Is there any way to granularly allow hosts from one vlan to be able to access another vlan with Inter-VLAN routing DISABLED?Can the use of an ACL override the setting?In general I don't want any traffic between VLAN's but there are 2 hosts on one VLAN that I would want to allow access to a server on another VLAN.
View 1 RepliesI have an RVS4000 version 1 with firmware 1.3.3.5. I have two VLAN's setup:
VLAN1 - 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
VLAN10 - 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0
Ports 1 through 3 are configured for VLAN1 and right now I have one PC connected directly to port 1 and nothing connected to ports 2 or 3. Port 4 is configured for VLAN10 with a managed switch (also configured on VLAN10) connected to it. There are 4 wireless access points connected to the switch.
On the Setup->Advanced Routing page of the RVS4000 I have the Inter-VLAN Routing option set to Disabled. Yet when I connect to one of the wireless access points and receive a 192.168.10.x address, I can ping the PC connected to port 1 which has a 192.168.1.x address.
Also, I would like VLAN10 to not have access to the Management GUI on the RVS4000.
I have recently purchased 2 SG 300 switches, 1 x SG 300 52 & 1 x SG 300 10, and I am hoping getting the following set-up working.To assist I have drawn the following simple network diagram (below) which hopefully makes it a little clearer what I am trying to do:I have 2 companies occupying a single office with the requirement to share printers/devices etc... so basically I am looking to set-up 2 VLANS (say VLAN 10 & VLAN 20) with inter-vlan routing. To add a little complexity the main comms area is located in the basement of the building, this houses the 2 DSL routers and 2 Servers, one for each company. I am proposing putting the SG 300 10 port switch in here and then use the 3 uplinks I have been given to connect back to the SG 300 52 which is in a patch cabinent 2 floors up. I want to use 2 uplinks (in a LAG) for Company A and 1 uplink for Company B. FYI. DHCP is being served out by each respective router.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have been banging at this now for two days and just cannot get Inter-VLAN routing working to work on this router.
Upgraded to latest Cisco firmware (1.0.1.9).Starting with factory default settings, I added 2 VLANS as follows: [code]
BUT....PC2 cannot ping PC3 - NOT WORKINGPC3 cannot ping PC2 - NOT WORKING [code]
I picked up a pair of RV220W's and before I spent loads of time at a remote site, I figured I'd go through some VPN testing at home to make sure I could get it setup properly. What this means is I've plugged the Internet uplink into a switch, then from the switch into both routers & configured them (using unique static IP's for each) from there. For what its worth: While I have some IT experience, I don't have strong networking experience.
I setup several VLAN's on the local RV220W, and the end result is to make it so that an asset at the remote site with an IP in any of the ranges (192.168.121.0/24, 192.168.131.0/24, 192.168.141.0/24 and any future VLANs) can communicate with/access resouces at the local site. Likewise, an asset at the local site with an IP in any of the ranges (.121, .131, .141 + any future VLANs) should be able to reach the remote resources (currently just 192.168.181.0/24, but future VLANs as well).
This evening I tried to focus on the relevant VPN pages of the Administration Guide to get the VPN up. Leaving the defaults I got as far as establishing a link between both sites and it seems that things are working right: From the remote site (.181) I can access the local site (.121, .131, .141); and from the local site I can at least ping resources (a laptop) on the remote site. (Yay!)
However, when I physically connected an asset that had a 192.168.121.X, 192.168.131.X and 192.168.141.X IP addresses to the remote RV220W (which is 192.168.181.0/24), I couldn't see it from the remote or local sites.I assume this is expected. But I'm reaching out to the community to see what other possibilities might be available becuase networking is a weak area for me. I figured it might be something like a Static [or Dynamic] Route but I really am not 100% sure.
'TECHNICAL' SPECS
Local Router LAN/WAN Settings:
LAN IP: 192.168.121.1 on default VLAN (1)
VLAN 13 defined 192.168.131.1 with DHCP enabled; Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
VLAN 14 defined 192.168.141.1 with DHCP enabled, Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
Inter VLAN Routing enabled for all VLANs
[URL]
I was looking for a small business router that has VPN support and dual WAN support for load balancing. Upon reading reviews, I think RV042/RV042G is a good choice. Now am thinking if it supports intervlan/ router-on-a-stick configuration?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI just received my rv220w and perhaps I haven't got enough experience with cisco routers. How can I restrict traffic between different VLANs?
