I want to connect a Cisco small business switch (sf302-8) to a Cisco catalyst 2960S over a multi mode fiber. The transceiver I am using in the catalyst is a GLC-SX-MM. I presume in the SF302, I will have to use a MGBSX1. My question is "are these transceiver compatible with each other and if not, is there a transceiver that will suit both pieces of hardware?
View 2 Replies
I will like to know if I can replace a 1gi fiber transceiver for a 10 Gi transceiver, without any changes on the switch config.the switch is a 3750G.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a core switch with the following ios and supervisor engine. Can we add a16 port LR (x2)or LRM(X2) ON the core switch?if not what modifications has to be done?if an ios upgrade is necessary is it a costly affair?At present we have two 1gb up link modules in single and multimode fiber .
#sh moduleMod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC WS-X6516A-GBIC SAL0803T308 2 48 SFM-capable 48 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45 WS-X6548-GE-TX SAD07500600 5 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active) VS-S720-10G SAL1439UMZK
#sh versionCisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPBASE-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI4a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Fri 16-Jul-10 19:51 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) uptime is 1 year, 27 weeks, 4 days, 23 hours, 30 minutesUptime for this control processor is 1 year, 27 weeks, 4 days, 22 hours, 58 minutes(code)
I am trying to use a SF302-08P switch to connect a conference phone (Cisco 7937) to my infrastructure. I connected the G2 port on the SF302 to a Gig copper port on the Catalyst. I configured both ports as trunked ports and port e1 on the SF302 as an access port for the phone. VLAN 1 is the default VLAN and VLAN 10 for voice. However, the phone does not connect to the Call Manager. I have changed the configurations on the G2 trunked port and the ethernet port (trunked ports, general ports, tagged and untagged). I have also changed the configuration on the Ethernet port (general, access, trunk, set it on the default VLAN, in the voice VLAN, etc.) The SF302 connects to the Catalyst, and PCs connect OK.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 24 port 2960-S that is not communicating with a 2960-LST that it is directly connected to over fiber. The link is up on the LST but will not come up on the -S. What command should I use to bring up this link? I have tried no shut from the (Config-if)# prompt.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm working with a customer who has an SGE2000P and a Catalyst 2960 to setup and configure a single mode fiber link. The SGE2000P has an MFELX1 fiber GBIC and the 2960 has a GLC-LH-SMD GBIC. When I have the customer plug in his fiber, there is a power light that comes on on the MFELX1 GBIC. Neither GBICs/switches show that a link or activity is occurring, but the presence of that light makes me think that they are connecting somehow. Are these two switches/GBICs compatible?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCompany I work for just moved into a new location. We have two data closets which are patched as independent entities, with no Ethernet tie connection. These closets are roughly 100 feet apart.
There is a fiber connection that runs between both closets, that the previous tenant used to connect the switches. I have placed a Cisco 2960 switch in each location, and added one mini SFP gbic's to each switch. After attaching both sides, neither light up. I do a sh inter gig1/0/49 on each and shows 'down down' (not admin down).
What is the trick on getting these to communciate, do I need to configure these ports, and are they supposed to light up?
What I am trying to accomplish is to get the one closet that is completely cut off, communicating by logically stacking, or 'daisy chaining' via fiber.
I turned off the lights and popped the fiber out, and I do see a faint red light (I did not look straight into it), so I think the fiber is active.
I need to connect 4 Floor Building with 4 Cisco 2960 - 48 ports switch each other and it needs to be through a fiber. So all PCs connected to each switch would reach the LAN/WAN from the other switch. (attached is the image here with)
I see that the 2960 has 2 SFP ports each port of each switch should connect each other or how?
My simple question is:
1. What cable / patch code I have to use = Single-mode or Multimode? ( distance for each switch will not more then 25 mts)
2. Do I have to use SFP or SFP+ module?
3. What kind of SFP/SFP+ module I have to use = Single-mode or Multimode?
4. What kind of connector should patch code have = LC / SC or ?
5. How to connect each switch with redundancy like ...each switch should be interconnected with each other or I have to choose Cisco 3750G which has more then 2 SFP ports (option#1 & opetion#2 = attached here with) =
Best practice for connecting cisco switches over fiber.
I'm trying to upgrade some of the netwotk in my workplace.To do this I have istalled a 24port Catalyst 3560X switch.I'm looking to link it to my exsisting network via fibre.
I spoke to a local Cisco supplyer who recomended the above switch and an Allied Telesis Media converter.
I cannot seem to get the Allied Telesis unit to connect to the cisco switch.I have proved the fibre link by connecting 2 AT Media converters over the fibre.Do I have to enable something on the Catalyst switch or is the AT Media converter not compatible with the Catalyst switch?
below is the current config of link that is already up. I need to add another fiber redundant link between 6509 and 2960 stack. How to work on config Spanning side by not taking 6509 down after the change. 6509 is in distribution.
---------------X-ALPHA-IDF-1FORMS-2960S-0# (SIDE)
!interface GigabitEthernet1/0/52description X-ALPHA-F-6509-0 uplinkswitchport trunk native vlan 18switchport mode trunksrr-queue bandwidth share 1 50 30 19priority-queue out mls qos trust dscpmacro description cisco-routerauto qos trust spanning-tree portfast disablespanning-tree guard loopip dhcp snooping trust!
