My monitoring tool is reporting alerts for high cpu utilization on Nexus 5010.Image is 4.1(3)N1(1) Only command supported on this code is sh proc cpu.The output of which does not really tell what is the current cpu utilization.How do i troubleshoot the cause of high cpu on nexus switches.
View 12 RepliesI currenty have a Nexus 5010 connected to a core 3750X switch stack in a VPC trunk using 2 1Gbps links. I want to move this link to 2 10Gbps links without losing connectivity. So I want remove a 1G link and move it to 10G and then once that's up move the other 1G link to 10G hopefully without losing connectivity. So the question is, can I have a 1G and 10G link between the Nexus and 3750s in the same virtual port channel without causing problems?
View 3 Replies View RelatedOur Data Center Switch (5010) rebooted itself today, underneath the captured screen
NX5010-1(config-vlan)#
Broadcast message from root (console) (Sun Feb 10 14:22:41 2013):
The system is going down for reboot NOW!
NX5010-1# sh system reset-reason
----- reset reason for Supervisor-module 1 (from Supervisor in slot 1) ---
1) At 740938 usecs after Sun Feb 10 14:22:41 2013
Reason: Reset triggered due to HA policy of Reset
Service: nohms hap reset
Version: 5.0(2)N1(1)
[code]....
we have a old Nexus 5010 running version 5.0(3)N1(1)it is in a franckenblock(like frankenstein) ie . we bought the parts and create our own system design before VCE was created. He have since bought VCE V block for our production sites. we use the franc ken block to test before we migrate to the production v block 300 FIX the issue we have is the 5010 will only see two 1 Gb/s SFP fiber modules in the first 12 slots. All these slots are dual 1g/10G. If we add more than two, it claims not to see them. We tried swapping the sfp and using both sfg-GE-MM and GLC-SX-MM moduels, no difference at all 1g sfp are in the first 5 slots. only the first two slots are up.the others say "Link not connected" or "SFP not inserted"all five links are the same SFP and are plugged in other switches.the green link lights are on plugged in SFP, even when the CLI states they are not plugged uni tried both two types of 1 Gb/s SFP. sfg-GE-MM and GLC-SX-MM ,i move the sfp between slot 1,2 and 3,4,5. nothing changed,From "sh int brief" you can see that it can see the sfp ie they are all 1Gfrom "sh int status " it sees 1g but why does it say type 10G?why when i go to the "int e 1/5" and try switch port mode now, it can't mode and trunk at now there (;also how to i stop or clear EU51 %SYSMGR-2-TMP_DIR_FULL: System temporary directory usage is unexpectedly high at 87%.i put as much info in the attached file as i could.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are looking for some latency in our net and I am trying to check if our STP implementations is running correctly - we have a simple flat network here and no blocked ports here - just two nx 5010 which are interconnected with two uplinks.A remote site - mirrored setup - with 2 10G dark fiber connections - one for each nx5010 - is connection a DR site. I have split the two sites in two stp domains by enabling bpdu-filter on the vpc between the two sites.
I have been running wireshark on the local segment for some time and see the STP RST ROOT announcement every 2. seconds - this is probably normal ? I was looking for some alternate root negotiation packets which would cause the mac tables to be flushed.
Can nexus 5010 supports inter v lan routing , as there is no core switch and router available in current network.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am not able to create more than 256 VLAN in Cisco Nexus 5010 switch. While creating I am getting "No VLAN resources available for VLAN creation" Details below -
Switch model - 5010
Software : NX OS 4.0 (1a)
Error Message:
Nexus_5010(config)# vlan 417
ERROR: No VLAN resource available for VLAN creation.
I'm trying to create a vpc between a Nexus 5010 and Nexus 5020 switch. I recently upgraded the software so they are running the same version. I connect get a vpc link. Is there something wrong with my setup? Is a vpc between a 5010 and 5020 even possible? They are connected using a pair of Intel X520's in 802.3AD teaming mode. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure get the QLogic 8240 card to work properly in ESXi 5.0. I want to be able to send the iSCSI traffic down the iSCSI portion of the card and use the ethernet portion of the card to do NFS.
Here are my vlans I am working with..
vlan 420 = fcoe
vlan 500 = NFS
vlan 1000 = iSCSI
I have my interface currenly set as the following on the Nexus 5000.
interface Ethernet1/17
[Code]...
I found intermittent link down(20~40 seconds average) occurred about 1~10 times every month. SAP reported a lot of active connections are disconnected and I used a batch to ping and found "requested time out" about 30 seconds.And Windows, SQL server, Nexus 5010 do not show any errors. We run cluster and cluster does not fail over.And I don't know which cables or nics cause this issue. When it happened, almost all servers are unreachable. For example, SQL server 1 -> SQL server 2, IBM HS22-1 -> SQL server 1. However, some connections are not dropped sometimes. It varies each time.PS: I run this topology last year without any problems but it started intermittent link down from 2011/1/7. Because there is no errors in Nexus 5010, it is difficult to troubleshoot. Cisco TAC recommended us to implement virtual port channel yesterday. Could I use "errdisable detect cause" to detect what caused the intermittent link down? Is there any error logs or switch parameters/status can use to troubleshoot?