For example: Hosts in one VLAN shall only be allowed to access a web server in another VLAN. All other traffic should be blocked. I've created two VLAN with Inter VLAN Routing enabled. But it seems there's no way to install a firewall rule between VLANs.
Just messing around with packet tracer for a little practice. I tried to setup a router on a stick config with 3 switches trunked and PCs on different vlans. Anybody know of any issues that may arise with STP and inter-vlan routing? I set everything up correctly with trunking, addressing, encapsulations, vlans, but did not touch STP. Unable to ping from any PC to any where.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI have used an RVS4000 v1 for some years now as part of my domestic network. In particular I have an extensive Sonos distributed audio system, and I use the RVS4000's Static IP Mapping feature to assign a fixed IP to each and every Sonos box. It all works perfectly.
However, earlier this year my ISP (Virgin Media) upped my broadband service from 20Mbps to 60Mbps, without extra cost. Very kind of them, excellent! Their new SuperHub was initially installed in its factory default state, mainly because the several technicians who got involved with it's installation did not know how to go about putting it into Stand Alone Cable Modem mode. I did not want to use either its router, switch or wifi access point, preferring instead to stick with my perfectly good Cisco alternative {RVS4000+3xWAP4410Ns}.
After they gave up, I successfully altered the firmware revision and box settings to put it to SACM mode. But first I checked its speed. As supplied, it came in at about 63Mbps download and 2.8Mbps upload. The same speedtest.net test once set as SACM, and connected to my RVS4000 got just around 21Mbps download, 2.8Mbps upload. Disable the RVS4000 Intruder Protection System (IPS) and throughput matches the SuperHub on its own, 67Mbps down, 2.8Mbps up.
My conclusions...
1) The upload speed is virtually a constant irrespective of my equipment configuration, and will be ignored for the rest of this post.
2) Because of the need to open every packet for inspection, my RVS4000's processor just cannot handle this amount of data, and effectively is throttling my throughput down to the same rate I was getting before my ISP improved the service. So now I have a 60Mbps service, but unless I disable IPS, cannot actually get the benefit of it. Not good enough!
After lots of reading on the various Cisco sites, I recently purchased a Cisco RV042G router. Its 800Mbps spec suggests throughput will not be an issue. An in fact that is confirmed by running speedtest.net, where results of 62Mbps/2.8Mbps are surprisingly marginally lower than the RVS4000/IPS Disabled, but OK. I now also discover that the RV042G does not have IPS.
My network-savvy colleague said "To be honest IPS is a luxury you don't really need IMHO. You must be in a tiny minority in terms of home users with such a feature. It's such a drain on resources because it's examining the contents of every packet to see whether it recognises an attack signature. Standard residential gateway routers don't do it. They have a regular NAT function, which automatically blocks any unsolicited inbound connections, and a firewall to keep out any broadcast traffic."
Given his comment, and my experience with the two routers, I am on the verge of returning the RV042G for a refund as it seems to be adding nothing new that I need. But first I would like to hear the considered opinions of the community users:-
1) Simply put, should I just stick with my RVS4000 and run it with IPS off, as I have it set now?
2) How important is IPS in a domestic setting?
3) Is there another similar Small Business product that I should be looking at? I do not particularly want a router with integral wifi, but I could consider replacing both the RVS4000 and the adjacent WAP4410N with a suitable all-in-one.
I am running out of time to send the RV042G back to my supplier.
Ive set up a rvs4000 with two vlans, one as a bussiness network and the other as a guest network. Everything works fine and the networks can not see each other. I would like to add wifi and I would like to do so with keeping both networks separate. I have a used 1130AG access point and was wondering if I could use this single AP for both networks. If so, how would I go about doing so? Is there a better suited AP for my needs?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI know very little about switches. This is the first time I've ever touched them. However, I'm the only one in the company who has the slightest knowledge on how to make them work.
4 vlans
vlan 1 - 192.168.32.1 - Existing network with Internet access
vlan 33 - 192.168.33.1
vlan 34 - 192.168.34.1
vlan 35 - 192.168.35.1
From the laptop on vlan 33 I can ping the management interfaces (192.168.x.1) for each of the vlans. However, I cannot ping anything on those networks.
