I have came across this topic, and I am wondering if this images can be uploaded to any 2900 series switches or not, and if this will work as access port for more than vlans. URL...
View 2 RepliesWe have multiple cisco cat 2900 switches. all switches don't have cascade cable port in back panel. i want some sort of solution to manage those switch remotely.
View 9 Replies View Relatedmake a couple of SF300 switches to work properly with a C2960S-48TS-L that acts as core switch/basic router. I can't seem to figure out how to assign VLANs correctly in trunk and access mode on the SF300. The 2960S are a no brainer with IOS commands but the webgui in the SF300 is a pain.
I've configured the 2960S with 3 VLANs and I would like to have the SF300 switches connect to the C2960S-48TS-L through VLAN trunk and then configure the ports on the SF300 switches to belong to the assigned VLANs of my choosing. I would also like to have all the SF300 switches management interface in VLAN 50.
I've partially described the enviroment below.
VLANs
Data VLAN 10: 192.168.10.0
Management VLAN 50: 10.20.30.0
Voice VLAN 100: 10.10.10.0
[Code].....
I just purchased a used Catalyst 2900 XL switch and have not been succesful in connecting to the console via minicom 2.5 running on Ubuntu 12.04 or 11.10, I don’t even get junk charecters in the terminal or echo on input. The switch passes POST according to the LEDs on the front and the network ports are fucntional for switching purpouses.
I’m using a Prolific PL2303 USB-Serial adapter, which works with minicom to console into another device. I’ve tried every baud rate available and tried combonations of hardware flow control, software flow control, and niether.I’ve tested the pinout of the console cable and all pins map correctly according to Cisco spec.I’ve also tried Cutecom, putty, and screen. I have not tried HyperTerminal because I do not use windows.Is it possible that the previous owner disabled console access? Do I need to reboot the switch each time I test a different baud rate?
The field engineer has a stand alone 24 port 2900 series switch that he has different equipment connected to and are segmented using VLANs. So for example, he's got ports 1-4 assigned to VLAN 10, 5-12 assigned to VLAN 20, 13-19 assigned to VLAN 30 and 20-24 assigned to VLAN 40. He would like all the gear on VLAN 30 to have the ablity to talk to all of the other VLANS, but VLAN 40 should not be allowed to talk with any other VLAN. Trunking would do no good here since the switch isn't connected to anything and you can only assign one VLAN per port.
Is there a way to do this within the stand alone switch? The only possible way I could think of would be to ensure that each VLAN has an assigned IP number (subnet) and doing this through access lists.
I have 2 Vlans with seperate networks and want to create a route between one server in vlan 465 to another server in vlan 436 via port 80.Vlan 465 has a ASA 5505 inside that IP address 89.254.12.35 will be initiating the connection to address 10.200.1.213.
-Vlan 465: server address 10.200.1.213
-Vlan 436: server address 89.254.12.35
However for extended security I would like to restrict the firewall opening to an IP to IP opening.
We have a typicaly environment, access, distribution, core, all switches are 6500s.I have a lab environment where machines should not talk to each other, so I think private vlans would be good for this. The problem is that the access connects to the distribution with a 802.1q trunk, while the distribution connects to the core with an 802.1q trunk. See the attached image for reference.
In this case, I would configure the primary vlan (888) on the two access switches, as well as the isolated (886) and the community (887), and set the associations.
vlan 886
name Isolated_PVLAN
private-vlan isloated
vlan 887
name Community_PVLAN
private-vlan community
vlan 888
private-vlan primary
private-vlan association 886,887
exit
The host ports would be set as such.
interface g3/40
switchport mode private-vlan host
switchport private-vlan host-association 888 886
My question is where to I put the promiscuous port? Is it on the uplink between the access and distribution? And If I configure it as I have below, what about the other VLANs that are needed at the access switch? Do they still pass through the trunk as normal, even with the private-vlan configuration? Or would every other VLAN need to be configured as a secondary private-vlan on the promiscuous port?
interface g5/1
switchport mode private-vlan promiscuous
switchport private-vlan mapping 888 886,887
Also, would VLAN access-lists be a better method for controlling this traffic?
I'm trying to setup a port on a catalyst 3750 so it will pass traffic for 2 vlans. It connects to a (watchguard) firewall which I've configured with a primary IP (for vlan 27) and a secondary IP (for vlan 29).
