Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E Switches Interconnected On Layer 3 Port Channel

Oct 3, 2012

We are currently designing  Layer 3 to the edge EIGRP solution  for our customers. The network is a hybrid of collapsed  core (Core to access) as well as a three layer design (Core/Distro/Access) for connectivity to the Data Centre, Internet, Wireless Blocks etc.The  core of the network contains two 6509-E switches interconnected on a  Layer 3 Port channel (no VSS). Access Layer switches (3750-X series running Stackwiseplus protocol)  connect to the core switches over p2p routed links and Distribution layer switches (3750X stackwiseplus) provide connectivity to the  Data centre, Internet, wireless blocks etc.
 
The access and distribution switch stacks(Cisco 3750-X) are set up with two or three member switches with uplinks multihomed to the primary and secondary core switch with each uplink included in EIGRP. In each of the stacks, one of the switches controls the operation of the stack, which will be  the stack master.As the Cisco Stackwise architecture is not SSO-capable but NSF aware, all Layer 3 fuctions must be re-established during a master switch outage. To minimize control plane impact and improve Layer3 convergence, uplinks should be diverse and originate from the member switches instead of the Master switches in the respective stack. This is as per Cisco recommended design solution.The above solution can be setup if there are more than two switches in the stack. i.e. uplinks are configured on the backup member switch modules.
 
1.But what about stack with two switches..Which switch should be set up as the Master for a two member stack with uplinks to the core primary and secondary from each switch(Master and Backup)
 
2. For Layer 3 routing, does the routing takes precedene over switch failures? Say for eg. In a two member stack, the master switch with uplink to primary fails, does EIGRP provide a fast convergence to route traffic via backup secondary and does not wait for the control plane on the switch stack to converge? All the access to core links will be set up for ECMP.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Layer 3 Port Channel Between Sites Connected Over Dark Fiber?

May 21, 2013

Has anyone configured Layer 3 port channel on Cisco 6509 switches which are connected over dark fiber between two buildings?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 / Layer 3 Port-channel Up But Can't Ping Across Link

May 17, 2012

I configured the interfaces individually at L3 and could ping across each link Example:

4500 Switch 2:            6500 Switch 1
int t5/1                    -      int g3/17                    1 Gig fiber link
tore down config
tried second set of interface
int t6/1                    -      int g8/17                    1 Gig fiber link
 Ping successful

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Layer 3 Port Channel From 6500 VSS Switch To Two Standalone

Jul 30, 2012

Configured Layer 3 portchannel from 6500VSS enabled switch to two different 6500 standalone switch. Configured first ip on VSS switch, second ip on standalone switch1 and third IP on standalone switch2. My question is
 
1. Will the portchannel be up?
2. If port channel is up, will I able to ping the connected IP's.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Trunk To Port Channel

Apr 22, 2012

I have 2 Cisco 6509 switches linked together via single Fibre as a trunk.I want to change this to a port channel where I will add another 3 fibre ports to the port channel but what order do I do this to minimise any disruption.

1-Configure PortChannel and add the 3 new ports, this will bring up the Port Channel but what effect will this have on traffic currently going over the single Trunk link? Will spanning tree go mad, how will switches react?

2-Convert existing Trunk link to Portchannel then add in new ports to PortChannel, I guess in doing this there will be a small hit on traffic as it changes to a port channel.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Port Channel In 3825 Connect To Two Different Switches

Jan 17, 2012

We have one 3825 router used as voice gateway. For redudancy, we want to connect it to two different switches which has STP and HSRP running. Can I create a port-channel with two Giga interfaces in 3825 and connect to two different switches? Should I configure port channel in switch with only one port in each port-channel? I know server can be connected to different switches with NIC teaming. I just want to mimic that kind of setup. I did one time for port-channel in 3825, but it was connected to a stacked 3750X. So it's different case now.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ME380x Port-channel From One Switch To Two Switches

May 8, 2013

I am trying to configure port-channel from one switch to two switchs, and only one interface of each switches make part of the port channel.Cisco IOS Software, ME380x Software (ME380x-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(52)EY4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) [code]