Below is what I have with the config. Right now not much attached to these switches until they are setup.
Code:
config-file-header
poe-switch
[Code].....
Say I have a managed switch that supports VLANs. I have two computers and one server connected to the switch (I'll call them PC-1, PC-2, and SRV-1).Without routing, I want both PC-1 and PC-2 to talk to SRV-1 and vice versa, however I don't want PC-1 or PC-2 to talk to each other.I achieve this by making each port a trunk port. I make PC-1 a member of VLAN 2, PC-2 a member of VLAN 3, and SRV-1 a member of VLAN 4. The port that SRV-1 is on I make a tagged member of PC-1 and PC-2 (VLAN 2 and 3 respectively) and make the ports the PCs are on a member of the SRV-1 VLAN (VLAN 4).Everything tests OK (that is, the clients can't talk to each other, however the clients can individually talk to the server)
View 6 Replies View RelatedWhat is inter vlan routing protocol? What are its three modes?
View 6 Replies View Relatedi am doing a set-up having the ASA as my Layer 3 device providing inter-vlan communication. ASA with 8.3 firmware. how i can achieve this goal. i am trying to follow some answered topic related to this but its pre 8.3. VLANs created on the same physical have same security level.
View 2 Replies View Related[code] I would like to config two IP ranges, one for staff, one for guest wireless access. The dlink wap supports multi vlan SSIDs.Reason I'm doing this is to prevent access on the guest wireless to access the win 2003 server.Will the switch inter vlan route the 192.168.2.1 to 192.168.1.1? How will vlan 2 get DHCP, will dhcp relay need to be set on vlan 2 to 192.168.1.20 ? [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan inter VLAN routing be done on SRW (Cisco 300 series) switches ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedTrying to set up the Cisco VPN router for remote acces to our network.We have ATT Uverse DSL and it is a Motorola Router, i think NGT 510.the Uverse router has very limited setup options.I cannot set it up as a bridge.The only thing I can figure out is to set the ip passthrough option to the VPN router.We have a static ip address for our internet service.
I have tried several setup and connection options, but cannot get it to work.
1. How to physically connect the routers and network devices?
2. How to setup both routers to play nice.
I live in a two family residential house and we share a common fibre connection to the internet. In the basement we have a modem/router(zyxel) which is in "bridge mode". Therefore not acting as DHCP. Behind this zyxel we have a Cisco RVS4000 router. Ports 1 and 2 go to family A, and Ports 3 and 4 go to family B. Family A and B have separate routers which are both set to "access point mode". Family A has an ASUS RT-N66U router while family B has a dlink DIR-615. The asus has an "access point mode" while the dlink needs to be set up manually to achieve this. The dlink must also have a static IP adress. The asus can receive ip adress.
What I have unsuccessfully tried to achieve and am currently trying to separate the networks so that both families can access internett, but at the same time it must be impossible to access VLAN1(Family A) from VLAN2(Family B) vice versa. Meaning no communication between the two families through the local network.
I have tried different options but I am not sure how to deal with trunk, tagged, untagged etc. etc. etc. It seems every time I manage to create two different networks there is still accessability/communication between the two VLANs and everytime I manage to give out different IP adresses to different ports i.e. 192.168.10.xx and 192.168.2.xx it is still possible to communicate. What also usually happens is that the internetconnection is severed at the same time.
Does Catalyst 3550 switch support inter vlan routing ?
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a DC topology based on 2 layers, access and aggregation, based on 2 pairs of N5548Ps, both without L3 Daugher Cards. My intent is to use the aggregation N5K pair as L3 inter VLAN layer, so I configured all the VLAN default GWs there. The 2 layers are interconnected via vPC, in a double-sided vPC topology for some N2Ks and some vSwitches. The point is that, despite connecitivity is working fairly ok, for some applications, like file transfer via either FTP or HTTP, between hosts in different VLANs, the performance is too poor. The file transfer starts ok, but after a while it becomes lower and lower. ICMP is working, but I can see some strange random behaviour, like having some packets taking more that 20 ms (sometimes 40 or more), whilst average is 2 ms.
