I have the Cisco VSS consisting two chassis 6509.I have the system Active-Dual detection via Enhanced PAgP with one neighbor - standalone cisco 3750. All works good.I want to add one more neighbor - cisco stack 3750x with 3 members. Will this scheme work? And what is in danger, if the stack is split into two parts?
View 2 RepliesI think that a catalyst3560X connect to VSS Catalyst 6509 by ether-channel.
I'd like to connect a catalyst3560X to VSS Catalyst6509 by the Ether-channel.
I heard need "Enhanced PAgP" that VSS Catalyst6509 connect to by Ether-Channel.
I don't know supported "Enhanced PAgP" on Catalyst3560X.
In IOS verson 12.X there was a Bidirectional Forwarding Detection configuration however in IOS 15.0 this isn't available at least not with the same syntax. Is this feature not available in 15.0?
In 12.X this was the syntax of the command:switch virtual domain <number>.
I am interesting if 3560x supports ePAgP. I have VSS which is formed by two 4500x switches. Can I use 3560x, which is connected two both VSS members via 10Gb optics for Dual Active detection ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am working on a network which has two ISP connections (Active/Active) terminating on router (ASR1000). From the LAN side (6500 switch) all the traffic need to be route on ISP1 but some of the specific subnets like 10.250.0.0/16 need to be route on ISP2 connection.
I am planning to use PBR and NAT with route maps. any documents or refrences are provided.
(access switches)---------(core switch)----------(routers)----------------(ISP1)
----------------------(ISP2)
The 6509 Series Switches support the scenario VSS Active-Active Chassis, I would like to setup both switch's as one virtual switch but working at the same time, not with Active - Stand By Chassis.
My plans it to create PortChannel accross both Switches 6509 in order to have 2 links one connected to one slot/switch and the other connected to slot/switch in the second 6509 for servers redundancy.
I am looking to implement VSS using our two 6500 series switches. The "Recovery Actions" when there is a Dual-Active situation says that the active chassis that detects a dual-active condition shuts down all of its non-VSL interfaces (except interfaces configured to be excluded from shutdown) to remove itself from the network, and waits in recovery mode until the VSL links have recovered. Does this mean that the Active chassis gets totally isolated thus triggering the modules on the Standby chassis to be active ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedAny have experience on triggered failover on VSS deployment with 1 VS-720-10G-3C in each chassis? I tried using "redundancy force-switchover" but after that the 20G VSL is flapping up & down and cannot be up normally, we got 1 FWSM in each chassis, any configuration need to fit in this kind deployment? BTW, if I shutdown the power source of VSS active chassis, both FWSM & VSS can failover normally.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2 6509 chasis with one SUP720-3B in each and current IOS is s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF4 and 2 FWSM with version is 3.3.1 I need to upgrade FWSM system software to 4.1, after checking FWSM 4.1 release notes, I thought of upgrading IOS to latest version to 12.2(33)SXJ.I got new 2 CF of 512MB and downloaded the new IOS on them and need to upgrade 6509 IOS first to meet the requirement for FWSM upgrade.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two Nexus 5596UP that will be connected together via VPC-Peerlink. From there I want to connect both 5596UP's to a 6509-VSS via VPC.The Nexus 5596UP's will be essentially layer 2 switches, all routing will be done the 6509-VSS's.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOne of the two supervisors in an IOS 6509-E did not come back up after a power outage. The failed supervisor in slot 5 was replaced and it booted successfully. However, the supervisor in slot 5 only booted up to a "Cold" state. I did notice the Hw version of the replacement module in slot 5 is 4.9 while the Hw version in the supervisor module in slot 6 is 4.8. What command do I need to issue to bring the supervisor module in slot 5 from "Cold" to "Hot"? [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to work up a config based on equipment that was ordered before I joined my current employer.
I will be deploying N2Ks at the top of each rack. Each N2K will be dual homed to two different N5K's. Being new to the Nexus, I understand that the N2K's have no brains and are dependent on the N5K's they connected to. Wasnt sure how to tell each 5K that the 2K that was dual connected to it needed to be able to move between N5K's based on failure/availability. I havent been able to find a sample config of what this will look like anywhere on the Nexus section of the Cisco site.
