I have an ASA so I don't think I need all the Security IOS bells and whistles on an internal router. Although, does the IP Base IOS allow for trunking and sub interfaces? I definitely need that and on CDW's website it says that the 1921-Sec/K9 w/ Security IOS includes 802.1Q and that spec is not listed on the 1921/K9 IP Base IOS model.
View 3 Replies View RelatedDifferences Between Two Models Of 3850 Switches?
Mar 4, 2013We are looking at doing some switch replacement. These switches will be in for ~7 years.We need POE for a VOIP phone system, and 10gb uplinks back to the core. We want to have the ability to go POE+ in the future.
We were quoted from our vendor for:WS-C3850-48P-S with 2x715w Power supplies. It looks like the data sheet says that to get POE+ you need 2x1100w or 1x1100w & 1x715w. Do we need to step up to the WS-C3850-48PF-S?
Implement Based On Newer Models Of Cisco Switches
Mar 13, 2013(eth ports routing only) and a layer 2 switch into a cluster of two layer 3 switch clustered. I have looked at Cisco 3550 EMIs with HSRP but I would like to implement based on newer models of Cisco switches.
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Pair Of N7K Distribution Switches Connected To A Pair Of Aggregation Switches
Mar 11, 2012We have a pair of N7K distribution switches connected to a pair of N7K Aggregation switches.We run vPC on both pairs of n7k's.
-n7k-d1 has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC1)
-n7k-d2 also has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC2)
My problem is that Spanning-Tree is blocking PC2 and all traffic from n7k-d2 is traversing the Peer-Link before reaching the Aggregation layer. Is this the best design for connecting two pairs of n7k's with vPC or if a better design would be to connect all 4 links into the same Port-Channel and vPC?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2906 So Much Switching Capacity In Switches
Sep 13, 2012Why Cisco implements so much switching capacity in their switches Obviously,16 Gbps of permutation performance is too much for the 8,8 Gbits (24*200+2*2000) needed by ports so why they put so many bandwidth?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring Intervlan Routing Between 2801 And HP Switches?
Aug 5, 2012I'm trying to configure intervlan routing between a cisco 2801 router and HP/Amer switches. Using int fa0/1 and subinterfaces I was sure I had it configured correctly, but I cannot ping the default gateways when I place a host in a particular vlan. Below is what I have configured.
HP switch - port 9 connects to fa0/1 on 2801
ip default-gateway 10.1.100.1
trunk 9 Trk1 trunk
trunk 10 Trk2 trunk - to another switch
[code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: InterVlan Routing With 3750 And 2960 Switches?
Nov 21, 2012I am using a 3750 as a default gateway for multiple Vlans on a few 2960 switches. The trunk lines are configured and working and I have assigned ip addresses to each of the Vlan interfaces on the 3750. My issue is that I can only ping the ip address on the Vlan interface of the 3750 if I have a working computer plugged directly into the Vlan on the 3750. I only have 3 vlans on the 3750 that have hosts directly connected (vlans 2, 10 and 40) the other vlans ( 20 and 70) don't have any clients plugged into them on the 3750 but the hosts reside on 2 different 2960s that connect via trunk ports. How do I keep the vlan interface on the 3750 switch pingable when I don't have hosts directly connected in that vlan on the 3750? (yes, I have enabled ip routing on the 3750)
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Based Routing With 3750 Switches
Oct 17, 2011I have a simple design with 3750. I configured a route-map which define a next hop. I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR? I think of CEF .
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Based Routing And 3750 Switches?
Sep 5, 2012I have a simple design with 3750.I configured a route-map which define a next hop.I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR?
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco Application :: ACE 4710 And HA On Stackable 3750
Nov 8, 2011I am running 4.2.1a and my topology is one subnet only so using one-arm thereby management svi, VIP, ft interface, and host server are all on same subnet.
With above scenario, is the ACE 4710 HA support on 3750 stack?
