Cisco Routers :: RV180W Routing Web Traffic To Router Interface?
Apr 8, 2013
Initially we had a rv110w in place and had problems with the port forwarding stopping a few times a day so we replaced with with a RV180W. Now port forwarding appears to be staying up, however I have a new problem. We host a web page, for some reason when an internal user points the url to the web page it resolves to the web interface of the Router and not the expected web page. If you are outside of the network it resolves to the correct web page. I am not sure why this is happening as it didn't happen with the RV110W or the PIX before that.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 7, 2013
Beta Firmware: 1.0.2.3
Web server log showing the issue:
2013-03-08 05:39:21 192.168.1.102 POST /somewebpage/somefile.htm - 80 - 192.168.1.1 - 404 0 0 6098 410 457
ISSUE: 100% of the traffic forwarded through the router is taking on the IP address of the router when it arrives at the web server. In this case, 192.168.1.1
My email server and FTP servers are having fits due to the anti-hammering issue that this creates.
I simply got the run around and they told me to call level 2 support and did not provide me with a contact number. For some reason, he refused to escalate the call. They simply told me to contact someone from a previous issue in which they gave me the beta firmware to download and I spent a lot of time on the phone to get that far. I do NOT want to speak with the same person who addressed my last issue.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2012
I have rv180w (firmware 1.0.1.9) and 1 Gbit/s internet.When i turn on WAN Traffic meter, WAN speed down to 100mbit/s.I didn't find any suggestions in official documentation.Is this a bug or undocumented feature?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2012
12 users, 3 servers, 5 smartphones/tables on the WiFi (existing AP), future VPN server (maybe 5 simultaneous inbound VPN connections at the most with at least one client using a Mac), Cisco Gigabit small business switch.Internet access, VPN connectivity, and firewall (reporting, close/open ports for custom applications as needed)I was originally going to select an ASA5505-50 user device for the above client. The device is highly regarded on the Internet, offers a command line interface, priced right for the budget and should perform all duties required by the client.However, the addition of the RV180W to the Cisco product line has me questioning my choice.
1)Does the RV180W offer a command-line interface?
2)Is the RV180W limited in the number of users it can support without having to purchase additional user licenses?
3)How are firmware/software upgrades handled with the RV180W?
4)What will the client be giving up if they choose the RV180W vs. the ASA5505?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2013
I got : RV180W router updated with the last firmware.Static IP for the DMZ host (Synology Server 212+) My problem is that I had try all combinaison since 10 days to get IP source in synology interface (to block IP's of bad connections...) but, I only see the RV180W adress....So impossible to block bad connections IP.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2012
I would like to ask if what is the difference between RV180W-E-K9-G5 and RV180W-A-K9-NA specifically the -E and the -A. As far as I know -A is the compliance code for Philippines. Am I right? If yes, what about -E? There is a documentation for wireless complaince on Aeronet devices but what about these SB products?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2012
I'm having some problems blocking IP blocks. I have several blocks of IP's that I want blocked.I want to block 77.0.0.0/8 from communicating with a server on my lan.So I make a rule in the RV042 to deny all traffic from 77.0.0.0 to 77.255.255.255, source wan1, destination lan, my server's ip,As soon as I move that rule above the traffic forwarding rules I have created, no traffic moves in or out via the wan interface. It seems to just cut off all traffic.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2011
I have two ethernet adaptors on my windows machine. OS is Win-XP.I am running ADSL broadband on LAN1 and on LAN2 I am accessing applications on our company's WAN. LAN1 is on 192.168.1.0/24 subnet and LAN2 is on 10.68.104.0/22 subnet.Accessing application through LAN2 involves DNS that is located distantly, therefore routers are also in picture.Problem is that while accessing the application that run on the network of LAN2, I have to disable LAN1. Otherwise the traffic goes on LAN1.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2012
We have an ASA that has 3 IPSEC VPN tunnels and standard interenet trafic coming in on Int E0/0 that I need to have go out Int E0/1. E0/1 is directly connected to a Steelhead Riverbed 2020. The Traffic will need to come back out of the Steelhead Riverbed 2020 and into the ASA to Int E0/2. From here it needs to go out either Int E0/3 which is connected to a Catalyst 3560 Switch or back out Int E0/0 though one of the VPN tunnels. I attached a PDF with a diagram if that works.
