During our recent VA we were told that the below vulnerabilities are exist in the ACS SSL/TLS Protocol Initialization Vector Implementation Information Disclosure Vulnerability on port 443
SSL Weak Cipher Suites Supported on port 2030
SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported on port 2030
Using LMS 3.2, I've started learning how to use the compliance templates.is there a regex to ignore case? For instance, if I have the line:
clock timezone est -5 in some configs, and
clock timezone EST -5 in others
is there a way to tell the template that upper case and lower case are acceptable matches?
I am installing a new 5520 with IPS for a client, and they were asking about the PCI compliance of the SSL(WebVPN) being self signed. I am not sure what document to find this information from under the PCI DSS. There was also mention about dual authentication being needed, but without seeing the actual requirements, I am just guessing at it.
What is required for making SSL PCI compliant.
I want to add the command "no logging event link-status" to all switchport mode access ports EXCEPT for the ones with the following switchport access vlans: 4022,4032,4042,4052,4072 & 4082. How do I create a compliance template to do this? LMS 3.2, RME 4.3.1
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm keep failing my pci compliance test I have a wrvs4400n and I keep getting "firewall udp packet source port 53 ruleset bypass" i've blocked port 53 but keep getting rejected. How to set the router?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to create a very basic template in compliance manager that checks for interfaces that aren't members of specific VLANs. VLAN 10 being one of them. I want to match interfaces assigned to VLAN 20. According to the documentation I have read, the following range statement should work because 10 falls between 3 and 19:
Submode: interface [#.*Ethernet.*#]
- switchport access vlan [#[3-19]#]
With the preceeding statement, however, interfaces assigned to both VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 are matching the rule. With this specific rule (not a range), only interfaces w/VLAN 20 are processed by the template, which is expected. We actually have numerous VLANs that we want to exclude/include. I only mentioned VLANs 10 and 20 for brevity.
working with a trial version of Cisco Prime 1.2. I am looking for a Configuration Compliance tool. I used it in Cisco Works LMS - but I dont see a way to do the same thing with Cisco Prime.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having a hard time getting Compliance Manager to accept a "banner login" command I'm attempting to use on 6500 IOS switches. I've edited the template, tried cut-&-paste, looked for the archive file on the server to directly modify it (without success), among other things. I have this feature functioning correctly on CatOS switches, but can't seem to get it properly set on IOS switches. What's the limit, as far as the template is concerned, on the number of characters with this type of command? Where are the archive configs located on the server; in the "shadow" directory?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a customer asking if Cisco supporst CISPR11 - Class B. All Cisco switches appear to support CISPR11 - Class A only. What is the difference? Is Class B supported?
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe use SecurityMetrics as our vendor for PCI compliance scanning. Of all our servers, only the video server fails their scan, and this is their result: "This scan is inconclusive. Though your server had open ports, we were unable to connect to any of them successfully. There is a high probability that some type of firewall or scan-detection software is blocking us from accurately scanning your server. Please configure any firewall or software that would interfere with our scans to allow all traffic from SecurityMetrics" Our streaming video server is our only public-facing server that has port tcp/udp 1755 open (for the mms protocol). All our other servers behind this firewall pass the test, but they only have standard email and http ports open. I am assuming that their scan of port 1755 triggers some sort of threat detection on the ASA. (I have "Basic Threat Detection" enabled only.)
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am currently trying to use LMS 3.2 Compliance management to verify and alter our access port configurations for 802.1x. Below is our current configuration
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get our internal network PCI compliant and when I run a network scan from securitymetrics.com I receive the following message about our RV082 router.
Synopsis : The remote service supports the use of weak SSL ciphers. Description : The remote host supports the use of SSL ciphers that offer either weak encryption or no encryption at all. See also :[URL]: Reconfigure the affected application if possible to avoid use of weak ciphers. Risk Factor: Medium / CVSS Base Score : 5.0
I have been googling many different search terms for ssl ciphers, rv082, and pci compliance but didn't see any solutions to this. Any experience with ssl ciphers and how to use more secure ciphers? I just performed a firmware upgrade to 1.3.98-tm in hopes that it would fix this issue.
how to check compliance for only one access list in cisco works.
Example:
I want to run a compliance template that only check access-list 13 to make sure it has the following and nothing else:
access-list 13 permit 1.1.1.1
access-list 13 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.127
If something else is listed, then I'll deploy the template and it will remove any other entry besided the two above.
I have tried a Global config compliance on + access-list 13 permit 1.1.1.1 and it comes back and says it's not compliant and wants to remove everything else, which is every other access list. I have tried submodes thinking that it could check under ip access-list standard 13, but that didn't work either.
confirm whether the Catalyst 3550 with IOS Rel. 12.2(44)SE is compliant with POE IEEE 802.3af? I see some conflicting informaiton on Cisco's web site. Before Release 12.1(22)EA2, Catalyst 3550 PoE-capable switches (without intelligent power management support) caused high-power powered devices that supported intelligent power management to operate in low-power mode. Devices in low-power mode are not fully functional.
