Cisco Switching/Routing :: HSRP Between Three 6509 Switches?
Jan 8, 2012I want to setup HSRP between three 6509 switches with a single virtual ip for all the three switches.
know if its possible and share any site or config.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / HSRP Migration To VSS With 0 Downtime?
Mar 13, 2012I have to migrate two Cat6K series switches in a Data center to the new Cisco 6509 Series switches with no downtime. i know there are few threads on the same topic but none of them discuss about the downtime.The two Old Cat6K series switches are working in HSRP redundant mode. All access/Dist switches are dual homed to these two switches in downlink direction. In the uplink direction a router is dual homed to both Switches. Now my requirement is to completely migrate the configuration from the old switches to the new one in VSS mode without any downtime. Already VTP server is running on of the old switches so VLAN migration is not an issue. I will update the network diagram in few hours .As per now i am going to follow these steps:
1. Remove active links from switch 1 and shut it down
2. Monitor network and traffic impact on switch 2
3. Install the new 6509 switch along with switch 2 (VSS config already done in Staging)
4. Config HSRP and make it standby
5. Connect all removed links back to new switch
6. Remove old switch 2 and monitor network
7. Connect new switch with VSS config
8. Connect the two new switches together in VSS and move virtual IP to SVI.
During last step i think i will face some minor packet drops.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - HSRP Standby Address Not Reachable
Jun 11, 2013I have my hsp setup where switch A and switch B share active/standby roles among several vlans. In the last few weeks, i have seen trouble tickets where connectivity is lost and upon investigation i discover that i can ping physical interface IP addresses for both standby and active devices but not the standby IP. I have also validated configurations and layer 2 paths and they haven't been broken.
What I end up doing is failover to the standby device and back and the problem clears, reachability is restored. My question is whether I am solving this the right way. If so, what is it that would cause the standby IP to not be reachable and how does my solution fix that? N/B the switches are catalyst 6509's.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: EIGRP And HSRP Being Broadcast To End User Ports On 6509?
Nov 14, 2011Is there away to disable the mulicasting of eigrp and hsrp to the end user ports on a 6509?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Provide Internet Redundancy To Local LAN User Running In HSRP?
May 7, 2013One of our customer , where there 2 6509 switch , one is Core_sw1 and other is Core_sw2 , catering about 32 Vlan , and HSRP in running for all Vlans , till here no problem , now there internet Router which having one Internet link , which connected and configured on Core_sw1 in a way that one interface of Core_sw1 is given Public IP and there is vlan 85 which internet vlan and vlan 85 ip are natted with that public IP with one simple static route given toward internet router , this is how internet is working ok.
Now i have configured vlan 85 in hsrp as all other are , how can give redundancy to vlan 85 user , that if Core_sw1 get down , internet traffic can get out through Core_sw2.using same internet router with single internet link .i am not talking of ISP redundancy , but Vlan 85 in Core_sw1 goes down , other Core_sw2 will server internet.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches
Nov 14, 2011If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Switches Which Are Running In VSS
Feb 15, 2011I've upgraded a 6509 switches wich are running in VSS, from IOS 12.2 (33)SHI1 to 12.2 (33)SHI5. After that I'm facing the folowing log messages periodically. [code] I know that this is a diagnostic result from TestUnusedPortLoopback feature. But this interface is disabled (shutdown).
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: IOS Upgrade For VSS 6509 Switches
Nov 19, 2012I have 2 6509 switches configured with VSS.As per advised my managment I have to enable SSH but it is not available existing IOS which is "s72033-ipbase-z.122-33.SXI3.bin". SSH available in "s72033-ipbasek9-mz.122-33.SXI10".
upgrade the IOS with VSS configured switches.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Using 6509 Series As Core Switches
Jun 2, 2012we are using cisco 6509 series switches as core switches. and Cisco 4510,4507 series switches as edge switches. all the vlans are created at core switches and propogating to edge switches through VTP. we are using OSPF as routing protocol at core switch for internal routing. till now we are using 4510,4507 switches as layer 2 switches. Since, 4510 & 4507 switches are hign end swithces i want use them as layer 3 switches instead of layer 2.if i change these switches from layer 2 to layer 3 does it make any impact on our network or better to keep them as layer 2 switches.if i change these switches to layer 3 is there any advantage i will have.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Do All Switches In LAN Need To Use Same Protocol
Dec 1, 2012On our backbone (Cisco 6509) we have the following config.