The reason we are doing this is we have Riverbed's at all our locations and they need to talk to each other to optimize traffic. Is this routing possible any other way than PBR (Policy Based Routing)? I am of the understanding that PBR is not supported on the ASA or PIX.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2012
The top device of my network is cisco router 7609. There are two part subnet of my network, each part use same device type, same running-configs and same network topple: sw6506(to campus)--->sw3560(to buildings)<--->linksys sr324(to offices). IP addresses for manager vlan is 192.168.1.0/24.Suppose we name two part subnet as A and B. the problem is from 7609 I can telnet to every device of part A quickly, but when telnet to each sw3560 of part B,it responses very slowly. And only sw3560 of part B are response slowly, other devices of part B are ok.If I telnet to linksys sr324 first, then from linksys sr324 telnet to the current sw3560, it's ok.I try to capture packets of manage vlan, but there seems no strange things in it.No users of part B report problems, it seems the network is running well. Compare two sw6506s, the only diffirent thing is, there are "overrun" count at each interface in use of part B's sw6506. Each interface traffic is far less than it's capability, but it's "overun" count still increasing at working hours everyday.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2011
I have two attachments that show my basic network layout. I can get from the VPN Cisco Client to Workstation 2 just fine with my current NAT rules in place. I can also get from Workstation 2 to Workstation 3 just fine. But I'm having issues when I try to get from the VPN client to Workstation 3... What would I need to do enable to get to Workstation 3 from the VPN client? IT seems very simple to me (just PAT that traffic as I do the traffic from Workstation 2 to Workstation 3) but that does not work.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2011
As above, I got a problem with C3750e, ios c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE1.bin, when send AF41 traffic passing through it. My topolygy is as following
WAN link <----------> G0/0/2.100 - ASR1002 - G0/0/5 <---------> G1/0/1 - C3750e - G1/0/3 <--------> G0/0/1 - ASR1004
On this C3750e, I turned on mls qos, trust dscp on both G1/0/1 and G1/0/3 and no else is configured. ASR1002 G0/0/2.100, i applied the CB shaping fror AF41 traffic.
C3750e#sh mls qos
QoS is enabled
QoS ip packet dscp rewrite is enabled
C3750e#sh mls qos int g1/0/3
GigabitEthernet1/0/3
trust state: trust dscp
[code]....
Then, from ASR1004, i send ICMP traffic with TOS set to AF41 (136) and i found out that
1. The traffic is dropped on c3750e
sh mls qos int g1/0/3 statistics
GigabitEthernet1/0/3 (All statistics are in packets)
30 - 34 : 63 63 48 86 1534
2. The traffic never get hit into AF41 class in ASR1002 ? Why C3750e dropped this AF41 traffic? and what can I do to fix it?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2012
On a router I can use IP Accounting or Netflow to see what kind of traffic is moving over an interface. Are there any tools on a 3750 switch with a routed interface which would tell you who is hogging the bandwidth on that interface?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
I'm just setting up a Cisco rv180w router to replace our aging Belkin. I need to allow a range of ports through the firewall to a particular PC on our internal network that runs our VOIP/SIP Trunk phone system.
The Cisco's Port Forwarding looks like it can only forward one port at a time, but for our phones I need to allow a full range of ports (in this case ports 49152-64512) to one machine at 192.168.x.xx.
On the Belkin I used something called 'Virtual Servers' which allows you to enter ranges of ports. Anybody know what the equivalent might be for the Cisco router?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2011
I have Pix 501 firewall and I'm just configuring the device for "Email Server" to allowing POP/SMTP.
