Cisco Firewall :: ASA 8.3 Routing Between Contexts
Feb 21, 2011Is it possible to route among contexts (I have 5 contexts) in the ASA without sending traffic to a fusion router (external router) to be routed. I am running ASA 8.3.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Firewall :: 5520 As ISP Causes VPN To Be Disabled When Using Contexts
Jan 31, 2012In the latest code, is VPN still disabled when using contexts? If you use a 5520 as an ISP based firewall for customers, then what would be used for VPN access? Also how many contexts does a 5520 support, and would putting 2 interfaces into an etherchannel for inside, and 2 for outside work? Reason I ask about that, the inside and outside would connect to 2 different core routers. I would be for an MPLS setup.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA 5515X Max Contexts In HA Mode
Jun 4, 2013What is the maximum number of contexts a pair of 5515Xs in HA mode can support?
I know each 5515X can have a max of 5 contexts, but does that mean in HA mode a pair can support 10 with license pooling?
Cisco Firewall :: Getting ASA 5540 Default Contexts?
Apr 19, 2011Q1. I would like to confirm like how many total of contexts do I have by default when I purchase the ASA 5540 ? are they two contexts aside from the admin context or two contexts including the admin context?
Q2. can I configure the default box with High Availability using the default contexts?
Cisco Firewall :: Connection Failure In ASA 5520 Security Contexts
Mar 27, 2011Ive got a virtualised firewall running 3 security contexts in routed mode. What am experiencing is that i cannot connect to an OUTSIDE host through the security contexts. From the firewall itself i cannot ping the directly attached host on the OUTSIDE interface but i can ping the directly attached host on the INSIDE interface. When i reload the firewall box, the first ping to the OUTSIDE host would be successful but subsequent pings fail and thus total connectivity is lost.
I even tried upgrading to ASA version 8.4(1) but still the same.
Cisco Firewall :: 7609 / FWSM - Duplicated MAC Addresses Across Contexts
Feb 27, 2012I have two 7609S routers each with a FWSM running 4.0( 8). I am licensed for 20 contexts.
Recently, I added a context for a new application and required access to a VLAN that already had an interface in another context.
The MAC address assigned to the interface in the new context was assigned the same MAC address as the interface in the previous context. This caused an application running through the first context to fail.
I know that on the FWSM I cannot hard code a MAC address to an interface in a context so how do I get around this problem caused by the duplicate MAC addresses?
Cisco Firewall :: 6500 - Passive FTP Through 2 FWSM Contexts Via VRF Instance
Mar 26, 2012I'm having problems getting FTP to work through two FWSM virtual contexts which are connected via a vrf. All this is configured on a 6500 switch with the FWSM running 3.1(4)
CLIENT-----CONTEXT_1-------VRF------CONTEXT_2--------FTP_SERVER
At the moment we can make the control connection but when we issue commands the connection times out.
Looking at the logs we can see the initial connection made to the server on port 21 from the client, this is also seen on the second firewall context (nearest the FTP server). The data channel is then seen on the first context, made using high src & dst port numbers and initiated from the client, successfully passing the ACL/Inspection, then on the second context we see the connection being denied by the incoming ACL on the second contexts interface connected to the VRF instance.
The rules are identical on the contexts and have been made by copying and paste the rule using CSM, we are using the predefined service group 'FTP-Group' which contains both tcp 20 & 21. FTP inspection is at default on both contexts.
We have tested with Win XP (capable of Active FTP only) & Firefox 3.6.12 which is the connections we are seeing in the logs trying to do Passive FTP.
Is this a problem with teh contexts randomizing sequence numbers or TCP Normalization? Or do we just have a problem with the Inspection engine on one of the contexts (I would have expected to see this on both contexts if it was a bug).
Cisco Firewall :: 6500 / Static NATS For FWSM Contexts?
Jun 28, 2011I am just designing a solution where a FWSM consists of 2 contexts initially and has a shared outside interface pointing to the 6500 switch. There are 3 subnets connected to each of the FWSM contexts. So if anyone wants to access these 6 subnets then a route would be needed pointing to the interface vlan of the shared interface on the switch. But that would not be enough to access the subnets.. I am sure we have to define static NATS to point them to the right context where these subnets reside.