On 3750, I use port channel 10. Likwise channel 10 is config on both ACE and HA WILL NOT WORK
On 3750, I then use port channel 10 and 11. Thereby, channel 10 is on primary ACE and channel 11 on standby ACE and it works but with following observation:
- standby ACE is configured channel 11 and it syncs up but replace 11 with channel 10 then shutdown 10 and all interface has "channel-mode 11" removed. I have to put "channel-mode 10" on each interface instead of 11 and then unshut the "inter port-channel 10" - then add "ft-port vlan xxx" to get it to work
- standby ACE has "switch/admin" default hostname but I expect after sync that it would have the hostname I defined "ACE-COLO/Admin" instead
Looking for other discrepency as this is my lab environment before I implement into production as to decrease downtime.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 - IP Routing In L3 Capable Switches?
Apr 11, 2012Is L3 ip routing on by default in 3550s? If so is the "ip routing" command visible in the config file? If no - I assume that one would enable L3 routing with that config command.In general terms are there any IOS devices where ip routing is enabled and one would not see the "ip routing" command in config. I.E. if that command is not visible in the config could you assume there is no L3 capablity in that device?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Connecting Switches Together With IP Routing
Aug 31, 2012CiscoSwitch1(4506) has 3 VLANs(12,13,14) and Switch2(4948) has 3 different VLANs(22,23,24) and IP routing has been enabled in both switches with SVI interfaces for each vlan. intervlan routing is works fine.Now there is a requirement to connect these switches together. Vlan 12 on the Cisco switch 4506 has to be made available from vlan 22 from Switch2(4948). basically Vlan 12 is having a multicast source (225.0.0.0 & 226.0.0.0) which should be accessabile from vlan 22 of cisco switch 4948.I got 2 ideas
1) Create a trunk between these switches and configure L2 vlan(12) in cisco 4948...i know theoritically it should work but what my concern is Ip routing enabled in both switches will it create any issues? is it a gud solution to this requirement?
2) Create a separate IP network on the ports connecting to both switches and set up routes to the networks.ex- console(config)#ip route 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.1.
Cisco :: What Are Equivalent Models From Netgear / Dlink And HP
Mar 10, 2013I am intetested in Cisco 2960 ttl models, but need to justify my choice over other brands.What are the equivalent models from netgear, Dlink and HP.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Second LAN Card On Models 1841 / 1941
Dec 18, 2011When two Routers Models 1941 (Main Router) and 1841 work connected with HSRP, and a second LAN card is added to each one of them If i connect the GE 0/1 and Fe 0/1 of each of one of them To FireWall1 (in cluster with FireWall2) AND i connect the second LAN (Added) of each one To FireWall2 (in cluster with FireWall1) If FireWall1 will failure , How can Router 1941 know, to move traffic from GE 0/1 to the second LAN card connected to FireWall2 (which is in charge now, by cluster definition)
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: Are There Multiple Models Of AP541N
Nov 6, 2011We are considering order the AP541N for our network. A few questions...
1). Are there multiple models of the AP541N? or just one cisco part number?
2). I am assuming the basic antenna comes with it. If this is something that I need to buy seperate.
3). Are there part numbers for the POE injector? Need to know part numbers on the AP541N and the poe injectors?
4). We would buy a couple of these and run them in cluster mode. My understanding is that I won't need a controller. Do I need to buy a certain model to use the clustering or is that available on all the AP541N?
5). Can I have this talk to active directory to authenticate users? Is that tough to do? Do I need install some kind of agent on a domain controller? I have configured the ASA to use Active Directory for authentications. Should it be any more difficult that that?
I have setup a few other Cisco APs before and am generally familair with wireless. But, I am not a "wireless expert" and don't have any experience with this particular product.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: L3 Routing On 3750 Switches?
Jan 21, 2013I have a small campus network using 3750 stackable switches and a 3725 router (see diagram below). Currently the 3725 router is handling inter-vlan routing for the campus and it looks like it's not able to handle the amount of traffic we're pushing. The router CPU sometimes hits above 90% due traffic load. What I would like to accomplish is move L3 process over to the 3750 MDF stack and the IDF1 stack. I am thinking creating SVI's on both MDF stack and IDF1 stack, run HSRP between the two stacks and may be do load balance traffic between the two stack as well.
View 8 Replies View Related