The next step after this will be to connect N5K_1 to blade on a 6509 and N5K_2 to a different blade on the same 6509. I will be installing two of the 10Gig blades in the 6509. Havent been able to find any sample configs on what this would look like either. We are upgrading the sup engines on the 6509 to the new 2T version.
use PAGP as backup for wireless link with another wireless link.
__WiFi________
PC-------Switch 1 Switch2---------- PC
__WiFi________
We are using 2960 series and from this reason we cant use L3 PAGP I dont know how is PAGP working. If it is checkung port status (UP/Down) or there are some specific L2 packet between etherchannel ports in group?
I have a two fiber connection from our Central Office(6513) to Remote office (6509). I have a requirement that on the remote office if one of the fiber goes down, the second fiber should work as a failover. I am planning to use SUP720-3B SFP to connect to the CO.
Can I connet one fiber to Sup720-3b G5/1 & another fiber connection to G5/2? or Can I connet one fiber to Sup720-3b G5/1 & another fiber connection to G6/2? I am running EIGRP between sites. Any sample config.
sup-bootflash:s72033-pk9sv-mz.122-18.SXD7b.bin"
Devices are 3750-24TS Switches, software version is 12.2(55)SE6. how to troubleshoot this issue, I have a pair of ports which are not bundling, no matter what. Is the same behavior with LACP or PAgP. In this outputs I have only the PAgP case.
Output is similar to:
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
12 Po12(SD) PAgP Fa1/0/23(I) Fa1/0/24(I)
Configuration on ports is simple:
SW1:
interface FastEthernet1/0/24
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 12 mode desirable
[code]....
I have a 2911 ISR and want to install a SM-ES2-24 Enhanced EtherSwitch Service Module.
Do I need to power down the router?
I understand that 8700W enhanced AC power supply is Compatible with 6-, 9-, and 13- slot chassis
Based on 8700W Enhanced PS datasheet, it can be installed into existing Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switch chassis: both E- and non-E series Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switch chassis.
Can we use 8700W enhanced AC power supply with 6513 externally / internally (within one of the chassis slots like 6513-E ?
I have an ASA5520 in location A with an ISP connection and a matching ASA5520 in location B with a separate ISP connection. We have fiber connecting the two locations and vlans passing back and forth so I will be able to configure the failover via a vlan as well as extend the ISP's to each location via vlans. The Active/Active configuration with the multiple security contexts does not seem to be an issue but how is a redundant ISP configured in this mode?We want to have context A using the ASA in location A with ISP1 as the primary and failing over to ISP 2 in locaiton B We also want to have context B using the ASA in location B with ISP 2 as the primary and failing over to ISP1 in location A Would route tracking provide the desired result? Is there a better option?
View 1 Replies View RelatedConnecting Avaya 9611G IEEE class 1 devices to a Cat2960s. How ever some of the phone are registering as class 3 devices no matter what interface the phone is connected to. Typical port config is as follows:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport access vlan 25
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
switchport voice vlan 22
srr-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5
[code]....
In NX-OS release 4.2(8) a feature was introduced to supress duplicate IP address warning messages in DCI environments.When using the same HSRP addresses in both DCs but blocking the HSRP exchange, ARP still detects these duplicate configuration and writes log messages. There obviously is a feature to suppress this but I do not find any reference how to enable it.url...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to make a design with 4 Nexus 5596UP. 2 of them equipped with Layer 3 Expansion Module so they can serve as core layer and the other 2 Nexus used as Layer 2 for aggregation server layer.The 2 Nexus in the core layer will run HSRP and will peer with ISP via BGP for Internet connection The 2 Nexus in the aggregation layer will be configured as layer 2 device and have FEX and switches connected to them.What I am ensure of is how the vpc and port-channel configuration should look like between the 4 nexus. What I was thinking is to run vpc between the 2 Nexus in the aggregation layer and between the 2 Nexus in the core layer. Than I was thinking of connecting each Nexus in the aggragtion layer to both Nexus in the core layer using port-channel and vice-versa.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I bought this ( Belkin N150 Wireless Modem Router with Push Button Security Set Up and Network Status Display (F6D4630uk4A): Amazon.co.uk: Computers & Accessories )I want to use this instead of the modem I have now. Is it possible to make this my modem to connect to from the internet? I have a cheap talktalk modem and I want to get rid of it.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow does the 3550 with enhanced image compare to the 3650 with enhanced image in terms of routing functionality?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI inherited a network redesign project mid implementation and ran across an issue that I was not 100% sure able to be resolved. Implementation is occurring in which the organization is changing over to a different ISP and we have some customers that will not be able to change their settings over to our new addresses from some time. I have seen a lot of posts about fail over and dual ISP configurations, but I could not relate them to this particular scenario.
