Does 800 series routers support OSPF or EIGRP? Command for EIGRP is available but when you try to run it, you get that "protocol is not available in the image". Is there a specific image that I can get that will support either of these two on a Cisco 851 or 861?
View 4 RepliesI was reading my book when I found :
redistribute ospf 2 external 2
The book says only ospf external routes of type 2 will be redistributed.But when I tried to configure the above command on router, I was not able to configure it; there was no external or internal option available with redistribute ospf command.
Below is the output:
R2(config)#router rip
R2(config-router)#redistribute ospf 1 ?
match Redistribution of OSPF routes
metric Metric for redistributed routes
route-map Route map reference
vrf VPN Routing/Forwarding Instance
<cr>
R2# show version
Cisco IOS Software, 2600 Software (C2691-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Do we have such command for eigrp? For example If i want to redistribute only external routes from eigrp into ospf, do we have any command such as :redistribute eigrp 1 external ?I understand there is several ways to achieve to same goal however I am just curious if we could acheive the same goal using single redistribute eigrp command without any route-map.
I believe the answer is yes, but incorperating more layer 3 features of our 3750's, I want to know if they fully support EIGRP or OSPF?
Also for a small business of 4 locations, each with a 10mbps fiber and a 1.5mbps mpls... wouldn't you say EIGRP would be easier? Want to look at making the failover automatic if the 10mbps fiber goes down between a site, then the network fails over to 1.5mbps mpls. When the fiber returns in service then the network automatically preferr the fiber again.
Currently we use static routes and if there is a provider outage we have to manually edit the config to flip flop the routes.
I am wondering if IOS bundled by default with CISCO3945E-SEC/K9 and CISCO2911-SEC/K9 contains adv. ip services features (like Eigrp, OSPF etc.).
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have small which I'm looking to implement and have built this on GNS3.
We have:
Router A in site 1
Router B in site 2
Router C in site 3
Router A and B are connection via a point to point 100M link and from Router C we have a 2 point to point one of which is 5Mpbs and going to Router A and Router B.
For Router C to reach Router A network it will go via Router B and these are 100M connection. When the link between Router A and B goes down. Router C should update and start using the 5m route.
For some reson, the routes are not updating. I have to do 'clea ip eigrp ne' for the routes to update and if I reload the routers all works well, it seems the problem is intermittent.
We are setting up a test lab in our DMZ. The path to the internet is basically like this. Anything past the firewall is irrelevant. For this lab lets assume it is vlan 300.
LAB SW ---> DMZ-SW ---> ASA FW ---> INTERNET
LAB IP Range = 172.16.300.0 /24
GW = 172.16.300.1 (On FW int)
Trunked all the way through.
I have an int vlan set up on the LAB SW. It is being trunked to DMZ SW. DMZ trunks it to ASA FW where there is a failover with a redundant switch.On the ASA the interface 0/2 is a subinterface 0/2.300 being used as the default gateway.
I have DHCP running in a specific range on the LAB SW and do get an ip address when plugged in. I cannot ping the default gateway on the ASA FW.The GW is defined using default-router command for 172.16.300.1 i.e. default-router 172.16.300.1?
We are running ospf on the firewall. There appears to be a pattern with ospf and a similar subnet setup elsewhere. I was wondering based off of this info would configuring ospf for 172.16.300.0/24 allow me to ping the GW from a client on the LAB SW.Secondly. I trunked 300 on the DMZ SW but I didnt add the vlan to the configuration. i.e. conf t <enter> vlan 300 <enter> Does this really matter? Or is having the vlan in the configuration only pertain to access mode on interfaces?
We have 2 sites, each with 2 x 4506 switches which will be connected togther using an etherchannel. The switches will provide access ports for client devices and will be configured with HSRP to provide gateway redundancy. SW1 will be HSRP active.2 metro ethernet links will be installed in each site which will connect back to our HQ sites. OSPF will be used over the backbone to provide resiliency and to allow shortest path routing to each HQ and to prevent traffic over the HQ to HQ link.
The 4506 will be trunked togther with an SVI for providing OSFP adjacency.For the traffic flow from SW2 to HQ2, traffic will hit SW1 and then route back to SW2 and then to HQ2. Is this the best way to do this? Should a second link be connected between switches just for routing or should something like GLBP be used?
I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists. However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
Here is the config on the ABR:
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32
!
!
router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10
network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10
[code]....
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'. Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?
I am having two small issues....First on my 3745 i get the following message:
*Mar 2 12:13:13.615: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:1): Neighbor 192.168.3.1 not on common subnet for FastEthernet0/1
*Mar 2 12:13:25.811: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:1): Neighbor 192.168.2.1 not on common subnet for FastEthernet0/1
Second problem is that I have my internet connection going to the 3640 on FE0/0 and it works just fine....I want to change over and have the 3745 be the internet router, but when I configure it, I get no connection.
