Cisco Switches :: Linksys SRW 224G4 / Catalyst 3650G And Management Via Trunk?
Dec 15, 2009
I have couple of Linksys SRW 224G4 and SRW 2024 connected together with Cisco C3650 switches. For my part of network VLAN100 is used as administrative vlan and VLAN1 as defult (on trunks or unused ports).Altrough most of switches work fine, on all older models of SRW224G4 (hw 1.0, various firmware versions) there is no connectivity to management utilities (also ping won't work) via trunk (where of course VLAN100 is present). At the same time there is no problem with access from "local" ports (assigned to VLAN100) and there are no problems with traffic on VLAN 100 along the network.
For example:Two computers (A and B), two switches (sw1 - old SRW224G4 and sw2 - Cisco switch), are connected as follow:
A--VLAN100--sw1--TRUNK--sw2--VLAN100--B
Swicthes have VLAN100 as management VLAN, computers are connected to access ports (untagged).A has access to management on sw1 and sw2 and connectivity with B?B has access to management on sw2 and connectivity with B but has no access to management on sw1...If sw1 and sw2 are same, old SRW224G4 - everything works fine.Newer versions of SRW224G4, SRW2024 and SLM2024 works OK.Why it doesn't work?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 27, 2012
I recently lost my configuration when attempting to reset the password for our Cisco 3560g switch, the switch connects to a Cisco 4506 switch via fiber back to our main office.
I have the switch temporarily routing all traffic to our 4506 by using the default route of 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.254 but the same switch is connected to a cisco 2600 router that is on a 10.10.20.0 network and the 3560g is on a 10.0.0.0 network.
Host computers sit on the 10.0.0.0 network, but they need to go to the 10.10.10.0 network for internet, domain, etc the same computers need to go to the 10.10.10.20 for remote connections and other services.
The address of the 3560g is: 10.0.0.254
The address of the 2600 is 10.10.20.2
When the default route is set to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.254 (4560 switch) domain browsing works perfectly
When the default route is set to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.20.2 (3560G) switch I can ping any ip address in that range and the address on the other
interface ip adresses on the 2600 (eg. 10.10.30.1 / eth2, 10.10.40.1/ eth3 etc.)
I have tried to weight the routes after adding them both to the configuration, but that doesn't seem to work at all.
The switch connects back to the office via vlan1 (10.10.10.253)
The 2600 is connected to port 1, which belongs to Vlan2 (10.10.20.1)
And client computers sit on ports 2-12 belonging to Vlan10 (10.0.0.240)
So in a nut shell, how would I go about setting it up so the machines on 10.0.0.0 can connect to 10.10.20.0 and 10.10.10.0 and vice versa at the same time? Everything was working fine until I rebooted the switch (3560g), which makes me think the person that configured this before me didn't save the running config to the start up config.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2011
How do I get the actual firmware for SUBJ? On Cisco site only. 1.0.2 . However, As far as I know It have a 1.0.6 with lot of bug fixes.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2013
I can not access the switch through the console. The web interface is working properly.
Model: SRW224g4
Below some pictures. The Hyper Terminal settings. Error:
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2013
Is there really any reason why you wouldn't use spanning-tree portfast on a trunk port other than a trunk between two switches? We have it enabled on all ports except for the fiber trunk between two non-stacked switches and the trunk ports connected to our Astaro firewall.I'd like to enable it on the ports to the firewall unless that would cause issues.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2012
I am struggling with a CE520 and its smartports stuff.I have configured the following vlans :
1- data
100 - phones
I need to bring those vlans (both of them) to a Cisco 800 router. The port of the 800 router is already configured as trunk and accepts vlan 1 and 100.The cisco 800 has both vlan 1 and 100 configured with 2 ips on different subnets, and ip routing is enable (to route between two vlans). Also, no access lists are configured.I have configured one port in the switch as role "router" and connected to the router. The other ports are all configured as phone-desktop (phone vlan 100 desktop vlan 1).If I connect a phone and manually configure an ip (the phone gets automatically vlan 100), and try to ping the phone from the router, it doesnt respond. Alse vlan 100 is protocol down.I am guessing what s the right configuration as the link between the switch and the router should be a trunk link for 1 and 100 vlans, but it looks like is transporting only vlan 1.Also changing the port role to "other" when you can specify the native vlan and another vlan, the switch doesnt accept vlan 100 as additional vlan on that link.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2013
Are there any best practices for preventative maintenance on Catalyst Chassis switches. Looking to build a PMI schedule for a customer. Or is there evidence not to perform it at all. Things like re-seating line cards, cleaning fan exhausts, etc.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2011
Any snmpset commands to add, modify and delete vlan table entries on SG300-10 switches? I checked url... however this information is apparently only valid for catalysts. The latest firmware is installed and the provided MIB files are used.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2011
I recently picked up a Catalyst 2960G and am trying to get SNMP management working over IPv6. I have the IP Address set to the local link, and can successfully ping and telnet to the switch (so the network can get traffic to and from the switch). However, SNMP packets just seem to disappear. I am running WireShark on my machine, and I see the packets go out to the proper IP, but nothing comes back. When I check "sho ipv6 traffic", I can see where there are UDP packets that are received, but, again, none going out. Also, when I run "sho snmp", all of the packet counts are 0.