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
spanning-tree vlan 1-200 priority 24576
1. is rapid-pvst the best spanning tree protocol to use? on some switches we have pvst (not rapid)
2. do all switches in the LAN need to use the same protocol?
3. does line 3 :priority 24576 mean that someone set tis switch as root manually? how can one further enforce the backbone as root (so noone adds a old switch with lower root id)
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding UCS 6248UP To 6509 Core Switches?
Apr 21, 2013In the next couple weekends I'm planning to add 2 CISCO UCS 6248UP Interconnects to 6509 Core Switches via 10G links.
Is there any impact anticipated? It's a production environment and no loss of up-time is acceptable.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Load Balancing Nexus Switches
Jan 24, 2013I am trying to understand what load balancing method is used on a port channel on a Nexus switch . I have a server connected by a VPC to two Nexus switches. The nexus switches are only acting as layer 2 switches. I have a 6509 connected via a upstream link that does all of the routing for my VLANS. If have a server connected to the Nexus switches and it talks to a server on my 6509 what load balancing happens on the Nexus going across VPC 27 which is a layer 2 trunk going up to my 6509. Is it done on layer 2 or layer 3 flows?
My Nexus shows the default load balancing configurations
Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:System: source-dest-ip
Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:Non-IP: source-dest-macIP: source-dest-ip source-dest-mac
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Etherchannel Load Balancing Between Two Switches
Mar 5, 2012Is it possible to use two different load balancing methods at each end of a port-channel between two switches?
We have a Cisco 6509 at one end of the port-channel and a Cisco blade switch 3020 at the other end. Right now, we are using "src-dst-ip" at both end of the port-channel. We would like to change this. That is, we would like the #3020 switch to use "src-dst-ip" while the 6509 switch should use the "src-dst-port".
Why we want to do this, the reason is that we have FWSMs on the 6509. I've read that by configuring "src-dst-port" on the 6509, one can get a better performance of traffic going through the FWSM. However, the issue is that the 3020 switch does not support "src-dst-port".
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E Switches Interconnected On Layer 3 Port Channel
Oct 3, 2012We are currently designing Layer 3 to the edge EIGRP solution for our customers. The network is a hybrid of collapsed core (Core to access) as well as a three layer design (Core/Distro/Access) for connectivity to the Data Centre, Internet, Wireless Blocks etc.The core of the network contains two 6509-E switches interconnected on a Layer 3 Port channel (no VSS). Access Layer switches (3750-X series running Stackwiseplus protocol) connect to the core switches over p2p routed links and Distribution layer switches (3750X stackwiseplus) provide connectivity to the Data centre, Internet, wireless blocks etc.
The access and distribution switch stacks(Cisco 3750-X) are set up with two or three member switches with uplinks multihomed to the primary and secondary core switch with each uplink included in EIGRP. In each of the stacks, one of the switches controls the operation of the stack, which will be the stack master.As the Cisco Stackwise architecture is not SSO-capable but NSF aware, all Layer 3 fuctions must be re-established during a master switch outage. To minimize control plane impact and improve Layer3 convergence, uplinks should be diverse and originate from the member switches instead of the Master switches in the respective stack. This is as per Cisco recommended design solution.The above solution can be setup if there are more than two switches in the stack. i.e. uplinks are configured on the backup member switch modules.
1.But what about stack with two switches..Which switch should be set up as the Master for a two member stack with uplinks to the core primary and secondary from each switch(Master and Backup)
2. For Layer 3 routing, does the routing takes precedene over switch failures? Say for eg. In a two member stack, the master switch with uplink to primary fails, does EIGRP provide a fast convergence to route traffic via backup secondary and does not wait for the control plane on the switch stack to converge? All the access to core links will be set up for ECMP.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Disable GOLD Diagnostic Tool On Switches?
Feb 22, 2012I had a sw/reset on my 6509 switch. The info in the crashinfo file pointed me to bug CSCso89550.
The workaround for this issue is to disable the gold diagnostics tool.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 5548 Pair To 2 6509 Core Switches / No Vss
Jun 8, 2012connecting a 5548 pair to our core 6509s. Just want to be sure we don't introduce any issues into the network.The 6509's are connected and perform all the routing. Essentially, we're moving away from a 3750 stack in the data center and the 5548s are the replacement. We'd want to limit the vlans to the specific server network vlans. Our current setup is a port channel between the 3750 and each of the 2 6509s for redundancy. I'd like to use the same functionality when we connect the 5548's but I'm looking for what the config should look like to ensure no spanning tree loops are introduced and that it is configured optimally.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: View Capacity Throughput (backplane) Of Core Switches (6509)?
