Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S - Will Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP) Run

Jun 10, 2013

Will Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP) run on all Cisco switches (2960S and 3010) or is it only available on Service Provider switches like the ME3400E?

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S Metro Ethernet ATT With Nexus 7000

May 24, 2012

we are setting up our first ATT metro ethernet connection.  I have a Cisco 2960S at the remote site and I placed a Cisco 2960 on the Host site to test and had no issues.  When I moved the  Host site to our Nexus 7000, I can not get a link..  both sides are set as trunks,

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Resilient Routing Design With OSPF

Aug 27, 2012

We have 2 sites, each with 2 x 4506 switches which will be connected togther using an etherchannel. The switches will provide access ports for client devices and will be configured with HSRP to provide gateway redundancy. SW1 will be HSRP active.2 metro ethernet links will be installed in each site which will connect back to our HQ sites. OSPF will be used over the backbone to provide resiliency and to allow shortest path routing to each HQ and to prevent traffic over the HQ to HQ link.

The 4506 will be trunked togther with an SVI for providing OSFP adjacency.For the traffic flow from SW2 to HQ2, traffic will hit SW1 and then route back to SW2 and then to HQ2. Is this the best way to do this? Should a second link be connected between switches just for routing or should something like GLBP be used?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1841 With Ethernet And ADSL As Resilient?

Nov 28, 2011

I have a cisco 1841 router in place. I also have a ADSL module which fits into the cisco router. My understanding is that if configured correctly, If the primary circuit were to fail (Ethernet Circuit MPLS), the ADSL would take over services until such time the ethernet link becomes available.
 
Therefore the ADSL circuit is used as a resilient link. If this is possible, can the Cisco 1841 be setup to automatically switch over to the ADSL? Would there be some sort of heart beat between the ethernet circuit and adsl circuit?Also from the other end of the Cisco router, the connection goes into a firewall. If the Cisco handles the failover, I assume I would not need to configure anything on the firewall.
 
The end users beyond the firewall, should be able to continue, however the performace would be degraded?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 / Routing Protocol Neighbor Between SVI And Routed Port?

Apr 18, 2012

I have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
 
On SW2:
*Mar  1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1
*Mar  1 00:57:00.711:   AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
*Mar  1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0
*Mar  1 00:57:02.303:   AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1

[code].....

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7010 / 5510 - Run OSPF As Layer 3 Routing Protocol Between VPC Peer Links

Mar 25, 2012

I have an environment where i have two nexus 7010 switches, along with 2 nexus 5510's. I need to run OSPF as a layer 3 routing protocol between the vpc peer links.  I have 1 link being used as a keep alive link, and 3 other links being used as a VpC link.
 
1) Is it best to configure a separate Vpc VLAN i.e 1010

2) Is it best to configure a vrf context keep-alive

3) just have the management address as the peer ip's.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Why Does Routing Work Without Declaring Vlan10 On 2960s-24td-l

Oct 28, 2012

I have recently split the voice vlan (10) from the data network (1), and am wondering why my catalysts and router do not require an interface Vlan10 statement.  In the past I used OpenBSD boxes to do the routing, and I first needed to configure vlan 10 on the interface before I could get inter-vlan communication to work.  With these Cisco devices it works, and I am wondering if it is because of VTP, for the fact that the ports maybe just pass all traffic, or is there some other explanation?  Below is the setup, and firmware is up-to-date on all of the devices.
 
When I plug a phone into the POE SGE, the phone turns on, obtains an address on the proper subnet, and conversations are clear (whereas without the ip nat inside on the new subnet the calls had a lot of static).  Possibly the reason that it works is because the phones properly create the tcp/ip packet, and it hops over the trunks and creates the states so that traffic routes back properly.  I will install wireshark to see exactly what is going on, but is there a simple explanation that I am overlooking?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 881-K9 - Unable To Use RIP Protocol

Jan 10, 2013

I have bought Cisco ISR 881 C880DATA-UNIVERSALK9-M with  c880data-universalk9-mz.150-1.M7.bin ios.
 
command "show ver" tell me:
 
License Information for 'c880-data'
License Level: advsecurity   Type: Permanent
Next reboot license Level: advsecurity
 
So I have advsecurity. On cisco site there  was a thing  URL

"Table 5. Cisco IOS Software Features on Cisco 880 Series: Advanced Security Feature Set (Default)"
 
that tell me I have  RIP protocol to use. But when I type "router rip" command and sub router sommands like: network, passive-interface, redistribution. There are no in runnning-config such things after all I've done. It have not been saved.
 
then the command "show licence":
 
#show license
Index 1 Feature: advipservices
Period left: Not Activated
Period Used: 0  minute  0  second
License Type: EvalRightToUse
License State: Not in Use, EULA not accepted
License Count: Non-Counted
License Priority: None

I need even RIPv2 to have simple routing information to exchange.
 
