Cisco Switching/Routing :: Power 7 Detect Messages 6500 Series
Dec 26, 2012
I am getting the below messages on my Cisco 6500 series switches every 1min. The IOS version is 12.2(33)SXI6 & with SUP32-GE-3B
%ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa1/1: Power Device detected: Cisco PD
%ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa1/1: Power Device detected: Cisco PD
%ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa1/1: Power Device detected: Cisco PD
These messages are I am recieving on few ports only not on all port having IP Phone connected. I tried changing the phone to some other model but that also did not resolved my problem. Also I tried powering on the phone using power adapter but the issue still persist.
Client are not facing any issues due to this error, but still I would like know what can be the issue which is generating these logs.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 28, 2011
I have a 6500 chassis with 2 power supplies. At the moment I am using the default configuration:
power-redudancy mode redundant
The problem is that an inserted module is in "power deny" state due too insufficient power.
I know, that It's not a good idea to change into combined mode (loss of redundancy), but my customers requested this anyway.
So I will change to combined mode. So here's the 1 million dollar question: "Which modules will go into power deny, if one of my power supplies fails?"
The 6500 config guide states:
"Power supply is removed withredundancy disabled
• System log and syslog messages are generated.
• System power is decreased to the power capability of one supply.
• If there is not enough power for all previously powered-up modules, some modulesare powered down and marked as power-deny in the show power oper state field."
Well, do you know if there's any way to configure some kind of priority? E.g. I definetly don't want by 10Gig Module or WiSM module to be in power deny. Can i statically make sure, those module will be powered on for sure? Like: "power enable module slot_number" How is this calculated? Or is random?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
Setting up NTP. Currently the source for NTP within our network is our core 6500.Currently the NTP source for the 6500 are internet based NTP Servers. I would like to configure the 6500 to respond to NTP messages as the NTP Master. However will the 6500's source remain as the internet based NTP Servers?? In other words if the 6500is configured to be NTP Master, where would it get it's time from?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
For intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?and on 3750 switches, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2012
I have a routed interface on a Cisco 6500 Series switch. I am trying to find a way to adjust the tcp mss.To date I have not yet been able to find a way to accomplish this. Is this just not supported?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
Is there a guide for a migration of the GLBP to VSS between to 6500 Series SW ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2011
For intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?hes, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2012
we need to relocate our core switch 6500 with sup 720 to another bldg
what is the command to gracefully shut it down I mean power off
I was told one can just switch off the power
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
We have two 6500s. One is running in power redundant mode and the other is running in combined mode.We need to change the one running in combined mode to redundant mode to ensure it can run ok on one supply if needed but I have a couple of questions.
1. Assuming that we are not oversubscribed on the power allocated, does changing the mode cause any disruption?
2. The switch running in combined mode seems to have allocated some power for an "Inline Local-Pwr-Pool" which is not allocated on the switch running in redundant mode (see attached). Does this allocation will be needed if we change the power mode?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2012
I have 6500 core switch with 2500W power supply, and I want to install a second power supply with 3000W ? is this applicable ? if yes, is there a specific configuration that must be done ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
I know that the 6500 with a Sup 720 reserves power for a redundant 720. If there is no plan to install that redundant Sup, is there a means of releasing that reserved power? I know that one approach would be to insert a card into that slot to cut the reserve down, but I need to reclaim all of that power.
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
We are having troubles getting a 10Gig interface to come up with a carrier... it shows down down.We are using X2-10GB-LR on a 6500 and SM fiber, distance to carrier hand off is about 90 feet.
According to: [URL]
The receiver power on a X2-10GB-LRis
Max
0.5
Min
-14.4
Our carrier is sending at +5db. Currently the interface is down.
My question is; would the interface even come up if it is receiving a powerful signal?
Here is DOM output for our interface.
show interfaces transceiver detail
Optical High Alarm High Warn Low Warn Low Alarm
Transmit Power Threshold Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2012
I am connecting power cable (series power cables) on 3750 stacks. i have connected them the same way the stack cables are connected i.e. fo rexample on a stack with 3 3750s:
1- fitst slot on fist switch connected the second slot last switch in the stack.
2- second slot/ port on the first switch to the first on second and seoncd on teh second switch to first on the third switch.
this how they are alway been stacked.Now, I need to connect power cables and I have followed the same method for stacks up to 4 switches. it seems that if a stack has more tham 4 switches, then the cabling will be dofferent!?I was wondering what will be on the cabling scheme for stacks more than 4 switches.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
My task is to upgrade a couple of 6500 series switches, 6513 with SUP720/MSFC3 (WS-SUP720) and Policy Feature Card 3 (WS-F6K-PFC3B) installed. How to upgrade those switches if in SSO redundancy mode with two SUPs installed?