However I can't seem to find the correct commands to enter on the cisco switch port (I've tried a variety).
FYI the current configuration is...
interface FastEthernet1/0/38
description ## Connection to WG vlan27 and vlan 29 ##
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
[Code].....
I got a Cisco 2800 router and am planning to use FastEthernet 0/1 to trunk in 802.11Q VLAN's to cater for some of our radio links. speed and operation of the sub-interface that will be created. Or explain it here. We got a radio link that we want to trunk into this Cisco 2800 and it is suppose to be connecting at 100Mbps but currently operating at around 80Mbps. Reports shows that the max in and out traffic for this link this year till today is 25Mbps. Will it not fail teh CPU etc ?
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
!
[Code]....
I would like to configure a 3750 switch port to be able to use two vlans. I know you can do this with a voice and data vlan, but what about two data vlans ? Say I have two devices, one on a 10 subnet and the other on a 172 subnet, but i only have one wall jack for both devices to plug into. So I use a mini switch to connect both devices and connect the switch to the wall jack; and of course this all leads back to one switch port. When I go to enter the switchport access vlan 172 cmd, how would I also make it so the device on the 10 subnet could route out ?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am a bit confused by the output of 'show run' and 'show run switch-profile' that pertains to a port-channel interface configured in a switch-profile. My main gaol is to find out how can I add/remove the allowed vlans the port-channel (configured as trunk) carries. The setup is like this. I have 2 N5k in vPC domain and Etherner1/11 on both switches is configured as trunk vPC that connects to a core switch. When I issue ‘show run’ for the port-channel and physical interface I get the following output. [code] From above it seems the switch-profile configuration is missing the 'switchport trunk allowed vlan' in the port-channel interface. If want I to remove vlan 30 from the allowed vlan, should I go under the switch-profile mode and remove vlan 30 from the allowed list even though the switch-profile configuration seems to be missing this.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm running a couple of nexus 7000 to aggregate a building full of 3750Xs.In the past few weeks I have noticed that the vlans I added to the port-profile never got propagated.So I looked at port-profile sync information and here is what comes up: [code] Why the commands are getting cached?
View 3 Replies View Relatedupgrading our small office network. We currently have about 75 employees with probably 125 devices on the network. I'd like to create about 10 vlans for the different departments and then configure intervlan routing as needed. Currently we have all unmanaged switches and it's just a huge broadcast storm on the network. We are upgrading our Cisco 800 router to an ASA5505 sec. Plus license. I need some recommendations on switches. Of course, this needs to be done as cheap as possible.... Is there a way to use the ASA to configure all the vlans and intervlan routing and access lists and use a cheaper switch to provide the access layer to hosts?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have the following config using a Cisco 1921. I am trying to get devices on the the native VLAN to get internet access via the gateway x.x.x.73.Any thing being routed from the other Vlans 15/20/30 can get access, but nothing from an internal IP address. Is there something I am missing.
The Xs replace the same 3 octets for each interface.I am trying to route from VLANs 15/20/30 to see VLAN 5. I have tried a few things, in terms of adding extra ip routes, but can't get anything to work. Each of those Vlans have another router on the other side of them, which I have also tried adding ip routes too, but nothing. One of the routers (Vlan15 is a Draytek 2830). [code]
How to configure traffic flow between computers inside VLANs and a routed port? Here is the setup details:
1. Switch 3750-X
2. VLAN 100 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.100.1 /24)
3. VLAN 200 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.200.1 /24)
4. routed port gi1/0/48 (IP address 192.168.150.1 /24). Note: this port is directly connected to a firewall ASA 5520 port IP 192.168.150.100 /24
Ip routing is enabled on the switch and inter vlan traffic is flowing ok. I can ping the routed port gi1/0/48 from any computer connected in the VLAN 100 or 200. For example computer with IP 192.168.100.25 can ping the routed port 192.168.150.1. Switch can ping firewall port 192.168.150.100 and the 'sh ip route' command shows the network 192.168.150.0 /24 as directly connected network.
any computer in the two VLANs CANNOT ping firewall ASA port 192.168.150.100 Is it because inter VLAN routing does not work with a routed port on L3 switch? I looked up fallback bridging, but it is meant for non IP traffic.The goal is I am trying to set the ASA port as an internet gateway for VLANs.
