We are setting up a new VPN from an ASA to a cisco 2801 router (behind a third parties checkpoint firewall). We seem to be almost there with the setup but the tunnel is not working correctly. I have included a debug from the 2801 router and its config and a diagram of the setup. [code]
View 2 RepliesI have a Cisco 2801 with flash: c2801-advipservicesk9-mz.124-16.bin where I use to doing VPN IPSEC.My problem is where I do a connection with a client, if my VPN dont have a traffic, the tunnel are closed. If a receive or send any traffic, the tunnel get up again.If don't have traffic, this tunnel is closed and after is opened other tunnel where is changed the conn-id to 999 for example.This comportament is normal? Exist a form that my tunnel never close? I enabled the parameters below: [code] But the tunnel continues closing if a don't have traffic.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to gather netflow data over an IPSEC VPN and through my research I've learned that I need to configure Flexible Netflow. However, I have a Cisco 2801 router with the latest ROMMON and IOS and the Flexible Netflow options aren't available.
For instance:
flow exporter dwtmonitor
destination 10.0.16.172
source Loopback0
transport udp 2055
output-features
When I type "flow exporter <name>" it only allows me to enter "flow <name>" and there's no "destination" options or anything else.
ROMMON: 12.4(13r)TIOS: 12.4(25d)
I have an issue where I can get traffic to pass from HDQ to two branch offices over our ipsec/gre tunnels even though the tunnels appear to be UP. The HDQ is a 2811, branch is a home office using an 871W and branch runs a 2801 router. I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W but when I configured branch2 (2801), they both broke. The tunnels appear to be up but traffic is not routing across them. The two 2801 routers run 12.4 (c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T2.bin). These are gre over ipsec tunnels. Currently traffic flows over an exsting MPLS network that we are getting away from due to cost. As soon as I change the routes to point to the Tunnels, it breaks. Traffic doesn't appear to pass through the tunnel. I have attached my sanitized configs.
HDQ#sh crypto sessCrypto session current status
Interface: FastEthernet0/1Session status: UP-ACTIVEPeer: 205.205.205.21 port 500 IKE SA: local 204.204.204.66/500 remote 205.205.205.21/500 Active IPSEC FLOW: permit 47 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 Active SAs: 4, origin: crypto map IPSEC FLOW:
[Code]....
i'm triyng to establish a vpn ipsec tunnel between my cisco2801 and a cyberoam equipment, at the end point.Debugging isakmp, i have this output, where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the remote peer address, and yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is mine.What can i try?
Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is (NULL)Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: Created a peer struct for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, peer port 500Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: New peer created peer = 0x661C2D4C peer_handle = 0x80000003Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: Locking peer struct 0x661C2D4C, refcount 1 for isakmp_initiatorApr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: local port 500, remote port 500Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE Apr 1 14:48:12.542: insert sa successfully sa = 66DF4F5CApr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0):Can not start Aggressive mode, trying Main mode.Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0):found peer pre-shared key matching xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxApr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-07 IDApr
[URL]
I have issue with Cisco Router 2801's Console Port. My student was doing a lab and he said during configuration, Console Port stopped responding. He was in middle of configuration, so now at present, only telnet is able to login on "R2>" user mode, enable password is not set, so getting "R2>en % No password set R2>" I have tried different terminal software but no output from Console Port, changed the Console Cables, replace with working console cables, change speed (baud) settings. Also tried to connect same console with "AUX" port and got same error mentioned above. AUX Port responds but I am not able to change mode (R2#) because of incomplete running-config. it seems "Console Port" is physically damaged.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have setup a ASA and everything but ipsec seems to be working. I was able to use the clientless ssl but I need ipsec working. I'm at a loss. config is a little sloppy and i will be cleaning it up but would like to get this working first.
Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.07.0290
Copyright (C) 1998-2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Client Type(s): Windows, WinNT
[Code].....
I'm actualy trying to bring two IPSec VPN on only one interface. I've successfully created a tunnel between Par and Barcelone and between Par and Mad. But I can't create it between Barcelone et Mad. We have a cisco ISR1921 in Mad and Barcelone, and a Netgear in Par.
Barcelone config:
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
[Code].....
I have a stable l2tp/ipsec config that I have been using for many years with the Windows XP native VPN client and the iPhone VPN client.This configuration does not seem to work with the native Windows 7 VPN client. What has changed between XP and 7 on the native VPN client front? I'm running IOS 12.4(15)T5.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi've an Cisco ASA 5510 with Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(2), in this ASA i've many L2L tunnels to this ASA, anda sometims new tunnels can't connect, the older tunnels still ok and working, yesterday this situation occured again and i've tried to clear all ipsec tunnels and try to reconnect again no one cames up again. At the time of this situation memory usage was about 78% and CPU is was around 5%. I've made a reload without changes and the situation returns to the normality.