The FWSM is running version 3.x code So say 1.1.1.0(shared), 10.10.0.0(inside1), 10.20.0.0(inside2) and 10.30.0.0(inside3) reside in Context 1 and 1.1.1.0(shared), 20.10.0.0(dmz1), 20.20.0.0(dmz2) and 20.30.0.0(dmz3) reside in Context 2 in each of the context we would have to make three static NATS
static(inside1,shared) 10.10.0.0 10.10.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(inside2,shared) 10.20.0.0 10.20.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(inside3,shared) 10.30.0.0 10.30.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
The same would go for context 2 as well
static(dmz1,shared) 20.10.0.0 20.10.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(dmz2,shared) 20.20.0.0 20.20.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(dmz3,shared) 20.30.0.0 20.30.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
By creating these NAT statements, would the outside users be able to access the subnets residing in the context?
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5512-X Version 9.1 Multiple Contexts Supported?
Apr 3, 2013if on the ASA 5512-X virtual contexts are supported with version 9.1 ?
I found different information on the Cisco web, the ASA datasheet says it is supported but in the configuration guide I found exactly the opposite information.
Cisco ASA Series General Operations CLI Configuration Guide 9.1 and 8.6 [URL]
Cisco ASA 5500 and ASA 5500-X Series Next- Generation Firewalls for Small Offices and Branch Locations Data Sheet (Updated) [URL]
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5585 Transparent Mode With Multiple Contexts
May 6, 2013We are deploying the Cisco ASA 5585 in transparent mode with multiple contexts, the port-channel was configured to connect to the core switches using dot1q trunk. We are experiencing an issue which is the core switches are configured loop guard globally, therefore the port-channel connected to the firewalls will be put into inconsistent state when the failover happen, and the two firewalls' failover can not fulfill the failover at last.
I have two queries below:
1. Does the firewall allow the BPDU passing through when it is in standby mode, for example, secondary firewall is active for group 2 and standby for group 1. does the secondary firewall block the BPDU from the vlans under group1 ?
2. Can we disable the loop guard feature on the switch port-channel or is there any other way to solve this issue ?
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 9.X Routed - Inspect Traffic For All L3 And Transparent Contexts
May 12, 2013We are currently looking at design models for a Multi-Tenancy solution.The firewall layer will be 2 X ASA's running 9.X to take advantage of VPN's in multiple context mode and mixed L3 and L2 contexts.
We will be delivering services through multiple L3 contexts (between 2 and 5 L3 contexts for services) and 1 transparent context for customers infrastructure who will then have virtual firewalls for NAT's and VPN's etc withing their own environment.
I am not very experienced with IPS so my query is; if we were to get an IPS license for both ASA's how would the IPS fit in, can we use it to inspect traffic for all the L3 contexts and the transparent context?
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 With Security Plus License Lost Contexts
Jan 28, 2013I have a ASA 5510 with Security Plus License and when I looked at the devices a few days ago I had 2 contexts, however after configuring the Mgm port as a regular port the contexts show 0, why? I can not find any post on the internet where this issue has happen: here is the output from show ver:
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 7.0(8)
Compiled on Sat 31-May-08 23:48 by builders
System image file is "disk0:/asa708-k8.bin"
[Code]......
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5585 Number Of Licenses Used By Multiple Security Contexts
Feb 5, 2012We are going to deploy a active/active setup of 2 ASA 5585's. Here we will implement a concept of security zones through context's where different services will be firewall through a separate firewall context. will a security context consume 1 or 2 licenses because we are running in a Active/active setup? Right now I got completely confused when my manager asked me that question.I would say that we only use on security context license - but since we are running in a active/active setup - even though the other instance is standby - will it consume a context license? We are using ASA OS 8.4.x.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 5515-X Management Access To Transparent Multi-mode Security Contexts
Jan 23, 2013I have setup a 5515-X in transparent multi-mode and setup 5 security contexts with inside and outside ports, one admin and 4 others. The problem I have run into is setting up a management IP for each context. On one of my other transparent firewalls in production we were able to apply an IP to the security context (not interface) however the new firewall is running the latest software and this same functionality is not available. The only options for IP in context mode is IP AUDIT. So my next plan was to create sub-interfaces of the management interface and assign one to each context however the 5515-x does not allow sub-interfaces on the management interface. How I setup a management IP on each context?
Another interesting thing i read is that the managment IP assigned to a context (if i could figure out how to set it up), has to be in the same subnet as the data interface which if fine but it also says that the management interface should not be connected to the same switch as the data interface because of MAC address table update issues, meaning that i could not use a sub-interface of one of the already configured context ports.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA5520 - Active / Active Failover In Multiple Security Contexts With Dual ISP?
