I would like to know if there an specific configuration in order to apply QoS configuration in Switches 3750X for Polycoms Phones.I was reviewing the information from Cisco but mostly of them apply only for cisco phones, and just some or basic for non cisco phones.
View 1 RepliesI just installed a refurb'd 3560 48 port POE switch and configured all ports on VLAN100. All Polycom IP 430 phones (with power adapter and without power adapter) constantly reboot every couple minutes. Any Cisco 7960 phone does not constantly reboot and works correctly. When I plug a small unmanaged switch into a 3560 port and then plug the Polycom phone into the unmanaged switch powering the phone with a power adapter, the phone works correctly. So it seems that the 3560 is causing the Polycom to reboot.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure LLDP-MED between a Cat45010+E Sup7 (IOS 15.1) and Polycom CX600 Lync phones. I have created and applied the correct network policy for the interfaces.
From these sites, I need to send all the correct TLVs or the phones won't respond: {URL}.
When a scour the config of the switch, I can't find any related configuration commands relating to the specific LLDP-MED TLV components which are enabled/disabled. Where are they hiding? I would like to confirm which TLVs are being sent by my switch and if they are matched to the phone. I can always use the DHCP method, put this is not preferred.
provide a sample Voice Vlan configuration for the Cisco 2960 POE switch to work with the Non-Cisco IP Phones?
Will these commands work? Vlan 2 is the new voice vlan, Vlan 1 is the data vlan.
mls qos
interface fastethernet 0/1mls qos trust cos switchport nonegotiateswitchport mode trunkswitchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport voice vlan 2priority−queue outspanning-tree portfastspanning−tree bpduguard enable
vlan 2name voice
We currently have 7 Cisco 3524-XL switches (10-12+ yrs old) which are 10/100. We purchased a handful of Cisco 3750X switches to replace them going with the whole stackwise and redundant power supplies. Our current configuration on the old 3524 switches is that they have hardset all the ports on them to 100MB/FULL since devices would auto-neg to 100/Half. Since we're going from 10/100 to 10/100/1000 switches, I want things to auto-neg as I have heard in the past and experienced that things work better when it auto-neg to gigabit. My upper management is afraid since the old switches wouldn't auto-neg correctly that we should hard set all the ports on the new switches, which would be a nightmare since some ports would be hard set to 100/FULL others to 1000/FULL, etc.. We've tested just about all of our devices at auto with the switches and they've all auto-neg to the correct speed. In short, is Auto-Negotiation the way to go with the newer switches or is it still better practice to hard set your ports?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a requirement whereby a CCTV system is being installed that will need multicast RTSP configured on the switch network. How this will be achievable on 3750X IP Services switches? if this is not possible then what switch hardware will be needed?
View 2 Replies View Relatedwhen enabling multicasting on layer 3 interfaces the CPU becomes fully utilized , is there any specific configuration should be enabled to reduce this .
Config :
Inetface vlan 100
ip pim sparse-dense
ip igmp version 3
[Code]......
I am trying to setup intervlan configuration and stuck on a problem. Here are the details:
1. Switches Catalyst 3750-x (as core switch) and Catalyst 2960S (as access switch)
2. Both switches have VLAN 20 and VLAN 1 on their database and both are active. BTW, after I figure out how to properly configure interVLAN routing the native VLAN 1 will not be used anymore. This is just an initial test.
3. VLAN 20 SVI interface (IP 192.168.20.200) on 3750 is up and can be pinged from catalyst 2960.
4. VLAN 1 SVI interface (IP 192.168.170.200) on 3750 is up and also can be pinged from Catalyst 2960.
5. Catalyst 3670 can ping a client computer (IP 192.168.20.10) connected to Catalyst 2960.
6. IP route enabled on 3750
7. Trunking is enabled on etherchannel connecting both 3750 and 2960
8. Client computer in VLAN 20 (connected to 2960) can ping VLAN 20 SVI interface 192.168.20.200 on switch 3560.But, the client computer in VLAN 20 can not reach any computer in VLAN 1 and vice versa. Strangely, the switches which these computers are connected to can ping each other or any connected client copmuters without any problem as described above.