-----------------X-ALPHA-F-6509-0# (SIDE)
!interface GigabitEthernet3/10description 1st floor POC2 Forms IDFswitchportswitchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk native vlan 18switchport mode trunkno ip addressmls qos trust dscpspanning-tree guard loop!
I have two 2960-s switches with GLC-FE-100FX fibre modules in and I am seeing packet loss over the link that is connected to the modules. When the interface is shutdown and brought back up it always comes up in half duplex even thought it is set to full in the config. I've seen other posts where you have to use the command no duplex then full duplex to get it to come up int full duplex. This does appear to work when I do a show int it says its full duplex however I'm stil seeing 20 - 40% packet loss on the link which suggests to me there is still a speed/duplex issue. The device at the other end is a Cisco 7200 which is set to 100Full. If I plug a Cisco 2811 into the fibre link I get zero packet loss which suggests its a problem with the switch.
I have changed the modules and fibre cables which makes no difference. As I stated at the start I have two 2960's both are showing exactly the same issue. Details of the switch are below the SFP are cisco branded:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
* 1 28 WS-C2960S-24TS-L 12.2(55)SE5 C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
switchport trunk allowed vlan 380,382,384,386
switchport mode trunk
duplex full(code)
I had a strange issue yesterday when onsite installing a new access switch.Port capacity full on a two switch stack of 3750 x48 PS switches (WS-C3750- 48PS-E)- New 2960 x48 PS - WS-C2960S-48FPS-L racked, with the plan of using it just as an edge switch via SFP Stacking cable.Setup the two connecting ports with simple initial config: - switchport mode trunk- no encapsulation option on the 2960, default dot1q- dot1q set on 3750 port- no shut on both sides.Connected the SFP Stacking cable but it didnt work:- %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in Gi1/0/1 is not supported
This is ok as I had a backup:- Next step tried using 2 x Short Haul SFP SX GBIC's with LC - LC OFNP 50/125 fibre patch lead - no joy- Extra backup of 2 x Long Haul SFP LX GBIC's with the same fibre patch - no joy- Checked the fibre and it was not a cross over so transmit and receive going down the same side, switchedand still would not come up.- Used Fibre as a straight through and still the same.In all cases there was no indication of any life in the connection.It is pointing to a faulty fibre patch lead but I know it has worked in the past. Could it be something to do with the config or device incompatibility? Or any setting I need to activate?
we have multiple Video production networks, with Video servers (AVID Unity ISIS) connected by 10GE fiber links to 4948-10GE switches. On almost every of these switches, I see more or less "Sequence-Err" interface errors. We do not currently have a known problem because this, and no other errors are seen. But I would like to understand the error, and therefore I would like to find out, what a sequence error means, what the cause is, and what the impact (to a frame) is?
By the way, it is well-known that the ISIS Video server does generate very excessive UDP data bursts. Maybe this matters? On Cisco doc I did not find an answer. The document "Troubleshooting Switch Port and Interface Problems" does unfortunately not refer to "sequence-err".
Here is an example output:
WS-C4948-10GE#sh int t1/49
TenGigabitEthernet1/49 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
[code].....
I have a question regarding fabric storage and cisco catalyst switch 3650.My plan is connecta a esxi server to a nexus switch and then to a san storage. I want add a new switch to have a redundant link between esxi and the storage.Can I use a cisco catalyst 3650 with a fiber conecction to connect the HBA esxi server card to 3650 sw and the SAN storage to the 3650 sw ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have WS-C3750X-24T-S switch with C3KX-NM-1G and now i want to put a transceiver GLC-EX-SMD= in the switch SFP port, is this GLC-EX-SMD= compatable with that switch ?. i thoroughly check the product datasheet and compatible chart but their i don't have seen ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having trouble setting up SSH on my new Switch.
no aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
ip domain-name king.local
[Code].....
I would like to be able to use Vlan 10 192.168.155.1 for SSH remote management.
I have Catalyst 2960 S (WS-C2960S-48FPS-L) Switch. I have plugged in SFP module but still interface is down and line protocol down. Is there any configuration to enable SFP module and make the interface up?
This port is connected to nexus 5 k.
i try to implement layer 2 qos in 2960. when i complete to configure the switch, i want to test the qos.PC1 conect to switch port 1,PC2 conect to switch port 2 . PC1 is source teminal. i use skydata.exe and FTP for the test.
when use the skydata ,the PC2 speed can reach 10mbps.when use the FTP , the PC2 only can reach 1.2mbps. why?
I can use Putty to SSH into my new switch (Directly connected to my laptop with ethernet cable), but I cant log into my switch.
Sent username "admin"
admin@192.168.251.1's password:
Access denied
It doesnt like my password, but I have only set 1 password (king) on this switch. I've configured 3 other switches with SSH and had no problem. Been trouble shooting for awhile and It'd be great if I could have a 2nd set of eyes take a peek, Also, my running config is attached.
