What the support for WCCP on a FWSM running 4.0(7) is like, if there is any at all ?
I've read that the earliest PIX release that supports WCCP was 7.2(1) but I'm not sure how FWSM 4.0(7) aligns with the PIX versions.The only doc's i can find refrencing WCCP on a 6500 with FWSM is in the 6500 12.2 IOS guide.
I am about to replace the supervisor engine in our pair of distribution switches in our data center. We currently have a FWSM module installed in each of my distribution switches running 3.1(20) code. The old sup720 are running 8.6(4) and the mfsc are running 12.2(17d)SXB11a. I am wondering about the compatibility of running the FWSM with the same code after installing the new VS-S720 modules. I do not plan on configuring virtual switch yet and did plan on upgrading the FWSM to 4 code train but just not immediately. Will I be able to run my FWSM using the current 3.1(20) code after I install my new VS-S720 running in native mode?
If I have to upgrade the FWSM then I need to know if I have to upgrade the module in each distribution switch at the same time? Furthermore I do not believe that the FWSM 4 code is supported in hybrid mode, which means that I will have to convert to native before upgrading to FWSM 4 before I install the VS-S720 in one of my distribution switches. Currently the FWSM modules are in active/standby mode in different chassis.
I had planned to install the VS-S720 module in one of my distribution switch and do the other installation a week later. I would rather not have to convert to native and upgrade the FWSM modules in both distribution switches during the first switch upgrade.
cnDS02> (enable) sh mod
Mod Slot Ports Module-Type Model Sub Status
--- ---- ----- ------------------------- ------------------- --- --------
1 1 16 1000BaseX Ethernet WS-X6516A-GBIC no ok
2 .... Please refer to Detail Note. cnDS02> (enable) sh mod
[code]....
We have 2 FWSM modules in each 6500 switches. 1st module is having 04 firewall vlan groups with 18 vlan interfaces in a single context firewall. All are working fine with no issues. Recently we create one more vlan on MFSC and add into the same firewall module. However newly created vlan inside the FW is not able to communicate with outside and also outside users not able to reach newly created subnet. But within the firewall zones (other interfaces) it can communicate. Once we did packet capture we noticed that its hitting firewall outside interface only and when we ping we got TTL expired error. we have default routes to outside and there's no any route inside as new segment is within the firewall (no any hop).
I guess there's no limitation on number of vlans that we can assign on one firewall eventhough there is a limitation for number of vlan-group which is 16 max (but we are within that limit).
Our customer is experimenting really bad performance when running 10Gig traffic through FWSM on C6509. Test with1 Gig traffic are providing find result perfromance as expected in this document: url... I have made a simple drawing so everyone can understand the setup:
The issue is when running 10 Gig traffic between Netapp servers. This traffic is going though the FWSM and the perfomance are really bad: around 50 Mbit/sec. If the traffic is not going though the FWSM ther performance are around 900 Mbit/s.
The customer and I think that the issue is releated the buffer in the C6509 and the FWSM which has big trouble managing 10G to 1G traffic convertering between C6509 and FWSM 6 G etherchannel connection.
When running 10G traffic through FWSM the number of output drops are increasing as you can see on the output bellow. The last thing which is wired a is that the speed is showing 1000 Mbits and not 6000Mbits. [code]
We have a pair of 6500s with Sup720 running 12.2(33)SXI3. Each has an ACE-20 (s/w A2(2.0)) and FWSM (s/w v3.2(15)). We have reached a limit on the number of rules we can configure on the FWSM, and have determined that we shall upgrade to 4.1(5), with ASDM to 6.2(2)F. A question has been raised regarding the s/w on the ACE-20 modules. Do we need to upgrade them as well?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have had a strange issue with a pair of FWSM's in 2 6500's, it seems there was a failover but both module's have been reset.