i have one SF300-24p switch where i setup some Vlans and echolife hg8245 ONT router to access internet. the diagram is the following
VLAN1 (Subnet of users) -----> Switch SF300-24p
VLAN2 (Subnet of users) -----> Switch SF300-24p
VLAN3 (HG8245) -----> Switch SF300-24p
VLAN4 (Servers) -----> Switch SF300-24p
i want to control access to internet on VLAN1 and VLAN2 (access on VLAN3), while providing access to VLAN4.My problem is in connecting to internet, i can't find a way to "route back traffic to VLANs 1 and 2 since HG8245 don't seem to provide proper static routing ON LAN interface. Maybe without resorting to changing the HG8245 router ?
We have cisco 3550 switch i have configured 3 vlans in this switch vlans are not able to accessing internet
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am trying to setup VLAN's in the company I work for and I am almost there but missing the part when the internet works.I have an SG300 as a L3 Router IP 192.168.0.93.I have created VLAN20 and VLAN40 Assigned VLAN20 192.168.2.1 and VLAN40 192.168.4.1
The static routes have been created and a default router going to the Sonicwall firewall at 192.168.0.1.Port 24 is configured as Untagged VLAN1, Untagged VLAN20 and VLAN40 in trunk mode and going to the Sonicwall NSA 2400. [code]
Working to move all 192.168.0.x network off of VLAN1 and move it a management switch.I have DHCP helper on pointing to the DHCP server.Both VLAN's once the DHCP server is configured to Gateway 192.168.0.93 can get an IP from the correct subnet either 192.168.2.x or 192.168.4.x
All PC's are getting a GW IP of 192.168.2.1 pr 192.168.4.1.All test PC's on both VLAN's can ping each other and any server with the correct GW.When I try to ping google.com or open a web page and try google.com it times out.
We have a network of 30 VLANS and currently all the vlans have access to everything. We are using Cisco 6509 switch for Layer3 routing.I would like to prevent some VLANs accessing the server VLANs. How can i resrict access to the server VLANs? Do i need to implement access-lists on the 6500 switch? or do i need to create VLANS on the firewall so that all traffic i filtered?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThey have a locked Cisco Router which is from the ISP and its confed on a fa 0/0 interface to share Internet access on the network. The ip on that interface is 195.198.11.217 255.255.255.252 and i tried it with a PC (set my personal ip to .218 and entered their dns info (195.67.199.27) and it is working. The question is now. My friend found a 3550 laying around and since the ISP wont let them conf their router he wants to use the 3550 to create 2 vlans with internet access and without access to eachother. Vlan 10 for the desktops and Vlan 20 for the wireless (Moving on to some netgear wireless switches) How would you configure the 3550 for this to work?
View 23 Replies View Relatedi am trying to set up a cisco 2950 with a vlan to seperate all of the pos machines on the network (4 of them) from all other machnes in the building (3 hard wired and wi-fi). i was going to use vlan 1 as a trunk to allow internet access to go from fa0/1 to both vlans (vlan 10 and vlan 20). i have read things about the acl having an explicit deny at the end, so i'm thinking that is my problem. i am testing it at my house before deploying it to the network. i have 1 laptop setup with an ip of 192.168.0.50, and the other is .60. my router is 192.168.0.1. i have the ethernet from the router plugged into fa0/1, the 1st laptop on fa0/2 and the other at fa0/3. before i set the vlans up, i checked the communication by just plugging them in and trying to ping, they could both ping each other, the router and 8.8.8.8. when i finished setting up the test vlans, they could not ping each other(what i wanted) and laptop 1 can ping the router, and 8.8.8.8. laptop 2 cannot ping anything.
the only thing i did was create vlan 10 and 20, set port fa0/2 to vlan 10 and no sh, fa03 to vlan 20 and no sh, fa0/1 to vlan 1 and no sh. then i did switchport mode trunk on fa0/1, and switchport native vlan 1. this seems to be how i was supposed to do it, but it's been a while since i have worked with switches. i'm sure it's simple, but after searching the internet and poring over my cisco books for 5 hours, it is turning out not to be the case. here are some details:
greenhouse#sh int fa0/1 switchport
Name: Fa0/1
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
[code]...
I have set up a scenario for a small business and have some questions about how to manage the access between the VLANs. Is there is a better / another way to do it. See the attached picture for the topology / info.