I have on 3750X stack with a few vlan
--------------------------------------------------
vvlansw06# sh vlan
VLAN Name Status Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
1 default active Gi1/0/6, Gi1/0/10, Gi2/0/5
Gi2/0/6, Gi2/0/37
10 LAN_10 active Gi1/0/16, Gi1/0/17, Gi1/0/19
[code]....
where are the others vlan?
I am installing a several new Cisco VM servers. The VM hosts are losing connectivity when we apply the etherchannel config in the core stack. VMware has stated that the etherchannel load balance needs to be src-dst-ip in order for the etherchannel to work.However, my current stack has 2 etherchannels configured to other switches through out the bldg in network closets. The current load balance configuration is src-mac.My question....when I make the change to src-dst-ip, will my network connectivity go down? I saw there was an older article on this that doesnt provide an answer just a work around. Here is the article. [URL].
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am working in Private IT company. The facility is having 4000 users and it is a high resliency site having two core switches and nearly 40 access switches. All core and access switches are 4506E switches and odd vlan is taking core-1 and even vlan is core-2. We are having cisco ip phones 6921 connected as daisy chain.( Phone is connected to access switch and the desktop is connected to ip phones). The Ip phone are getting registered cisco call maneger server. The call manager one leg is connected to one core switch and another one is core 2 same like my DHCP server.
For all vlans the the default gateway is my firwall. The voice needs to hit the call manager, hence we have implemented a source routing to call manager for the voice vlans. the problem is once we down the Core-1 some of the IP phones are not getting registered no matterit is on odd or even vlan. The same issue for Core-2. We suspect that there might be some issue in the DHCP server for voice vlan routing. But server team is saying that there is no issue with the DHCP server.Now network is vulnerable that if any core switch is down my voice ip phones will be down.
I have some Catalyst 3560 PoE switches running the latest 12.2(50)SE1 image. I have a working configuration for STP, QoS, Voice & Access VLANs, Port-Security & IGMP snooping - I stress this is working PERFECTLY. Now I have been playing with wired 802.1x port authentication for a while which again I have sucessfully deployed on ports without IP Phones. I did some more testing with 802.1x clients behind some Cisco IP Phones and after understanding the issues and workarounds I thought I had a working environment. The environment is XP SP3 with the new separate wired 802.1x supplicant, workstations are all in a 2003 AD Domain and the wired 802.1x settings are configured through group policy. I had issues with Windows Server 2003 SP2 not working behind IP Phones but this I put down to the supplicant being different from the new one in XP SP3. MS don't have any plans for Server 2003 SP3 (or XP x64 SP3?) nor can I find any hotfixes to resolve this so it's a 'caveat'.Anyway I have tested this many times and with XP SP3 and the new supplicant it all seems to work well (only the access VLAN is using 802.1x Authentication, I am not authenticating the IP Phones via 802.1x).
Now today it stopped working and 802.1x clients behind the 7970 IP Phones no longer authenticate. I have spent an hour or so looking at this and the IOS is the same, as is the configuration on the IAS (Radius) server, as are the XP clients. I was scratching my head a bit and then looked at the IP Phone - the software on the phone has been upgraded to 8.5(2) - previously it was 8.4(4). I managed tp downgrade the software via CUCM to 8.4(4) and it now works. I have retested it several times so this is obviously an issue (either a new feature or a bug?) with the latest code for the 7970. I have checked and it's the same codebase for all the latest IP Phones - 7906, 7911, 7931, 7941, 7942, 7945, 7961, 7962, 7965, 7970, 7971 & 7975 which was released on 1st June. I have looked through the release notes and EAP-FAST has been added but this is an update to the EAP supplicant on the phone and not a feature of the 802.1x pass-thru from the attached device. I can find no other 802.1x or EAP references.
i've some trouble configuring a TDM switch PRI-to-PRI from Telco to an RMX 1500. After a lot of hours spent on configuration now i can receive and make call from the RMX, but only two channels. When I try to make a third call I get "Cause i = 0x82AC - Requested circuit/channel not available" This is the HW configuration: Cisco 2811 (IOS Version 12.4(25c)) with 2 VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1, 16-PVDM2 and 64-PVDM2 on the first VWIC i've two Telco PRI (each with 15 bi-directional channel), on the second VWIC i've connected with E1 cross-cable the RMX 1500 with 6 timeslots configured, This router already doing VoIP translation from the Telco PRI to an Asterisk PBX (fax and DID).
