I've ISE v1.1.2.145 and Cat 6500 IOS ADVENTERPRISEK9-M, Version 15.0(1)SY2
I'm trying to add 6500 in the trustsec group with ISE and followed the trustsec 2.1 documentation. After configuring it keeps on giving me error in the ISE logs below with the subject #CTSREQUEST#
11302 Received Secure RADIUS request without a cts-pac-opaque cisco-av-pair attribute
Below are the steps:
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11017 RADIUS created a new session
15012 Selected Access Service - NDAC_SGT_Service
11302 Received Secure RADIUS request without a cts-pac-opaque cisco-av-pair attribute
Also after i configure cts credentials and radius-server pac command in 6500, it starts giving me log messages that radius is down and the next moment it comes up again. It is continously doing that.
aaa new-model aaa authentication login default group radius local aaa authorization exec default group radius local aaa session-id common ip radius source-interface Vlan31 vrf LEGACY [Code] .....
I´ve implemented 2 Cisco ISE v1.1 in HA to run MAB and 802.x Authentication / Authorization. Using Local ISE DB and Active Directory as an External Identity Source for wireless and wired users and devices. This was working fine 2 weeks ago after finishing installation.
My NAD devices are a Core SW 6500 for wired users (there are no access SW, just the Core for the whole network, its a small office) and a WLC 2405 for Wireless Users.[code].....
Today I have configured my ACS 5.2-0.26.4 to synchronize with NTP server which is implemented in Cisco 6500, but it don´t become to work. The switch Core is configuared in HSRP, for that reason in the ACS server I defined the IP virtual of the Core like ntp server, maybe the ACS don´t work with IP virtual of the switch Core. Finally I wanto to kown if is posible to synchronize this versión of the ACS withc cisco 6500. I had integrated this ACS versión with cisco 2800.. maybe the ACS could integrate with same special models.
I have Configured a WLAN with WiSM2 Controller installed on a 6500 series, Aironet 3600series APs and ACS 5.3 for userauthentication. The ACS is connected to Active directory so users are authenticating using the AD (802.1x is used and not a pre-shared key) on SSID A. I have created a separate SSID B for guest users. I have put restrictions on this SSID. Guest users are also created on the same AD where internal users are created. How can I force Guest users to connect to SSID B and not be able to connect to SSID A? Currently they can connect to both.
I have 6500 VSS Core Switch configured as NTP Server .I have installed ACS 5.2 vmware and sucessfuly integrated with the AD . I have noticed in some case, i lose connectivity between ACS and AD and when i say test connection , it shows clock skew error . Reboot of ACS sometimes solves the issue, else it comes up automatically after some hours . In core switch , i have configured time as PST +4 and in ACS it is configured as PST +4 , which automatically goes to GST.
I have a need to allow a small group of users temporary level-15 access to several 6500 switches (running 12.2-33 SXJ2 code), but do not want to provide them with the enable secret password which is used on the rest of the network (over 1200 devices). I tried to eliminate AAA using the "no aaa new-model" command, but was told I could not remove aaa while there were active sessions, and "login local" no longer appeared as an option for vty lines. So, I created a local user database called "support" which I used to replace the "group" entry in the authentication and authorization sections of our AAA config and for login on vty 0 4. [The username is given a privilege level of 15 along with an individual password for authentication. (ex. user name jsmith privilege 15 password 0 xxxxx)] I modified our AAA configuration to support local login, but was unable to establish "enable mode" (i.e. # prompt) with any account. I can login locally, but only to a normal "user mode" (i.e. > prompt).Here is the current, unmodified and sanitized config for our AAA and line vty 0 4 sections. [code]
I'm trying to test such 802.1x wired environment:windows xp sp3 as supplicant windows NPS as radius server 2960 as authenticator latest anyconnect (3.1.01065) + nam and standalone profile editor.I have a question: What is the difference between protected identity pattern and unprotected identity pattern (set in nam profile editor)? As I understand documentation PEAP-MSCHAPv2 is a tunneled method and it uses un- protected identity pattern to protect user's identity during phase 0. But if I use any fake identity here (anonymous, anonymous@[domain], etc) access is rejected (Access-Reject in switch debugs). I have to use exacly the same pattern in unprotected identity pattern as in protected identity pattern ([username] or [username]@[domain]) to gain access, regardless of authenticaton mode (same in machine only, user only authentication).