My question is:
My switches is set up with x numbers of VLANs and a routed port (no switch port) to the ASA for internet connectivity. How is the best (or only??) way to manage the access between the VLANs? Is it ACL's on the switch?
And by "managing access" I mean VLAN 50 (public WiFi) only have access to the internet, only management servers have access to management VLAN, Client VLAN only have RDP access to server VLAN and so on. Is there any way to do this in the ASA (or add another (gigabit) router to the topology)) or it the only way to have lots of ACL's on the switch itself? I have thought about "router on a stick", but then I imagine there will be a bottleneck between the switch and the ASA?
(Equipment is 2 x 3650G, ASA5505, AP1252 - see attached file).
I have a small cisco switch cluster (seven different 2924, 3524cisco switches) with 3550 as a cluster control which does all the inter vlan routing that works fine.
This cluster is in semi production PBX interop testing lab. This is a closed network without internet access and not connected to our corporate network.However now I have to add this capability so some equipment in the lab can get Microsoft updates over the internet.
I've created a port on a 3550 (fa0/19) and connected it to another network that has internet access. It picked an ip address and when I'm logged in to the 3550 I can ping hosts on the outside network. However I can't ping any hosts on that network from any hosts that are connected to my vlans.I've tried a few different things, but still can't make it to work.
Here is a short version of my 3550 configuration:
!
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log datetime
no service password-encryption
[code]....
I've got a 3750x stack set up as my core switch (only a small-ish environment) - I'm shortly going to be deploying an enterprise wireless network with Corporate and Guest SSID's. I'm going to be putting all traffic from the Guest SSID in VLAN 244, and don't want it to have access to any of the other VLANs (1 (Legacy Eqpt), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 248 & 252).
IP ranges for all the main VLANs are:
1: 10.0.0.x/22
4: 10.0.4.x/22
8: 10.0.8.x/22
12: 10.0.12.x/22
16: 10.0.16.x/22 etc etc (you get the pattern)
I'll probably give Guest traffic (VLAN 248) the IP range 192.168.10.x/22 (not because I NEED that many addresses, but it's easier for everyone to remember/understand if I keep the subnet masks the same all round). However I also have a CCTV VLAN (252) which already has the range 192.168.0.x/24, which some people in other VLANs WILL need access to.
So my question is: What is the syntax for the ACL on my 3750x (IP base - 15.0.2) to prevent traffic from VLAN 244 gaining access to any of my other VLANs. I'm making a broad assumption here that a layer 3 switch is perfectly capable of supporting that function? I need ALL the syntax for setting up ACL's - I've never done it before
My gateway device by the way is 10.0.4.1, and I do have inter-VLAN routing set up on the core switch (obviously).
I have configured vlans in 3560G switch but vlans notable to accessing Internet
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have a network of 30 VLANS and currently all the vlans have access to everything. We are using Cisco 6509 switch for Layer3 routing.I would like to prevent some VLANs accessing the server VLANs. How can I restrict access to the server VLANs?Do i need to implement access-lists on the 6500 switch? or do i need to create VLANS on the firewall so that all traffic i filtered ?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am not sure if what I am trying to accomplish is possible. On my internal network I have the following VLANs setup (102, 104, 106) and they map one to one to a subnet (ie: 102 = 192.168.102.0/23, 104 = 192.168.104.0/24, etc).All interVLAN routing is done on a 3560 via vlan SVI. Connected to the 3560 via a routed port is a ASA 5510. The routed port has IP 192.168.100.1 and the ASA interface on the other side of that routed port has IP 192.168.100.2. I use 802.1x on the wired network to assign users (based on their department) into a specific VLAN. I want to extend this concept to Remote VPN access. Therefore I setup multiple Group Policies (policy is applied based on an LDAP attribute) where each policy defines a different DHCP scope. This has successfully allowed me to login wtih different users who get assigned to different Group policies and they obtain the correct DHCP IP address from the internal DHCP server (ie: an engineering person logins remotely and gets an IP in 192.168.102.0 range). However the issue (and as I was planning this out I knew this would come up) is that traffic can be routed out from the VPN client to its destination but there is no return path.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe need to give differentiated internet access to three VLANs. Each one of this VLANs is used for totally different purposes, so traffic between the VLANs is not allowed. Each VLAN has its own internet access provided for the data center using one fast ethernet connection.