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750s Port Channel Between Server And 2 Different Switches

Jan 27, 2013

Here's what I'm trying to do.  We are having new storage servers installed that will be using NFS.  I'm being told that they need to have their connections port channeled.  Right now, the servers have connections to 2 different 3750s for HA. Is it possible to configure a port channel between these 2 connections?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Create A Port Channel That Spans Two Different Nexus 2248TP Switches

Oct 20, 2011

I have a router on  which I would like to create a port channel that spans two different Nexus 2248TP switches, and then create a couple subinterfaces on the router's po interface.  I've done this successfully on my primary router, but the config doesn't seem to work on the backup router.  The primary is running IOS 15, while the backup is running 12.4.25d advanced IP.  I do see the trunk come up from the switch side, and my router subinterfaces and po interface show up, however I'm not able to get anywhere from the router.  It's not even able to reach other hosts on the same network.  As soon as I remove the port channel config and use the physical interface and assign the same address used on the port channel interface, everything works as expected and I have connectivity.
 
interface Port-channel21
no ip address
hold-queue 150 in
!
interface Port-channel21.248
encapsulation dot1Q 248 native
ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0

[URL]

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sg300 And SLM2024 VLAN As Layer 2 And Layer 3 Switches Connection

Mar 18, 2012

I want to setup VLAN with the switches SG300 and SLM2024. What is the suggestion to connect these 2 switches. We have the Juniper net screen.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing ::1002 Layer 3 Ether-channel Vs Two Separate Links

May 19, 2013

We were going to create a 2 port, layer 3 etherchannel between a 1002 router and a 3750X layer 3 core switch. We wanted to create bunled link between them but, now we are going to be putting a Riverbed device between the router and core switch. Because of this, would it be best to abandon the idea of creating a layer 3 etherchannel and just have 2 links from the router and core switch and have traffic load balance between the 2 links?The Riverbed will have 2 connections into it from the Core switch and 2 connections into it from the 1002 router. I was hoping to keep the layer 3 etherchannel but, do you think it would be best to create 2, /29 nets and have the router/Riverbed and Core Switch/Riverbed load balance.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6509 - Ether Channel Configuration?

Dec 1, 2011

I came across a Catalyst 6509 switch configuration and have noticed some strange thing on the ether channel configuration side, it appears that it have interface port-channel 2 and port-channel 2A, what was that mean? its the ether channel not forming and joined together?
 
What wrong with the below configuration that cause it to automatic created another port-channel (2A) interface in this case?

[code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Fabric In Slot 5 Reported Timeout Error For Channel 11

Apr 27, 2013

There is a cisco ws-c6509,recently it appear error log “%FABRIC-SP-6-TIMEOUT_ERR: Fabric in slot 5 reported timeout error for channel 11 (Module 3, fabric connection 1)”. When I reload the device,the error log disappear.But a few days later,it appears again.I try to replace the slot 3 (WS-X6704-10GE),the error log continues.The IOS version is 's72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF8"

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5580 Port Channel To 6509 VSS?

Dec 17, 2012

Anyway, here's the situation I'm trying to configure several VLANs on my ASA to uniquely allocate to contexts, the VLANs will be trunked from my VSS. Unfortunately I'm not clear on how to achieve this, the configuration guide for 8.4 talks about multiple contexts and routed setups all which don't appear to apply exactly. I've configured the port channel at both ends and I've configured sub-interfaces on the port channel and assigned VLAN IDs. These sub-interfaces are then allocated to the contexts to set 'ip address' etc. I've not been able to successfully test this configuration and I am concerned that it is incorrect..

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5010 Interconnected With Two UpLinks

Dec 11, 2011

We are looking for some latency in our net and I am trying to check if our STP implementations is running correctly - we have a simple flat network here and no blocked ports here - just two nx 5010 which are interconnected with two uplinks.A remote site - mirrored setup - with 2 10G dark fiber connections - one for each nx5010 - is connection a DR site. I have split the two sites in two stp domains by enabling bpdu-filter on the vpc between the two sites.

