Before going further let me tell you I hate QoS..the policies that I applied. I am trying to create reserve traffic for a CE but when I try to download or upload the traffic goes from 2MB which is where it should stay to up to 6MB?completly losted, I will not move to ccnp sp like this.
View 2 RepliesI have a Cisco 5505 with a 12Mbps feed. I want to reserve 2Mbps for RTP traffic. I followed the QoS guide here: url... The goal would be that any traffic destined for port 5000 through 5100 UDP or TCP from any IP to any IP on any interface.should always have 2Mbps available to it.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI want to be able to use port 1-80 for all outgoing traffic. I have a VPS outside my home, which can redirect the packets to the prober ports.Is it possible with an application on the computer and VPS? Or is it impossible?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two computers. Computer A is connected to the internet through GSM network. Computer A also have NIC adapter which is connected to local network with IP 192.168.33.10/24.
Computer B in connected to internet with DSL connection.
On both machines I use TeamViewer to make VPN secure tunnel between this two computers. Computer A gets IP:7.200.100.2 Computer B gets IP:7.200.100.3
How can I access from computer B to specific device with IP 192.168.33.250 which is on local network of computer A?
Is it possible to route traffic from VPN to other local network, or it is some possibility to use port forwarding from VPN connection to specific IP address on the local network to specific port number?
I know that the 6500 with a Sup 720 reserves power for a redundant 720. If there is no plan to install that redundant Sup, is there a means of releasing that reserved power? I know that one approach would be to insert a card into that slot to cut the reserve down, but I need to reclaim all of that power.
View 10 Replies View RelatedCurrently, we have a Cisco router (28xx), ASA 5520, and a core switch 4500. We have different vlans. We also have Auto QoS running for our Cisco IP Phones.My manager just asked me to see if I can either reserve some certain bandwidth for one vlan, or give that vlan higher priority on internet traffic than the others.
1.) Anyway we can reserve some more bandwidth for one vlan than other vlans?
2.) If #1 cannot be done, how can we provide higher priority on the internet traffic to one vlan than the others?
3.) Is #1 or #2 the same config? If not, which one would be easier (without changing our current QoS settings)?
4.) If 1 or 2 can be done, which device I should config the settings on?
5.) This question may be duplicate, but do we need to reset our current QoS to achieve the goal?
Is there any traffic interruption if turning on TE in a working MPLS core?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a 7206 VXR router between a several Mikrotik routers on our backbone. We have the Mikrotiks on both sides of the CIsco 7206VXR setup for MPLS/VPLS. I need to simply setup the 7206 to pass the MPLS/VPLS tagged packets to the next router on the link. We are using OSPF as the routing protocol. I am told by our Mikrotik guy that I just need to enable LDP and VPLS tunnels 4:0 on the 2 gig interfaces on the 7206VXR to let it pass the MPLS/VPLS traffic. It sounds simple but I'm not sure how to do this.
Any commands I need to imput to allow this router to pass this MPLS/VPLS traffic.
I am working for a company based in Sydney Australia, the company recently open an office in London UK, therefore we are going to get leased lined based on MPLS.We were advised that Customer Edge router will be CISCO1941/K9. We want to our UK client to access our web-based applications via MPLS network instead of internet. The UK office is using BT Business ADSL with 5 Static IP address (please note the modem IP address is actually dynamic), we are going to get a Cisco 857/K9 router which will be used for the entry for the UK client to access the MPLS network. My question will be how do I configure the Cisco 857 router to allow one of the public ip to access the MPLS network. It appears that there are two options, and I am not sure if this is going to work or which one is working better. I have attached two diagrams for clarification of my case.
Option 1 Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) get the assigned 5 Static IP addresses One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be assigned to the FE1 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic) One of the five IPs to 217.xx.xx.170 will be assigned to the WAN interface of Sonicwall Firewall Router which also serve as Internet Access Gateway for LAN users, All trafiic destined for Sydney LAN will be using FE0 (Cisco 1941) as gateway
Option 2Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) will get 192.168.0.1, Cisco 857 router will be the default gateway for LAN users, using one to many NAT, also one to one NAT, One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be forwarded to the FE0 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic)
We have 2mb mpls network between three sites. Each site also has its own internet connection for hosting webserver and internal users to access internet. Each site has a few internal subnets. Each site currently has a 2800 series ISR.