View 18 Replies View RelatedBasically I am trying to use Wireshark to do a packet capture on a Nexus 5010. I want to do a monitor session on on the switch so I can capture from a source port to a destination port on the same switch. I can configure the source port but when I go to configure the destination port I get "ERROR: Eth102/1/4: Configuration not allowed on fex interface". I have tried to reconfigure this port as a switchport but "switchport mode access" command does not take. I don't want to make any changes to any other ports but this one.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHere is an example of what each switch logs when a server drops offline. Sample logs taken between 5:32am and 5:35am on Feb 20. This particular one was having problems all weekend. Switch #1 encountered over 2000 interface resets. The corresponding VPC port on Switch #2 only had 13 resets.
NEXUS SWITCH #1
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-FOP_CHANGED: port-channel10: first operational port changed
from Ethernet1/10 to none
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel10: Ethernet1/10 is down
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel10: port-channel10 is down
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN: Interface port-channel10 is down (
No operational members)
[code].....
I'm not sure if I'm missing something basic here however i though that I'd ask the question. I recieved a request from a client who is trying to seperate traffic out of a IBM P780 - one set of VIO servers/clients (Prod) is tagged with vlan x going out LAG 1 and another set of VIO server/clients (Test) is tagged with vlan y and z going out LAG 2. The problem is that the management subnet for these devices is on one subnet.
The infrastructure is the host device is trunked via LACP etherchannel to Nexus 2148TP(5010) which than connects to the distribution layer being a Catalyst 6504 VSS. I have tried many things today, however I feel that the correct solution to get this working is to use an Isolated trunk (as the host device does not have private vlan functionality) even though there is no requirement for hosts to be segregated. I have configured:
1. Private vlan mapping on the SVI;
2. Primary vlan and association, and isolated vlan on Distribution (6504 VSS) and Access Layer (5010/2148)
3. All Vlans are trunked between switches
4. Private vlan isolated trunk and host mappings on the port-channel interface to the host (P780).
I haven't had any luck. What I am seeing is as soon as I configure the Primary vlan on the Nexus 5010 (v5.2) (vlan y | private-vlan primary), this vlan (y) does not forward on any trunk on the Nexus 5010 switch, even without any other private vlan configuration. I believe this may be the cause to most of the issues I am having. Has any one else experienced this behaviour. Also, I haven't had a lot of experience with Private Vlans so I might be missing some fundamentals with this configuration.
I have a 5010 that simply won't load any system image. Loads the kickstart image just fine, but once at the Switch(boot)# prompt just give me garbage when I enter "load bootflash:n5000-uk9.5.1.3.N2.1b.bin Restarting system.
Loader Version pr-1.3
loader> dirbootflash: lost+found n5000-uk9-kickstart.5.2.1.N1.1b.bin n5000-uk9.5.2.1.N1.1b.bin n5000-uk9-kickstart.5.1.3.N2.1b.bin n5000-uk9.5.1.3.N2.1b.bin
[Code]....
I attempted to enable jumbo frames on a Nexus 5010 (NX-OS version 4.2(1)N1(1)). I created the policy map below and lost access to the switch.
policy-map type network-qos jumbo
class type network-qos class-default
mtu 9216
After recovery I see from the logs that all vlans and interface were suspended. I've attempted to look for reasons for a compatibility issue but I am unable to find what is checked and what could have been incompatible. The other troubling thing is the adjacent switch suspended its interfaces too but no change was done there. What I need to look out for so that this does not happen again?
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 1,10,601 on Interface port-channel1 are being suspen
ded. (Reason: QoSMgr Network QoS configuration incompatible)
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-5-IF_TRUNK_DOWN: Interface port-channel1, vlan 1,10,601 down
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 10 on Interface port-channel508 are being suspended.
[code]....
We have a Cisco 3845 router configured as a voice gateway with multi SIP trunks. But when it reachs 200 calls traffic, the CPU increase to 60-70% and caused by CCSIP_SPI_CONTROL process.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 46%/30%; one minute: 54%; five minutes: 58%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
377 400729448 171017979 2343 6.31% 10.71% 12.44% 0 CCSIP_SPI_CONTRO
[Code].....
We are facing high CPU Utilization on Cisco 3750X-48P-L without any traffic on it. find the attached log files for 2 separate 3750's stack, we have upgraded the IOS of SW2 from "c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.bin" to "c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin" but still we found the same issue with CPU utilization.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've been looking at reported problems with our Vdeio Conferencing kit attched to a stack of 3750's (which I think is down to QoS) but this got me looking at the logs. We get a lot of high CPU utilization warnings mainly for SNMP (315), Hulc running con (95), Virtual exec (289). I understand the last two are normal, and the SNMP one is probably Cisco Works polling as it happens every 4 hours.