Inside Interface Address: 132.147.162.14/255.255.0.0
Outside Interface Address: ISP provided IP address
My question is can my traffic goes from inside interface to outside interface? (because the inside interface address not from 10.0/172./192.168 private address)Also I'm allowing internet from this email server (132.147.162.14) so what my access list to be configured? and what my subnet mask shoud be there?
Pix(config)#access-list outbound permit tcp 132.147.162.14 255.255.0.0 any eq 80
Pix(config)#access-list outbound permit udp 132.147.162.14 255.255.0.0 any eq 53
Pix(config)#access-group outbound in interface inside
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2012
we have a Cisco 3825 router which does not work well with a DSL modem(ISP provided). I have configured the Gi0/0 port of the router to plug into this DSL modem but it does not ping to the ISP gateway. If we do a shut/no shut on the interface then it work fine for about 30 secs. Sometimes even for 1 hr. Then the packets drop and we cannot pass any traffic through this interface.
Now, if the ISP connection is terminated on a computer it works fine. It works fine without dropping any packet.I have tried various options like using a straight/cross cable. I have tried to configure the interface negotiation for 100/full, 100/half, auto/auto and almost all the options.I have also tried to interconnect the devices using a L2 device like a HUB. Nothing works.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2013
I installed the RV180W yesterday and decided to play with it a bit today. I got stuck on the firmware update. Tried different browsers on different PC's. Tried going to 1.0.1.9 first. I have the "reset all configurations" button checked. After looking through the posts here I'm not sure this firmware will even fix my next few problems(port forwarding etc). Is there a trick with this device?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I'm trying to make the VPN connection between two routers CISCO RV180w.I performed the basic configuration in cisco "server". I did the same in cisco "client".The following configuration and logs, do not know what to do ...
SERVER CONFIGURATION:
IKE Policy Configuration:
VPN Policy Configuration:
CLIENT CONFIGURATION:
[code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2013
We have installed a fiber internet access and have the ONT from the provider already installed.We're trying to use the RV180W to use this internet connection. [code] So I need to configure the router with the .36 static IP on the WAN, and using the .37 gateway and the provided DNS servers. I also need that this WAN is tagged with VLAN ID 20. I'm only able to set VLAN ID on the LAN ports via the admin interface.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2012
I am struggling to configure my new RV180w router to accept a VPN connection from my Apple computers.
I wish to use IPSec with Group and Pre-Shared Key authentication. The RV180 has just replaced my 800 series ADSL router and I want my remote clients to be able to connect using either the VPN client capability built into the OS X operating system or the Cisco VPN Client software installed on their Macs.
So far, using the RV180's web setup screens, I have created a VPN Policy and a corresponding IKE Policy was created as well. I couldn't see anywhere to include the 'Group' name. I have created a user but wasn't sure of which Protocol to use so I am trying XAUTH.
At the client end some people are connecting using Cisco's VPN Client software Download Software - Cisco Systems
Some people, with OS X 10.6 and above, are using the Mac OS X network built-in VPN client.