We're thinking about using cisco 2911 for Internet access, VPN and firewall. I suppose that best option for VLANs is using Catalyst 2960S or a swithing module for the 2911, but these two options are too expensive for us. We're thinking about using swtiches from the SB series (maybe a SG-200).
We're totaly newbies to VLANs so we have many doubts. This are our questions:
1) The 2911 has three on board ethernet interfaces; we have three VLANs and three internet connections, so we need to use HWICs to get three more ethernet ports. That's right?
2) We need three HWICs or there is some kind of HWIC with more that one ethernet interface?
3) The routing solution is to assign static routes in the 2911 for each interface connected to a VLAN through a 2911's interface connected to internet?
4) Simply connecting three different router interfaces with three different switch ports, each one of them assigned to one of the three different VLAN, are we going to get internet access for all devices in those VLANs? or do we need to configure something else like trunking, VSIs...?
5) Can we achieve our goals using the SG-200 switch?
6) We have the chance to use older routers, is this possible? We're specially interested in knowing if a 1841 or a 2801 router could be used for this setup.
7) This is not a production environment so we can use refurbished equipment.
I have a Cisco C3560CG which is running C3560c405ex-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)EX2.The switch has vlan 1 and vlan 50 configured, vlan 50 should have access to a limited number of host in vlan 1.The following acl has been applied on the inbound to vlan 50:
10 permit tcp 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.15.243 eq 137 138 139 445
20 permit udp 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.15.243 eq netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ss 445
25 permit icmp 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.243
26 permit ip 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.16.30.254
30 permit ip 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.15.254
[code]....
I sure the above would work, but for some reason some of the packet counter are not incrementing but the traffic is being blocked. But I would like to see the counter increment.Also I have that I may beed to use VACL wouls this be the case?
i have a strange problem in my campus network.im trying to run port security on my access switches which they are 3550 with ios c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-52.SE when i run the port security with Sticky option, even i put 1000 mac address for just learning on the port but when i issue the switchport port-security command every pc connected to that port loses its connection with network UNTIL i enable dhcp snooping!!! all my client are getting they ip address from DHCP server but strange thing is that how on earth i have to enable DHCP snooping to port security work properly? also when i check the configuration under the interface when dhcp snooping is not yet enabled switch doesnt add any mac address under the interface so no one can work until i enable snooping and then switch adds mac addresses under the interface configuration.is this Bug on this version of IOS?[code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 3750g connected to a "core" switch stack of 7 other 3750g's via 2 GigE ports in a trunk. This is currently in a switchport mode access port- channel so only the default vlan data is sent over. Now we have a need due to physical location of these switches, to allow vlan20 (DMZ) from this 3750g to the switch stack. I will configure a few ports on the switch stack for vlan20 and they need to be able to talk to the stand alone 3750g.To do this I will change the port channel on both endpoints to
-switchport trunk ecapsulation dot1q
-switchport mode dynamic desirable
also making the appropriate change on the interfaces belonging to this trunk.My question is, now that its a trunk port that carries multiple VLANs, how much is the bandwidth reduced on that 2gbps link?I have a very active VLAN (10) on the stand alone switch, but on the core I'm not going to be assigning VLAN 10 to any ports. So does traffic from VLAN10 even come across the trunk (wasting bandwidth) if no ports on the core side are assigned to it? I really just need vlan 1 and 20 (for now).
I have the following configurations in cisco CISCO7606 (R7000). Its meaningful to have the below configuration, wherein , we are allowing multiple vlans on the access port?
interface FastEthernet4/45
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 124-127,423,478,493,578,699,751,787,895,987,1981
switchport mode access
end
interface FastEthernet4/46switchportswitchport trunk allowed vlan 124-127,423,478,493,578,699,751,787,895,987,1981switchport mode accessend
I am facing problem in configuration with SF-200-24P Switch . I am failed to configure two vlans on same access port i.e. data vlan and voice vlan. there is an option of auto voice vlan with vlan 1 and i changed to our voice vlan i.e. vlan 101 but didnt work. I tried many options. when i assign single vlan on each
access port it works . I have to configure like to work both data vlan and voice vlan with one access port. I worked on enterprise cisco switches its simple but on small business switch first time i am working.