Jun 1, 2011I have an ASA5520 in location A with an ISP connection and a matching ASA5520 in location B with a separate ISP connection. We have fiber connecting the two locations and vlans passing back and forth so I will be able to configure the failover via a vlan as well as extend the ISP's to each location via vlans. The Active/Active configuration with the multiple security contexts does not seem to be an issue but how is a redundant ISP configured in this mode?We want to have context A using the ASA in location A with ISP1 as the primary and failing over to ISP 2 in locaiton B We also want to have context B using the ASA in location B with ISP 2 as the primary and failing over to ISP1 in location A Would route tracking provide the desired result? Is there a better option?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: VLAN Routing To Internet Through Firewall 3560G
Jul 24, 2012Since two weeks I have a problem with the VLANs who I started to configure. I hope together we find the way.I have 5 VLANS configured in a CISCO 3560G switch. In my windows server 2003 I configured DHCP scope for each VLAN.One of the requirement to connect vlans each other is to put the IP of each vlan as gateway in the clients.So, how can I do to access to internet?. The ip of my Firewall are in one of the VLAN´s.When the configuration of the LAN only had one DHCP scope the gateway was the ip of my firewall. But now i don´t know how to configure the DHCP server, or the firewall, or the switch, or all of them To get access to internet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 9941 - Policy Based Routing With Firewall
May 10, 2012I have problem while implementing policy based routing with a firewall. Let me explain in detail.
I have 2 remote site(Site A-small , Site B - Big) , Site B is connected with HQ with Tunnels 1 and 2 , Site B and Site A is connected with Tunnel 9941.
What I want is: Scenirio for Communication :
1)Site A--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> FW-------------->VPN Router Site B------------------>Central Site
2)Central Site--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> FW---------->VPN Router Site B-------------->Site A
3)Site B--------->FW-------------------->VPN Router Site B------>Central Site
4)Central Site--------->VPN Router Site B-------------------->FW------>Site B
5)Site A--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> Site B(no firewall)
6)Site B--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> Site A(no firewall)
Tunnel 1: 10.13.199.1-2
Tunnel 2: 10.13.199.1-2
Tunnel9941: 172.22.99.1-2
Site A LAN- 10.99.41.0/24
Site B LAN- 10.99.0.0/16
Central LAN - 10.18.0.0/16
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 IP Routing
Apr 8, 2013I am new to the ASA so I am not completely familiar with it's ins and outs but here is the situation.I have a VPN connection that my company uses regularly. I have the VPN Pool on 192.168.18.0/25 and my Internal network at 192.168.16.0/24. My problem is that I have my phone system on 192.168.16. 254 and the only way to see it is if I change the pool to be within the same IP range as my internal network. The catch is that if I do this then that is the ONLY IP that is available to that VPN connection. Is there a way to make the 192.168.16.254 available to 192.168.18.0/25?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Routing Using ASA5505 And Pix 501?
Jun 16, 2011I have 1 network that I'm trying to make secure, and it needs to access 2 seperate networks. I tried using an ASA5505 that I had on the shelf to accomplish this but discovered that I had the basic license and that was prohibiting me from getting my connection to my 3rd network. I scrapped that idea and grabbed an old pix 501 off the shelf to bring my connectivity to my 3rd network online since the 3rd network is only passing ip traffic to a small group of servers on the outside I figure the 501 should be just fine.
So, here's the problem I am running into:My internal network is 10.10.16.0/16, I have a new domain controller with DHCP on it handing out addresses in the 10.10.16.0/24 range.External Network 1 is 192.168.16.0/24. The services I need from that network are primarily in 192.168.0.0 range, however there is a comcast router 75.123.123.123 (Changed of course) that provides high speed internet I need for my www traffic.External Network 2 is 10.1.1.0/16 I have about 4 servers I need to access on this network and that's it. This network has it's own domain and DHCP controller and I've been given a range of ip's to use on this network of 10.1.3.180-10.1.3.189 My switch is just a plane jane 3com switch with minimal management so I am attempting to use my ASA5505 to handle my layer 3 routing.