1) Increase Internet connection to 10mbps and configure site-to-site VPNS in a mesh configuration so that each site has a vpn to each other site. This would create six vpn tunnels.
2) Configure so that only Exchange and VoiP traffic use the MPLS network under normal conditions. All other traffic (backup/misc apps) should be routed to use the Internet VPNs. If the MPLS fails of course we would like the Exchange and VoiP traffic to fail over to the VPN connections as well until the MPLS comes back up.
I have P router (7206VXR) and I need to export netflow from its MPLS interfaces to the netflow software.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco 1841 router at Branch end and a Cisco 2821 router at the HO connected by a 2MB Leased line. There is a Video Conferencing device setup in the branch office . We want to reserve 1MB bandwidth for the video conferencing and leave the remaining BW for Data . The traffic between the locations is passed through the tunnel using the static routes .
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 877 on an ADSL connection. QoS isn't doing the trick -- I need to reserve 200 meg or so of my outbound (upstream) bandwidth for VoIP to end complaints about voice quality. Any example of how to classify SIP, RTP, IAX, and Skype traffic and put a rate limit on anything that doesn't fall into that category? The VoIP phones also are in their own IP range on the LAN side if that would make things easier...or I could even connect them into a specific port on the internal switch in the router.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWhy this router have DHCP server and Port forwarding features and many LAN ports, but does not have DHCP reserve feature? If I can plug many computers, each one get own IP address, but how I can't fix it? I need to port forwarding of course, but if lease time ended, next time my computer got other IP address, so I need to reconfigure port forwarding each time! Of course I can do it, but try to explain it for your wife? Yes, I can use static IP addresses, but for what this box have DHCP server?
View 9 Replies View RelatedThis problem applies (in my case) to our ASA5510. The issue here is that the http service on the ASA is runnnig off of the standard port 80. Login to the firewall and run the following.no http server enable http server enable 8080,Now you should be able to add a NAT/PAT on port 443 to another server of your liking. Just remember when you attempt to use ASDM to manage the ASA in the future to specify the new port 8080.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan the new Cat 3850 run MPLS ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have two Motorola MC9090's that will no longer connect through my MPLS back to coperate. They both stopped working at the exact same time yesterday.
They connect to a Cisco WAP321 that is connected to a Catylist 3750 that is connected to a Cisco 1921.
Each device can ping anything on that network. Both the switch and the router can ping the devices.
But if I try to ping a device on the coperate network the devices timeout.
The PC's connected to the switch via CAT5 have no issues connecting back to coperate (RDP to server)
I'm going to start the evaluation of implementing the virtualization of our campus LAN using MPLS.We'll get many inter-VLAN routing domains per VRF on the same LAN infrastructure.The LAN infrastructure is based on C6500 implementing VSS.Do you have experience with this kind of setup?Any known/faced issue that might prevent the setup of MPLS on VSS enabled C6500?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes 2650 and 2620 support MPLS ? If yes what IOS version should i download?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a 2921 router and want to use mpls feature. Right Now we are using c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M1 image but mpls static cross connect” is not working with this image. And will this image(c2900-universalk9-mz.SSA) be worked?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for Routing Design scenarios to complete our configuration needs for remote branches. We will have two 1921 routers in each location, one with a T1 from our MPLS carrier, the other with a DSL connection from an ISP. The T1 router will have an assigned AS and use BGP to router back to head quarters. The DSL router will have an IPSec tunnel back to an ASA 5510 at head quarters. I envisions a GRE tunnel from the DSL router back to head end routers connecting to MPLS at head quarters. Not sure yet how to manipuate the routing between head quarters and the branches such that the T1 router is the primary route to and from the branches and the DSL router is for failover/backup.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've studied and labeled out MPLS and MPLS VPNs several times. The situation I'm presented with is a little different from most of the case studies I've seen in my MPLS books. I've attached a diagram.