Here are some relavant snipets from my "sho run":
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
ipv6 enable
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2011
We have quite a few 3560 & 2960 on our edge network - what I have been looking at was to access switches via web-interface i.e. web-browser. Only problem with this is it always gives you access on privilige level 15 which is not ideal as not all who we decide to give access to these switches will be admin and allowed to configure these swicthes - In the 3560/2960 data-sheet states:
"Alternatively, a local username and password database can be configured on the switch itself. Fifteen levels of authorization on the switch console and two levels on the Web-based management interface provide the ability to give different levels of configuration capabilities to different administrators"
Where as there is no mention of how to configure these two levels of Web-based management in the configuration guide.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2012
How does the ESW 500 or SF300 line guarantee QoS of voice traffic when trunking switch to switch? I have (2) ESW 500 series switches in series. The phone on switch 1 have no audio issues, but the phones on switch 2 (the last in the series) have intermittent voice quality issues when dialing across a WAN circuit to another office. The phone on switch 1 do not have that issue though they traverse the same circuit. They are all using the same VLAN 100.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2012
I'm working with an established Network, which has 2 Allied Telesis Switches (1)&(2).I must add another Allied Telesis (3), and a Cisco Switch.If I connect just the Cisco Switch, and the AT(3), it works ok. I mean it trunks. It also works ok if I connect the AT(3) with AT (1) and AT (2). But if I want to connect the Cisco SW with AT(1) and AT(2), or AT(1), AT(2) and AT(3) It doesn´t trunk. Even if I set the Cisco Switch port I use, as a trunk port.I think I have a problem with the vlans already created on AT1 and AT2. But the problem is that I cannot access to the AT console mode.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2013
I'm trying to set up a trunk between an SG200 and a SRV2048.. I am attaching my configuration that not works..
I test to ping an host that is open on Vlan 22 on Swich01 from the other switch, SWITCH02 , from a port 26 that I opened on VLAN 22 in untagged mode but nothing works..
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
Is it possible to trunk a SF300 switch with a 3750 switch? If so how? Whenever I turn trunking on the 3750 port I lose connection to the SF300.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
Our company currently have a 3com 2816 connected to a 3com 4800G through a trunk. The 4800G connects to the PBX and to the ip phones/computers. We are currently using vlan1 (192.168.100.n) for data and vlan 3 (192.168.101.n) for voice , Ip addresses are being issued by a DHCP server. Each user has an assigned IP phone and it has an ethernet port that connects to each computer. This setup has been working properly until I purchased an SG300 and replaced the 3com 2816.
The ip phone is showing a bad gateway and the PC are getting an ip address of 192.168.101 (which is for voice). Theoretically it should work, but what is weird is, it seems the SG300 trunking with the 3com 4800G is not working. Is it possible that it is on ISL mode rather than dot1q?I also saw its running RSTP, should I changed it to classic STP?How do I fix this or what troubleshooting should i do?