3745 -
Current configuration : 1624 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
LD version 0x10
GIO ASIC version 0x127
[Code]...
We recently perchaced 4503 switch with Sub Engine 7L. It has universal IOS. We are unable to run EIGRP and HSRP protocol and the switch came with temporal license.how to proceed further to get EIGRP and HSRP enabled on the 4503 switch.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have an environment where i have two nexus 7010 switches, along with 2 nexus 5510's. I need to run OSPF as a layer 3 routing protocol between the vpc peer links. I have 1 link being used as a keep alive link, and 3 other links being used as a VpC link.
1) Is it best to configure a separate Vpc VLAN i.e 1010
2) Is it best to configure a vrf context keep-alive
3) just have the management address as the peer ip's.
I am trying to configure EIGRP on my ASA DMZ Interface - topology as follows: [code] The ASA is currently configured for EIGRP with the inside 3560x switch and passing routing updates properly.However, the ASA will not send/receive routing updates to/from the DMZ 3560x switch - the two devices do establish eigrp neighbor relationship. [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedThis is the message that I am getting from my 1941w router. I have a isakmp tunnel built with a GRE tunnel going through it.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI'm in the process to install two 4948E switches. I will be configuring GLBP and wanted to get some guidelines on configuring GLBP and EIGRP:
- First question is like HSRP I'm configuring it on both swithches like this:
Switch 1:
interface vlan 5
ip address 10.1.5.249 255.255.255.0
glbp 5 ip 10.1.5.1
glbp 5 priority 110
glbp 5 preempt
glbp 5 authentication md5 key-string xxxxxx
[code]....
- Second question is about EIGRP, when I configure EIGRP on the main switch that is AVG with the following commands, will I also have to run the same commands on the second 4948 E too?
router eigrp 10
network 10.1.5.0 255.255.255.0
Is there a command available on the 6500 that I can use to see what prefixes it is advertising directly to a neighbor?
The diagram is detailed and complex, but the simplest problem statement is that it doesn't look like my 6500 distribution switches are advertising certain prefixes to one of the 6500 access switches. I don't know whether this is an issue of the distribution switches not sending the prefixes down to the access layer (they should be; the route originates on a different set of access switches) or my access switch is dropping the prefixes. I don't see them in the topology table at all.
If the prefix isn't being advertised, I need to troubleshoot the distribution. If it is and it's being ignored, I need to troubleshoot the access. There are no obvious conditions that would prevent the access switch from getting the prefixes -- interfaces aren't passive, no distribute lists at work, everthing in the same AS, I have neighbor relationships (and I am getting other prefixes over these links, and these prefixes are being advertised to other access switches), auto-summarization is off, split horizon is still on . . .
I have a very detailed diagram of all of the metrics and links and I don't see any reason why my access switch shouldn't be getting the prefixes. 6509 chassis, dual sup 720 3B, 12.2(33)SXI4a advanced enterprise services IOS.
We have, for nearly 4 years, used EIGRP on our 6513 to make use of two unequal links to our branch offices. This worked because we could use the variance command and cause EIGRP to insert two routes into the table, one from each carrier. Thus it was we could balance the load to each one with a ratio similar to the ratio of the bandwidth of Link A to Link B.
We just purchased 2 Nexus 7010's to replace our single 6513 core.After much consternation we have found from our Ciscio SE that the Nexus 6.0.2 software rendition of EIGRP does not support variance.
Why would Cisco take their own propriatary protocol and then gut it by removing features? I'm quite ready to send these Nexus boxes back in favor of a newer 6500 series. MEC doesn't work like it is supposed to and the show-tech runs for over 24 hours without ever finishing (and this we can repeat on both boxes, multiple times).
We've opened a tac case but I just wondered for any work around for the 'variance' command?
I have a hub and spoke WAN that conisits of one core location with with a 6500 and nine other buildings using 4006 Catalyst that conenct back to the core via dual gig fiber. We are using EIGRP at each location as well as the core. I was tesing something at one of our buildings decided to hang a 3750 off the 4006 and enable the same eigrp process on the 3750 that is enabled on the 4006 and 6500 (EIGRP 1).
1. All the routes that the 6500 knows about are advertised out to each of the nine locations.
2. The 4006's are all advertising thier directly conencted routes to the 6500.
Onto the location I was testing at:
The 4006 where I was testing at has four vlan interfaces enabled and they are in an UP/UP state. The ip routes from the 4006's directly conencted vlan interfaces propogate to the 6500 at our core location and the 6500 sucsefully propgates these learned routes to all the other 4006's.