I understand that it is good to connect to the MSFC3 via console and upgrade this first, is this correct?
I also have to upgrade some 6509 but I only can test it on one 6509-E, how to get everything up to date. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2012
some of the features of 6500 are enabled by default and woudn't appear in the "Show run". See the command below and how do I make sure whether these featues are enabled by default or not. Would it appear in the config if enabled?
ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx
ip verify unicast source reachable-via any
storm-control broadcast level 70
what are the difference between the commands below and can they be enabled together.
spanning-tree guard root
vs
spanning-tree loopguard default
vs
spanning-tree guard loop
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2012
Cisco IP phones attached to a Moduke in one of my Cat6500 access Switches suddenly went down. Upon closer inspection of the Switch Sys log, I observed the following Sys log error messages: [Module 9 is experiencing the following error: Inline Power Module - PS Voltage bad. ]A sh Mod output indicates the PoE daughter card and Main Module are "ok" - see attached output. It appears issue is related to the the actual Power Supply module and not the blade module and installed PoE Daughter card. I am inclined to open a TAC case for a PS replacement, but wanted to see if this can be resolved without a hardware replacement. At this time all 48 IP phones attached to this module are out of Service.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
The following discussion is based on cisco cat 6500 switches with two power supplies: p1 and p2. . Both power supplies are running in combined mode .Each power supplies is rated with 500 watts max( I just picked 500 watts for simplicity)Combined mode In combined mode, each power supply provides approximately 83% of its capacity to the chassis. This allows for greater utilization of the power supplies and potentially increased PoE densities
1) Let say our specific 6500 switch's configuration requires 1000 watts. We have two power supplies p1 and p2 ,each with rated power of 500 watts. Both power supplies must operate in combined mode. Will power supplies be able to meet the total load power requirement of 1000 watts?
Here is my understanding :The maximum power delivered by each power supplies is 83 percent of its rated power, assuming power supplies are running in combined mode.
So Maximum power delivered by power supplies
= 83% of p1+ 83% of p2
= 83% of 500 + 83% of 500
= 415 +415
=830 watts
Thus the required load of 1000 watts can not be met by our power supplies in combined mode.
2 )Suppose our switch's switch configuration needs 500 watts. Again our power supplies each rated with 500 watts, are configured for combined mode. How much power is being delivered by each power supply? Is it 83 percent of the total load i.e 500 watts?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2013
can I plug power supply from 4500 to 6500? more specifically we have power supply PWR-C45-1300ACV. And we need to place some power supply to 6500, which has only one active module. So 1300 should be enough for it. But we dont know if they are physically compatible, if it is possible to plug. I didnt find this power supply to be officially?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
Q. Does the Supervisor 720 support all existing Cisco Catalyst 6500 series interface and services module, protecting customer investments?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2012
I am little confused about the location of FIB table and adjacency table in both cisco 6500 series and fixed ports switches .In case of 6500 series switches
"Central CEF mode:The CEF FIB and adjacency tables reside on the route processor,and the route processor performs the express forwarding. Use this CEF mode when line cards are not available for CEF switching, or when features are not compatible with distributed CEF."
If line cards do no support CEF, then FIB and adjacency tables are built and are located on route processor( control plane ). Data plane operations are implemented in software and route processor performs those operations.
Some Cisco switches actually use different hardware to control the different planes. For example, the Cisco Catalyst 6500 is a modular switch that uses the Multilayer Switch.Feature Card (MSFC) for control-plane operations, and the supervisor Policy Feature Card (PFC) for the data-plane operations.
Supervisor module has has MSFC and PFC. MSFC implements control plane operation where as PFC implements data plane operation.But the first paragraph says in Central cef mode, both data plane and control plane operations are implemented by route processor. [code]
Do these switches implement the Central mode cef in same way as mentioned above. i.e
"Central CEF mode:The CEF FIB and adjacency tables reside on the route processor and the route processor performs the express forwarding. Use this CEF mode whenline cards are not available for CEF switching, or when features are not compatible with distributed CEF."Or fixed ports switches such as 3750 implement data plane operation in hardware where FIB tabe and adjacency table are maintained on Data plane.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
Is there any challenge to upgrade core switch 6500 series from Nexus 7009 which runs NxOS, because i have 3750X series switches connected at distribution and access layer in my network topology??
Is there any challenge if we place NxOS in core and IOS in distribution and Access layer??? how we are able to match sh run config in existing 6500 switch to Nexus 7009 NXOS?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2013
I am receiving the following error on 3750 stack switches. have already verified the power status and found ok.
IOS used: Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
211540: Jun 10 10:45:17.935 UTC: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-UNBALANCED_PS: Switch 4's power stack has unbalanced power supplies
211541: Jun 10 10:46:18.045 UTC: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-UNBALANCED_PS:
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
After stacking two 3750X switches, with four equal power-supply's, with StackWise and PowerStack , still got the next message every few hours %PLATFORM_ENV-1-FRU_PS_ACCESS: FRU Power Supply is not responding (gn4m-rt1p08-04-2)( note that the message revers to the second switch in the stack ) although the stackwise and powerstack on the switches is oke and are working correctly. !
Config : Stack-power in power-sharing mode/strict With CLI on the switch : All the power supply's and stack-power details, prio look OK.
Only: LMS prime /inventory/cisco-view/configure/power supply status result : some power supply's are marked as disabled.with the command > power supply 2 slot a off/on I manage to get the status back to "normal", but after a few hours some power supply's are again marked as "disabled".
Looks like SNMP en IOS difference from opinion.
Hardware
WS-C3750X-24S-S
C3KX-PWR-350WAC
Software
15.0(2)SE
C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2013
We have two switches of the same model (WS-C3560-48PS-S) that are not providing PoE. I'm trying to remotely determine what the cause of the issue is.
Here is some output.
Hostname#show power inlineAvailable:0.0(w) Used:0.0(w) Remaining:0.0(w)
Interface Admin Oper Power Device Class Max (Watts)--------- ------ ---------- ------- ------------------- ----- ----Fa0/1 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/2 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/3 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/4 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/5 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/6 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/7 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/8 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/9 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/10 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4(code)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2011
how can we upgrade 6500 non modular ios to normal 6500 ios?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2012
In a stand alone 3750x switch configuration, can the secondary power supply only act as a redundant power supply (active/standby), or can it become a "pool" of power similar to power sharing mode for StackPower (somewhat active/active)? I understand there is no stack involved here but I'm curious if this functionality is possible.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2012
Is there a way to get more messages out of a 2950 set to syslog? I've turned every logging option I can find to DEBUG, but all I get in my syslog are LinkUp/Down messages and "Configured from console by console". I'd love to see more information such as configuration changes, or even someone attempting to set up DTP on a switchport set to access mode.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2012
I've got a 48-port 3750 running 12.2(46)SE and I am seeing these messages in the logs. Has any seen this message before or what it means ?
Invalid packet (too large) length=22320
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2012
I have a new redundant network with two cores C1 and C2 and five access switches A1 to A5. They are all Cisco SG300 switches. I have noticed there are too many STP messages emanating from one host which has a MAC address which cannot be traced on the network. In the redundant network, I made C1 the root bridge by giving it a priority of 4096 and C2 has been given a priority of 8192 so that it is the secondary root bridge in the network. I have left all other STP settings to default on the rest of the switches in the network.
The problem is that one host is advertising a RST root bridge all the time. Now it has a mac address which is different from the mac address of the root bridge itself and i cannot trace this mac address on the network. Look at the snapshot of Wireshark output in the attach.The source MAC address which is the host advertising all the time is 1c:df:0f:34:db and the root bridge is 1c:df:0f:bb:34:c4.
Why would the root bridge be resetted all the time?I've also noticed that one port in a LAG configuration on one of the access switches is flapping up and down all the time.I tried to troubleshoot this problem. It is not the cable. It would be something else. What could cause this flapping of the port?Could it be related to STP?
On the other Core switch C2 I can see a LAG status switching between forwarding and blocking all the time. What could make the LAG status to flap from forwarding to blocking and back all the time like this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2012
Is there a way to turn off 802.1x authentication messages to the console of a 3750 switch? The issue we have is that we like to monitor the terminal when remotely configuring our switches. However, every time a computer authenticates to the network we get messages and sometimes quite a few depending on the situation.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2010
I had these error messages on both my Cisco 2851 and on my Cisco Catalyst 6506.
On Cisco 2851:
%SYS-SP-3-CPUHOG: Task is running for (2000)msecs, more than (2000)msecs (4/4),process = SEA write CF process. [code]...
And on 6506:
Dec 27 15:20:55 MET: %SYS-SP-3-CPUHOG: Task is running for (2000)msecs, more than (2000)msecs (129/129),process = SEA write CF process.[ code]...
I have these IOS versions on my Cisco:
Cisco 2851: 15.0(1)M4
Cisco 6506: 12.2(33)SXI
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
While working at a client site today, I was troubleshooting some ICMP connectivity for a network we have created.I turned on 'debug ip icmp" on the 3550 switch int he middle, and was inundated with the following debug output:
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
[code]....
This output fires several times a second, and based on how often it is firing, I am curious if it may be a culprit with respect to the fact that the client has indicated that they have some slow internet.Should the next step be to look at the workstation at 172.16.1.5?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2012
Is there any way to change the port that is used for syslog messages on a Cisco 9500 switch?By default this is set to UDP port 514.There doesn't seem to be a command to change the port.
View 1 Replies
View Related