How would I go about stacking 4 Cisco Catalyst 2960-48PST-L switches? The one switch needs to accept a fiber connection from a distribution switch. Do I have to buy flexstack module and cables? If so where does the module go on the switch? If this switch cannot do this set up, any other switch I should look at.
View 6 Replies View RelatedWill catalyst2960 supports SSH, and how to configures with CLI.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to upgrade a Catalyst IOS, but I got a bit confused. The catalyst is currently running "c2960-lanbase-mz.122-35.SE5.bin", but I want to upgrade to "c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-35.SE5.bin", in order to enable ssh. [code] What are the appropriate steps in order to upgrade to "c2960-lanbasek9-mz. 122- 35. SE5.bin". I have downloaded the tar file (c2960-lanbasek9-tar.122-35.SE5.tar)
1) Do I have to delete the old directory (drwx 192 Mar 1 1993 02:07:21 +02:00 c2960-lanbase-mz.122-35.SE5)?
2) Are these the correct steps to download and extract the IOS?
3) Where will the tar files be extracted? Will an new directory be made or do I have to make one manually?
I have packet loss with QoS configured and I was wondering is it somehow connected with the QoS configured on the switch.The traffic is passing through fa0/19 and gi0/1 interfaces.
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos srr-queue input bandwidth 90 10
mls qos srr-queue input threshold 1 8 16
mls qos srr-queue input threshold 2 34 66
[code]...
I have 4 Catalyst 2960 connected via Etherchannel to each other. If I plug in my notebook in one port, I see the traffic from the neighbor port. So my switch acts like a hub.. I had a look at my MAC table and saw it isn't full.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have ciscl catlyst 2960 8port switch, (flash:c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-50.SE4/c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-50.SE4.bin).
and in need to configure bandwidth limit for one of the port as a 1Mbps.
In an attempt to restore a Cisco IOS I deleted the file C2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin my swich
Before deleting the same was as follows:Directory of flash :/
3-rwx 12824 Mar 28 1993 21:00:37 -03:00 vlan.dat4-rwx 3096 Mar 7 2012 08:43:37 -02:00 multiple-fs5-rwx 2289 Mar 7 2012 08:43:37 -02:00 private-config.text6-rwx 7482 Mar 7 2012 08:43:37 -02:00 config.text9 drwx 192 Mar 23 2012 16:18:54 -03:00 C2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2
32514048 bytes total (20204544 bytes free)Switch-01 #
Right now this switch as follows:
switch: dir flash:Directory of flash:/
2 drwx 64 <date> crashinfo_ext 3 -rwx 4120 <date> multiple-fs 5 -rwx 12824 <date> vlan.dat 6 -rwx 4018 <date>
[Code].....
I need to know if Cisco Switch 2960 support Netflow. If it doesn't, how do I configure the switch to enable Netflow?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Catalyst 2960-S switch and a pre-standard IP Phone (Cisco 7960). When I connect the phone to the switch the switch recognizes the phone and supplies power. I would like to prevent this behaviour. ie. I would like to disable detection of pre-standard equipment. Is there a command I can issue on the 2960-S to do this? For example, on a switch from a different vendor I can issue the command: no power pre-std-detect to prevent it from detecting the 7960 phone, is there an equivalent command on the Catalyst 2960-S ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to create trunkports on our Catalyst 2960. I'm following this guide to configure interface fa0/1
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have two 2960's in this new environment that I am administering. I am receiving a message on one unit (Designate it 2960-2) of %IP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 192.168.168.8 on Vlan1, sourced by 3037.a63e.540. The "sourced by" address is the 2960-1. I do not know how these units were originally set up. How can I determine where the duplicate address is originating from.When I perform an ARP -a the address that corresponds to the 192.168.168.8 is the mac address of the ethersvi interface on the 2960-1. I
View 3 Replies View Related I followed the 3-switch Redundant stacking diagram and now when I boot up the stack Switch 2 is acutally Member 3 and Switch 3 is Member 2.
We plan on having Port-Channels spanning across Switch 1 - Master and Switch 2 (Member 3) of identical port types. Switch 3 (Member 2) is going to have 2 10GIG port channel created.
Is there going to be a problem renumbering the stack as they physically sit or should I just configure the devices based on thier logical member numbers.
I don't understand why the stack connection is Switch 1 - 1 ----> Switch 2 -1
Switch 2 - 2 ----> Switch 3- 1
Switch 3 - 2 ----> Switch 1 - 2
I have CISCO RPS 600 (PWR-AC-RPS) is it support Catalyst 2960 and 3560 ? and which type of cable require since i have cable 22-18 pin and on my switch require 22-14 pin.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAt one of my sites, I have a 100mbit TLS. For this connection to work properly, the port on my end needs to be setup for 100mbit, full duplex. When I connect the TLS to an interface on my Cisco 2821, configured at 100/full, it works perfectly. Now the confusing part, I'm trying to connect the TLS to a Catalyst 2960. I configure the necessary port for 100/full, and get 'notconnect' on that interface. I set the interface to auto/auto, and it negotiates at 100/half and causes collisions and packet loss.
View 9 Replies View Related