May 30, 2012How i can view the capacity throughput (backplane) of core switches (6509)? How i know much is in use?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Series Switches Support VSS Active-Active Chassis
Feb 7, 2012The 6509 Series Switches support the scenario VSS Active-Active Chassis, I would like to setup both switch's as one virtual switch but working at the same time, not with Active - Stand By Chassis.
My plans it to create PortChannel accross both Switches 6509 in order to have 2 links one connected to one slot/switch and the other connected to slot/switch in the second 6509 for servers redundancy.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?
Nov 21, 2011I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis
Nov 21, 2011I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7609 For Switching / Based On LAN (VRRP / HSRP) Feature
Oct 18, 2011I am facing an isssues with 7609 for LAN switching , based on LAN (VRRP/HSRP) feature.Actually we are having ES+ cards (on 7609) and we are using multiple groups(say 350 vrrp groups) running on the router . the routers are connected as router 1>>> mux(which is working as switches)>>> router2
my questing are
1. does their will be "multicast packets" (for VRRP/HSRP group) "from backup router to Master router", when in stable state( ie when Master and backup are already chosen) , or the packet from backup to master should be unicast.I know for sure, the packet from master to back is multicast packets denstination to Multicast IP packet and To MAC address.I am not sure but I think from backup to master it should be multicast
2. what is frequency of these packets( from backup to master)
3. As i have multiper group on a single interface ( we are using q-in-q), when the connectivity from router's is broken, then does all the groups will muticast their active roll in the lan sengment "at once" or it will be in a groups say 100 groups at once, and after few ms few 100's and sone ( as is on OSPF or RIP)
we are in between troubleshooting I hope we get the ans( Actul problem we are seeing in the router's that we have 2 ports on active routers and 2 ports on standby router , but we are not seeing muticast on 1 port on standby router where as all other 3 ports are seeing multicast packets) [code]
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2951 - HSRP Backup Taking Two Minutes When Switching Off Primary Router
Oct 7, 2012I configure HSRP on Router 2951 as a primary router, and Router 2811 as backup router. But when I am switching off my Primary router the backup router is taking 2 mins to take over form primary router.
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560E - HSRP Gateway Failover And Routing Table
Nov 12, 2012We have two Cisco 3560E layer 3 switches at the core of our network. The switches are configured as an HSRP pair and the clients on our network point to the HSRP address as their default gateway. So if CORE-A dies, then CORE-B will pick up the address and the default route for the clients will continue to be available.We also need to specify a few static routes on the core switch to allow us to get to specific networks. Is there a way to do this so that the routes failover in the same way that the default gateway does?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: IPv6 HSRP Implementation On IOS-XR 4.2.1
Nov 11, 2012I'm looking to try and implement ipv6 HSRP on a series of IOS-XR Routers running 4.2.1 following on from successfully setting up IPv6 HSRP on a few cat6509s on VLAN Interfaces in other parts of the network. I have entered the "router hsrp" configuration menu and gone into the interface in question that I'm looking to setup with IPv6 HSRP. Unfortunately, there version 2 or address-family ipv6 commands are not available.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - HSRP Design And VSS
Apr 17, 2012is it possible to run hsrp on two routers (not l3 switch) connected to a l2 switch ? if so does the two routers need a back to back connection ?
i know if use two l3 switches (instead of routers) and connect to a LAN switch then we need a back to back connection between the L3 switches
also can we use hsrp on vss on 6500?
design
1800 router 1800 ROuter
| |
| |
|---------- L2 switch-------------------------------|
if the above design is acceptable how does the routers know which one is active and which one is standby ? if we need a direct connection between two routers they have to be on a seperate subnet and routers dont allow broadcasts - so how will hsrp work on routers ?
L3 switch --------------------------l3 switch
| |
| |
|---------------L2 switch---------------|
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 HSRP For LAN Fail-over
Jan 23, 2012Planning to implement HSRP in layer 3 switch.
We have two numbers of Cisco 4900 ME Switches. Basically want LAN failover from these devices. There are about 400 users in our network. I have attached rough network topology for your reference(I am not good at Microsoft Visio). Need to know implementation of the HSRP in these switches. Two distribution switches(Cisco 4900 ME Switches) are connected to 4 Access switches and these are connected to the LAN.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: HSRP Flapping On 7604?
Jul 9, 2012i have 2 cisco 7604 distrubution routers .Both routers are running 310 hsrp groups.
Sundenly there is hsrp flapping which causes high CPU.