So here's my issue:ASA5505 (IN:10.10.16.1, OUT: 192.168.16.6): Passes traffic to External Network 1 and to the comcast router, no problem. All my computers on my 10.10.16.0/16 network have access to everything on 192.168.0.0/24 as well as getting full name resolution and www traffic across the comcast router. Can NOT access 10.1.1.0/16 no matter what. From inside the ASA or from on the inside LAN ports. It CAN ping the PIX 501 PIX 501 (IN:10.10.16.3, OUT: 10.1.3.180) Can ping EVERYTHING. Can ping 192.168.0.0/24, can ping 10.10.16.0/16 and can ping 10.1.1.0/16. Set to globally assign the other IP's in my range as addresses for outgoing traffic.Workstations (IN: 10.10.16.XXX DHCP, using 10.10.16.1 as gateway) Can only access everything on External Network 1. ZERO access to External Network 2. ATM I have both INSIDE and OUTSIDE ACL's wide open for both firewalls just to get connectivity going. I will be tightening it up after it is operational.Attached find a log file (Sensetive data removed of course) that contains the sh run and sh ver for both the ASA5505 and the PIX 501.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 And LAN To LAN Routing?
Jan 5, 2012I am just about to buy ASA 5505. I need outside interface with Public interface that can NAT to two internal (priv)( networks. Can I have two inside interfaces, like192.168.1.0 and 10.2.0.0 that can talk to each other? Can I do it without vlans? Reason why, I would need to reconfog my current switches. On cisco web they saying that: "With the Base license, the third VLAN can only be configured to initiate traffic to one other VLAN" - but I need two inside netwroks be able talk to each other.
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA 5520 Routing With No ISP CPE
May 30, 2013I have an interesting situation that I can't find a Cisco supported configuration for. My customer has a pair of 5520's setup in a failover pair and has two internet connections. The primary ISP has an Adtran router onsite, but the backup ISP did not provide a CPE router. I only found this out when I was onsite and needed to get it working otherwise I would have suggested purchasing another router.
I am trying to find out if this would be a supported configuration.
Here are the important parts for the way I got it working to fail over to the backup ISP and still provide outside access to critical applications. I substituted private IP addesses to protect the customer's identity.
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
nameif outside-primary
security-level 0
[Code].....
So as you can see the primary internet is all on the same IP subnet, but the backup NAT object is an IP address on a completely different subnet than the "outside-backup" interface. As a note, this is working perfectly and it is only a temporary situation, but if it would be supported I may end up using this configuration again as a perminent solution.
Cisco Firewall :: InterVLAN Routing On ASA 5505?
Apr 20, 2011I have Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall with security plus license. I want to Configure 3 different subnet for inside network 10.1.x.x, 10.2.x.x and 10.3.x.x So any PC from 10.1.x.x should be able to ping 10.2.x.x So my question is that possible with ASA?? If yes than how can i configure on ASA 5505, as i know on 5510 we can configure sub interface and do intervlan routing.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Inter-VLAN Routing In ASA 8.3
Oct 21, 2011i am doing a set-up having the ASA as my Layer 3 device providing inter-vlan communication. ASA with 8.3 firmware. how i can achieve this goal. i am trying to follow some answered topic related to this but its pre 8.3. VLANs created on the same physical have same security level.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Routing Between Interfaces On ASA 5520?
Jul 10, 2012We have an ASA 5520 which is in multiple context mode. We are trying to pass traffic from the outside interface to the dmz interface. We have a /27 public ip range. We need a small amount of those addresses to be in the DMZ for SIP servers specifically. The rest of the addresses are NAT'd to the inside interface.So i created the outside interface GigabitEthernet0/0 with 1.2.3.192/28 Inside Interface GigabitEthernet0/2 with 192.168.20.0/24 DMZ interface on GigabitEthernet0/2.1 with 1.2.3.208/29 So all i want to do is route traffic that comes in the outside interface and out to the DMZ interface for the 1.2.3.208/29 subnet. I set the gateway address as 1.2.3.214 which is the DMZ interface address on the ASA.
View 20 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Routing Between Interface
Mar 26, 2013I attached the complete config. The earlier discussion, I cannot select reply. Looks like ACL is denying it. But I am not sure which one or how to permit it.
sh run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.0(4)
[Code].....
Cisco Firewall :: 5520 VPN / NAT / Routing Interactions
Oct 7, 2012I have two ASA 5520 units, both running version 8.3(2) code. Among many other uses, they have an IPSec tunnel between them to link office 1 and office 3 together. Office 2 does exist, and is connected to a different port on the ASA in office 3; there is no IPSec involved with office 3. [code] SAM can ping JANE. JANE can ping SAM. The Office 3 ASA can ping FRED. FRED can ping the Office 3 ASA. JANE can ping FRED. FRED can not ping JANE, by design. When SAM pings FRED, FRED receives the packet, but NAT has not been applied to the source IP address (which is what I'm trying to do, and which does happen when JANE pings FRED), and therefore FRED does not have a route for the response.