The SG300 is configured as a layer 2 switch. Configuration for the trunk below:
interface gigabitethernet27
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 3-4
macro description switch
macro auto smartport type switch $native_vlan 1
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2012
I've noticed that a couple of switches are complaining about duplex mismatches on trunk interfaces. When I took a closer look, two switches (switches 1 & 3) are reporting that they have a duplex mismatch to a device connected to a downstream switch (switch 2). Basic topology is switch 2 has a 1G fiber link to both switch 1 & 3.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2012
Is it possible to use Port Security mechanism between two switch (3750 or 3560) ports while trunk has been configured? If it's not possible, is there any other way to ensure that no other Switch can be connected other then the one switch which has been configured/placed by a network engineer?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2012
I have client who has two distant offices with 3750 L3 as core (do all vlan routing for local office) and multiple L2 access switches with multiple VLAN’s connected to it. First 3750 is hub also connected to internet, second 3750 is spoke and acting as a router on stick. We have eigrp configured on both side ISP provided client 100Mbps link as a trunk with two vlan; vlan10 for voice and vlan20 for data. We assigned two small subnets to these vlans 10.15.17.0/29 and 10.15.17.9/29. Hub addresses are 10.15.17.1 and 10.15.17.9 respectively. How to force voice over VLAN10 and data via vlan20, but still do some load balancing? How to setup default route on second (router on stick) switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2012
I've been having a debate with a colleague about QOS COS values. My colleague says I need to use COS values across layer 2 trunk links between access layer switches and core switches. My argument is if phones are marking packets with DSCP values I don't need to be concerned with Cos.The reason I ask is we're implementing a new phone system, the ip phones will mark RTP traffic wih dscp value EF and Call signaling with DSCP value of CS3. If my understanding is correct I can trust the dscp values of the phones. We are using Cisco 4507 switches which I believe automatically trust dscp values so I would just need a class-map to match the dscp values and apply the output policy map on the egress interfaces as follows? [code]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
We have 7 3560's in 7 different locations connected to our providor for wan access. Our provider has given us a copper cable at each point and we have connected it directly to our 3560 switch at each location. Each port is configured the same way at each location. Each switch is running eigrp.All of the switch ports on each switch are configured as a trunk and vlan 299 had the ip address for the eigrp connection: [code] This setup is working as each switch see's all of the other switches as an eigrp neighbor. We have also made sure that the switch at our head office has spanning tree priority for vlan 299.
So the problem is, if there is a change in the topology at one of the locations it usually causes one or more of the other connections to go down for some reason. We just cannot pinpoint what is causing this change. There are no log's or anything other than an eigrp hold time expired message.?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2012
we recently aquired a managed services job and have to do a overhaul of the vlan configs and have a whole dozen WC2948G's trunk between a set of ports as well as trunk out a LAG channel setup to non cisco equipment. the deal is the lacp-channel works properly on both ends but no routing of vlans between ports and between the lag trunk are working.
theres alot of settings in the config and im planning on clearing it and starting from scratch but before i do i want to know where my problem lies.
[code]...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2012
trunk port connecting but not allowing access to tree; i connected 4506 port to 3550 port; and i set both to switchport mode dynamic desirable; the 4506 port was set with switchport mode access and switchport mode access vlan ?; i used the command default switchport access vlan to remove the vlan; the ports are up but as I stated I cannot connect ot our workgroup tree
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2012
I have a 3750 as a core and have a series of HP Procurve switches that are daisy chained using one port. I have two vlans on the port now (6 &9) and everything works fine, all switches communicate and end devices on the switches are also talking. There is a requirement to add a device towards the end of the chain which requires it to connect using Vlan1. Once I add Vlan1 to the port onthe 3750 I lose connectivity to all the HP switches.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2013
I faced with a strange behavior of ME3600.For testing purposes I linked Cat3550 and ME3600 switches via trunk mode. All interfaces are in Up state. But I couldn't ping SVI200 of Cat switch from ME3600 and vice versa. [cde]
This scheme perfectly works with another L3 swithes. For example Catalist3750. I know that ME doesn't support VTP, DTP and so on. Also, I've tried latest software.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2012
I have a Cisco SG300 switch on which trunks are configured. I have a server which sits on the switch via a trunk link of four network cables (4 Gbps total)on which LACP is enabled. I'm having trouble connecting to the server using VNC from a computer on the network. It doesn't happen all the time though, it's just random.
On looking at the logs of the switch, I saw something unusual. The trunk that connects the switch to the server is constantly removing all the member ports and adding them back again after a few minutes interval. That causes the trunk link to flip on and off all the time. What could be the reason that's causing it to happen? I know it could be the network cable but I'm using brand new cables and the server also is brand new.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2011
I'm trying to trunk Fa0/3 port of 3524XL switch and Gi0/1 port of 3650G, below are the commands used. [code]
The issue is VTP not getting propogated into the Cisco 3650G switch so I'm not getting the VLAN database from my Cisco Core Switch 6500. Am I missing anything in the configuration???
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2013
I have just configured up a sg500 with a lacp trunk to an upstream switch.