IEEE 802.3af—The major features of this standard are powered-device discovery, power administration, disconnect detection, and optional powered-device power classification. For more information, see the standard.
I'm trying to turn off SSH version 1 & 2 to pass PCI compliance. Problem is, I cannot touch the VPN link between the two offices. I'm afraid the PKI certificate used for the VPN will be deleted if i zeroize the RSA key which seems to be the only way to stop the router responding on port 22.
Here is the stuff from the running config related to the crypto map:
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
[ code].....
I'm only CCNA so I'm not even sure if the certificate or RSA key is being used for the VPN link, but I can't tell from the running config that zeroizing it would be a good idea and not break the VPN. I'm open to other ways of disabling SSH, as we are able to just connect using a console cable. But it looks like denying port 22 with an access-list doesn't even stop the router from responding to the port.
Is the Aironet 1400 bridge FIPS 140-2 compliance? Based on the Release 12.3(8)JA, the Cisco IOS software release 12.3(8)JA is undergoing FIPS 140-2 Level 2 validation. Does it mean it is FIPS 140-2 compliance with this software level to run on Aironet 1400 bridges? [URL]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to test such 802.1x wired environment:windows xp sp3 as supplicant windows NPS as radius server 2960 as authenticator latest anyconnect (3.1.01065) + nam and standalone profile editor.I have a question: What is the difference between protected identity pattern and unprotected identity pattern (set in nam profile editor)? As I understand documentation PEAP-MSCHAPv2 is a tunneled method and it uses un- protected identity pattern to protect user's identity during phase 0. But if I use any fake identity here (anonymous, anonymous@[domain], etc) access is rejected (Access-Reject in switch debugs). I have to use exacly the same pattern in unprotected identity pattern as in protected identity pattern ([username] or [username]@[domain]) to gain access, regardless of authenticaton mode (same in machine only, user only authentication).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a new Cisco Secure ACS 5.2 on a VM. We want to use it to for administrative access to our Cisco equipment with TACACS+. I am trying to map user permissions to different groups of devices based on active directory group membership, however it is not working.
I am using an LDAP (configured for secure authentication) external identity store. On the directory organization tab, I have confirmed the accuracy of the subject and group search base and the test configuration button shows that it's finding > 100 users and >100 groups.
On the directory groups page I have entered the groups according to the required format. cn=groupname1,ou=groups,dc=abc,dc=com
I have a rule based result selection under group mapping. I have two rules in the format below.
Conditon
LDAP:Externalgroups groupname1
Result
Identitygroup1
I have the default group set to a identity group named other. My problem is, no matter what user attempts to authenticate, the Default rule is applied, and the user is put into the other identity group.This occurs when I log on as a groupname1 user, groupname2 user, or as user that is not a member of either of those groups. LDAP authentication works and the user is able to logon to the device.
We are using ACS 5.2 and we are trying to create a Microsoft Active Directory (AD) Identity Store. We have a user to be used in the Active Directory creation General page and we would like to know how the test communication / ACS to AD communication takes place.
Our user is a predefined user in AD and has admin rights, but the password expires every 60 days. Will this affect the communication between AD and ACS 5.2 at everytime the entered user's password expires?
I'm currently looking for a solution in order to restrict the modification of the host internal identity store (add or delete MAC host) per group. The default administrator roles does not include "per group restriction". Under the ACS I defined one group per department? My objective it to allow each department to access their ACS MAC database to add or delete MAC addresses as required.
How to restrict internal identity store per group?Do I need to create new roles? and how?I was not able to get an answer from the ACS ADMIN manual.
I have a new ACS 5.3 configure and a ASA5550 to authenticate VPN users using a remote LDAP server. Once I try to authenticate the users with the ACS it gives me the error message "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)."
I checked out the documentation and have already configure the Identity store sequences to redirect everything to the LDAP server, I also did the Bind test and it says that is ok, but I still have the same problem.
I validated the Access Policies Menu, and tried to create a new Service Selection Rules, but whet I get to the option of modifying the Identity option I get the error: "This System Failure occurred: {0}. Your changes have not been saved.Click OK to return to the list page. " and I'm not able to modify the identity, not in this new option I created, nor in the ones already created in the ACS.
I have two ACS v 5.2 (primary and secundary) and some users are in the internal stor and the others are in the AD.The local site topology is like this:
PC - AP - WLC - ACS - AD
Authentication method is PEAP(EAP-MSCHAPv2) and all user have the certificate company installed. The OS in the client users is Windows 7.Users was working fine but some users reports intranet disconnections. I see in the ACS log many "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)." and "24415 User authentication against Active Directory failed since user's account is locked out" alarms.I believed it was because user wasn´t in the AD data base, but some times the same user is authenticated successfull and other i see the "22056...." or "24415...." alarms.