We have a IPsec site to site tunnel from our main HQ router to a Cisco ASA 5510 in the core network in the colo. This allows our HQ office to reach the private sub nets in our core without using a Cisco VPN client. The problem we are running into is that this seems to be putting undue strain on the Cisco 2811. I feel like the 2811 should be able to handle it but doing any kind of upload or download through the tunnel spikes the CPU/Interrupts and makes the router CLI basically stop responding until the traffic transfer is stopped or completed. During this time, certain Cisco SCCP phones on our Broad works platform cycle while the SIP phones on the same platform are OK. We are trying to alleviate the load on the 2811 by setting up a VRF from the HQ network to the private VRF used in the Core for private sub net communication. The problem I'm having is the the HQ also has some public traffic that I do not want to include in the VRFs and would like to have it travel through the P2P circuit we have and access the internet or other public devices through the core public IP Internet routing table.
The flow would be this:
-going to a public address use the public internet routing table
-going to private address in the 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x - use VRF to core Private network.
This is a little different of a set up from most of the VRF VPN examples I've seen. Most of those the CE devices is completely private. This is not the case at our HQ.
We have the problem that MPLS labeled packets are not being processed on EHWIC-1GE-SFP-CU if L3PDU + Shim-Header exceeds 1500 bytes.When we move the config exactly to the on-board Interface Gi0/0 it works with put any problems. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to confirm internet access from remote network through MPLS cloud to another site. Let me explain. We have a MPLS network with Wind stream as listed in the visio drawing; site 1 has internet access through the Time-Warner cloud for all users. Site2 has internet access through the Wind stream MPLS router. Site three has no internet access, and only has LAN access layer2 through Windstream routers to Site1 for networks 192.168.0.0/24, 10.1.1.x/24. My question is can we give everyone at Site 3 internet access through the MPLS network down into Site 1 using the Time-Warner ISP cloud.
I placed routes on the Site 3 3750 stack IP route 192.168.50.x 255.255.255.0 to the interface of the MPLS router at site3, then at site 1 we have IP route 192.168.50.x 255.255.255.0 to the MPLS interface, and able to ping all anything on the 192.168.50.0 network. I added the IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.50.x the MPLS router interface, we do not have internet access at Site 3 using Site 1 network.
I confirmed at Site 1 from the Cisco 3750 switch we can ping 4.2.2.2 = Google. How to confirm this will work and what’s required to complete this connection to give everyone at site 3 internet access through Site 1 Time-Warner.
I thought I saw a post/question in regards to "how to" configure a Broadband backup for a MPLS circuit.. What I am trying to do is use a cable/dsl/ broadband (secondary) connection as a backup to a MPLS circuit (primary). I have EIGRP and BGP configured on both the branch endpoint and the tunnel headend. The tunnel is used by the interface that connects to the secondary circuit. The branch location router is a 1841 and the "headend" tunnel router is a 3825. I am wondering about the configuration/syntax of a "weight" or static route that can be used to have data flow over the tunnel when the MPLS circuit goes down - and then switch back to the MPLS circuit when it comes back on line.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are about to install a new network consisting of Cat 4500s with Sup7E at the Access Layer, with Nexus 7000 at the Distribution and Core layers. We have 14 floors with at least three 4500s on each floor. Within the office block where the Access Layer and Distribution Layer reside we need to support secure borderless networking using 802.1x to place users from different parts of the business into segregated networks at layer 3.All switches will have the feature sets to support MPLS/ VRF / OSPF / EIGRP / BGP etc.We quickly dismissed the idea of using VRF-Lite due to the sheer number of Vlans we would need to managage and maintain, the point to point links alone just to get one additional VRF on each floor required far too many Vlans.As a result we are now considering deploying MPLS. The obvious benefits include scalability and manageability, the fact that all switch to switch links can now be routed, instead of having to using SVIs.
View 2 Replies View Relatedwhy the WAN protocols like Frame-relay, HDLC and PPP are called Layer2 protocols?What is the address scheme they use?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have got a PC at work (Windows XP Pro SP3) that is on two networks with the IPs 10.20.30.167, subnet 255.255.255.0 (internet enabled) and 10.0.0.20, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). On the 10.0.0.X network there is a gateway with the IP 10.0.0.200 allowing access to another network; 192.168.60.X, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). I have added the route on my work PC to access the 192.168.60.X network via this gateway and I can access all PCs on all three networks from this PC.Now, I am using LogMeIn Hamachi so that I can access the networks at work from home. The PC at work is the 'gateway' PC on the Hamachi network. When installing Hamachi it created a new network connection and bridged this connection with my 10.20.30.167 network adapter to allow access to the 10.20.30.X network from an external PC when connected using the Hamachi VPN connection. I have manually configured my Hamachi connection on my PC at home to the IP 10.20.30.169, subnet 255.255.255.0, with the default gateway set to 10.20.30.167. I can ping all computers on the 10.20.30.X network from my PC at home.