I read through some articles saying that until you don´t have the L3 license (the one coming with L3 Daughter Cards) you can expect some weird behaviour on L3 level. Is that true?. What can I do apart of purchasing L3 Daughter Cards?. Can I enable L3 Basic license at the moment (I don´t need dynamic routing for now).
Here some excerpts of what I´m saying:
PING results:
10000 packets transmitted, 10000 packets received, 0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.809/2.496/57.559 ms
System version: 5.0(3)N2(1)
License and features on the N5Ks:
switch# sho license usage
Feature Ins Lic Status Expiry Date Comments
Count
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FCOE_NPV_PKG No - Unused -
FM_SERVER_PKG No - Unused -
ENTERPRISE_PKG No - Unused -
[code]....
I have been looking into this for a while and I can't seem to figure out why my 2nd vlan is not able to connect properly to the net.
My switch has 12 ports where my devices connects directly, they are all on Vlan 1 and they all work perfectly. on Port 12 I have a dlink router that is connected to a cable modem. the dlink router has an Ip address of 192.168.0.20
I created a second vlan (vlan2) and enabled dhcp relay on it. then I assigned port 9 on the switch to (vlan2)my laptop which is connected to port 9 seems to get an ip address fine and able to ping only some devices on my network (vlan1) and is not able to go out to the internet. I think it has to do with the routes. [code]
We have two Cisco 5505 firewalls connecting to two ISP's . The two internal LAN's on the firewalls are 192.168.184.0/24 & 192.168.186.0/24. We also have a Cisco C3560x layer3 switch with vlan interfaces 184.3 & 186.3. We have two DGS-3100 Dlink layer 2 switches connecting our users to the Layer 3. Ip routing is enabled for intervlan communication & I can reach the Switch interfaces & firewall gateways from machines on both on the vlans.We have pbr enabled on the 3560 & users only on the .186 network can get to the internet. The switch is running the ipservices license & the sdm template is "desktop routing" .
Users on the .184 cannot access the internet but we can ping the layer3 interface & the firewall gateway. [code]
Can nexus 5010 supports inter v lan routing , as there is no core switch and router available in current network.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn 3750 switch,I have configured intervlan routing.I have three vlans Vlan 10,vlan 20,Vlan 30 and I have assigned IP address for that Vlan.In vlan 10,I have connected one systen gigabitethernet 0/1 interface.From my system I am able to ping vlan 10 ip address but I can't able to ping other vlan ip address (vlan 20,vlan 30).Is it possible to up the protocol for all that time.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently set up a small photography business and am trying to get a Cisco 877 and Cisco SG300-10 switch to talk to each other.
What I want is for the Cisco 877 to handle the internet and the SG300-10 to handle the local network,
I have set up 2 vlans in trunk mode on the switch and want vlan2 to manage local traffic and vlan3 to handle the internet.
I have got the 877 connecting to the internet what I dont have, traffic going to vlan2 on the switch from the 877
Look at the running configs for the switch and the router and tell me how to get the vlan on the router to pass traffic to the switch. In a nutshell I am inserting the internet into the switch but am not sure how to progress. I have the c870-advipservicesk9 image file on the router.
Switch Config
interface gi2
description connection-to-data-vlan
exit
interface gi3
description connection-to-internet-vlan
exit
vlan database (code )
I am working for a large campus network. The network has more than 70 VLANS in a Layer 3 Switch(Catalyst 4503). Customer wants to stop intervlan routing between all vlans except 2 vlans. How will i do that? I have also a Firewall (ASA 5520) & a Router (2811) in up of the switch. Besides this, I have run HSRP in Layer 3 Switches for redundancy.how will i stop intervlan routing between VLANS except 2, with ACL or any other process has?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI'm looking to restrict Inter-VLAN routing through L3 switch (cisco 6500) and wanted to know best possible way to do it. I used VACL and achieved success to some extent, but my config is making clients take up to 5-6 mins to authenticate IP address from the DNS (bootps).My VACL config was as follows:
Subnet to restrict is 10.100.15.0 (VLAN 15)
STEP 1: Created extended ACL to allow bootpc/bootps through DNS
ip access-list extended EACL_DNS
permit udp any eq bootps any
permit udp any eq bootpc any
STEP 2: Created standard ACLs to allow only relevant subnet, server VLANs & some IPs from other subnets for printers/scanners etc.
