I am in a doubt if the 3560-12-PC-S supports OSPF. Datasheet says we need IP Services image. But 3560-12PC doesn’t have the option with IP Services. Then I havigate to [URL] how?
So, any clues whether or not this box can run OSPF?
We have a Cisco switch in each office and every now and then the port that has the D-Link Wireless AP (DAP-1522) connected to it goes to err-disable state. Actually sometimes even a regular port that has a cisco phone connected may also go to err-disable state (less often). So I have to telnet into the switch and issue shut and no shut command on that interface to get it back to life, then it works for a few days or weeks until it happens again. Any suitable configuraiton for that interface, that would prevent that from happening or a workaround ?
Here's the info:
Model: cisco WS-C3560-24PS and cisco WS-C3560-48PS
Image:c3560-ipbase-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
This is the log from one switch:
31w5d: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: psecure-violation error detected on Fa0/2, putting Fa0/2 in err-disable state
31w5d: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address 74e2.f592.f7f2 on port FastEthernet0/2.
31w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/2, changed state to down
And from another, which is almost the same:
5d10h: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: psecure-violation error detected on Fa0/3, putting Fa0/3 in err-disable state
5d10h: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address d8a2.5e31.2cf6 on port FastEthernet0/3.
5d10h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/3, changed state to down
5d10h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Here's the configuration of fe interfaces (they are all alike):
interface FastEthernet0/2
description Voice & Data Combo Port
switchport access vlan 11
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 15
[code]....
I have an office that I need switchports for 24 cubicals that need 2 network ports each with POE. The problem is due to my cable path the switches need to be right at the cubicles themselves and they need to have no noise.
The compact switches are quiet enough but in order to get the density I need I will have to use 4 3560C-12PC-S and they don't have stacking cables.
My question is, is there a POE enabled switch that is larger than 12 ports or has stacking capabilities or is the 3560C-12PC-S or 2960C-12PC my only options?
I have some c3560 with system MTU set 1546 with interface VLAN10 whose MTU size is 1546 and there is no possibility to change it to another value. and we have some cisco 2600 where I can't set MTU bigger as 1500. I have a problem in establishing the OSPF adjacency between cisco 2600 abd 3560 , the command "ip ospf mtu-ignore" is set on both side but it doesn't work - the OSPF packets which are sent by c3560 are simply lager as 1500 bytes and are dropped by cisco2600.
the problem is that sometimes c7200 losses their BGP session, I would say in most cases it happens between NPE400 and NPE-G1/G2 whit error message like "session closed by a peer x.x.x.x" after some seconds BGP session goes again UP , and then after some minutes again DOWN .
it can be MTU problem, as the traffic passes those c35660 with MTU1500. The neighbour status showes that "transport tcp path-mtu-discovery" is enabled an all neighbours but it seems doesn't work. if I disable the path-mtu-discovery on the neighbours - the BGP session between them stays stable.
I have a 3560-8PC in which the mgt vlan randomly (twice in one day or 2 weeks later) goes into the down state and will return w/o any interventaion 15-20 minutes later. Int G0/1 is the uplink to a 3750. I dont think its a layer1 issue at this time since i have seen it work just fine for over 2 weeks and drop again. I don't see any errors on the 3750 either.
WS-C3560-8PC 15.0(2)SE C3560-IPBASEK9-M
LOG:
----------------------------------------
.Oct 20 19:34:37.533 EDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changeds tate to up
[Code].....
I have C3560 switches in my work environment. I want configure ssh on that switch but the IOS what they have 'c3560e-universal-mz.122-58.SE2' not support. As per advised I was triying to upgrade 'c3560e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2" for all my access switches.
I successfully upgraded for two switches.
I have two problems now
01. I upgraded the IOS successfully one Switch but the Poe is not working. What is the reason ?
02. After upgrade the IOS, the out put is as follows
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
* 1 30 WS-C3560E-24PD 12.2(35)SE5 C3560E-UNIVERSAL-M
Cisco#sh boot sys
[Code].....
I have a weird situation with some switches.
Switch .55 can ssh into Switch .57 but cannot ssh into Switch .56.
Switch 56 can ssh into Switch 55 and ssh into Switch 57
Switch 57 can ssh into Switch 55 and ssh into Switch 56
The software on .56 is:
C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
I noticed on .56, when I do a show ip ssh I get: SSH Enabled - version 1.5. It doesn't say version 1.99 like the others even when I configure version 2. Is this a bug I am running into?
how to configure SLA monitorin for Dual Path default route in Layer 3 switches, like C3560?