I have a new Cisco Secure ACS 5.2 on a VM. We want to use it to for administrative access to our Cisco equipment with TACACS+. I am trying to map user permissions to different groups of devices based on active directory group membership, however it is not working.
I am using an LDAP (configured for secure authentication) external identity store. On the directory organization tab, I have confirmed the accuracy of the subject and group search base and the test configuration button shows that it's finding > 100 users and >100 groups.
On the directory groups page I have entered the groups according to the required format. cn=groupname1,ou=groups,dc=abc,dc=com
I have a rule based result selection under group mapping. I have two rules in the format below.
Conditon LDAP:Externalgroups groupname1 Result Identitygroup1
I have the default group set to a identity group named other. My problem is, no matter what user attempts to authenticate, the Default rule is applied, and the user is put into the other identity group.This occurs when I log on as a groupname1 user, groupname2 user, or as user that is not a member of either of those groups. LDAP authentication works and the user is able to logon to the device.
We are using ACS 5.2 and we are trying to create a Microsoft Active Directory (AD) Identity Store. We have a user to be used in the Active Directory creation General page and we would like to know how the test communication / ACS to AD communication takes place.
Our user is a predefined user in AD and has admin rights, but the password expires every 60 days. Will this affect the communication between AD and ACS 5.2 at everytime the entered user's password expires?
I'm currently looking for a solution in order to restrict the modification of the host internal identity store (add or delete MAC host) per group. The default administrator roles does not include "per group restriction". Under the ACS I defined one group per department? My objective it to allow each department to access their ACS MAC database to add or delete MAC addresses as required.
How to restrict internal identity store per group?Do I need to create new roles? and how?I was not able to get an answer from the ACS ADMIN manual.
I have a new ACS 5.3 configure and a ASA5550 to authenticate VPN users using a remote LDAP server. Once I try to authenticate the users with the ACS it gives me the error message "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)."
I checked out the documentation and have already configure the Identity store sequences to redirect everything to the LDAP server, I also did the Bind test and it says that is ok, but I still have the same problem.
I validated the Access Policies Menu, and tried to create a new Service Selection Rules, but whet I get to the option of modifying the Identity option I get the error: "This System Failure occurred: {0}. Your changes have not been saved.Click OK to return to the list page. " and I'm not able to modify the identity, not in this new option I created, nor in the ones already created in the ACS.
I have two ACS v 5.2 (primary and secundary) and some users are in the internal stor and the others are in the AD.The local site topology is like this:
PC - AP - WLC - ACS - AD
Authentication method is PEAP(EAP-MSCHAPv2) and all user have the certificate company installed. The OS in the client users is Windows 7.Users was working fine but some users reports intranet disconnections. I see in the ACS log many "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)." and "24415 User authentication against Active Directory failed since user's account is locked out" alarms.I believed it was because user wasn´t in the AD data base, but some times the same user is authenticated successfull and other i see the "22056...." or "24415...." alarms.
I switched the role for ACS primary to works as secundary and we see the same alarms.
I have ACS 5.2 running as a VM. I'm AD, then local authentication successfully for device access, but I want to define ACS user groups to restrict login. I don;t see any way to do this. If I use AD groups, they don;t show up as selection options on the policy screens, just the ACS locallyy defined groups.
We have a ACS 4.3.2 installed with users authenticating against an Active Directory database. The AD database not only authenticate the users but also assigns the group that is used to select IP address pool.Now the requirements require to use token authentication with SafeNet. This authentication uses the same username but the password is composed of the original password + OTP.The problem is that the SafeNet server doesn't return the group membership.I've read about the Identity Store Sequence in ACS 5.x and I think I could use it in the following sequence:! configure an Authentication Sequence using the SafeNet token server (this works with ACS 4.x)I configure an Attribute Retrieval Sequence against the AD database. This would use the username only, no password and would retrieve the group membership.