CAT1
Feb 03 17:08:46.525: %SNMP-5-MODULETRAP: Module 8 [Down] Trap Feb 03 17:08:46.522: SP: The PC in slot 8 is shutting down. Please wait ...Feb 03 17:09:01.525: SP: shutdown_pc_process:No response from module 8 Feb 03 17:09:11.382: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 8 set off (Reset) Feb 03 17:10:56.093: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 8: Running Minimal Diagnostics...Feb 03 17:10:59.796: %SVCLC-5-FWVTPMODE: VTP
[Code]...
We run a 6500 with an FWSM with multiple security contexts as well as cascading contexts with a "shared V LAN" . There is a problem with regards to Linux machines and our shared network.
For example, we have three Linux machines in production, each in three separate V LAN's. For me to communicate to these boxes from one V LAN to another I must first ping the server. If I do not ping the server it will not bring up a connection like ssh or HTTP, etc. Below is the error I get from the FWSM that hosts the Linux server, but like I said once I ping the server the error goes away. We only have this problem with Linux machines, and it is a problem for all three of them. Is the FWSM having issues understanding something with all three Linux boxes? Below is the error I get at first, when I try to SSH from one V LAN to another V LAN with the Linux machine.
6 Dec 21 2012 16:33:54 106015 10.255.12.109 22 10.255.1.30 63000
Deny TCP (no connection) from 10.255.12.109/22 to 10.255.1.30/63000 flags SYN ACK on interface inside.
Below is what happens when I initiate a ping to the Linux Server and then ssh again. Notice it builds the connection with no problem after the ping. During the ping it builds the dynamic translation, and then when I ssh it builds the TCP connection. Do you know why this could be?
6 Dec 21 2012 16:35:08 305009 10.255.12.109 10.255.12.109
[Code]....
There is a 6500 switch with fwsm. We have extended 2 vlans from the ISP into the FWSM. Also there are atleast 10 other vlans for our internal network. We would like say half of the internal vlans to go out of the 1st ISP vlan and the remaining half from the 2nd ISP vlan. Is there a way we can do this in the FWSM?
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirstly is this the right forum to post threads about FWSM's. We have 2 FWSM's in two seperate 6500 switches. There are a number of contexts on each FWSM.I want to fail a context from one FWSM over to the other 6500 and FWSM. Can you tell me how I can do that? Do I need to do it in the admin context and do I need to do it on the admin context of each 6500?
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe are thinking of introducing ASA's into our setup instead of using FWSM for our firewalls with our 6500. Currently we use multiple contexts with the FWSM, as we provide hosting services for multiple clients and want them behidn their own firewall. My question is how can we make this happen with an ASA. Since with the FWSM we use the backplane of the 6500 and SVI's for all interfaces between them. For example if we have 20 clients what will be the ideal setup for us to use with an ASA. If we can infact use mutiple contexts how can we? Is there a way we can maybe bundle all the ports in the ASA into the 6500 as a layer two trunk port and continue to use SVIs to manage all the clients.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have just joined a networks team and will be working on two fwsm versions 4.0(8) in two 6500 routers. Now the fwsms seem to be virtualised with multiple contexts. The server team want a new context setup for a group of servers behind a vlan. [code]
This context just seems to have two Vlans and a BVI interface. What is the function of this context and why we have 2 admin contexts?
Also another important question is on which 6500 do I create the new context? Is the admin context active on one 6500 just like other contexts and will sync across or do I have to create the new context on both 6500s.
Is it possible for me to create 2 vlan interfaces on the 6500 and have them both in the same subnet?
For a specific customer requirement I would like to have a vlan interface on the 6500 as default gateway, sat in it's own vrf, and then route all traffic inbound and outbound to this vlan through the FWSM interface, preferably in the same subnet. I don't think this will be possible so just looking for confirmation either way.
As I will be running EIGRP between a pair of central 6500's and 2 remote offices it will make things much easier for me advertise the connected FWSM interfaces in to EIGRP for access in/out of all my VRF'd subnets. If I need another subnet for each VRF FWSM next hop then I'll have to reditribute a list of statics which I don't really want to do.