I have been running wireshark on the local segment for some time and see the STP RST ROOT announcement every 2. seconds  - this is probably normal ? I was looking for some alternate root negotiation packets which would cause the mac tables to be flushed.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Will All 4-ports Of N5K Will Be Same Port-channel

Sep 12, 2012

Have 2 N2K with dual-connections to both 2 N5K, will all 4-ports of N5K will be the same port-channel. N2K as well ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Port-Channel Between 4507

Nov 29, 2011

I need to configure a port channel between two sw 4507R. with port Giga, but those port are in different modules.
  
Sw-1
interface GigabitEthernet5/48
description **** Conexion Switch-2*****

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches

Nov 14, 2011

If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 As A Port Channel Bridge?

Dec 7, 2011

I have 3750 core/distribution switches with routing enabled in two offices connected with copper link and L3 port channel interfaces. NewOffice#2 has moved about 5 miles farther away from office#1 and I have to deploy new core/distribution switch connect it to old core#2 via F.O and move all access switches with it. Old core will stay in old #2 offices as a bridge between office#1 and new office#2 Office#1core<->copper (Ethernet) <->oldoffice#2core<->f.o. <->new office#2core How I should configure port channels ports on oldoffice#2 core to act as bridge between office#1 core/dist and newoffice#2 core/dist without changing anything else (ip, etc) on whole network

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Lost Port Channel Between 6513

Feb 24, 2012

We have 2 6513's that are linked via 2 10 gig interfaces, using an LACP channel.I received an alert this aft stating that the far 6513 was unreachable and the port channel int PO3 had gone down, the 2 10 gig interfaces had also gone down on either side. 5 mins later PO3 had resestablished itself and has been fine since. [code]

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5018 / Port Channel Down?

Feb 7, 2013

We are running nexus 5018 in our DC.What is the difference betwen "channel-group 214 mode active"  and " channel-group 216" Any difference?.. because i have problem with this config we are going build a server config? 
 
We have problem with porth channel down.
 
5K# sh int po71
port-channel71 is down (No operational members)
vPC Status: Down, vPC number: 71 [packets forwarded via vPC peer-link]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - How To Setup Port-channel

Jan 22, 2012

I set up a port-channel trunk between a acess switch 3750 ( int gi2/0/1 and gi2/0/2) and Core 6509( int gi7/11 and gi7/12).
 
On the both the 3750& 6509 I configured:
 
interface Port-channel15
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,103
switchport mode trunk
 
But the ports on the core g7/11 and g7/12 keep shutdown and when I do show interfaces port-channel 15, it show the interface is shutdown.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4507 - Configuring Layer 3 Switches?

Sep 5, 2012

I've been conducting research on configuring 3 distribution switches in my network which are Cisco Catalyst 4507's to communicate with our core over layer 3. Our core switch which is already configured at Layer 3 for intervlan routing is a Cisco Catalyst 6509.
 
I've got the configuration portion complete and all devices are able to communicate my only question is about QoS. Do I have to configure QoS at the layer 3 interfaces for voice, if so how is that completed. We have several vlans and separate the vlans for each building by voice and data. We only configure ports on the access switches with voice vlans for QoS and we use the auto qos option on these interfaces.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Min-Link Configuration On 3750-X Port-channel

Feb 27, 2013

I am building a new network and intended on using the min-link feature on my port-channels between a 3750-X series switch and Nexus 4k.

However reading further into this it seems this feature is only supported on higher end models. I cannot find any reference to the min-links feature in the 3750-X configuration guide. Is this an available feature?

The 3750-X model is WS-C3750X-24T-L running IOS 12.2(55)SE3 IP Services

My thoughts is that the is only an LACP supported feature so I may not see the command until I have entered an LACP specific command on the port-channel but unfortunately I do not have a 3750X to verify this on at present.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Setup In VSS Configuration - Port Channel ID

Jan 22, 2012

I have a pair of 6500's setup with VSS and there is currently only one link between then. However one end of the link is on Po10 and the other end is on Po25.  If I move the Po25 over to Po10, will things break? It seems to be working fine now. I'm about to add a second link and I'm concerned about the current configuration.  It makes more sense to me to have both ends of the same link on the same port-channel ID.  I've seen documentation which states otherwise however.
 
interface Port-channel10
no switchport
no ip address

[Code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / Allowing Etherchannel Or Port Channel?