View 2 Replies View Related#sh run | inc user
!
username USER0 secret 5 $1$passwordusername USER1 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$passwordusername USER2 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$password
!
#sh run | inc aaa
!
aaa new-modelaaa authentication login local_authen localaaa authentication login radius_authen group radius localaaa authorization consoleaaa authorization exec local_author localaaa authorization exec radius_author group radius localaaa session-id common
!
#sh run | begin line vty
!
line vty 0 4access-class 3 inexec-timeout 15 0authorization exec radius_authorlogging synchronouslogin authentication radius_authentransport input sshline vty 5 15!sh verCisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
the intent of the above is that management connections will only be accepted via SSH, and all of those will be authenticated via RADIUS, unless it's down, then it will use the local username/pw combinations, most of which are given Privledge level 15. Telnet should never work.SSH works as expected (authenticates via RADIUS), but the problem is that Telnet also works, will ONLY use the local database (never RADIUS), and, for some reason, leaves the users at Privledge level 1, instead of the configured 15.Essentially, it seems that at every point I have told it to do something that isn't the default with regards to telnet, it ignores me.Prior to a recent IOS upgrade, the switch didn't support SSH, so the previous config was Telnet with RADIUS, and that worked fine.
Had a switch die over the weekend, a c3560, per our normal procedure I pulled the hardware put a very basic config on it(vlans, portchannel, uplink ports, ip of management vlan, con and vty security, snmp, enable secret, and hostname). Then I use solarwinds orion to upload a copy of the old config to bring the switch back to the same state as the one that failed. Its a system that has worked for us 3 or 4 times in the past. But this time when the base config was on the box it couldnt ping across the network.I have tried clearing the arp cache and the dynamic mac tables, i verified the routing tables and even removed the 10.1.185.128/27 route and re-added it, saw the routing update go across to the other 65k, tried bouncing the edge switch(i cant bounce the 65k's), took down the po between the edge and 65k.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a c3560 switch that has two gig fiber modules in it. I need to uplink fiber to one of these at 100mb. This is because this port will be rate limited to 20mb and 10 percent is the lowest you can go with the rate limiting command. Is there a 100mb fiber module i can insert in the 3560
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are seeing output drops on a C3560 switchport, this port does not have QoS enabled -- application does not need special qos treatment, as long as packets are not droppd, so I suppose all traffic will share the same queue? then how should I read the output of "show platform port-asic stats drop" which indicates that it is queue 3 weight 2 drop? I am wondering what is the best way to fix this? enable mls QoS and increase queue 3 bandwidth share on this interface or just increase the output queue depth?
switch#sh mls qos interface gi0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1
QoS is disabled. When QoS is enabled, following settings will be applied
trust state: not trusted
[Code]......
I am having an issue with VoiP phones giving me an insufficient bandwidth message. I have three remote locations connected to our main building using 2 Mb point to point ethernet solutions through TWC. Each remote location has a Cisco WS-C3560-24PS running IOS C3560-IPBASE-M, version 12.2(25) and have the cable modems plugged into port 1 on them. The remote buildings are labeled 192.168.101.xxx, 192.168.102.xxx, and 192.168.103.xxx. There are 14-16 VoiP phones in each remote building. The main building being in the subnet of 192.168.100.xxx. I have the 3560s connecting to a single port on a 2801 in the main building, all using the subnet of 192.168.253.xxx The phone server sits in our network at 192.168.100.203. I have created the ACLs, class maps, and policy maps on all of the equipment.
For the remote buildings I have the following:
ACL
===========
Extended IP access list VOIP
permit tcp any host 192.168.100.203 dscp ef
permit tcp any host 192.168.100.203 eq 5566
[Code]....
I have put a hub in to capture traffic via Wireshark to see if DSCP flags are being appropriately marked and I do see that all VoiP packets are getting marked with as EF. However, I have been receiving phone calls from people in the remote buildings stating that their phones will cut out, flash Insufficient Bandwidth on the LCD displays and then the call will cut back in. I am wondering if the 2801 is not applying QoS with the rate-limits in mind since it is set to 100 Mb, or is it an issue with trying to take 3 remote locations and bring them down into 1 port on the 2801?