The reason I am not just using the FWSM as gateway is because I need to run HSRP across 3 different devices (another 6500 in a second suite), and failover FWSM will only give me 1 level of redundancy for those gateways.
I need to remove FWSM from a prodcution 6509. This FWSM is a standby. What's the best way to remove without powering down the switch or impacting antyhing?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm having problems getting FTP to work through two FWSM virtual contexts which are connected via a vrf. All this is configured on a 6500 switch with the FWSM running 3.1(4)
CLIENT-----CONTEXT_1-------VRF------CONTEXT_2--------FTP_SERVER
At the moment we can make the control connection but when we issue commands the connection times out.
Looking at the logs we can see the initial connection made to the server on port 21 from the client, this is also seen on the second firewall context (nearest the FTP server). The data channel is then seen on the first context, made using high src & dst port numbers and initiated from the client, successfully passing the ACL/Inspection, then on the second context we see the connection being denied by the incoming ACL on the second contexts interface connected to the VRF instance.
The rules are identical on the contexts and have been made by copying and paste the rule using CSM, we are using the predefined service group 'FTP-Group' which contains both tcp 20 & 21. FTP inspection is at default on both contexts.
We have tested with Win XP (capable of Active FTP only) & Firefox 3.6.12 which is the connections we are seeing in the logs trying to do Passive FTP.
Is this a problem with teh contexts randomizing sequence numbers or TCP Normalization? Or do we just have a problem with the Inspection engine on one of the contexts (I would have expected to see this on both contexts if it was a bug).
I am just designing a solution where a FWSM consists of 2 contexts initially and has a shared outside interface pointing to the 6500 switch. There are 3 subnets connected to each of the FWSM contexts. So if anyone wants to access these 6 subnets then a route would be needed pointing to the interface vlan of the shared interface on the switch. But that would not be enough to access the subnets.. I am sure we have to define static NATS to point them to the right context where these subnets reside.
The FWSM is running version 3.x code So say 1.1.1.0(shared), 10.10.0.0(inside1), 10.20.0.0(inside2) and 10.30.0.0(inside3) reside in Context 1 and 1.1.1.0(shared), 20.10.0.0(dmz1), 20.20.0.0(dmz2) and 20.30.0.0(dmz3) reside in Context 2 in each of the context we would have to make three static NATS
static(inside1,shared) 10.10.0.0 10.10.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(inside2,shared) 10.20.0.0 10.20.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(inside3,shared) 10.30.0.0 10.30.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
The same would go for context 2 as well
static(dmz1,shared) 20.10.0.0 20.10.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(dmz2,shared) 20.20.0.0 20.20.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static(dmz3,shared) 20.30.0.0 20.30.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
By creating these NAT statements, would the outside users be able to access the subnets residing in the context?
I have a customer that has a FWSM on a 6500, I want to create a read only account for them, i believe user privelage of lvl_3 When I log into the firewall it prompts me for a password straight away.
Is there a way that i can create a login that when it prompts me for a password, I can have a password setup to put into that prompt to get a certain level of access, instead of the standard lvl_15 access
I'm looking at upgrading our FWSM modules in our 6500's. They're the WS-SVC-FWM-1 modules.
We're running on version 3.2(12) at the moment and I'm looking to jump up to 4. Any recommendations around whether I should to go to 4.1(6) or 4.0(16)? There aren't any features in particular that I would need in 4.1 but want a good stable base to sit on for 12 months until I look at this exercise all over again.
i do have two 6500 in VSS mode , and one FWSM module on each 6500, i want to configure these modules as Active/Standby, how do i start , should i follow this (not in VSS mode): url..
View 1 Replies View RelatedIt is my understanding that the FWSM for the 6500 series switches uses a 6 port Etherchannel on the backplane to communicate with the 6500 series switch.Can you shutdown vlan1 on the switch and still communicate with the FWSM? I was under the impression that you could not (although I am looking at a config with it shutdown)
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are running an FWSM on a 6509 with a SUP720. Firmware 3.2(18), in MultiContext Routed Mode, with shared MSFC.Everything runs fine on this baby most of them time, however occasionally without warning and with no specific pattern the Primary node will fail (as in completely stop responding) and the secondary will takover as active. Two get the primary up agian, I reset the hw-module and then no failover active on the secondary to return the primary as active. However, after this event, I start to experience strange issues with connectivity. Certain TCP src dst combinations will just not work.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm using ASDM 6.2 with a FWSM on a 6500.