I'm looking for Cisco ISE v1.1 to use the following licensing feature. url...Endpoint is dynamically profiled by Cisco ISE and assigned dynamically or statically to an endpoint identity group. Cisco ISE authorization rules do not use this endpoint identity group.
I am currently running cisco ACS 5.1.0.44 and use active directory as the main authentication identity store to allow network administrators to have access to network devices in my organization .As per the established security policies in my organization , the ACS has to disable any account after 3 failed login attempts to any network devices .i have gone through all the settings oN the acs but couldn't find where or how it is done .
I have installed ACS 5.4 and we are looking to authenticate our Anyconnect users with ACS via Active Directory. I think I have the correct commands in our ASA ( we had ACS 4 and authenticated our anyconnect users ).
I also have configured ACS to use Active Directory and installed the server side cert in ACS. I'm just uncertain how to program ACS to use the security group that I have setup in Active Directory.
I have an ACS 5.3 cluster, that is configured to use AD. There are a few wireless devices, and monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts. I would like to configure ACS to first check AD for the user authentication, and if that fails to roll over to the local (Internal Users) identity source where I can define these user accounts.
It seems that when the authentication hits the initial Identity Policy rule, it never moves onto the next one if the first fails.
Attached are screen shots that show how i'm configured for the test, i have a local user defined and I'm trying to log into the firewalls.
- Identity Definition : Screen shot of the main ACS definition for the rule i'm testing that's not working - Identity Rule 1 : The configuration of rule 1 that if it fails i need it to move onto rule 2. - Log Output : Screen shot for one of the failed attempts from the ACS View Log server.
Reason I need to configure it this way is:
- Wireless users authenticate to wireless using AD user accounts. Some hand held scanners do not support that and will need to authenticate using the MAC address. - Authentication to Network devices for managment uses AD accounts. We have some monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts, and will need to be able to log into Network devices to issue some commands (Examples: Cisco Prime LMS and NCS, Infoblox NetMRI).
how profiling works exactly ?How intelligent is the profiling engine, meaning: Will it discover that one device has more than one different MACs and will merge the entries in the database ??
Example:This is in fact the same device, there is only one WLC-2500 in the network ....If it can discover that, what needs to be configured on the ISE to do that ?
I have setup an Identity Firewall on a ASA version 5.6 on a DMZ interface.I have installed the ADAgent on a domain member Win2008 and configured as follows: [code]
where ashdew is a domain user and ACL 122(only one line) is applied on the dmz interface and NAT is properly configured.The ADagent has been properly tested and ASA can register to it.The ASA can connect to AD DC controller and query user database.I have placed a laptop ip 172.17.h.x on the DMZ and can ping the DMZ interface.
The laptop cannot authenticate on the domain and the asa does not seem to retrieve the user identity.Do I need to add extra rules in the access-list 122 to permit trafic to DC?Can I check on the AD Agent if it can retrieve the user to ip mapping ?
I understand that Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 supports the integration with existing external identity repositories such as Windows Active Directory and LDAP servers. In fact, in my environment, my ACS 5.3 is now integrated with AD and RSA.My question here is can Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 integrate with "multiple" WIndows AD, LDAP, RSA Server etc.? if yes, is there a Cisco document stating this? The keyword here is multipple.
I am trying to setup PEAP authentication for wireless users but I got stuck at place where I have single ssid and users are store in different identity stores like some will be using their active directory and some are locally created users on ACS. I created separate service for wireless authentication and under that I am unable to create rule to differentiate them with identity stores. any idea how to achieve this.
I tried creating identity selection based on role but it does not work as for protocol like radius.peap,ms-chap ACS does not look for another identity store once user not find in an identity stores.
I configured before ACS v4.2 to authenticate network devices using internal users at first, and if the user is not found use AD list users. But with v5.3 I have some problems doing this, on identity policies I use rule based result selection option, I configured 2 polices for Identity source, one for Internal Users and other policy for AD user, but it only works with the first policy, internal users or AD, but works only for the first policy identity. how to do that, if the user is not found on first policy, continue to the next policy.
I need a specify users to allow access to particular devices and give privilege only for show command or show run. Here is how I tried to configured.