Can a C3560-24PS switch with 32 MB flash be loaded with IOS 15? Will it be able to execute the code and function properly?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two layer 3 switches C3560 and C3750 Cisco switches with ios version "ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5".Now with the current ios version, these layer 3 switches are not supporting object group.so my question is , do i need to upgrade the ios, for this feature, if yes, which version ?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to configure the C3560-24TS, QoS control by IP or subnet.i tried to study books and videos many times but still feel i am not well known about QOs...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just trying to setup a dhcp server in my catalyst 3560 switch for a nortel ip phones. I show you mmy configuration:
VOICE VLAN: 3
DATA VLAN: 1
S1:10.2.110.200
port:4100
Nortel IP Phones: IP 2002 (Firmware Version 0604D9H) & IP 1110 (Firmware Version 0623C7)
Switch Configuration:
aaa new-model!aaa session-id commonip subnet-zeroip routing!ip dhcp pool datos network 10.2.100.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.2.100.1 lease 0 2!ip dhcp pool voice network 10.2.110.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.2.110.200 option 191 ascii "VLAN-A:3" option 128 ascii "Nortel-i2004-A,10.2.100.200:4100,1,5." lease 0 2!!!!no file verify autospanning-tree mode pvstspanning-tree extend system-id!vlan internal allocation policy
[Code]...
I have a C3560-24P PoE switch, running on a very small network with nothing special about the endpoints or the configuration (5 laptops connecting via 1 wireless AP, 1 firewall uplink, a networked printer and one conference room phone using PoE. That's it.) I actually have inline power turned off on all the non-PoE device ports.
We are encountering a very strangle anomaly where if a client attempts to send a print job through the switch, to the network printer, the printer makes a noise as it if's begun to initialize and then the switch immediately goes into a reboot. Also the reboot appears to immediately drain all he batter power from the UPS unit that it's connected to. The unit is an APC SmartUPS 750 (500W, 750VA) and when the switch reboots the load on the UPS jumps to well above 100% until the switch appears to 'level out'. Is that kind of power draw normal when rebooting a C3560?
Switch details:
IOS version: c3560-ipbasek9-mz.150-2.SE1
128MB Memory
512K nvram
Model Revision: F0
I can´t configure speed in a giga port on WS-C3560-24PS-S switch(config-if)#speed ? no negotiate Do not negotiate speed
do you know if the port support speed 100??
because I need to connect with 2955C-12 switch in one port: 100BASE-FX (Multimode Fiber) uplinks, this port its only 100mbps?
and the switch C3750G-12S-E can I configure the ports on 100mbps?
I'm having some weird issues with our 3560 that's connected to an MPLS line. The speed of the port plugged into the providers equipment is 100Mb, but we're only allocated 10Mb of bandwidth from them, I tried to police our traffic out of the port using srr-queue bandwidth limit 10, however when I do that I get some really weird bandwidth results.
Using iperf I've run bandwidth tests with srr-queue bandwidth limit enabled and with it disabled, when it's disabled I get the full 10Mb as expected, however once I enable it I'm lucky to get 5Mb, and while the test is running connectivity between sites is almost useless (which is not the case if I disabled bandwidth limit). Is there anything special I should be doing when I have this enabled? I also have priority-queue out enabled with only one dscp marking placed in queue 1, with very little traffic hitting that queue, but regardless of what I do I can't get the expected bandwidth with the bandwidth limit command, even if I place my iperf traffic in that priority queue.
I need to replace an older 3560 with a new 2960-S and am wondering if the SX SFPs I already have will be compatible with the 2960-S. [code] I cannot find any way to get the part numbers of the SFPs.
View 7 Replies View RelatedMy clients switch is running out of Spanning-Tree instances (c3560 only supports 128 instances). I know that running RSTP with VSTP can mitigate this that all instances over 128 will be handeled by RSTP, but before I implement this are there any other thoughts out there on how to mitigate this. Would MSTP be able to handle more STP instances or MISTP perhaps?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a c3560 that on Port 1 I can not get any device to talk to the DHCP server.Previously there was a client connected to this port however over the weekend he stated he lost connectivity.
In my troubleshooting I have connected that client to another port and now he is good to go...I connected my laptop and tried to connect to the network however I could not.I checked the logs and did not see anything that lead me to think it was having problems.
Is there another way to shut this down and hopefully start it back up without having to restart the entire switch?
We are setting up a test lab in our DMZ. The path to the internet is basically like this. Anything past the firewall is irrelevant. For this lab lets assume it is vlan 300.
LAB SW ---> DMZ-SW ---> ASA FW ---> INTERNET
LAB IP Range = 172.16.300.0 /24
GW = 172.16.300.1 (On FW int)
Trunked all the way through.
I have an int vlan set up on the LAB SW. It is being trunked to DMZ SW. DMZ trunks it to ASA FW where there is a failover with a redundant switch.On the ASA the interface 0/2 is a subinterface 0/2.300 being used as the default gateway.