ip access-list standard SACL_VLAN_15
permit 10.100.15.0 0.0.0.255 (the subnet I'm restricting)
permit 10.100.50.0 0.0.0.255 (server VLANs)
permit 10.100.25.45 0.0.0.0 (printer in another VLAN which has to have access in VLAN 15)
STEP 3: Created VLAN access list
vlan access-map VACL_15 10
match ip address EACL_DNS
action forward
vlan access-map VACL_15 20
match ip address SACL_15
action forward
STEP 4: Applying VLAN Access list on VLAN 15 vlan filter VACL_15 vlan-list 15 Though the above works, below is noted:
1. I'm still able to PING 10.100.15.2 (the switch virtual interface) from outside the subnet, which I don't intend to do so. Howeve all cients in the subnet have no connectivity from outside the VLAN 15.
2. As mentioned its taking quiet some time to negotiate with the DNS server at system boot time.
you find attached my network architecture with 2 Nexus 7010 on core layer and 2 Nexus 5020 on distribution layer, each one with 1 N2148T fabric extender switch. PC-A1 and PC-A2 are connected to one N2148T, PC-B1 is connected to the other N2148T. Nexus-7000-1 is HSRP Active for all VLANs, Nexus-7000-2 is HSRP standby. PC-A1 and PC-A2 are connected to VLAN A, PC-B1 is connected to VLAN B. PC-A1 and PC-A2 have the same default gateway correspondent to IP HSRP on VLAN A. It happens that PC-A1 is able to ping PC-B1 while PC-A2 is unable to ping PC-B1. If I issue a traceroute from PC-A2 I see Nexus-7000-2’s physical IP address as the first hop even if Nexus-7000-2 is HSRP standby. After the first hop the traceroute is lost. If I shutdown Port-channel 20 on Nexus-5000-2, PC-A2 starts to ping PC-B1.I can’t understand what’s wrong in this architecture.
View 6 Replies View RelatedIn my home setup I have an PFsense firewall wich is doing all the routing right now, but right now my net speed is maxing out about 500mbit, i my think it's the pfsense hardware, but its an 1500Mhz C7 VIA with 2Gb ram, I just bought two new switchs, HP-1910-24g and a HP 5500-24G they can do some layer 3 routing, will my speed get a bumb up when the switch is doing some of the vlan routing.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to do the inter vlan routing packet tracer file url...configuration of MLS are as bellow can anyone tell me why vlan on switch0 can not ping vlan on switch1. [code]
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a connection on IP 192.168.1.21, Subnet 255.255.255.0 - this is on the default VLAN1 on the switch. I need to route this to IP 10.0.3.101, Subnet 255.255.252.0 - which is set up on VLAN2 on the switch. I have set the switch to Layer 3 via console.
how I setup this route? I am use the Browser based interface.
I have set up a 2811 with seperate VLANs for phones, and another for computers/printers. Fa0/0 is trunked to a 3560 switch, which has all end devices plugged in. I have enabled the IP Routing commands on both devices, and from advice turned off proxy-arp on the VLANs on the router (unsure if this is causing the issue). The setup is as follows
Computer VLAN = 192.168.20.0
Phone VLAN = 192.168.50.0
Both on the same subnet, along with a router loopback address in the same subnet, at 192.168.10.1.I am having an issue understanding why, but if I try to ping a phone from a PC it times out. Or if I try to type the phone's IP into an internet browser to get the phone's GUI on screen, it fails. This should not be happening as IP routing has been enabled on both, and everything is in the same subnet, correct? PC's can ping other PC's and network printing works fine. Phones register and operate fine, but the two VLAN's will not interoute.Furthermore if I try and ping the router's loopback from the switch, it fails. But the trunk is up and operational because DHCP and devices work within their own VLAN. If I try to ping end devices from the switch, it returns 100%. There seems to be an issue with the router looping the different networks together.
I've recently installed an SGE2010 switch, which I have set to 'Layer 3' mode.
I have created 2 VLANs using 192.168.10.x and 192.168.20.x (using .50 for the VLAN IP address in each case) - however, I need to be able to allow certain traffic between the VLANs.Alternatively, to get things started - I'm assuming I need to set up ACLs to allow access between VLANs - how would I configure the switch to allow all traffic from one VLAN to the other?