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are facing problem with Cisco IP phones which are connected to module WS-X4248-RJ45V.Phones are getting restarted and sometimes phones will not take power.Initially we suspected issue with power consumption, but we have enough power in the module.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Catalyst 2960-S switch and a pre-standard IP Phone (Cisco 7960). When I connect the phone to the switch the switch recognizes the phone and supplies power. I would like to prevent this behaviour. ie. I would like to disable detection of pre-standard equipment. Is there a command I can issue on the 2960-S to do this? For example, on a switch from a different vendor I can issue the command: no power pre-std-detect to prevent it from detecting the 7960 phone, is there an equivalent command on the Catalyst 2960-S ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have a couple of 7911 that get stuck in Registering, each monday. During the week, no user reports the problem. But after the weekend, we get ready to hear complaints from our collegues. The same phones often experience this issue, although the other phones report no problems. The problem is temporarily solved when we issue "shut/no shut" on switch ports.
phone firmware version: SCCP11.8-5-2S
Interface configuration:
interface FastEthernet1/0/27
[Code].....
Will ACL110 allow IP phones communicate with VoIP server. Do I need to add line to allow multicast traffic? [code]
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe are experiencing two of our layer 3 switches (3560 PoE and 3750 PoE) switches giving us problems with giving power to IP phones. These switches have an embedded PoE module and would previously give power to all IP phones on all its ports. Now all of a sudden over the past few months 6 of these ports have stopped powering phones. The phones are the same ie. 7911 and they take less than 15.4 W. We believe that the PoE module has started malfunctioning and has stopped giving power to all the ports. The port 'grants' power and then removes it. Below is a link showing all the messaged we receive on the terminal session. It is NOT a hardware fault with the PoE: [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 6500 which has two VLANs defined
VLAN 30 for Data VLAN
VLAN 31 for Voice VLAN
I have two Cisco 3750 switches.both switches are connected to IP Phones.the configuration of Cisco 6500 Trunk Port to Cisco 3750 is [code] On Cisco 3750, the trunk port to 6500 has the configuration [code].The IP Phones connected to the Cisco 3750 are 7911,7979, 7940, 7961.
All phone are working fine, the phones get their ip address from voice vlan, and systems connected to phones get from data vlan, except 7940/7960.
These two models of IP Phones remain on Configuring IP, and when you check the IP Settings, it gives Data VLAN IP, which does not have a TFTP.once you manually enter TFTP address in the field, it registers instantly, due to ip routing in the network.
these phones were working fine before, but suddenly few days back they went out of the network, and still are in Configuring IP state.I also tried to convert these ports connected to 7940/7960 to access ports [code] but still the IP is taken from the Access Vlan (30). Even If you configure a single VLAN on these ports, the IP phones then never get the IP.
I just trying to setup a dhcp server in my catalyst 3560 switch for a nortel ip phones. I show you mmy configuration:
VOICE VLAN: 3
DATA VLAN: 1
S1:10.2.110.200
port:4100
Nortel IP Phones: IP 2002 (Firmware Version 0604D9H) & IP 1110 (Firmware Version 0623C7)
Switch Configuration:
aaa new-model!aaa session-id commonip subnet-zeroip routing!ip dhcp pool datos network 10.2.100.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.2.100.1 lease 0 2!ip dhcp pool voice network 10.2.110.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.2.110.200 option 191 ascii "VLAN-A:3" option 128 ascii "Nortel-i2004-A,10.2.100.200:4100,1,5." lease 0 2!!!!no file verify autospanning-tree mode pvstspanning-tree extend system-id!vlan internal allocation policy
[Code]...
I'm having some trouble with a 4510 Switch Line Card. I need some recomendations for troubleshooting it.We have some PoE phones connected to the card number 3. When those phones were restarted, they did not go up again. In order to discard wiring issues, we connected the phone directly to the card 3, and the phone did not go up. If the phone is connected to a different card, it goes up correctly.
Additionally, to restore the service, these phones were migrated to other cards, but when we disconnect the equipment, ports in line card 3 remain in an up / up state (and nothing is connected to those ports!!), and only reflect the actual state after restarting the port.What steps could I do in order to troubleshoot this issue?. What should I look for, or how do I discriminate the problem? Might it be a hardware issue, a PoE issue?