We all connected without a problem to the previous 800 series router using IPSec with Group authentication and Pre-Shared key.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2013
i've installed the new firmware on my router and now the UC is showing 100% all the time. I've tried to factory reset it, it's doing the same thing. If I downgrade to previous firmware, it goes back to normal . I've only 1 PC in my network (test lab), so no big traffic here. is it a bug ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2012
I have two 1800 routers running VRRP. Also I have two sub interface configured on both router and both router connected to swith through thunk link. My goal is to limit inbound traffic to 3Mbps for both VLANs on router's inside interface which is connected to switch.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
I have configured policies to shape the traffic on the interface of cisco 7206 router. Now my managemet wants to configure these policies on time based ie policy should be applicable during specified time period onle. Is it possible? if yes how to configure it?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2012
I just recently switched from the WRVS4400N to the RV180W. I have 4 VLANs, and I want VLANs 1, 2, 3 to communciate freely, but I DONT want VLAN 4 to communicate with anybody, just Internet access. On the WRVS4400N, I was able to do this using the Firewall > IP Based ACL. I notcied that the RV180W, does not have such an option. I am sure there is something I am missing, I just cant find out how to isolate VLAN 4.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2012
we've changed our rv042 for a rv180w and now when I try to upload files to my ftp server (vsftpd under centos) it get stuck at 100%.I've changed my ftp server to proftpd instead of vsftpd and everything's ok.but vsftpd isn't the problem since i was able to upload with my rv042 without any problems.so i guess there's a problem with the rv180w security.i've already disable stealth mode and it's doing the same thing when i try to upload to the same server but through the vpn tunnel, everything's ok.So it's really in the rv180w lan->wan routing
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
Have not purchased RV180W at this time, therefore have not read manual. Need for small office, 2 VPN logins max & not 24x7 use. What VPN client software ? (using Win7-64bit laptops)
I did notice software called Quick VPN Client 1.4.2.1 for download.
Does buying RV180W allow download of Cisco Systems VPN Client software ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I am located in UK which uses PPoA for ADSL broadband. I use a DrayTek Vigor120 ADSL2 Modem to act as an ADSL bridge and PPoA to PPPoE converter. This passes the ADSL authentication requirement (and subsequent single static IP address) to the Cisco Small Business RV180W sitting behind the Draytek. However, the RV180 (Firmware Version 1.0.0.30) cannot form the PPPoE connection. I have tested the modem, adsl username and password by creating a PPPoE interface on my computer and connecting this directly to the Draytek modem. The computer receives the expected IP address and I can ping remote public IPs. I have entered the username and password into the PPPoE profile,
Authentication type: CHAP (confirmed by ISP but I have also tried all other options just in case).
Connection Type: Keep Connected.
MTU Size: 1400 (also tried default, which worked OK on computer interface).
MAC Address Source: Use Default (I have successfully used combined modem/router so a "fixed" MAC address is not required).
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2013
I live in China. I want all of my PC's and devices to connect through the RV180W VPN Router to a VPN provider in the US so that all of my traffic is encrypted and appears to have a US IP address. I need to find a VPN Service Provider that supports the RV180W and how to configure it. I don't want to configure every PC and device, I just want them to use the VPN conneciton at the router.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2013
I am using DynDNS in lieu of a static ip. My ISP changed my WAN ip last night as expected however the RV180W did not update the WAN ip, and so the router is now offline. Using a secondary internet connection I have logged into DynDNS.com and checked my hosts file and confirmed the ipa has not updated since March. I changed the update period from 360 to 2 so this never happens again, but I need to now change the WAN ipa in the RV180W to match the new one. I remember a screen that shows the current WAN ip address greyed out under the present one, but I dont recll where to go to get to that. I am at a loss as to where I go in the RV180W to change the WAN ip address.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2012
We are deploying over 20 RV180W Routers for a client and need to find a faster way to configure them for shipping.We have created a base image (all settings that will be shared between the 20 locations), we need an easy and quick way to make IP changes for the 3 VLANs and Local Security Groups for the IPSEC VPN.I tried to edit the CFG file by hand, but the checksum fails when it is loaded into the RV180W.How can I accomplish this? Can I manually create the checksum?Can I remove the checksum?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2012
Comcast has indicated that this is required for IPv6 to work, and since it means gatting a /64 address space for my network I am understandably eager to tak advantage of this new functionality when it is available in my area.
View 44 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
I am wanting to purchase the RV180W for a small Optometrist office. We are beginning our transition to EHR and what to ensure the RV180W is HIPAA compliant and if not what would be the next best product for about the same price?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2013
Our company own a RV180W router. It works well with firmware 1.0.1.9 but with firmware 1.0.2.6 it is impossible to SSH between our devices. Ping still works though.
View 1 Replies
View Related