I have DHCP running in a specific range on the LAB SW and do get an ip address when plugged in. I cannot ping the default gateway on the ASA FW.The GW is defined using default-router command for 172.16.300.1 i.e. default-router 172.16.300.1?
We are running ospf on the firewall. There appears to be a pattern with ospf and a similar subnet setup elsewhere. I was wondering based off of this info would configuring ospf for 172.16.300.0/24 allow me to ping the GW from a client on the LAB SW.Secondly. I trunked 300 on the DMZ SW but I didnt add the vlan to the configuration. i.e. conf t <enter> vlan 300 <enter> Does this really matter? Or is having the vlan in the configuration only pertain to access mode on interfaces?
We have 2 sites, each with 2 x 4506 switches which will be connected togther using an etherchannel. The switches will provide access ports for client devices and will be configured with HSRP to provide gateway redundancy. SW1 will be HSRP active.2 metro ethernet links will be installed in each site which will connect back to our HQ sites. OSPF will be used over the backbone to provide resiliency and to allow shortest path routing to each HQ and to prevent traffic over the HQ to HQ link.
The 4506 will be trunked togther with an SVI for providing OSFP adjacency.For the traffic flow from SW2 to HQ2, traffic will hit SW1 and then route back to SW2 and then to HQ2. Is this the best way to do this? Should a second link be connected between switches just for routing or should something like GLBP be used?
I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists. However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
Here is the config on the ABR:
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32
!
!
router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10
network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10
[code]....
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'. Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?
I have an environment where i have two nexus 7010 switches, along with 2 nexus 5510's. I need to run OSPF as a layer 3 routing protocol between the vpc peer links. I have 1 link being used as a keep alive link, and 3 other links being used as a VpC link.
1) Is it best to configure a separate Vpc VLAN i.e 1010
2) Is it best to configure a vrf context keep-alive
3) just have the management address as the peer ip's.
Does 800 series routers support OSPF or EIGRP? Command for EIGRP is available but when you try to run it, you get that "protocol is not available in the image". Is there a specific image that I can get that will support either of these two on a Cisco 851 or 861?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIf i look at the Feature Navigator , it says that IP Base Supports OSPF and EIGRP. But if i look at the Cisco Link it contradicts the Cisco Feature Navigator.
[URL]
if I have 6509-E with VSS-SUP720-10G and want to run OSPF and BGP on the Switch. What is the IOS i require? WIll IP Base Suffice or i need to take Advance or Enterprise Image.
We have an existing network with a core 6500 as a VSS connecting 4 buildings with 4500 chassis under which number of L2 switches are connected. Currunlty we are using RSTP in ring for redundancy but we want to use OSPF in LAN for faster conversion.All the VLAN's are created on 6500.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am beginning to implement OSPF into the network I work on. I have a network which consists of multiple 4500, 6500 series routers and 3560s. Each switch has its own set of VLANs. In other words VLAN X on one switch is not the same as VLAN X on another switch. I had envisioned connecting each switch via trunk links and then routing via the loopback addresses on each device. That didn't work. Then I created a VLAN 100 on each switch. Each one was configured with an IP in the same subnet range (10.3.0.1 and 10.3.0.2). I added these addresses to the OSPF process in area 0. It worked. However, this is not desired. I have not seen many examples of 4500 layer 3 switches configured with OSPF. The examples I have seen show the interfaces configured with IPs.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2 Nexus 5596UPs with a layer 3 cards that are exhibiting some very peculiar behavior. The systems are running 5.1(3)N1(1).I have configured 2 VRF contexts each running their own OSPF process. There is a static gateway of last resort configured on each VRF, which is to an upstream pair of 5585X's in Active/Active. Each OSPF process has the "default-information originate always" command configured, however, backbone neighbors are not recieving a gateway of last resort from the 5596UPs. The applicable configurations are show below. All other routing information is passing correctly between devices in the network. This network is not production, it is a proof of concept for a larger implementation.
View 26 Replies View RelatedI have a 867VAE-K9. On feature navigator it is listed as supporting OSPF. However when I go into config mode and type "router ?" BGP is there, but OSPF is not. Also, under my tunnel interfaces there is no support for any OSPF commands such as "ip ospf cost" etc. I'm in the process of raising a TAC. I have tried five or six different versions of IOS code that is available for this device, in each, we never see OSPF listed but sometimes see "router odr" or "router lisp"...
View 5 Replies View Related