I then added a route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X to go via 10.20.30.167 (the 'gateway' on the Hamachi network). I also enabled IP forwarding on the 'gateway' PC (my PC at work). I can not ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X network from my PC at home apart from 10.0.0.20 (the other NIC in the Hamachi gateway PC) and 10.0.0.30 (another PC on the 10.20.30.X network that is also on the 10.0.0.X network).Now, with IP forwarding enabled on the Hamachi gateway PC I would assume after adding the route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X traffic to go via 10.20.30.167 that I would be able to ping all PCs on the 10.0.0.X network...I also tried adding a route on my home PC to send all traffic for the 192.168.60.X network via 10.20.30.167 which has a route via 10.0.0.200 to the 192.168.60.X network, but this also did not work.I then tried adding the 10.0.0.20 network adapter into the network bridge that the Hamachi connection made, also keeping both IPs (10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20) on this network bridge by adding them into the 'IP Settings' in the 'Advanced TCI/IP Settings'. I also added the 10.0.0.200 gateway for good measure. I still cannot ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X or 192.168.60.X networks from my PC at home.
I have also added the route to the 10.20.30.X network on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to go via 10.0.0.20 and tried pinging a PC on the 10.20.30.X network but this also has not worked. Also setting the default gateway on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to 10.0.0.20 does not allow this...Surely bridging the networks 10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20 on my work PC would allow another PC on the 10.0.0.X network to access the 10.20.30.X network after adding the route or setting 10.0.0.20 as the default gateway?
We have a PPPoE DSL link with a dedicated IP providing by a small ISP(ISP A) in Canada. We are having trouble reaching a small group of IPs in the US to be able to access some client resources.We have eliminated all possible local issues by removing the firewall and making a direct connection to the ISP. We have also had numerous tests prove successful when we use other local ISPs.
Trace routes show that the packets get dropped a few hops from the destination on a US ISP(ISP B).The routes even appear to be very similar to the other ISPs we tested. We escalated to ISP A and they say that everything is working properly on their end and the problem is with ISP B. They claim they "have no partnership with ISP B and therefore cannot create a ticket to get it resolved". I tried calling ISP B but I get nowhere because I am not a customer of theirs.
My solution is to give ISP A the boot, but management has denied that request because of the amount of effort required to switch over. How I can escalate this? Is there anyway to go over and above the ISPs?
I have an skill exercise with 4 Routing Protocols Default Route,Static Route,Eigrp, Ospf. I have about 6-7 routers, and each of them has an routing protocol. But the problem is the Main router INTERNET, which it has to use Static in a direction, and default in the opposite path. This is the scheme of routers and how the r.protocol have to be configured.
View 19 Replies View RelatedThe websites I usually go on now have some type of error page when I go to them. So far it has happened to 2 of them though they might not be related.
Here's what the page says:
Site 1- Valenth
Quote:
Warning: mysql_connect() [ function.mysql-connect]: [2002] Connection timed out (trying to connect via tcp://ec2-184-73-84-14.compute-1.amazonaws.com:3306) in /var/www/valenth.com/include/database.class.php on line 25
[Code]....
i've had this internet problem that has been going on with a wireless laptop i've had since april. it only happens on this computer, and i've tried many solutions. occasionally, i will try and go to pages on google chrome and an error pops up that says "this webpage is not available." when i play games that are online, they get disconnected as well. i've added google chrome and my other browsers to the firewall list and i've also changed the DNS server. when i use the troubleshooter it says something like "router, or modem is not connected to the internet. i've even downloaded the "fix it" program and it detected no problems
View 1 Replies View RelatedI can't get RDP to work on a specific computer.I've already set it up on the router, know the IP address, and I can get it to work great with the server, but the workstation we want it to go to won't accept it.I checked, it's set to allow RDP, the firewall exception was setup, also turned off the firewall completely, removed the antivirus software, checked TCP/IP filtering on the lan connection, even changed the listening port and still nothing.
View 9 Replies View Related