All of our VoIP phones bounced (re-registered) in the middle of the work day and we do not know why. There is no maintenance going on at this time. The phones came back up right away. Upon further investigation, I only found one error message on our core switch (WS-6509 running IOS ver. 12.2(18)SXF13) and I'm wondering if that was the cause:
Jan 3 13:51:04.030: %SIBYTE-SP-5-SB_OUT_OF_RX_DSCR_CH1: Out of RX descriptors on mac 0 - channel 1 (count: 299)
I cannot find any other instances of this error message from the internet.
We are facing issue with one of the module installed on cico 4506 swicth. All of a sudden cisco phones connected to that module went down and the messages logged on the console. [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe currently have around 150 2975 switches and have had problems with it them not handing out PoE power to the cisco phones and access points at random times. There is plenty of power left for the switch to use. We have at least 15 that will be running fine for about a week and then all of the devices that use PoE power will shut off and will not come back on until we reload the switch. If you console in there aren't any messages that pop up and if you look at the port it just shows on connected or will show IeeePD in the power inline. We have contacted Cisco TAC and they just RMA them.
View 6 Replies View RelatedMy management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
i cant find any difference in these two devices when i am trying to compare throughput.I need upgrade our new POP and there will be around 4900 MAC adresses in VLAN 150 and 130 MAC adresses in vlan 200.Uplink is 1 gig routed internet connection and there is 14 downlinks to separate villages.i found a few differences for eg stack interface on 3750x but i dont need it.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a stack of 2 x 3750X switches these are running 12.2(55)SE5. I needed to add some static IP routes and found that the ‘ip routing’ command is not supported. I came across a document that stated “On switches running the LAN base feature, static routing on VLANs is supported only with Cisco IOS Release 12.2(58)SE and later.” So I have upgraded to 12.2(58)SE2, but ‘ip routing’ is still not a valid command.
The release notes state:“On the Cisco Catalyst 3560-X and 3750-X Series, it adds support for 16 static IPv4 routes in the LAN Base image.”
I have read other posts that talk about running the ‘sdm prefer routing’ command which I have done, but I am still unable to add any routes or run the ‘ip routing’ command.
I have an 1811 with several subnets connected to it.I recently installed a 3750x plant and want to bring my interior routing back to it.
All the routing is handled by the 1811 via secondary interfaces on vlan1?
I have 192 ports, and subnets show up on almost all of them. None of the ports are assigned to any specific vlans. Most ports have several subnets on them.
What is the best approach to getting the 3750x to handle the routing?
my company pay a switch 3750 X. WS-C3750X-24T-E. It uses IP services basically but I failed to configure InterVLAN routing. why interVLAN routing doesn't work on my switch?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a CUCM BE environment with a number of remote users with 8961 phones connecting to an ASA 5501 via AnyConnect. The phones register fine and can make inbound/outbound calls as well as four digit dialing to other users at the corporate site.
The problem is when a remote user tries to four digit dial another remote phone. The called phone will ring but there is dead air once answered and then the line goes dead.
This sounds like a routing issue to me. How to get AnyConnect clients to be able to reach each other?
I am setting up a vm environment for a customer in my lab off site. I have two stacked 3750-x switches, a san, and threes UCS c220 M3S servers for hosts. I am trying to separate the lan traffic, san iscsi traffic, and san management traffic using vlans. The problem is i'm unable to communicate cross vlan with my current config, which I have attached to this post. The only noteworthy things in my conifg is that the ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.83.6 is referring to a switch stack they have on site, that I will connect this stack to using the first two trunk ports on each switch, that I do not have here in the lab. I don't want to cause any confusion in why I have things set a certain way.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 7 POE switches that have ESI IP phones attached. I have two VLANS, 1 and 2. VLAN 2 is used for voice and is defined in each switch.The ESI IP phones connect to my POE switch ports and the pc attaches through the ESI IP phone.
I have had voice quality issue between floors in my building. Talking to others on my floor via the IP phone, there are no voice quality issues. [code]
Why does my 3750x-12s switch say it's not supported in CNA??? I upgraded to CNA 5.7.1 and still says unsupported. This device is supported or I'm just missing something.I use CNA heavily to manage our MANY vlans.
View 1 Replies View Related