Mar 3, 2012

I am using 3560.IP rouitng is being turned off on this.Curious to know if I will create etherchannel or port channel.I think etherchannel.Correct me if I am wrong.On connecting switches I have vlan10,20,30 to be allowed.I am sure I need to allow these all vlan in 10,20,30 which are on the trunk port on each side switch.Post that will add channel-port lacp and make it in active mode.Is that correct.This way traffic will be load-balanced/aggregated on minimum 2 ports who are the part of this.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C2960 - Port Channel Load Balancing?

Apr 15, 2013

I have an inquiry about a configuration I deploy in a C2960 switch. I have configured a ether channel with 8 ports, the load balanced method is source mac address. The bundling protocol is LACP.
 
I have found the ether channel is not balanced as I expect. One of the eight interfaces is congested.
 
Code...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Auto Qos Dropping Port Channel In 3750?

May 13, 2012

We have a switch that, when configuring auto qos on and edge port facing video equipment, the upstream port channel drops. I was wondering if no auto qos would have to be configured on the member ports of the port channel prior to enabling auto qos on any other ports. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Redundant Supervisor Port Channel?

Oct 30, 2011

I have a Cisco 6500 series switch with VS-C6509E-S720-10G ,I have two redundant supervisors between two chassis on the LAN with no add-on line cards ?

I need to know if I can use the redundant supervisor 10 Gb uplinks to form a layer-2 Port channel between the two 6500 switches as i do not want to use want to keep the port idle additionally I need more bandwidth between the two switches for my server farm?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 STP Config On Port-channel Best Practice

Apr 3, 2012

I have 2 cisco 6500 in a VSS configuration , All of my Lan access switches are Stack switches and every Stack is connected to the VSS in a Port-channel so basically this is a loop free environment with no blocked ports .As a best practice I left STP in the Background (mstp)which enhanced cisco features to STP should I configure on the Aggregator (6500-VSS) and on the Access switches ?
 
Because of my topology I dont see the need in configuring most features like Uplink Fast and Backbone Fast but I have configured Loop Guard in addition to UDLD on the 6500 Aggregation Switches (on the port-channels).On the access ports I have configured portfast , bpduguard and guard root (seems a little pointless to configure the two...)
 
1.should I Leave UDLD on and get rid of LoopGuard and configure Guard root instead ? since LoopGuard cannot be configured with Guard Root.
 
2.should I configure GuardRoot on access ports if I already have BpduGuard on them ?
 
3.Is there anything I need to configure on the physicall interface or is everything configured on the port-channel since STP reguards port- channel as a single interface ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Create A Port Channel Between HP Servers (4 Nic) And Two Nexus 2k?

May 9, 2012

I am trying to create a port channel between HP servers (4 nic) and two nexus 2k.  The server side its a single team with 803.2ad fault taulerence and on the nexus side it have created two port channel (port channel 1 for nexus 2k1 and port channel 2 for nexus 2k2) and made them ACTIVE (channel group mode active)
  
But when i add a another server on different ports and port channel them the same way as the above server on nexus 2k1 and nexus 2k2, the first server stops pinging. so i have to sht down the first port channel and reopen them - then it works, however it says NO NETWORK ACCESS on the servers (running windows 2008). the only way is to reboot the server  i cant be doing this on a production network.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How Many Port Channel Can Configured In Switch 3750 X

Apr 23, 2012

I would like to know how many port channel can i configured in the switch 3750 X ? and if there is a limitation by IOS ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Possible To Configure QoS On 4500 Sup7 On Layer 3 Routed Port

Apr 26, 2013

I want to know if is it possible to configure QoS on a 4500 Sup7 on a Layer 3 routed port like the following example (Similar to CBWFQ on IOS Router)?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved