Cisco WAN :: 7206 VXR Configuration To Pass MPLS Traffic?
May 28, 2013
I have a 7206 VXR router between a several Mikrotik routers on our backbone. We have the Mikrotiks on both sides of the CIsco 7206VXR setup for MPLS/VPLS. I need to simply setup the 7206 to pass the MPLS/VPLS tagged packets to the next router on the link. We are using OSPF as the routing protocol. I am told by our Mikrotik guy that I just need to enable LDP and VPLS tunnels 4:0 on the 2 gig interfaces on the 7206VXR to let it pass the MPLS/VPLS traffic. It sounds simple but I'm not sure how to do this.
Any commands I need to imput to allow this router to pass this MPLS/VPLS traffic.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 11, 2012
I have P router (7206VXR) and I need to export netflow from its MPLS interfaces to the netflow software.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2011
A former coworker of mine setup VPN capabilities to our office network shortly before he left. It is no longer working. We can connect to VPN but I'm not able to ping any devices on the remote network or Remote Desktop to any of the server. After 30 minutes, the VPN connection drops. I have attached our ASA 5505 config to assist in troubleshooting.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2011
I can telnet to the router and ping places on the inside and outside. However when I connect a laptop to the inside interface I can ping to the outside for a bit but can't open a web page and then connectivity is gone all together. At first I thought it was a NAT issue but I know I am good on that front. I have attempted to change the speeds and duplex settings on the outside interface but it does not seem to work. Again if I take the cable from the outside interface and plug it into a laptop it works fine. The thing that makes me wonder is why can I connect to the outside interface and configure it just fine?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
I have configured policies to shape the traffic on the interface of cisco 7206 router. Now my managemet wants to configure these policies on time based ie policy should be applicable during specified time period onle. Is it possible? if yes how to configure it?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2012
I have configured below SNMP v3 commands in Cisco Router 7206VXR (NPE-G1) . I have tested with all option but it is not working . SNMP server is a SNMPc tool and I have configured user name and piv and authentication credential correctly in both side . Same configurations is working for all Cisco switches but not working for Cisco Router.
SNMP V3 configurations:
access-list 20 permit 43.194.10.0 0.0.0.255
snmp-server view readview iso included
snmp-server group readonly-group v3 priv read readview access 20
[ code]....
Router :
Host Name# sh versionCisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRD7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)[ code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2011
There are some troubles in my 7206 vxr . The process of this problem below.
LOG:
Self decompressing the image : ####################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################
[Code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2011
ROUTER#sh run | i ip cefip cef table event-logip cefip cef accounting non-recursive load-balance-hash ip cef accounting non-recursive external
>snip<
ROUTER#conf tEnter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.ROUTER(config)#no ip cef accounting non-recursive load-balance-hashCommand authorization failed.
% Incomplete command.
ROUTER(config)#no ip cef accounting non-recursive load-balance-hash ?% Unrecognized commandROUTER(config)#^Z
cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G1) processor (C7200-JS-M), Version 12.3(10c)
How do I remove "ip cef accounting non-recursive load-balance-hash" from the config. I'd like to leave the box as I found it. Is it to do with an authority level or something more?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
I used the GUI configuration tool for this ASA 5505. When I install it no traffic passes. I am wondering to verify my config. I have masked the usernames for VPN with xxxxxx and yyyyyy. [code]
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2011
A PC connected to a Cisco 877 router and 877 router is connected to another router (7301) via GRE tunnel,Cisco 7301 router is a NAS server and is being used as a PPPOE server.If user create a PPPOE connection on his computer and dial with a username/pass we want to send the PPPOE traffic to 7301 router, so 877 router should pass the PPPOE traffic to 7301 and user will be able to connect,User -> 877 -> 7301(PPPOE server).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2011
I am trying to setup my very first ASA5505 and I cannot get it to pass traffic from the inside to the outside. I am not using NAT/PAT. Here is what I have done so far.
ASA5505(config)# interface Vlan 1ASA5505(config-if)# nameif insideASA5505(config-if)# security-level 100ASA5505(config-if)# ip address 33.46.132.34 255.255.255.248ASA5505(config-if)# no shut
[Code]....
Then from the asdm I permited everything from inside to go out but I cannot get any traffic through. I can ping the outside if I source the outside interface but not if I source the inside. The logs would not show me anything.
I did a packet tracer and it indicates the implicit deny rule at the end of the access-list is stopping my traffic eventhough I have allow rules above it?
I also checked the box in the asdm to allow traffic to pass without NAT
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2008
i read cisco document:[URL] pptp client is in inside,pptp server is in outside.when i donot use firewall, the pptp connection can establish successfully.but use pix 525 7.0(7) i config:
inspect pptp.
pptp connection cannot setup.
show connection in pix:
pptp tcp 1723 is ok.
gre connection only one "E" flag, E means 'outside back connection'.i try second method:delete 'inspect pptp',permit tcp 1723 and gre traffic from outside to inside, and i have config static nat,but the pptp connection cannot work too.so i think there is a pptp bug exist in pix 7.0(7).
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2011
I setup the ikev1 client and can connect but I can't pass traffic either way. I have tried icmp, port 80, smb etc... here is my config: ........
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2011
I am trying to use a ASA 5510 with AnyConnect as an in-line SSL VPN device. I have a separate firewall that NAT's 443 to the inside IP of the ASA, which is the only configured interface on the ASA. I can connect to the ASA from the WAN just fine and the AnyConnect client connects just fine, I get an IP lease across the VPN on my LAN, all looks well. The problem is that I cannot pass any traffic. The only device on my LAN that I can ping is the ASA, nothing else including the default gateway is accessibe. I have setup a static route on the ASA pointing 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to the LAN gateway, but no dice.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2011
We have an issue where by we connect to various customers and the Cisco IPSEC remote access works fine from our LAN through an ASA5505 to a customer site.We have 1 customer that we have some issues with. We can connect from the LAN through to the customers VPN, authenticate and establish a tunnel but in we cannot pass traffic. When we try from outside of the office on a public internet connection the VPN works fine. What could cause this issue?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
How can I see the quantity of traffic that is passing through into an IPSec VPN in a ASA 5520.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2012
we have a Cisco 3825 router which does not work well with a DSL modem(ISP provided). I have configured the Gi0/0 port of the router to plug into this DSL modem but it does not ping to the ISP gateway. If we do a shut/no shut on the interface then it work fine for about 30 secs. Sometimes even for 1 hr. Then the packets drop and we cannot pass any traffic through this interface.
Now, if the ISP connection is terminated on a computer it works fine. It works fine without dropping any packet.I have tried various options like using a straight/cross cable. I have tried to configure the interface negotiation for 100/full, 100/half, auto/auto and almost all the options.I have also tried to interconnect the devices using a L2 device like a HUB. Nothing works.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2013
I recently upgraded from a Cisco 3900 series router to a Cisco ASR1k router. Since the upgrade, I have internal clients who claim they cannot connect to external VPNs. These internal clients are behind a NAT that routes a public IP address to a group of clients with private IP addresses.
How can I ensure that all VPN traffic is able to pass through the NAT?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2013
[OK] Site to Site IPSec + GRE = success, no problems.
[OK] IPSec remote access = success, no problems.
[NO] SSL VPN = remote users can successfully connect to all internal systems. Cannot pass traffic to the Internet.
Hardware:
Cisco 2811, Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(22)T5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) . Software: Cisco Any Connect Secure Mobility Version 3.1.01065
Single hub router terminating IPSec+GRE site to site, IPSec remote access, and SSLVPN remote access VPN services. All services currently configured and running successfully with the exception of the SSLVPN service. Remote users can initiate and successfully establish SSL VPN sessions. While established, connectivity to all internal systems/resources are successful. Only when the remote access client tries to connect to "Outside" Internet resources does traffic not pass successfully. Troubleshooting has pointed to a NAT related issue (I believe).