As you can see, I want to NAT any traffic going towards office 2 to have as a souce address the interface address of the Office 3 ASA. This is because office 2 has a restricted routing configuration. Recall from above that when JANE pings FRED, this NAT happens and everything works. When SAM pings FRED, the NAT does not happen, as seen in debugs collected on FRED.
Cisco Firewall :: Routing Between PIX 506E And ASA5510?
Mar 17, 2013There is a PIX 506E and ASA5510, with different connection to service provider. Problem is Apple remote users can't access resources protected by the PIX506E. Apple users can access resources protected by ASA5510. Physically the PIX and ASA are in close proximity with no physical connections. Is it possible for Apple users to authenticate with the ASA and the traffic get routed to and get authenticated by the PIX, inorder to access resources?Due to bandwidth restrictions, a DMZ on the ASA will not be created at this time inorder to consolodate firewalls. Currently 2 x T1 is the connection between ASA and ISP; 1 T1 connects PIX to ISP.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Routing Between VLans On ASA 5505?
Dec 5, 2012I have an ASA 5505 and I have the three regular vlans, outside, inside and dmz. The best would be only have outside and inside and skip dmz, but without explenation there is not possible to have more then two clients in whats now dmz because of a mac filter on third party device.
So as security is concerned dmz and inside is equal, one to one and there should be full access between them. I ran the wizard and said that the only way traffic not should be possible to flow is from dmz to outside.
In the NAT rules the onle rule is
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
But traffic from one way or the other dmz to inside, og inside to dmz it says in log
3Dec 06 201215:38:39305006172.17.6.1053portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside:192.168.6.102/49358 dst dmz:172.17.6.10/53 From documentation I have an image with network drawing from documentation. What do I have to do allow traffic btween inside and dmz, both ways.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5540 - BGP Dynamic Routing
Jan 10, 2012Does ASA 5540 support BGP routing protocol to be configured on it??
I'm talking about the latest versions.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Routing Between Interface
Mar 26, 2013I have a WAN interface and 2 LAN interface. I need both the LAN be able to access a server outside the network via the WAN (outside) interface. I am using a ASA 5510 firewall instead of a router, because I don't have a router. It looks simple enough but it does not work. I ping from the a PC (172.16.22.8) connected to LAN (inside) Network to 10.10.10.1 which is the WAN local interface also did not work. But from the ASA Firewall, I could ping my LAN (inside) PC. I followed a config i get from this forum. However, it did not work. Below my config.
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
[Code]....
Cisco Firewall :: Internet Routing ASA 5505?
Aug 11, 2012I have a Cisco ASA 5505 that has been configured to act as a router as well. I have configured 3 VLANS that have access to the internet. For some reason the "InsideWifi" and the "Guest" VLANS have very slow internet speeds and sometime web pages wont finish loading properly. The "Inside" VLAN gets the speeds that are expected. The DNS server does reside on the "Inside" VLAN. Is there anything wrong with my configuration that would cause the internet speeds on the other VLANS to be slow? My config is attached.
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Routing Failed To Locate Next Hop For UDP 500
Jun 13, 2013we have a asa that block some ip dresse with this reason ( Drop-reason:(no-adjacency ) No valid adjacency ) and when i check the log i found this message for the same blocked ip adresse when they try to make dmvpn tunnel wyh the hub . Routing failed to locate next hop for UDP from MPLS:10.0.104.53/500 to MPLS:10.5.250.251/500 i inform you that the ip adresse of the hub (10.5.250.251 ) is connected in DMVPN Interface not MPLS ,and tha ASA is configured with na nat-cotrol command .nat is not configured.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 8.3 - InterVLan Routing With NAT
Aug 10, 2012I have found multiple solutions to this question for < 8.2 but no solutions for the new way the ASA does nat statments,Basically i have multiple VLAN's and i need 2 of them to communicate
inside - 192.168.1.0/24 ( security-level 100 )
voice - 192.168.100.0/24 ( security-level 100 )
Error i am getting is:
192.168.1.100 192.168.100.100
Deny inbound icmp src inside:192.168.1.100 dst Voice:192.168.100.100 (type 8, code 0)
[Code]....
They are not working, I have found multiple examples for the old style nat statements to resolve this issue but none on the new style.