I am getting native vlan mismatch on the individual ports of the lacp team.
24-Jan-2013 12:54:48 %CDP-W-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch detected on interface gi1/1/24.
24-Jan-2013 12:57:35 %CDP-W-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch detected on interface gi1/1/48.
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2012
I am looking into the possibility of using private vlan's for some dmz implementations however I do have what may be some very rudimentary questions. It seems straightforward how to configure the primary/secondary vlan configuration as well as associating them. However in my case I would be looking to configure the PVLAN on a 6500-vss platform acting as the router while all of the hosts which I would desire to have in the isolated vlan would be spread out across a number of older Cisco switches which only support "protected port" setup or Procurve switches all of which I do not have budget to replace with something newer. So in my scenario I would have a 6500 connected by trunk to multiple switches which only support a protected port setup such as a Procurve (top of rack) or a Cisco 2950. As the Procurve or 2950 would not support Private VLAN setup, do I then just configure the secondary vlan to be allowed across the trunk from the 6500, configure that vlan on the Procurve or 2950 (as vtp will not foward the info for the secondary vlan) and assign that vlan to the host port as well as setting it as a protected port and this will communicate just fine across the trunk to the router as well as stopping the protected port in top of rack switch 1 from being able to communicate to a protected port in top of rack 2,3,etc? If the above scenario is what needs to be done, do I just use a regular trunk or do I have to use a PVLAN trunk?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2012
Got an odd problem with trunking, all vlans except vlan1 trunk perfectly. Link is from a pair of dualhomed FEX 2248TP's to some 3650G Switches. Nexus running - version 5.1(3)N2(1) 3560's running - 12.2(53)SE2 & 15.0(1)SE2
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2012
We run a network of several 2960G and 3650G switches in a network with a number of VLANs. One one particular VLAN (let's call it VLAN 10) it appears that non-broadcast traffic (i.e. normal unicast traffic) is being copied to every port in VLAN 10 only on one switch . The traffic is not crossing trunk ports and does not appear on other switches that have ports in VLAN 10. We first spotted this by noticing that a UPS port had an unusual amount of activity on our port througput graphs:
This traffic at 4 am is not expected and this profile is repeated across all ports in VLAN 10 on this switch (a WS-C2960S-48TD-L stack running IOS 15.0(1)SE3)\iffed one port using local SPAN (the UPS port) and discovered that this traffic was not broadcast, which was running at a normal low rate at all times. The traffic appeared to be unicast traffic from other ports of the sort you might see on a hub. It was from various hosts that live on VLAN 10, most (not all) of the conversations had one end station homed on the 'problem' switch. There are about 800 non-broadcast packets per hour and this is a busy VLAN so it does not account for all the traffic on the VLAN.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2011
I'm having a hard time getting Compliance Manager to accept a "banner login" command I'm attempting to use on 6500 IOS switches. I've edited the template, tried cut-&-paste, looked for the archive file on the server to directly modify it (without success), among other things. I have this feature functioning correctly on CatOS switches, but can't seem to get it properly set on IOS switches. What's the limit, as far as the template is concerned, on the number of characters with this type of command? Where are the archive configs located on the server; in the "shadow" directory?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2011
I just purchased 2 SF-300 48 port units for 2 customers. I want to be able to remotely manage them over the Internet with my browser. BUT, customer sites already use port 80 for web servers. So, how do I configure this switch to use some other port than 80?
I called support, and much to my surprise he said it cannot be changed. How bizarre that a device with many hundreds of configuration settings does not have one of the most basic settings...
At one customer site I can configure port forwarding and translation to get around this problem, but the other site's router does not offer port translation..
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2013
I am setting up a 3 host ESXi cluster. I am using a pair of stacked SG500-28 switches for switching redundancy. Each host has 8 NICs. 4 to each switch. I have successfully setup a 3 NIC LAG with 1 path to one switch and 2 paths to the other. These LAGs work. When I setup a 2NIC LAG via the console for management, and the associated ports on the switches, I lose managment communication with the host. Before setting up the LAG in the ESXi console, I set that vswitch properties to us IPHASH as instructed here bit.ly/VLaTEt I have attempted to follow those instructions as closely as possible. The one thing that I am wondering is whether the SG series supports etherchannel. I can't find any reference. Either way, it works on the other vswitch that is for vMotion. I can vmkping between the hosts over that LAG. But setting up a LAG on the management vSwitch doesn't?
View 5 Replies
View Related