When connecting from a remote access workstation, utilizing IPSec remote access client (built-in Cisco IPSec client from Mac OS), the session establishes and the client works flawlessly. Examining the Cisco 2811 router, you see the /32 host route from the remote access session get installed, and you see the corresponding NAT translation entries created when the client accesses outside (Internet) resources. Appropriate configuration to implement "hair pinning" have been included to handle the in and right back out (with NAT translation) needed for remote clients to access the Internet.
Configured the 2811 for SSL VPN, and remote access clients can successfully connect and access all internal network resources. Examining the Cisco 2811, the /32 host route for the remote access client is installed, pointing to SSLVPN-VIF0 interface with a next hop of 0.0.0.0 When checking the NAT translation table, there are NO entries for the remote access client address created which leads me to believe the hair pinning/NAT function is not being invoked for SSLVPN clients.
Originally, the IPSec remote access VPN local pool was 10.0.100.0 /24. To keep from having to adjust the existing NAT translation, PBR Route-MAP for the hair pinning function - I took the 10.0.100./24 and broke it into a pair of /25 networks. Bottom half for the IPSec remote access VPN pool (10.0.100.0 /25); upper half for the SSL VPN pool (10.0.100.128 /25). By utilizing SSL VPN, is the traffic somehow bypassing the DIALER1 interface where both the crypto map (and more importantly: IP NAT OUTSIDE, and PBR configuration for the hair pinning function)? I cant explain why NAT translation entries are not being created for SSLVPN client sessions.
Cisco 2811 Configuration has been included. IPSec & SSL VPN Remote Access Sessions Captures (performed from same remote client) have been included.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
I cannot telent to 1941 router from a Window 7 PC and I can a Window XP PC. Telnet is enabled on Win 7 PC. I upgraded 1941 to latest IOS.Compters running Windows XP can telnet to router and hit the internet. Computers running Windows 7 cannot hit the internet. I replaced the 1941 with a 1760 router and Win 7 computers can telnet to router and hit the internet. I used the same config from the 1941 on the 1760.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2011
I ' m not able to configure the asa 5510 to allow the multicast traffic to pass through ASA.The multicast traffic have to pass from inside interface to outside interface.Can I configure the multicast traffic to pass through asa with a static nat ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2011
I have installed asa 5520 , software ver is 8.4,I have SSM-20 installed in asa 5520. How to pass traffic through this ssm-20 ,how to create sensors,how to update signatures of this IPS module ,is there any procedure to automatically update the signatures .
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2011
Just setup a site to site vpn between 2 ASA 5520 Firewalls in two locations but vpn doesn't work even though i see phase 2 completed on the logs. I can't ping across the LANs.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2011
we have two routers CISCO881-K9 and we have established l2tpv3 pesuduwire between two routers: attached the configuration file for both routers.
Although the l2tp established but we are unable to pass the DHCP or other traffic through l2tp tunnel from router A to router- B. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2012
Is there any traffic interruption if turning on TE in a working MPLS core?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2011
I am working for a company based in Sydney Australia, the company recently open an office in London UK, therefore we are going to get leased lined based on MPLS.We were advised that Customer Edge router will be CISCO1941/K9. We want to our UK client to access our web-based applications via MPLS network instead of internet. The UK office is using BT Business ADSL with 5 Static IP address (please note the modem IP address is actually dynamic), we are going to get a Cisco 857/K9 router which will be used for the entry for the UK client to access the MPLS network. My question will be how do I configure the Cisco 857 router to allow one of the public ip to access the MPLS network. It appears that there are two options, and I am not sure if this is going to work or which one is working better. I have attached two diagrams for clarification of my case.