What is the limitation of HSRP group on cisco 7604 router .Below is the show ver from the router
----------------- show version ------------------
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRC2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[Code]......
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560x / HSRP On LAN And WAN Interface?
May 9, 2012I currently use L3 switches as edge routers to my WAN. I want to use a pair of 3560x switches with IPbase to provide a failover path to my WAN using HSRP at one location but had some problems testing the configuration. My plan is use a virtual address on the LAN interface (VLANx which port gi0/1 accesses) and the WAN interface (VLANy which port gi0/24 accesses). I want switch 1 to be primary since it will have an IPS attached to it, and switch 2 will be backup and used only when switch 1 or the IPS requires maintenance. On both the LAN and WAN sides there is no advanced routing going on, the various hosts just depend on the availability of their respective default gateways, so HSRP should be sufficient to provide a failover in either direction.
In my testing I got 1 or the other link to fail over but not the entire switch. What should my config look like to achieve failover of the entire switch in the event 1 or the other interface goes down, and fail back when the primary links are again available?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3945 - License To Run HSRP?
May 20, 2013if the Cisco 3945 router requires any license for it to run HSRP. Also advise which IOS runs HSRP on the 3845 router.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - HSRP Is Instable
Apr 14, 2013n our datacenter we've implemented HSRP on 2 6500's for redundancy purposes. Both switches are connected via a trunk. When an interface is administratively brought up, HSRP becomes instable. Below some selective logging:
12:58:01.759 CET: %HSRP-5-STATECHANGE: Vlan32 Grp 32 state Standby -> Active12:58:01.919 CET: %HSRP-5-STATECHANGE: Vlan21 Grp 21 state Standby -> Active12:58:02.031 CET: %HSRP-5-STATECHANGE: Vlan42 Grp 42 state Standby -> Active12:58:02.031 CET: %HSRP-5-STATECHANGE: Vlan18 Grp 18 state Standby -> Active12:58:02.223 CET: %HSRP-5-STATECHANGE: Vlan4 Grp 4 state Standby -> Active
Basically what happens, is that both switches becomes active and thus are forwarding traffic. After a few seconds all is back to normal. It seems they are missing each others "hello messages", so the state change is in this case normal outcome. What I can't figure out', is the root cause. Since it is triggered by bringing up an random interface configured as a dot1q trunk, I'm thinking of STP limits. But the limitations I found are 10.000 active STP logical ports and 1800 virtual ports per slot. In my case this is 2591 logical ports and all the virtual ports per slot are below 1800. This suggest the switch is capable of running this set-up without a problem.
Some extra information:-Sup 720 10GE-Version 12.2(33)SXH2a-No Vss used-No drops on trunked interfaces between the 2 core switches-83 standby groups (max256)
-R-PVST
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3850 - Way To Configure HSRP
Mar 3, 2013I just started a evaluation license for IP Base on my 3850 switches. But i can't configure HSRP cause the commands are not there (I rebooted allready). Do you need enterprise for HSRP on the 3850?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: HP C7000 / Nexus 5K - Locking Down HSRP ARP / MAC?
Mar 6, 2013Had a Sev 1 issue today. We have a bunch of Nexus 5ks connecting to some HP C7000 Chassis for the use of Virual environments. Engineers build and tear down servers during the day, however today, an engineer configured a virtual machine accidently with its IP address as the default gateway. Each pair of nexus switches has one physical SVI per vlan and a HSRP address for the vlan. Of course this engineer configuring the server IP address as the HSRP address killed the vlan... which lead me onto think... are they are tried and tested techniques to protect this from happening on the switch. Enforcing the ARP/MAC of the HSRP address and not allowing it to change or any other device to change it?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5546 HSRP Not Formed
May 17, 2012I have a paif of nexus 5548 configured VPC using the mgmt interface as heartbeat and 2x10G as peerlink. Peer-gateway is also configure on the vpc domain. I have 2 FEX straight thru connection to each Nexus'es. Created 2 VPC and both are up and no suspended vlans. Allowed VLANs in peerlink is 10,20,30,40 and 50. I configure SVI for VLAN 10 on both nexus 10.10.10.100/24 and 10.10.10.101/24 respectively. The problem is when I create HSRP on this VLAN 10 (vip 10.10.10.88), the hello packets are not heard by both nexus, thus both Nexus are acting as active with unknown standby. I can ping both vlan 10 from each Nexus. I tried deleting and putting back the config but no luck.I tried creating another SVI vlan 20 on both nexus and form hsrp, result is same as in vlan 10. I am running version 5.1 release on both nexus.
View 3 Replies View Related