1. Configured two seperate Shell Profile and Command set with privilege level 4-5 and allowing only show run command
2. create seperate service selection rule with adding the require NDG and protocol TACACS and maching service "RestrictAccess"
3. In the RestrictAccess Service I have following configured; Identity: internal users, Group Mapping to a particular group where the user exists, authorization: matching the above created identity group, NDG, shell profile, command sets
All the steps are attached in the .doc file. However when I tried with the particular user he is able to access everything and he is not hitting the correct access rule.
We are running ISE 1.0.4 with a requirement that on the surface is simple, but fails to execute properly no matter how I tweak it it. It is:
VPN users either need to be within a certain AD group or They need to authenticate against RSA.
I set authentication to use an identitysequence with RSA listed first, then AD second. I set authorization to check identity server (using network access:AuthenticationIdentityStore). - If it’s RSA, pass it. - If it’s Active directory, AND the condition with a check on that group membership. Pass if both pass. - Set the default authorization rule to deny access.
This should work. Here’s where it breaks down. It all stems from the fact that the same userIds exist in RSA and AD and that ISE steadfastly refuses to attempt the second identity server method listed in the sequence if RSA is listed first.
• If I list RSA first and the “authentication failed” policy is set to Reject: For users not in RSA that I want to authenticate against AD, it rejects – it attempts against RSA but never hits AD (second server listed in the Identity sequence). This is what is brokenThis works for users in RSA
• If I list the RSA server first and the “authentication failed” policy is set to continue Users not in RSA will pass authentication that shouldn’t because the network access: AuthenticationIdentityStore value will be pointing to the RSA server, regardless of whether they actually passed to that server or not.Effectively users can connect regardless of whether their password is right or notThis option sets it to proceed from authentication to authorization
• If I list AD first in the sequence Since the same ID exists in both AD and RSA, it’ll fail as bad password against AD. It'll never attempt against RSA.
Am I missing a simple fix for this? I have a testbed in which I can simulate the issue but since I don’t have an RSA server handy, I’m using an identity sequence with AD and fallback to internal. It works as I’d expect, falling back from AD to local if the user doesn't exist in AD. If the user is in AD, it never tries local and shows the attempt as a bad password.
I'm receiving about 99%CPU on 6500 .Butwhen i go show cpu sorted ,i can't see any process taking more than 2% load .My IOS is s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF13.bin
6500#sh processes cpu sorted | exclude 0.00CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/97%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 99% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 114 11136 1772 6284 0.79% 0.13% 0.30% 1 Virtual Exec 6 84386920 6320367 13351 0.71% 0.27% 0.23% 0 Check heaps 123 94861244 849807118 111 0.31% 0.38% 0.39% 0 IP Input 180 10647916 52152600 204 0.07% 0.03% 0.02% 0 CEF process 316 12053884 68553405 175 0.07% 0.21% 0.08% 0 OSPF Router 1 281 31925228 239981938 133 0.07% 0.04% 0.05% 0 Port manager per 213 61331112 213008378 287 0.07% 0.08% 0.09% 0 SNMP ENGINE 37 5577644 36376566 153 0.07% 0.05% 0.02% 0 Per-Second Jobs
I want to add module of WS-X6716-10GE(-3C). The type of 6500 isCisco WS-c6509-e (r7000) processor (revision 1.2).Can I add this module to this type of 6500?Do I need to reset the 6500 in order to the 6500 receive the module?
We have got a big problem with our NAM (WS-SVC-NAM-1) - it does not boot. We have got a second one and in an other chassis. I changed the chassis, and RAM and Flash from the other one. RAM and Flash are ok.
We checked the disc (hardware) with an Ontrack-tool -it is OK.
environment: 6500 VSS
sh logging: Jun 17 13:18:24: SW1_SP: Switch 1 Physical Slot 7 - Module Type LINE_CARD inserted sm(cygnus_oir_bay slot7), running yes, state wait_til_online Last transition recorded: (offline)-> empty (remove)-> empty_clr_persist (remove)-> empty (insert)-> may_be_occupied (timer)-> occupied (known)-> can_power_on (yes_power)-> powered_on (real_power_on)-> check_power_on (timer)-> check_power_on (power_on_ok)-> wait_til_online