However I've got an odd one: Apr 25 07:34:58: %SYS-1-CPURISINGTHRESHOLD: Threshold: Total CPU Utilization(Total/Intr): 93%/0%, Top 3 processes(Pid/Util): 296/85%, 144/0%, 154/0%
What is Pid 296? It's not listed on the switch:
293 39056 18456 2116 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 SpanTree Helper
294 8 73 109 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 EEM Server
295 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 EEM Policy Direc
[Code].....
From couple of weeks we have observed the cpu utilization of cisco 6509 with SUP 720 is high. During daytime from 9:00 to 21:00 it keeps increasing & reaches 98% & after 21:00 becomes normal.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCpu always hitting 70% to 80 % and interrrupt traffic is 70%. Want to know the root cause for this issue.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 73%/65%; one minute: 71%; five minutes: 67%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
1 8 59 135 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager
2 58864 3290773 17 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter
3 1784 238001 7 0.07% 0.01% 0.00% 2 Virtual Exec
[code]....
I have a 2 cisco core (cisco WS-C6509-E (R7000) processor) and been working for quite sometime.they are conneted with HSRP with active standby config with a 10 g module for redundancy just today I see that the cpu utilization went to about 50% and its the same on both cores.
[Code] .......
I have some events where the CPU utilization in a cluster switches of WS-3750 is going to 100%, the process with the major utilization of CPU is the "hulc running con".
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have seen high CPU utilization on some Cisco switches of type 2960S. Also we got info, that applications are running with poor performance or with interruption.Following IOS is loaded: C2960s-universalk9-mz.122.55.SE
View 9 Replies View RelatedHigh Utilization event generated for Nexus 7010 shows in LMS 4.0.1. share your input why its generated. We have checked up Nexus, it showed not utilization.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am seeing a strange situation on my 6500 switch?By having snmp walk on '1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3' (== cpmCPUTotal5sec), I came to know that there are two processor and the cpu util for switching processor is gone to 88 % and some time creeps to 99 %.
snmpwalk -v2c -c "removes" sw6500 '1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3'
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3.1 = Gauge32: 12 (--- this is for CPU of Router Processor )
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3.3 = Gauge32: 99 (--- this is for CPU of Switching Processor )
but when I do sh process cpu on the console, all looks normal as it shows cpu utilization of RP. why the value is so high on the switching processor ?
In Cisco 3750 facing high CPU utilization for specific period. During this period traffic response times across the switch degrades. Steps to identify interface potentially generating traffic. I have attached 'sh proc cpu history' , ' sh ip traffic', 'sh proc cpu sorted' during troubled period .
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have cisco 4510R+E switch with IOS-XE Software Version 03.01.01.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).Our this switch is having two core & one core is always going to about 90% to 98% cpu utilization while other core is showing normal (about 5% to 10%),we check with-This switch is gateway of our LAN.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am experiencing high cpu utilization in my 29501 switch. see the copied sh process cpu output.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/95%; one minute: 89%; five minutes: 37%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
1 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager
[Code].....
I am running a 1712 12.4(25d) with NAT, VPN and FW/IDS. I have a broadband ethernet connection at 20mb. As I run some traffic through it, the processor jumps up to near 100% and throughput comes to a screeching halt. IP CEF is turned on and makes no difference when it is turned off or on.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am a new network engineer on a retail company and I am having a problem on the High utilization of my 3-stack switch 2960 only during Peak Hours of the Store Sales.
Note: on Peak hours, it is peaking at 90-95 %
here is the utilization after Peak hours:
4444333334444433333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
[Code]......
I am looking at the utilization on a Catalyst 3560-E. I am running a test with eight 1 GIGE links RXing at 95 % utilization. All of the traffic is going to a TenGigE port. The device on the TenGigE port is echoing back all of the traffic received, so the 1 GIG links are TXing at 95% as well.When I do a "show controllers utilization", the port utilization numbers are correct, but the fabric utilization is higher than I would expect. The fabric should be 128 gigbits / second in this switch, and there is 7.6 gigabits TX/RX to the ten gig port. The fabric utilization is at 49%. I would expect 7.6 / 128 = 5.9% or possible double that. [code]
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco 6509 modular IOS getting high cpu in interrupt but the switch process switching is still less. Any sugeestion what could be the problem?
Process sbin/ios-base, type IOS, PID = 16407CPU utilization for five seconds: 12%/81%;
Sometimes cpu goes upto 100%
Version - s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-vz.122-33.SXH5
we have 2811 router with multiple servers connected to it's lan from which there are monitoring servers in between , the router suffers always from high cpu utilization
configuration has alot of ACLs & NAT & IPSEC Tunnel with wan bandwidth 20 M? Is there any method to reduce the high CPU utilization shown below !!
CPU utilization for five seconds: 90%/80%; one minute: 93%; five minutes: 90%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
104 737029848 427864243 1722 5.45% 5.65% 5.65% 0 IP Input
253 63392216 11081854 5720 1.04% 1.15% 1.12% 0 IP NAT Ager
260 82602372 137425723 601 0.64% 0.64% 0.66% 0 PDU DISPATCHER
[code]....