I am trying to establish a site to site VPN with a RV180 connecting back to a corporate Network using an ASA 5510. I have the RV180 setup with the Remote IP setting and a FQDN all setup and I am able to tracert back to the ASA but I wanted to know if I have to modify anything on the ASA side and how do I setup a pre-share key to establish the secure connection.
View 1 RepliesWe have successfully establish a site-to-site vpn, but we have some difficulties when PPTP users try to access the remote network linked by this tunnel. LAN users can access the remote network without problem, but users who are connected remotly to the lan (PPTP) can't access computer on the remote network. Is there a way to allow PPTP user to access the remote network ? Adding a route ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure my network so that VPN traffic is only routed to a single physical port on the RV180 or to a certain subset of devices on a network.
I have a site-to-site vpn setup in a home office and am connecting to the corporate network. The user has a couple of devices running on the home network that need access to the corporate network.
We are hoping to leave his PC accessible to his home network as well as the corporate network, but restrict other devices from accessing the vpn.
I beleive I could do it by playing with the subnet but I can't get my head around it.
So I just got a couple of Cisco RV180 routers that I am trying to setup a VPN link between the two. Both have their own static IP addresses on the WAN side, and so I used the Basic VPN wizard to define the public addresses for each other, use a pre-shared key, and set the local IP address ranges in the routers in the following layout: Router ALocal: 172.16.0.0/24Router BLocal: 172.16.1.0/24When I try to ping from one end to to a computer on the other I lose all the packets. When I looked at the transmission information, I found that Router A is transmitting but not receiving and that Router B is receiving but not transmitting.
View 0 Replies View RelatedAny one with any insite into getting this working. I have an rv180 configured for site to site vpn and dynamic routing. Should be a simple task but the vpn connects for a second than drops.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been asked to setup a site to site vpn to connect two remote offices.We have two ASA 5510's, one on each side.I can get the two ASA's setup and setup the VPN and have everything work like it is suppose to. Traffic passing from local network to remote network.
However, I have been asked to add two secure routers to the setup. One secure router between the local network and the ASA, and the other the same on the other end, between the remote network and it's ASA
Essentially, just like this:
LAN---------------------Router-------------------------ASA----------------ISP-----------ASA-------------------------Router---------------------------LAN
192.168.1.x (inside 192.168.1.1) (inside 10.0.1.1) (inside 10.0.2.1) (inside 192.168.2.1) 192.168.2.x
(outside 10.0.1.2) (outside public ip) (outside public ip) (outside 10.0.2.2)
I don't understand how this is suppose to work. I can get each side configured so that the clients on the inside can get out to the internet.A local client using the inside interface of the router as the gateway, the router then sends by route this traffic to the ASA's inside interface which then forwards the traffic to the default route/gateway of the ASA to the ISP gateway out to the internet.However, when I am thinking about the VPN I don't understand how it is suppose to work. Because the LAN address get's translated to the outside address of the Router which is 10.0.0.2, so that it goes to the ASA inside address 10.0.0.1. If I were to ping an ip address of the other LAN, it shows up as coming from 10.0.0.2 which wouldn't be part of the VPN traffic, since the VPN traffic is the local addresses as it was setup with just the two ASA's. I don't see changing the VPN traffic to the 10.0.0.0 network working because the clients on the remote network have 192.168.2.x addresses. While the ASA and router can translate from 192.168.1.x to 10.0.1.2 to the internet and back will work, I don't see requesting a connection to 192.168.2.x from 192.168.1.x working).if it matters, one router is a cisco 1841, and the other an hp 7102dl.I don't really understand why, but they just want to have the routers used in the setup. Whether it is on the inside or outside of the ASA, it doesn't matter.
I'm looking to get a remote office RV220W connected to my ASA5510. I have several PIX 501 and ASA5505's connected to the ASA5510.
I've setup everything similar that I can think of though I'm still not connecting.
IKE Policy:
Direction: Initiator
Exchange mode: Aggressive (for using FQDN Ident)
Remotes are all DHCP, so setup Local Identifier on RV220W as FQDN and typed in a FQDN for the remote RV220W. That is the same name I used for the Tunnel-Group on the ASA. Remote is IP, ASA is setup to send IP for Ident.
IKE SA:
3DES, SHA, DH2, 28800
VPN Policy:
Auto Policy, Remote Endpoint IP
[Code]....
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI bought 2 RV180 to setup a VPN tunnel between a remote site and central office.The VPN tunnel is established, I can ping from central office to remote site but browsing on that server fails. [code]
Seems the routing is not really working through the VPN Tunnel.
I configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic. When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.
View 5 Replies View Relatedwe have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
I have a ASA 5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.
Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.
how we immplement the same on ASA 5510.
I have a ASA 5510 at our corporate HQ that has one site to site VPN. I need to add 6 additional site to site VPN's to this ASA for our remote branches. How can I add them without affecting the existing site to site VPN? The 6 site to site VPN's will all have the same settings however these settings are different from the existing site to site that I already have set up. How can I set it up so the 6 additional VPN's use their own crypto map and all use the same settings?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a ASA 5510 that has multiple site to site VPNs. I need to create an additiona site to site VPN but only allow 1 host to access and traverse the tunnel. The network is on a 192.168.5.x but the host that will need to access this tunnel needs to be on a 172.16.33.x network. I dont want any other traffic allowed to access or traverse the VPN tunnel for this host. How can I set this up?
View 33 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5510 8.2(5) in Site1 and a ASA 5505 8.2(1) Site2 they are setup with a site to site tunnel.Each site has VPN clients that connect and I would like to allow clients from both sides access to servers on the other side of the site-to-site tunnel.
I enabled same-security-traffic permit intra-interface I also added the remote networks to access-list that is doing the split tunneling. [code]
I have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a dynamic VPN site to site between ASA 5510 vs C880 with segment 172.23.191.0/25 for ASA side and some host in C880 side (e.g. 128.1.100.211, 128.1.115.181, 128.1.104.212) . The VPN is up, but only have communication with a host (128.1.115.181).
In the logs appears the next message when I try communication for all aother IP in the policy map configuration: IKE Initioator unable to find policy: Intf Inside, Src: 172.23.191.87, Dst: 128.1.115.182..ONLY WHEN I PINGING FROM SOME HOST IN C880 SIDE (e.g. 128.1.100.211) the communication is successfull.
What happen with this VPN, because I need to pinging from C880 IP host to ASA segment for establish communication?
I'm trying to figure out how to get two 5510 ASA's to establish a Site-to-Site VPN.The version with two static IP's is working perfectly and stable but I haven't figured out how to get a VPN running between a static and a dynamic IP
View 12 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
I'm setting up a Site-to-Site Cisco VPN between ASAs. I'm being told by the remote site engineer to set the maximum MTU at 1362. Is it possible to set the MTU for one specific site-to-site VPN on my ASA 5510 Security Plus to MTU 1362? I see my interfeces are all set at 1500. If not, would you recommend I setup a subinterface on my inside network router and a subinterface on the ASA with an MTU of 1362 to get around this issue? Then use this subinterface for traffic from my inside network to transverse through prior to hitting the VPN.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSite A has an ASA 5510 and a single internet connection.Site B has two internet connections (primary and backup). If Site B also has an ASA, I can configure Site A's ASA to deal with a failover at Site B (set peer 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2). Does this work if Site B has an IOS router instead of an ASA? In other words will "set peer 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2" on the ASA work when it's talking to IOS on the other end?
View 15 Replies View RelatedI am not very experienced with Cisco networking.
Here is the situation.
Site A - headquarters 192.168.1.x
Site B - remote office 192.168.20.x
Site C - remote office 192.168.30.x
Site A - ASA 5510
Site B - ASA 5505
Site C - ASA 5505
Site-to-site VPN is established and works between A and B, A and C. Users would like to establish a tunnel between B and C to work on a common project and the data is on Site B.
I tried configuring the S2S VPN with pre-shared keys on both firewalls at sites B and C but in the end it is not established (I cannot ping either side). I used the Wizard interface multiple times and one time the CLI. I generally followed the settings chosen between the headquarter and the individual remote sites and tried to replicate them. Obviously I have made a mistake somewhere.
Could there be any limitation on the ASA 5505 in terms of licensing and the number of S2S tunnels?
I have a site to site tunnel (bidirectional) configured between two ASA 5510's (head office and remote office) running 8.2.2. I'm trying to upgrade one end (head office) of the tunnel to 8.3.2 but when I do that, traffic from the remote office to the head office isn't transported. Traffic from the head office to the remote office is still fine (remote desktop sessions, etc).
A quick comparison of the 8.2.2 config and the 8.3.2 config on the head office ASA look identical in terms of the crypto/site-to-site commands.Is there any Cisco guide created yet for creating site/site tunnels under 8.3.2? I'm able to upgrade both ASA at the same time if that's determined to be a prerequisite.
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 at our main office that makes connection with a 5505 at our other office using site to site VPN. (works)
Now for the question,
we want to access our other office from the main office but we wont want them to have access to our servers etc. so basically we want to control them but they shouldn't have the rights to control us.
Is this possible with a site to site VPN? and how to do it.
Our HQ office has an ASA 5510 with full access to internal and external IP's. We have a small group of remote users that are working from a shared office suite and they only have Internet access by way of internal default gateway. Using a VPN client is not desirable due to many other devices requiring access to HQ. Is there a way to create a site-to-site VPN from this remote office space back to HQ (ASA 5510) if they have no access to the public IP address on their end?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI was traying to make a site to site VPN between a cisco 1800 router and cisco asa 5510. But it was impossible to get it. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a situation where I need to have remote users vpn into my ASA 5510 and then turn around and hit a site to site tunnel. Now when I am in our office I can hit the site to site vpn fine. When I am at home and vpn to the asa I can not get to the site to site resources. Do you see where my config is incorrect? result of the command: "show run"
ASA Version 9.1(1)
!
hostname xxxxx
domain-name xxxx
enable password xxxxx
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
[ code]....
I would like to know if there is any command that i can use to terminate a site-to-site connection and restart it whenever i want to.I don't want to use the shut down command since i use the specific interface as an exit point to the internet.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a S2S VPN setup between a pair of ASAs (5510 and 5505) both running latest. Works fine and connects 3 local vLANs to the remote site, which has one /24 subnet. When I try and add a fourth local subnet it takes it but I can't get it to pass traffic to/from the new subnet. [code] I have added vLAN 20 as a remote network on the 5505 and as a local network on the 5510. Applied, broke the connection and re-applied it.When I ping from the 20 vLAN I get destination cannot be reached from an ISP upstream router and when I tracert, I get DEF GW, ASA's next Hop to the internet and one hop farther out where I get a unreachable message from that (3 hops and a fourth 'hop' that says it cannot reach)
When I ping from vLAN 10 it returns a ping. When I tracert it hits the vLAN Def GW, and then directly to the server I am trying to ping in the remote location (two hops).I can ping all things local form the 10 & 20 vLANs and get out to the internet fine.