This past Friday I configured a 3750x with two /22 vlan interfces and one physical gi port with an IP address and also configured on Ethernet port on the 4006 with an IP address in the same network block as the 3750x gi interface (a /30 netowrk block). I saw both interfaces come up and EIGRP sucesfully established a neighbor adjecency between the 3750x and the 4006.
I noticed that the 3750 advertised out all of it's directly conencted routes to the 4006 and the 4006 advertised it's directly conencted routes to the 3750. However, the 4006 did not advertise any of the routes it had learned from the 3750x to the 6500 and nor did the 4006 advertise any of the routes it had learned from the 6500 to the 4006. My suspicion is that the "eigrp stub connected summary" statement is enabled on both the 4006 and 3750 thus prevenintg them form advertising out any routes other than thier directly conencted routes. Can any of you verify that I'm either correct or inccorect about this?
here are the eigrp statemnets from the 6500 and 4006:
6500:
router eigrp 1
redistribute static
network 10.0.0.0
network 172.16.0.0
network 172.17.0.0(code)
Four 6500 connected to each other to form a full mesh. Switches 4 and 7 is running eigrp. A question came up, why didnt it have eigrp on SW 2 & 3 ? Will it still be redundant if link between SW3 and SW4 is removed? If redundancy is working, SW3 should be able to find its way to SW4 via SW7 or SW2, yes?
The config looks:
SW4 eigrp
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.0.0
redistribute static
auto-summary
[Code]....
Recently, the eigrp was configured to SW 2 and SW 3 as well, it included the “redistribute static” statement. The route for SW2 and SW3 now has the VLANs, 51 or so. Sent ping from a PC to VLAN1 IP of SW3, then link between SW3 and SW4 was disconnected, network connectivity went down for about 20secs, and ping came right back. Thought it was a success. All of a sudden, outside connectivity was lost. Ping within the LAN was successful, but no internet connection.
The eigrp on SW2 and SW3 was removed, and the internet connection came back up. The initial concern was that although there is physical redundancy in place, the other routes may not be known. Hence, eigrp configuration has been attempted for SW2 and SW3. Perhaps the “redistribute static” should have never been configured on SW2 and SW3, SW7 does not have the “redistribute static” statement anyway.
Without eigrp running on SW2 and SW3, does it still have redundancy? For what it’s worth, SW4 and SW7 are both VTP servers. With the current configs, does it still have redundancy? Link redundancy was never tested; it always has been assumed that it works. Later today, with it’s current config, the link redundancy will be tested.
I have a 3750 at a branch running EIGRP connected to two routers that both have configured:
access-list 1 deny 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 2 permit 0.0.0.0
access-list 2 deny any
router eigrp 1distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet0/0distribute-list 2 in FastEthernet0/0
Due to this recently applied config the switch become unreachable from the outside and cannot ping anything. Everything connected to it works fine. I was able to remote into it from a switch behind it and noticed that the 3750 has no default route in the routing table. I do see a default route in the eigrp topology table. How to make the switch learn a default route maintaining the existing configuration on the routers.
If i look at the Feature Navigator , it says that IP Base Supports OSPF and EIGRP. But if i look at the Cisco Link it contradicts the Cisco Feature Navigator.
[URL]
if I have 6509-E with VSS-SUP720-10G and want to run OSPF and BGP on the Switch. What is the IOS i require? WIll IP Base Suffice or i need to take Advance or Enterprise Image.
I am in a doubt if the 3560-12-PC-S supports OSPF. Datasheet says we need IP Services image. But 3560-12PC doesn’t have the option with IP Services. Then I havigate to [URL] how?
So, any clues whether or not this box can run OSPF?
We have an existing network with a core 6500 as a VSS connecting 4 buildings with 4500 chassis under which number of L2 switches are connected. Currunlty we are using RSTP in ring for redundancy but we want to use OSPF in LAN for faster conversion.All the VLAN's are created on 6500.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am beginning to implement OSPF into the network I work on. I have a network which consists of multiple 4500, 6500 series routers and 3560s. Each switch has its own set of VLANs. In other words VLAN X on one switch is not the same as VLAN X on another switch. I had envisioned connecting each switch via trunk links and then routing via the loopback addresses on each device. That didn't work. Then I created a VLAN 100 on each switch. Each one was configured with an IP in the same subnet range (10.3.0.1 and 10.3.0.2). I added these addresses to the OSPF process in area 0. It worked. However, this is not desired. I have not seen many examples of 4500 layer 3 switches configured with OSPF. The examples I have seen show the interfaces configured with IPs.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2 Nexus 5596UPs with a layer 3 cards that are exhibiting some very peculiar behavior. The systems are running 5.1(3)N1(1).I have configured 2 VRF contexts each running their own OSPF process. There is a static gateway of last resort configured on each VRF, which is to an upstream pair of 5585X's in Active/Active. Each OSPF process has the "default-information originate always" command configured, however, backbone neighbors are not recieving a gateway of last resort from the 5596UPs. The applicable configurations are show below. All other routing information is passing correctly between devices in the network. This network is not production, it is a proof of concept for a larger implementation.