At the time of the fail i've collect the outpu from debug crypto isakmp 255, the outpu was in the annexed file.
How to make a Cisco 881 router finally work. I have the following configuration:
Current configuration : 2964 bytes
!
! No configuration change since last restart
version 15.1
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
[code].....
As much as I understand, the VPN tunnel is active.I can access the Internet, but I cannot access anything through the VPN tunnel.
I configured my cisco client with the info from the vpn wizard and get the following error :
error in the cisco vpn client when enabling the log : Invalid SPI size (log) + reason 412 the remote peer is no longer responding (application) message I see via the ASDM-IDM : Built inbound UDP connection for interface WAN
I'll explain briefly what I'm trying to do here :
* Remote vpn with windows users having cisco clients
* Group authentication and in the asa5510 LOCAL authentication
My WAN interface contains a public ip/29 I also defined a LAN interface with security level 100 in 10.0.60.0 255.255.252.0 range the vpn dhcp range I want to attribute to vpn users : 10.0.69.0/24
Basically I want users to initiate the vpn tunnel to the public IP and be able only to access the LAN range with the 10.0.60.0/22 range
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname xxxx
domain-name xxxx
[Code].....
I have set up a remote access ipsec vpn on an asa 5520. I can connect, and ping internal ip addresses, however I cannot ping back out to the internet, and dns resolution does not work.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 RV220W Routers installed in seperate offices. We are attempting to setup a IPSec tunnel between the two sites. So far we have been unsuccessful in getting this to work.On both sides, we are getting a successful connection established, but netiher site is recieving any packets. Both sides are transmitting packets though. We have exhausted our resources trying to figure out why.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi have configure l2tp/ipsec vpn on cisco ASA 5520 and also configure windows 7 client but its getting error
Error in ASA debug log
debug crypto isakmp 7
Mar 26 07:44:28 [IKEv1]: IP = 59.161.130.13, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message
[Code]......
A customer of mine has two RV082 in different locations. The "main" router is providing a gateway-to-gateway VPN tunnel, and is also used by a few road warriors for VPN access. We've had some issues with the "main" router lately, so we've decided to exchange it for a brand new device (v3). The old RV082 was a hardware revision v2 device, so I had to manually rebuild the config on the new router. The new router is working fine so far - connectivity and gateway-to-gateway VPN are fine. IPsec Client VPN, however, doesn't work at all. The config of the new router is identical to the config of the old one, IPsec Client VPN used to work fine on the old router.
The router is running the latest firmware (v4.0.4.02-tm). I've been trying to make IPsec VPN work with "QuickVPNplus ver: 1.0.6" and the "Cisco QuickVPN Client v1.4.2.1". From what I understand, both programs first connect to the routers external IP and download some sort of VPN config file. The info in that file is then used to create the actual connection. The problem is that the config file is invalid. It contains HTML code instead of config data. This is the code: "<HTML><HEAD><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; URL=/cgi-bin/welcome.cgi"></HEAD><BODY></BODY></HTML>". The URL is the same I see when logging in to the admin interface of the router. The Cisco client tells me in its "wget_error.txt": "rwConnStart message=All 1 wget requests did not return a valid vpnserver.conf". Both clients connect to the router fine, and the config download itself is working - only the returned data is invalid.
I've already tried lots of stuff to make the problem go away - enabling/disabling the firewall, VPN passthrough options, and other things. I'm beginning to think that there may be a bug in the firmware I'm using, or that the way Client VPN works has changed in a way that makes connecting with a client implementing the "old" method impossible. By the way, PPTP is working fine, so we're using it as a temporary workaround. My client, however, isn't happy with this workaround - he bought a relatively expensive router so he can make use of its advanced features, after all.
Problem: IPsec VPN setup seems ok (Client to gateway) but is not responding from client requests. However, remote manage works, PPTP works.
My environment:
Hardware: RV016 10/100 16-Port VPN Router
Firmware: v4.2.1.02 (Jan 18 2012 14:10:55)
Clients: Mac OS X 10.8 (integrated VPN client) , Windows 7 (build in VPN client) OR both with NCP-E VPN client.
None of the above works with IPsec. I have tried all kinds of combinations. I don't think the problem is wether I use Group1 or Group2 or DES or AES...It must be something else... Neither of the built-in VPN (IPsec) clients in Mac OS X or Windows can be configured in an easy way. BUT the NCP-E client can. I have tried to set it up to exactly meet the settings on the server but no progress...How do I setup an IPsec VPN group so that I can use any of my VPN clients to work?
PS. I have also tried the client that comes delivered. 1- It does not work and 2- it's only available for Windows.
I tried any type of combination and just couldn't make it works. Only PPTP works well. Whether Apple iOS IPSec VPN is supported or not?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 2801 with dual ADSL WAN connections, PATing to a network hanging on the fa0/1 interface. From the server connected to the router (hanging off of the fa0/1) interface, I can ping any address and there are no issues. But from inside the Cisco CLI, pinging certain addresses causes erratic behavior. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 2801 router. The Fa0/0 int shows up/down. I have plugged it into diffrent cisco and non cisco switches and even a cross over cable to my laptop. I cant seem to get the protocol up. I have changed the speed to 100 and duplex to full to try to get it up that way and nothing. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a 2801 with dual ISP connections, and I have configured route-maps to direct voice traffic over ISP1 (working just fine), and I'm attempting send all other traffic over ISP2 (traffic is load-balancing instead). The connection to ISP2 is DHCP, and I have configured a route-map to route this traffic using the 'ip next-hop dynamic dhcp' command, but when I look at the route-map, it states the following: ip next-hop dynamic dhcp - current value is UNKNOWN..Is there something that I need to enable in order to see the next-hop, and properly send traffic over the ISP2 connection? [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a Router 2801 What conf should i make to access the webserver from the same LAN.
!
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.63
[Code].......
I looked but could not find any information on what's the use of the USB interface on my 2801 router. I saw something about Cisco USB memory module and eToken by Aladdin. Is this interface restricted to Cisco and Aladdin only?
View 17 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco RV110W small business router setup at my home. It has one of those HTML GUI interfaces, check the boxes, etc.., to get things working. Basically, your typical home router with VPN. I have enabled the VPN, it's PPTP, added the password, and now it's automagically configured! I can successfully VPN to my home with a Windows7 client. Here's my problem, I now need to VPN into my home router with a 2801. Is this possible? Everything I found on the subject has only been to setup a Cisco IOS router as a VPN server or tunneling to another IOS router. No examples using an IOS based router as the client.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have one Router Cisco 2801 at the customer site and facing issue of having very High CPU coming to 99%.CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/28%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 98%
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to run the following commands on a 2801 router, but the commands are missing:
mls qos
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 40 32 46 48 56
The only QoS command i have in global config is (no MLS qos) :
REMOTE-ROUTER1(config)#qos ?
restore-show-output Restore old show output
shape-timer Set the HQF shape timer interval
The router is running IOS:
System image file is "flash:c2801-ipbasek9-mz.151-4.M5.bin"
Am i just running the incorrect IOS or am i missing somehting, i need to change the QoS Map for my Nortel VoIP. The VoIP phones connect to a 3750 PoE which used to conenct to a 2651XM to route VoIP and data traffic over the same copper pairs (WAN link to hub site) hence the need for a Service policy but being Nortel phones, require changing the cos-dscp map. the 2801 is going to replace the 2651XM using a new HWIC.
We have a 2801 rotuer in place that hooks up to a metro ethernet link that's obviously dropped off to us via ethernet. Anyway, the throughput granted to us is 20MB, but for some reason I can't get it to go anything above 11MB at the most. I've spent a day going through documentation trying to find the fastest speed the 2801 supports and I can't find my answer. I've seen that the high speed wan cards in this router support up to 45MB, but I'm not using a WAN card, only one of the two built in 10/100 ports.
what the maximum throughput speed is on a 2801?
I have a FWSM in my 6509, this firewall is managing three VLANs, one of which holds a file server. As you all know, FWSM do not support VPN like the ASAs and PIXs do. I have been trying to add remote access to this file server LAN all week. The only VPN device i have is a 2801 router.
first layout: VPN router behind FWSMstatic translation from FWSM LAN (private) to VPN WAN (public)default route was facing back at FWSMip address pool was to be NAT'd on the interface facing the FWSM the idea was that my VPN address pool would be NAT'd back to the FWSM on it's VLAN. since the FWSM was managing this VLAN and recognized the source IP of the translated address pool, i would have access to my precious file server.
second layout: VPN router fa 0/1 on a /30 with 6509 (public)VPN router fa 0/0 still on the same LAN as FWSM (private)address pool for VPN once again NAT'd to fa 0/0default route pointed to fa 0/1static route of FWSM LAN pointed to fa 0/0 this idea was to have more of a 'inside' and 'outside' interface on the VPN router. this too did not work, having used every trick in the book, i could still not ping anything on the FWSM LAN while VPN'd in the network (aside from the LAN interface on my router)
trace route was showing that the all routes were headed out fa 0/1 (default route) and all to my FWSM died. i really don't think my address pool is being NAT'd, though my route map statement applied to the NAT policy is permitting my VPN address pool.
I am new to VPN technology, one of those things that happened to land on my lap. how this layout could work? there are no good VPN Remote access walkthroughs for a situation like this (2801 allowing access to a FWSM controlled LAN)
i have configured remote access vpn on my 2801 router's gio0/0 int ip x.x.x.1. i connected my laptop through vpn client from internet. i connected successfully and my vpn router gives me the assigned ip block y.y.y.1. from my laptop i can ping the other int gio/1 ip z.z.z.1 but i cant ping the ip z.z.z.2 of my core sw which is connected on router's int gi0/1.
View 14 Replies View RelatedThe application here is a wind power project, built in two phases, without any effort to coordinate or integrate the two sites during the design phase. All operations activities for both phases are performed by one staff out of a common location. This is a rural area and Internet connectivity is mission critical due to contractual obligation with Electrical Utilities.
The client has a need to reconfigure a network which has grown over time in a layer by layer approach, whereas at every point in time that an additional T-1 or other changes occurred to address a specific need, no thought was ever put into integrating the entire site as a whole. It is at best a dysfunctional solution which somewhat accomplishes thier needs, and at worst, a kludgy, grossly security compromised, and difficult to use infrastructure. There is every kind of equipment one can imagine, each installed by some entity providing needed services on the site, but forced to make uninformed decisions because the client really has no IT department to coordinate with. Over time, every vendor just provided their own switch, router, or maybe figured out how to reconfigure another existing device to also provide the routing or access needed, To say the least, it's a mess.
The client requests a solution which provides a means to accomodate 6 internet connections (4 T-1 lines, and 2 satellite) in a manner which aggregates available bandwith and provides redundancy. The T-1 lines will be the main internet access, with the satellite connections only used if available bandwidth falls below some threshold, say 3Mb. There are many internal networks which need to be routed to and between, in total, about 20 subnets. There are 2 SCADA (Control) networks which have a mandatory requirement of 1Mb each, a VoIP system which does not use any internet connetivity as there are 6 POTS lines dedicated to it, an internal office LAN and a turbine manufacturers site LAN.
The T-1 lines, at 1.5Mb x 4 = 6Mb.
The 2 SCADA networks require a guaranteed 1Mb each, the remaining 4Mb is to be allocated between the office LAN and the turbine manufacturer site LAN. The satellite connection are only to be active in the event bandwidth falls below 3Mb.
There are 2 Cisco 2801 routers on site which could be reutilized if appropriate. Each T-1 has it's own Adtran CSU with Ethernet out. All T-1 lines are /29 IP Blocks. 2 of the T-1 lines are adjacent IP Blocks, for what its worth.
Everything here is open to reconfiguration. The client wants this finally integrated correctly with the ability to address emerging Electrical Utility cybersecurity requirements in the immediate future.
An ideal solution would be fully redundant to eliminate the single point of failure at the edge router. As to whether there needs to be separate edge and interior routers, I just don't know that. I would guess everything could be done with just a pair of redundant routers at the edge, but perhaps it is better to do the interior routing between subnets on a different router(s).
Again, the goal is a well integrated, redundant, and secure solution. My part is mostly complete, with the OSP part of the network finally at 100% after 5 years of stupid and careless misconfigurations and bad fiber splicing (by others).
I'm absolutely covered up in business at Layer 1 & 2 on these sites, as the physical plant and associated network elements are typically very poorly designed, specified, and implemented. The complexity of this job leads me to seek outside advice and ultimately a more qualified Cisco professional than me. I'm experienced enough with Cisco to know when I'm in over my head. I know a diagram would be nice, but at this point I've only got a very detailed diagram which reveals too much site identity information to make public. I'll wait to see a few comments and in the meantime work on removing site identity info so I can post a good diagram for everyone to see.
Someone told me the commands, but I can't remember them. Have a router (2801) at the end of a highly utilized T1 link/router. How do I protect it so my SSH and/or Telnet sessions will get serviced if the router is real busy.
View 9 Replies View Related1- Cisco Router
Eth0/0 : Ip address 192.168.1.1 /24 == connected my laptop of 192.168.1.2
/1: Ip address : 192.168.2.1 /24 = connected cisco swith
2 - Cisco Switch
VLAN 2 Name : Sales : ip address 192.168.3. 1 = connected computer 192.168.3.2
VLAN 3 Name : Marketing : ip addres 192.168.4.1 = connected computer 192.168.4.2
So I want my laptop that connected the router Eth0/0 Interface should access both VLAN 2 and VLAN 3 computers
I've been looking and I can really find much info about this, I got a 1841 and 2801 router with ADSL WIC cards and both are synching really low compared to my cheap home router
This leads me to believe I need a firmware update so I got the adsl_alc_20190.bin and loaded it into flash and reloaded my router but its still saying my firmware is using an embedded one.
sh flash:-#- --length-- -----date/time------ path1 1000636 Oct 4 2011 05:59:54 +00:00 adsl_alc_20190.bin
sh dsl interface atm0/1/0ATM0/1/0Alcatel 20166/20174 chipset information ATU-R
[Code].....