And I don't know. Cisco 880 series is G2 or G1. Cisco ISR beginning from 890 series is G2. About 880 I don't know. There no informanion about it or at least I have not found it yet. On one 891 is the same problem. When I type "router eigrp 1" everything is great. But when "router rip"  - do no work.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Enable Multicast Routing On 2960s

Mar 23, 2013

I need to enable multicast routing on 2960s but the command "ip multicast-routing" isn't available on my release (12.2.(55)).
 
From which release this command is available?     

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S And MLS QoS Map

Oct 8, 2012

I have C2960S-48FPS-L and C2960S-24TS-S both of them are using C2960S-UNVERSALK9-M image with version 15.0(2)SE on both I run "mls qos"
 
and on 48FPS-L I run "mls qos map cos-dscp..."on 24TS-S I cannot run it. there is no such command. there is just "mls qos rewrite..." and "mls qos srr-queue..." variants. 
 
I thought that one image give the same set of commands...?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S Multicast Routing

Jan 17, 2012

while i am configuring a port on switch .The switch reloads.After reload the show version says,System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x458F6C, address 0x0,show version from the effected switch is,Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(58)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 805 Show IP Interface Brief Protocol Down

Feb 24, 2013

I have encounterd a broplem on my Cisco 805 model.
 
When i use the command "show ip interface brief" the status shows "up" but the protocol is "down" on my serial interface.
 
The link between my to sites is down after this happend.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X BGP / Protocol Not In This Image

Apr 14, 2013

When I config BGP on my 3750X Switch, it show error as below:
 
protocol not in this image
 
should I need to upgrade the IOS or Where I can found a supported image (support BGP)

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: No IP Forward-protocol UDP In 2960?

Jul 10, 2012

I am trying to enter this command in Cisco 2960 but the device is not accepting it. Is this because of IOS or this command is not available for 2960?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Cannot See Which Protocol Is In Use For Etherchannel

Jan 31, 2013

I am trying to review the port-channel configuration on a 6500 series. I am issuing the "show etherchannel summary" command and the out put shows the Group, Port-Channel, and Ports. It does not show me the protocol that is in use such as PAgP or LACP. Does this have to do with the Etherchannel in the "On" mode rather than "active", or "Auto"?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: STP Between 2960S And SG300

Dec 8, 2011

I am currently having an issue with connecting a Catalyst 2960-S switch to a Small Business SG300 switch. When I connect them they are unable to form a link. When I do a show spanning-tree it says the mst link is in dispute.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S QoS For VoIP?

Mar 25, 2012

I read some papers about QoS. The thing is that I have to implement 30 switches with QoS to connect to a lot of Cisco IP phones. The switches are Cisco 2960S with code image "C2960S Software (C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3". Should I use autoQoS feature or manually configure them?. How should I treat uplinks between access switchs and core/distribution? I have a lot of doubts regarding queueing, because all the info I had read its for another model/image.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Mix 10G And 1G Uplinks On 2960s?

May 16, 2013

I'm looking at the WS-C2960S-48TD-L and have a question about the uplink ports. Is it possible to mix 10G on one uplink and 1G on the other?  The datasheet says 2x10G SFP+, 2x1G SFP so I am thinking mixing is not possible.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Use USB Option On 2960s

Nov 5, 2011

just got new hardware and decided to try the newer USB port for IOS upgrades. I could not get the switch to recognize my 2gig flash drive. Do I need a proprietary stick or special format?

I also noticed when I removed it the switches crash dump and rebooted?

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Destination Port Protocol Is Down In 3750

Jun 18, 2012

I have configured SPAN in cisco 3750 switch as below mentioned. but the destination port protocol is down.switch(config)#monitor session 1 source interface gigabitethernet1/0/1switch(config)#monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet1/0/11 ingress vlan 1

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Do All Switches In LAN Need To Use Same Protocol

Dec 1, 2012

On our backbone (Cisco 6509)  we have the following config.
 
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
spanning-tree vlan 1-200 priority 24576
 
1. is rapid-pvst the best spanning tree protocol to use? on some switches we have pvst (not rapid)
 2. do all switches in the LAN  need to use the same protocol?
 3. does line 3 :priority 24576 mean that someone set tis switch as root manually? how can one further enforce the backbone as root (so noone adds a old switch with lower root id)

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: RFC 5171 / Implement UDLD Protocol?

Oct 29, 2012

I'm trying to implement the UDLD protocol (Cisco-compatible), but face  some problems. There is no enough information for implementing this  protocol neither in RFC 5171 [URL] nor on  [URL] How can I get a more detailed information regarding protocol state  machines and timers?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: LMS 4.2.3 Is Not Generating Protocol Flap / Down Alarms?