At the moment everytime I want to make a change to firewall rules I click apply and the rules are applied Immediately. I have to make multiple changes during the working day which I don't like to do.
What I would like to do is make changes during the day but not apply them until out of hours (some sort of batch mode). Like I can do in my check point firewalls.
I have 2 modules of FWSM in 6500 switch (failover). I need 5 context. When I use in routed mode (like in the picture) , I cannot ping the servers behind the firewall. (I have ping to FW context) In transparent mode, it is not happening.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have FWSM failover pair, Active/Active configuration, admin and another 4 context, few context active on first FWSM, other on second FWSM.I needed to add VLANs 51 and 52 to FWSMI created VLANs on both Cat6500, created firewall vlan-group 3 a and put "firewall module1 vlan-group 3" on both cat6500Then I log in in system space on primary FWSM and created interface VLAN.Created VLANs automatically occured in system space on Secondary FWSM.Then I wanted allocate VLAN 51 and 52 to context XY, so I went to part of configuration for context XY and "allocate-interface Vlan51" and "allocate-interface Vlan52".
View 1 Replies View Relatedtell me for the FWSM (blade on 6500 or 7600) the maximum number of virtual interfaces (VLANs)
View 14 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up a config to have WCCP with Blue Coat WAN Optimizer. I have following sinple setup at the moment. Cisco 6500 <----> Firewall. How should my topology should be. Should I have whe WAN-Optimizer in between (in path of switch and firewall on the same VLAN) or have different vlan hanging off the 6500 and have WCCP redirect traffic?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have 881 routers and are planning on testing out some WAN optimizing hardware, we're told that our router needs to support PBR and WCCP protocols. Will this router handle it?
View 3 Replies View Relatedif the Cisco Switches in my enviorment can support WCCP?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been tasked to setup a Transparent Squid proxy and do redirection on a Cisco 6513 Switch.I don't have access to the SQUID but think that my config below should be OK. We have setup a TEST user Vlan 13 . Any traffic from this destined for the we on 80 or 443 should be redirected. Vlan 10 is where the Squid proxy is sitting. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedCan i use acl object group with wccp redirect list?My platforms are 6500 and isr 2921
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been looking around Cisco's website but I can't find an answer to this -- If the 2900 platform suppots WCCP redirection using GRE?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI had a problem with a FWSM of 6500 because the FWSM primary change to standby and after back to active.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco 6500 with FWSM and ACE module which are in one central DC. Also we have four different Datacenter (Hub & spoke) and in our FWSM we have configured four contexts in central DC FWSM for each DC. Each DC servers are different VLAN and IP subnet. Now we have to configure ACE module for load balancing among those different subnet servers. What will be the design and configuration for this solution? Like routed or one-arm mode design.
Scenario Example:
1. App Server01
IP:192.168.11.5/24
GW: 192.168.11.1 in FWSM
FWSM Context: DC1
Physical Location:DC1
VLAN:11
[code].....
Now customer requirement is we have to load balance using ACE between these App Servers which are in different context s in FWSM and one Server is not FWSM. how to configure or design or placement of ACE and FWSM for above scenario.
The network gods recently updated our 6500 and upon reboot, the FWSM booted to CF:1 maintence partition,which caused an immediate outage. On the router, I ran the following command to set the default FWSM boot partition to the configuration with:Router#boot device module 4 cf:5 However, it appears the "show boot device" command has been replaced with "show bootvar" which doesn't show me which partition the router will boot the FWSM to. Is there a command I can run from the Router that will actually confirm the boot partition for the FWSM if the router reloads.
View 1 Replies View Related