Option 1 Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) get the assigned 5 Static IP addresses One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be assigned to the FE1 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic) One of the five IPs to 217.xx.xx.170 will be assigned to the WAN interface of Sonicwall Firewall Router which also serve as Internet Access Gateway for LAN users, All trafiic destined for Sydney LAN will be using FE0 (Cisco 1941) as gateway
Option 2Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) will get 192.168.0.1, Cisco 857 router will be the default gateway for LAN users, using one to many NAT, also one to one NAT, One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be forwarded to the FE0 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic)
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
Before going further let me tell you I hate QoS..the policies that I applied. I am trying to create reserve traffic for a CE but when I try to download or upload the traffic goes from 2MB which is where it should stay to up to 6MB?completly losted, I will not move to ccnp sp like this.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2012
i have a 7206 router to be used as a gateway for internet router 7206 inerfaces are connected directly to cisco switch 2960g note that 7600 work only at 1 gega , and cant be used for 10 or 10 . im looking forward to use router 7600 instaed of 7206 i copied the config of 7206 and pased in 7600 but some commands which are under interfaces command was not accepted here is the config which as not accepted in 7600 router
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
note that the 4 lines above was not accpted in 7600. does these commands will affect the new config ?i just want to ask before im trying to apply this config to production network?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2013
We have a small cisco 1800 series workgroup router that seperates our network from the outside world. The data coming into our network goes into the router on interface fa0/1 and comes out on interface fa0/0. fa0/0 is split into 2 sub-interfaces (fa0/0.2 and 0/0.3). These sub-interfaces correspond to a desktop and server vlan on our network. The workgroup router is connected to a 3560G trunk port (we'll call it switch 1) and switch 1 connects to another 3560G (we'll call it switch 2). Recently I was asked to add another layer of security to our network by installing an ASA 5510 firewall and forcing certain types of traffic to authenticate using their domain credentials for our network. The firewall was set up between the router and switch 1 in transparent, multi-context mode. There are 2 security contexts, 1 for the desktop vlan and 1 for the server. Both have the same security settings applied to them since we want the same behavior regardless of whether they are trying to access the servers or the workstations.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2012
I've just started a CCNA course and my lack of knowledge has me a bit stuck. My network is comprised of Cisco components and I'm semi familiar with them just from reading and looking through options. I currently am using a Cisco ASA 5520 on my network and I am trying to join another network via one of the interfaces. My network is 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 and my inside interface is 192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0. I enabled a second interface using a static ip of 10.0.0.1 with a subnet of 255.255.255.128. Connected to that interface, I have a Fortigate firewall at 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.128. I can ping just fine from the Fortigate network to the 10.0.0.1 interface on the Cisco ASA 5520 network, but I can not ping the 10.0.0.1 interface (or anything past it) on the ASA 5520 from any computer on the Cisco network. I've read that ACL's and NAT have to be done as well as enabling traffic between interfaces with the same security levels. (both interfaces have security levels of 100 and the option is checked to allow traffic).
Note: each network has it's own internet connection. The connection is to share information on servers on both networks with each other.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2012
asa 5505 do not pass traffic as a patch cord, how to make it pass traffic? [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
I am migrating over from and old PIX to an ASA 5510. After configuring the new device everything else is functional (Internet) but users are unable to pass traffic when connected through the vpn, they are able to authenticate and I see their session connected on the ASDM but no data is passed..[code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
We have 2mb mpls network between three sites. Each site also has its own internet connection for hosting webserver and internal users to access internet. Each site has a few internal subnets. Each site currently has a 2800 series ISR.
1) Increase Internet connection to 10mbps and configure site-to-site VPNS in a mesh configuration so that each site has a vpn to each other site. This would create six vpn tunnels.
2) Configure so that only Exchange and VoiP traffic use the MPLS network under normal conditions. All other traffic (backup/misc apps) should be routed to use the Internet VPNs. If the MPLS fails of course we would like the Exchange and VoiP traffic to fail over to the VPN connections as well until the MPLS comes back up.
View 2 Replies
View Related