View 26 Replies View RelatedI have a 867VAE-K9. On feature navigator it is listed as supporting OSPF. However when I go into config mode and type "router ?" BGP is there, but OSPF is not. Also, under my tunnel interfaces there is no support for any OSPF commands such as "ip ospf cost" etc. I'm in the process of raising a TAC. I have tried five or six different versions of IOS code that is available for this device, in each, we never see OSPF listed but sometimes see "router odr" or "router lisp"...
View 5 Replies View Relatedbetween 4510 E(172.29.95.2) and ASA(inside IP 172.29.95.19) ospf not up, but between L3 interface tenGig 6/1 OSPF running with area0 [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with ME-3600x running two ospf processes. Proc1 is WAN and PRoc2 is LAN. I am redistributing routes into both directions. After a WAN outage , certain wan routes did not get redistributed into the LAN process. I had to do a clear ip route to fix the problem. Has anynoe seen such a scenario with ME-3600x or any other switch/router
View 8 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to create a route-map for an EIGRP Distribute list on a N7K, the goal is to not advertise a 10.0.0.0/8 and 172.31.30.20/32 networks out a link to a remote site while permitting all other traffic to the internet (default). I configured the ACL/route-maps below and applied them outbound on the N7K interface but no subnets at all are being received on the remote site router.
ip access-list DENY_10.0.0.0
10 permit ip any 10.244.244.20/30 <<--WAN interface network
20 deny ip any 10.0.0.0/8
25 deny ip any 172.31.30.20/32
30 permit ip any any
[code]....
I'm attempting to redistribute a static route into EIGRP on a 3750 switch and pass it to an upstream router, sadly however this isn't working, or at least the route isn't being recieved on the upstream router. [code]
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe are deploying a new office in the building next to our main office. The main office has a Cisco ASA 5510 behind that is a Cisco 3750 stack. In the new office we are deploying a new Cisco 3750, they will be connected via fiber cable. I have sliced off VLAN 800 as a transit link /30 with an address space of 10.249.249.1-4. The new 3750 only has two VLAN's 800 and 112 (10.112.0.0/24). VLAN 112 routes are advertised to the neighboring 3750 properly as seen in the routing tables of the 3750 stack:
D 10.112.0.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.249.249.2, 00:22:24, Vlan800
Traffic passes between all local VLANS with no issue. I found in order to get packets to pass between the ASA and the new 3750 I had to add a static route to the ASA:
S 10.112.0.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 10.100.0.1, inside
My question is why is EIGRP not advertising the 10.112.0.0 network to the ASA. Here are EIGRP configs on the switches
Existing 3750 Stack
router eigrp 100
network 10.0.0.0
redistribute static
[code]....
I'm having big problems with the 'ip default-network' command. [URL] I build the topology shown in the above link and it works well. Then I deleted the static route on router 2513 and removed the 'ip default-network' command. I configured RIP on all routers and issued the 'ip default-network 198.10.1.0' command on the upper right router. After that the default route is installed on the 2513 router.But when I configure EIGRP instead of RIP, the default route on 2513 is not installed:
Gateway of last resort is not set
131.108.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 131.108.99.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/1
L 131.108.99.1/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/1
161.44.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
[code]....
Network 198.10.1.0/24 is flagged as default network. I would expect the router to install a default route now but it does not. Experts are recommending to not use the 'ip default-network' command. But it is included in the Route exam so I try to understand it.
I have an issue with my setup of a 6500 switch (12.2(33)SXI9).We have a 6500 switch with several VRF's. For a certain VRF I would like to redistribute a static route in EIGRP. After doing so I don't see the static route on my eigrp neighbor.
This is a overview of my config. I'm basically redistributing only my static route for this vrf in eigrp.
I found a similar case in which the solution was adding a metric to the static route. (eg. redistribute static route-map static-eigrp-pp metric 10000 100 255 1 1500). But the strange thing is that we don't have this issue on a similar machine (same IOS, same config setup). [code]
We have several DMVPN-connected sites that are connected to our 2821 ISR pair.They're all configured as eigrp stub connected summary. Yesterday, a few of the sites went inaccessible, but the VPN tunnels were still up and running. Upon further investigation, we noticed that the remote sites stopped receiving routing updates from our 2821's. As a quick fix, we added static routes to bring the sites back up.Later that night, we removed the static routes and cleared the eigrp neighbors, hoping it would fix the problem. When it didn't, we cleared them two more times.Suddenly, the router lost all downstream adjacencies. While we were adding statics to at least bring the sites back up, all of the adjacencies came back.
View 2 Replies View Related