View 3 Replies View Related1. We have Two 3900 Router on the core layer which are terminated with one ISP on one Router and Secondary ISP on Second Router.
2. Can we configure my ASA 5520 with Active/Standby termenating two IPS providers one on Active ASA 5520 and Other ISP on Standby ASA 5520, so that when Active ISP fail ASA Secondary can become Active and send the Traffic throough Secandary ISP.
3. The reasion behind giveing Public IP on Firewall is to Terminate VPN on our Firewall i.e. SSL and IPSEC VPN.
Few Clarification If we can achive the above:
1. How will the DMZ Servicec nated with my Primary ISP on my Primary ASA will be routed when the Secondary ASA is acting as Active Firewall.
2. Can Web SSL and Client To Site IPSEC VPN users access service via the Secondary ISP- ASA when my Primary ASA and ISP is down.
I have a dual ISP, 1 primary and 1 secondary terminated on fa0 and fa2 on our ASA respectively. ASA was configured so that, when the primary fails, the secondary kicks in. [code]
It was until yesterday that we experienced downtime on the primary ISP that the secondary doesn't do the fail-over. I have to manually configure the device to use the secondary ISP. Currently, I'm looking at maybe this has something to do with the licensing.We are currently using a Base License, should we be upgrading to Security Plus?
I am looking at deploying a pair of 5585X's in an active/active multiple context state. I am creating Mulitple contexts that need to be able to route to each other. I was going to deploy a type of Gateway context that has a shared interface to all of the other contexts, instead of sharing interfaces directly between the contexts, i beleive this will work as basically i am just cascadng the contexts and sharing interfaces.
The main problem i have come across, is that if i deploy active/active across two appliances using 2 failover groups i can not see a way to route between them, for example.
I have Context 1, Context 2 and Context GW A including the shared interfaces of Con1 and Con2 in failover group 1 on appliance A with the respective standbys on Appliance 2. I have Context 2, Context 4 and Context GW B including the shared interfaces of Con 3 and Con 4 in failover group 2 on appliance B with the respective standbys on Appliance 1.
I need to be able to route traffic between Context GW A and GW B so that the contexts can communicate in normal operation and in failover. I do not beleive that I can share an interface between contexts in two separate failover groups and to be honest without adding a L3 device between the appliances i am not sure if this is possible.
I have FSWM active/standby installed in 6509-E core switches running following FWSM Firewall Version 3.1(3) Device Manager Version 5.0(2)F..I want to upgrade to latest FWSM version as well as ASDM, I downloaded asdm-622f.bin and c6svc-fwm-k9.4-1-5.bin from cisco portal. When i checked the show version of FWSM, it says..The Running Activation Key is not valid, using default settings: Running Activation Key: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
I have gone through threads on CSC about how to upgrade FWSM in failover mode, now my concern is, Do i have to take care about activation key or keep as it is ? I have maintenance contract with cisco for all devices.
we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe have around 80 staff and I think the current infrastructure is overkill for the size of the company. The current kit is old and they have no GB ethernet ports. They currently have:-
Core Switch:
1x Cisco c6509with a 48 port fast ethernet module (WS-X6248-RJ-45)
and an 8 port fibre module (WS-X6408A-GBIC)
I'm looking to replace this with something with 72 ethernet ports and 8 fibre ports
Access Switches:
2x 3500Replacement needs at least 48 ports and 2 fibre modules each
and 2x 5500Replacement needs at least 72 ports and 2 fibre modules each.
If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
Some info about hardware and config:
6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.
All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.