I switched the role for ACS primary to works as secundary and we see the same alarms.
I have ACS 5.2 running as a VM. I'm AD, then local authentication successfully for device access, but I want to define ACS user groups to restrict login. I don;t see any way to do this. If I use AD groups, they don;t show up as selection options on the policy screens, just the ACS locallyy defined groups.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a ACS 4.3.2 installed with users authenticating against an Active Directory database. The AD database not only authenticate the users but also assigns the group that is used to select IP address pool.Now the requirements require to use token authentication with SafeNet. This authentication uses the same username but the password is composed of the original password + OTP.The problem is that the SafeNet server doesn't return the group membership.I've read about the Identity Store Sequence in ACS 5.x and I think I could use it in the following sequence:! configure an Authentication Sequence using the SafeNet token server (this works with ACS 4.x)I configure an Attribute Retrieval Sequence against the AD database. This would use the username only, no password and would retrieve the group membership.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for Cisco ISE v1.1 to use the following licensing feature. url...Endpoint is dynamically profiled by Cisco ISE and assigned dynamically or statically to an endpoint identity group. Cisco ISE authorization rules do not use this endpoint identity group.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am currently running cisco ACS 5.1.0.44 and use active directory as the main authentication identity store to allow network administrators to have access to network devices in my organization .As per the established security policies in my organization , the ACS has to disable any account after 3 failed login attempts to any network devices .i have gone through all the settings oN the acs but couldn't find where or how it is done .
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have installed ACS 5.4 and we are looking to authenticate our Anyconnect users with ACS via Active Directory. I think I have the correct commands in our ASA ( we had ACS 4 and authenticated our anyconnect users ).
I also have configured ACS to use Active Directory and installed the server side cert in ACS. I'm just uncertain how to program ACS to use the security group that I have setup in Active Directory.
I have an ACS 5.3 cluster, that is configured to use AD. There are a few wireless devices, and monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts. I would like to configure ACS to first check AD for the user authentication, and if that fails to roll over to the local (Internal Users) identity source where I can define these user accounts.
It seems that when the authentication hits the initial Identity Policy rule, it never moves onto the next one if the first fails.
Attached are screen shots that show how i'm configured for the test, i have a local user defined and I'm trying to log into the firewalls.
- Identity Definition : Screen shot of the main ACS definition for the rule i'm testing that's not working
- Identity Rule 1 : The configuration of rule 1 that if it fails i need it to move onto rule 2.
- Log Output : Screen shot for one of the failed attempts from the ACS View Log server.
Reason I need to configure it this way is:
- Wireless users authenticate to wireless using AD user accounts. Some hand held scanners do not support that and will need to authenticate using the MAC address.
- Authentication to Network devices for managment uses AD accounts. We have some monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts, and will need to be able to log into Network devices to issue some commands (Examples: Cisco Prime LMS and NCS, Infoblox NetMRI).
how profiling works exactly ?How intelligent is the profiling engine, meaning: Will it discover that one device has more than one different MACs and will merge the entries in the database ??
Example:This is in fact the same device, there is only one WLC-2500 in the network ....If it can discover that, what needs to be configured on the ISE to do that ?
I have setup an Identity Firewall on a ASA version 5.6 on a DMZ interface.I have installed the ADAgent on a domain member Win2008 and configured as follows: [code]
where ashdew is a domain user and ACL 122(only one line) is applied on the dmz interface and NAT is properly configured.The ADagent has been properly tested and ASA can register to it.The ASA can connect to AD DC controller and query user database.I have placed a laptop ip 172.17.h.x on the DMZ and can ping the DMZ interface.
The laptop cannot authenticate on the domain and the asa does not seem to retrieve the user identity.Do I need to add extra rules in the access-list 122 to permit trafic to DC?Can I check on the AD Agent if it can retrieve the user to ip mapping ?
I understand that Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 supports the integration with existing external identity repositories such as Windows Active Directory and LDAP servers. In fact, in my environment, my ACS 5.3 is now integrated with AD and RSA.My question here is can Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 integrate with "multiple" WIndows AD, LDAP, RSA Server etc.? if yes, is there a Cisco document stating this? The keyword here is multipple.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to setup PEAP authentication for wireless users but I got stuck at place where I have single ssid and users are store in different identity stores like some will be using their active directory and some are locally created users on ACS. I created separate service for wireless authentication and under that I am unable to create rule to differentiate them with identity stores. any idea how to achieve this.
I tried creating identity selection based on role but it does not work as for protocol like radius.peap,ms-chap ACS does not look for another identity store once user not find in an identity stores.
After clicking on below path we are not getting option as should be reflected. Below is the snapshots for the issues.
Access Policies > Access Services > Default Device Admin > Identity