Apr 10, 2013

We are using CISCO LMS 4.2.3 in our network in India, we are facing a issue regarding  alarm generation for a protocol flap/down, especially when BGP / OSPF neighbourship got flapped.These flapping will result in the data service degradation , by which we came to know that some protocol flap may occurred at router end & then we go for the manual check by login into the router.after escalating the same to cisco we came to know that it is a bug of Cisco LMS. using any other method/technique to view the protocol down alarms automatically for cisco routers.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: VPDN Protocol Ppoe On 2811 ISO

Dec 25, 2012

I want to configurate Vpdn protocol PPOE but i can not write protocol  ppoe under vpdn group name on cisco 2811. cisco 2811 iso is 12.4 T adventurer and i upgrade it 15.1 advansecure but problem is still.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching / Routing :: 3550 - Line Protocol Flapping

Aug 27, 2012

I work for a Wireless ISP and the device impacted is the back haul radio into the site. I have swapped from a 2950T to a 3550. Replaced the radio, PoE, patch lead. We have re ran the cable up the tower using shielded outdoor cable with a drain wire which has been earthed to an earthing block in the cabinet. We have other devices on the tower not experiencing the issue. We suspect cable interference however am now at a loss to diagnose further.

[Code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / Dual Hand-off L3 Protocol?

Jan 31, 2012

Currently our Cisco 3750  have one interface (port 1) that connected to our provider (Internap) with the IP 66.150.7.68 assigned. Now we want to upgrade to dual handoff L3 protocol. Below is the network configuration from Internap.
 
>>>> We have assigned the below /30s for each of the interfaces and will statically route the 66.150.7.0/25 down both interfaces.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 63.251.162.20/30
>>>> 63.251.162.21 - border1.sef003 - Internap side
>>>> 63.251.162.22 - your side
>>>>
>>>> 63.251.162.184/30
>>>> 63.251.162.185 - border2.sef003 - Internap side
>>>> 63.251.162.186 - your side
 
tell what command lines do I need to input on my Cisco switch for port 1 and 2 in order for the dual handoff to work correctly?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 - NBAR Protocol Pack

Apr 4, 2013

I'm trying to upgrade NBAR protocol pack on my Cisco 1941 router, so i downloaded new NABR protocol pack  (version 4.0.0) and transferred it into router flash via tftp. When i try to apply new protocol pack with command : ip nbar protocol-pack flash:[protocol-pack-name]
 
i got this error :  
% NBAR Error : Advanced Protocol Pack can not be loaded on top of Standard Protocol Pack
 
The router is running IPBASE IOS with Security License, IOS image is c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.153-1.T.bin. Does NBAR2 packages works on IO BASE images?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can RPS2300 Support 2960S

Aug 18, 2012

When using dynamic configuration tools, if I choose 2960 (not 2960s), I have the option to choose RPS2300 as redundant power, but when I choose 2960s, I cannot choose RPS2300. However, in a document describe both 2960 and 2960s, it said that RPS2300 can be used. Does RPS2300 support 2960S?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S QoS Configuration Not Work

Dec 20, 2012

Recently I'm working with my client to setup their network and he want me to limit user access internet bandwidth to 2 Mbps and the topology show below.Users ---> Switch ---> NAT Router ---> (int gi1/0/24 - qos apply)  Edge Switch ---> INTERNET ROUTER (12Mbps) --->> INTERNET,This is my configuration, but it doesn't work, the end user still able to get more than 2Mbps internet speed.Access-list 100 permit ip any any dscp default,class-map match-all QoS_Floor_Limit, match access-group 100.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack 4900M With 2960S?

Mar 11, 2013

I would like if is possible to stack a Cisco 4900M with a 2960S. I know it is not the most common situation but i need it.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S MAC Address Control

Feb 20, 2013

I would like to enable port security to hardcode the MAC address on the ethernet switch. There are 5 ethernet ports in the same ethernet switch to be assigned for one person (one note book), e.g. port 5, 6, 15, 16 and 23. The model of ethernet switch is cisco 2960S and one MAC address is configured on 2960S.
 
1. Does 2960S support this requirement to allow input the same MAC address to 5 different port?

2. If yes, can ethernet switch "smart" enough to forward the packages to "active" ethernet port which is connected to notebook and the rest of four ports are inactive.

3. if no, any solution or any work around to achieve this requirement 

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S / LAN Design Using 10G EtherChannels?

May 11, 2011

We are designing a LAN Network for ourselves.The proposed design is as follows:
 
4 x 2960S switches in a Stack   Access-Stack-I 4 x 2960S-PoE switches in a second Stack Access-Stack-II
 
2 x 3750X switches in a Stack   Core-Stack
 
Now I would like to connect it in the following manner ?First,I would like to use EtherChannel using the 10Gig LinksSecondly, I would like to use Cross-Stack EtherChanel too.I have given a graphical illustration of the connectivity Now my Qs: a) Will the 2960S supports EtherChannel using the 10G links and the 3750X too... b) Does the proposed solution will work... or It will have any problems.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S Cannot See VLAN100 Traffic On SW1

Jan 29, 2013

I have two switches (2960S's) both with IP Phones on VLAN100..We need to monitor voice traffic via a monitor port on SW1 of all VLAN100 traffic on both switches.The following is what we have configured, but we cannot see VLAN100 traffic on SW1
 
According to Cisco doco you cannot have a SPAN and RSPAN on the same session, however since these are two sessions on SW1, I would have thought it to be OK.

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved