I know that the 6500 with a Sup 720 reserves power for a redundant 720. If there is no plan to install that redundant Sup, is there a means of releasing that reserved power? I know that one approach would be to insert a card into that slot to cut the reserve down, but I need to reclaim all of that power.
View 10 RepliesI sort of messed up and upgraded the IOS on one supervisor on a 6500 without doing the second, saved and reloaded. How to I get the 2nd one working again? When I issued a show module the "normal" Active sup shows active and the standby shows as Supervisor.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI was wondering if there was a way to disable the RPS in a 3825? When I do a Sho Env All I get the following;
Redundant Power System is present.
RPS is in standby state
Redundant Power System is present.
RPS is in standby state
How ever there is no RPS in the system. At least not that I know of. There is only one power supply.
I have a 6500 chassis with 2 power supplies. At the moment I am using the default configuration:
power-redudancy mode redundant
The problem is that an inserted module is in "power deny" state due too insufficient power.
I know, that It's not a good idea to change into combined mode (loss of redundancy), but my customers requested this anyway.
So I will change to combined mode. So here's the 1 million dollar question: "Which modules will go into power deny, if one of my power supplies fails?"
The 6500 config guide states:
"Power supply is removed withredundancy disabled
• System log and syslog messages are generated.
• System power is decreased to the power capability of one supply.
• If there is not enough power for all previously powered-up modules, some modulesare powered down and marked as power-deny in the show power oper state field."
Well, do you know if there's any way to configure some kind of priority? E.g. I definetly don't want by 10Gig Module or WiSM module to be in power deny. Can i statically make sure, those module will be powered on for sure? Like: "power enable module slot_number" How is this calculated? Or is random?
I have a Cisco 6500 series switch with VS-C6509E-S720-10G ,I have two redundant supervisors between two chassis on the LAN with no add-on line cards ?
I need to know if I can use the redundant supervisor 10 Gb uplinks to form a layer-2 Port channel between the two 6500 switches as i do not want to use want to keep the port idle additionally I need more bandwidth between the two switches for my server farm?
I was wondering if I am able to add a redundant power supply to an asr 1001 router that is in production without losing connectivity or causing any diruption to the Users - is it hotswappable?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 2 6504's running HSRP as my core. They are each etherchannel'd to my Datacenter switch (3750 Stack) -- see image below.The problem i a having is with the etherchannel status:
Core1 PO11 status w (waiting)
Core2 PO11 status P(bundled)
DC11 PO48 status P -- but only to Core2 - the interfaces to Core1 are suspended. (See attached configuration documents) None of the devices have any information in the logs. I run this same configuration in my central location, but we are running Nexus 7000's. With the 6500's, do I need to split the port channels on the 3750 to allow them to negotiate the etherchannel? If I split the portchannels, are there any concerns? Should I expect to see the etherchannel status as P (Bundled) or H (Hot-Standby)?
I have a peculiar issue with a router whering I get the message in the Show Environment as below.
sh environment out
Redundant Power System is not present.
SYS PS1 is present.
Type: AC
AUX(-48V) PS1 is absent.
Fan 1 OK
Fan 2 OK
Fan 3 OK
Fan Speed Setting: Normal
Alert settings:
Intake temperature warning: Enabled, Threshold: 55
Core temperature warning: Enabled, Threshold: 70 (CPU: 95)
Board Temperature: Normal
Internal-ambient temperature = 22, Normal
CPU temperature = 37, Normal
Intake temperature = 22, Normal
Voltage 1(3300) is Normal, Current voltage = 3300 mV
Voltage 2(5150) is Normal, Current voltage = 5210 mV
Voltage 3(2500) is High/Low, Current voltage = 2168 mV
[Code]...
Does a portable RPS device either from Cisco or another manufacturer exists, that would allow you to move primary power for a switch without causing an outage? I realize that for the Catalyst 3560 for example, you can get an RPS 2300 or 675, but my understanding is that these are made for a more permanent installation, not to mention rather costly.
It looks like the RPS 675 is rather inexpensive after all, especially in the secondary market, but still rather large for toting around.
We bought Cisco sup engine WS-SUP32-GE-3B for 6500 switches 2 nos for redundancy. I have connected 6 systems on each sup engine ports. How to clarify whether both sup engine will forward the data while one is Master and other is standby?
View 4 Replies View Relatedwe need to relocate our core switch 6500 with sup 720 to another bldg
what is the command to gracefully shut it down I mean power off
I was told one can just switch off the power
We have two 6500s. One is running in power redundant mode and the other is running in combined mode.We need to change the one running in combined mode to redundant mode to ensure it can run ok on one supply if needed but I have a couple of questions.
1. Assuming that we are not oversubscribed on the power allocated, does changing the mode cause any disruption?
2. The switch running in combined mode seems to have allocated some power for an "Inline Local-Pwr-Pool" which is not allocated on the switch running in redundant mode (see attached). Does this allocation will be needed if we change the power mode?
I have 6500 core switch with 2500W power supply, and I want to install a second power supply with 3000W ? is this applicable ? if yes, is there a specific configuration that must be done ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe are having troubles getting a 10Gig interface to come up with a carrier... it shows down down.We are using X2-10GB-LR on a 6500 and SM fiber, distance to carrier hand off is about 90 feet.
According to: [URL]
The receiver power on a X2-10GB-LRis
Max
0.5
Min
-14.4
Our carrier is sending at +5db. Currently the interface is down.
My question is; would the interface even come up if it is receiving a powerful signal?
Here is DOM output for our interface.
show interfaces transceiver detail
Optical High Alarm High Warn Low Warn Low Alarm
Transmit Power Threshold Threshold Threshold Threshold
Port (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm) (dBm)
[Code]....
Cisco IP phones attached to a Moduke in one of my Cat6500 access Switches suddenly went down. Upon closer inspection of the Switch Sys log, I observed the following Sys log error messages: [Module 9 is experiencing the following error: Inline Power Module - PS Voltage bad. ]A sh Mod output indicates the PoE daughter card and Main Module are "ok" - see attached output. It appears issue is related to the the actual Power Supply module and not the blade module and installed PoE Daughter card. I am inclined to open a TAC case for a PS replacement, but wanted to see if this can be resolved without a hardware replacement. At this time all 48 IP phones attached to this module are out of Service.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe following discussion is based on cisco cat 6500 switches with two power supplies: p1 and p2. . Both power supplies are running in combined mode .Each power supplies is rated with 500 watts max( I just picked 500 watts for simplicity)Combined mode In combined mode, each power supply provides approximately 83% of its capacity to the chassis. This allows for greater utilization of the power supplies and potentially increased PoE densities
1) Let say our specific 6500 switch's configuration requires 1000 watts. We have two power supplies p1 and p2 ,each with rated power of 500 watts. Both power supplies must operate in combined mode. Will power supplies be able to meet the total load power requirement of 1000 watts?
Here is my understanding :The maximum power delivered by each power supplies is 83 percent of its rated power, assuming power supplies are running in combined mode.
So Maximum power delivered by power supplies
= 83% of p1+ 83% of p2
= 83% of 500 + 83% of 500
= 415 +415
=830 watts
Thus the required load of 1000 watts can not be met by our power supplies in combined mode.
2 )Suppose our switch's switch configuration needs 500 watts. Again our power supplies each rated with 500 watts, are configured for combined mode. How much power is being delivered by each power supply? Is it 83 percent of the total load i.e 500 watts?
can I plug power supply from 4500 to 6500? more specifically we have power supply PWR-C45-1300ACV. And we need to place some power supply to 6500, which has only one active module. So 1300 should be enough for it. But we dont know if they are physically compatible, if it is possible to plug. I didnt find this power supply to be officially?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am getting the below messages on my Cisco 6500 series switches every 1min. The IOS version is 12.2(33)SXI6 & with SUP32-GE-3B
%ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa1/1: Power Device detected: Cisco PD
%ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa1/1: Power Device detected: Cisco PD
%ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa1/1: Power Device detected: Cisco PD
These messages are I am recieving on few ports only not on all port having IP Phone connected. I tried changing the phone to some other model but that also did not resolved my problem. Also I tried powering on the phone using power adapter but the issue still persist.
Client are not facing any issues due to this error, but still I would like know what can be the issue which is generating these logs.
Currently, we have a Cisco router (28xx), ASA 5520, and a core switch 4500. We have different vlans. We also have Auto QoS running for our Cisco IP Phones.My manager just asked me to see if I can either reserve some certain bandwidth for one vlan, or give that vlan higher priority on internet traffic than the others.
1.) Anyway we can reserve some more bandwidth for one vlan than other vlans?
2.) If #1 cannot be done, how can we provide higher priority on the internet traffic to one vlan than the others?
3.) Is #1 or #2 the same config? If not, which one would be easier (without changing our current QoS settings)?
4.) If 1 or 2 can be done, which device I should config the settings on?
5.) This question may be duplicate, but do we need to reset our current QoS to achieve the goal?
We have 3750-X's with dual power supplies. When one of them is disconnected the NMS/Netcool is not picking up the trap. What MIB is needed to monitor the power supplies?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using 6500 with VPN Accelerator on this device. I have a dozen other VPN connections GRE and IPSEC to routers and ASA and other Juniper Firewalls.
They all work perfectly.The error I get is map_db_find_best did not find matching map (Never seen this error be for) [code]I can't put the whole config for security reasons.
I have a 6509-E with redundant 3000W power supplies (WS-CAC-3000W) but one supply is current non-operational.From the outputs I'm not sure whether the issue is (more likely to be) with the supply to the PSU or the PSU itself, i.e. whether my first action should be to get an electrian to check the supply or fault call the PSU with our maintenance providers and have it replaced?
View 3 Replies View RelatedDoes SG500X support the following
redundant Power Supply?PIM sparse mode (PIM-SM), PIM dense mode (PIM-DM), and PIM sparse-dense mode?Layer 4 prioritization: enables prioritization based on TCP/UDP port numbersUni-Directional Link Detection (UDLD) — monitors a link between two switches and blocks the ports on both ends of the link if the link goes down at any point between the two devices
I am receiving the following error on 3750 stack switches. have already verified the power status and found ok.
IOS used: Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
211540: Jun 10 10:45:17.935 UTC: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-UNBALANCED_PS: Switch 4's power stack has unbalanced power supplies
211541: Jun 10 10:46:18.045 UTC: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-UNBALANCED_PS:
[Code]....
After stacking two 3750X switches, with four equal power-supply's, with StackWise and PowerStack , still got the next message every few hours %PLATFORM_ENV-1-FRU_PS_ACCESS: FRU Power Supply is not responding (gn4m-rt1p08-04-2)( note that the message revers to the second switch in the stack ) although the stackwise and powerstack on the switches is oke and are working correctly. !
Config : Stack-power in power-sharing mode/strict With CLI on the switch : All the power supply's and stack-power details, prio look OK.
Only: LMS prime /inventory/cisco-view/configure/power supply status result : some power supply's are marked as disabled.with the command > power supply 2 slot a off/on I manage to get the status back to "normal", but after a few hours some power supply's are again marked as "disabled".
Looks like SNMP en IOS difference from opinion.
Hardware
WS-C3750X-24S-S
C3KX-PWR-350WAC
Software
15.0(2)SE
C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
We have two switches of the same model (WS-C3560-48PS-S) that are not providing PoE. I'm trying to remotely determine what the cause of the issue is.
Here is some output.
Hostname#show power inlineAvailable:0.0(w) Used:0.0(w) Remaining:0.0(w)
Interface Admin Oper Power Device Class Max (Watts)--------- ------ ---------- ------- ------------------- ----- ----Fa0/1 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/2 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/3 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/4 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/5 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/6 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/7 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/8 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/9 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4Fa0/10 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4(code)
how can we upgrade 6500 non modular ios to normal 6500 ios?
View 5 Replies View RelatedIn a stand alone 3750x switch configuration, can the secondary power supply only act as a redundant power supply (active/standby), or can it become a "pool" of power similar to power sharing mode for StackPower (somewhat active/active)? I understand there is no stack involved here but I'm curious if this functionality is possible.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible for me to plug in and turn on on-board redundant power supply for a 4402 WLC that is already online and in production without any disruption to Wireless users and APs attached to that same controller?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to replace a defective redundant sup. I read on several articles that inserting new redundant sup should not be an issue as the active sup will always send its configuation to the standby. We are running SSO on the Sup720. Should I switch it to RPR before I install the redundant sup? I read a case wherein they switched it to RPR from SSO before inserting the new redundant sup. My concern is the IOS mismatch since Cisco doesn't always send the same IOS on RMAs.What I am planning is this.
1. Save/Backup configuration
2. Remove the redundant sup on slot 8 (since it is a 6513)
3. Insert the new redundant sup on slot 8.
4. Check if all the configurations were synced from slot 7 to slot 8.
5. Copy the IOS from sup-bootflash to slavesup-bootflash. (if the IOS are not the same)
6. Check show bootvar to see if the boot variables are correct.
7. If bootvar is the same, reload slot 8 to boot the new IOS.
Is this a good plan or am I missing something? I am worried with this document if the redundant sup has a different software. If i insert the card in slot8, according to Cisco, it will revert to RPR. If slot 8 boots and it has a different OS, then slot 7 will switch to RPR even if it's active. Would I still be able to access the slavesup-bootflash of slot 8? Is it going to boot 100%? I read that doing a force switchover will cause a flip and RPR would cause the line cards to reinitialize and I don't want that. Well I am not going to do a force switchover since i want slot7 to be active and retain slot 8 as hot.
Before going further let me tell you I hate QoS..the policies that I applied. I am trying to create reserve traffic for a CE but when I try to download or upload the traffic goes from 2MB which is where it should stay to up to 6MB?completly losted, I will not move to ccnp sp like this.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI would like to add a redundant supervisor to my core 6509. Is this tricky to do? I know they have to be running the same IOS. I am worried if I put the new supervisor in it will write over the exsisting running config.
Catalyst 6000 supervisor 2 (Active) WS-X6K-S2U-MSFC2
Policy Feature Card 2 WS-F6K-PFC2
Cat6k MSFC 2 daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2
Can 2 Cisco 4507E switches with redundant SUP6-E modules be connected togther using the the standard 10GB CX4 modules and CX4 copper cables? Are there any special modules or cables required.
View 1 Replies View Related