Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 With 2 L2L Tunnels To Same Site / Network
Feb 24, 2010
I have an ASA 5510 at Site A with a L2L tunnel to another site, Site B. Single subnet at each site. In a few weeks we will be adding a second Internet connection to Site B, so both connections will be active. But we want traffic to go over the new connection unless it goes down, then use the other. How do I set that up on the ASA so it doesn't get confused as to which tunnel to take to get to the Site B subnet?
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 4, 2012
How many [concurrent and maximum] roaming user tunnel and site to site vpn tunnels are supported in ISR 2921 ..
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2012
I wanted to know the maximum VPN client sessions (using the Cisco VPN client) and Site-to-Site VPN tunnels that I can connect to my ASA 5505 simultaneously.
In other words, if I have x VPN clients and y Site-to-Site tunnels, at any time, does x + y have to be <= 10 (Total VPN Peers)? If yes, can I upgrade to the security plus license to increase the Total VPN Peers to 25?
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : 8
VLANs : 3, DMZ Restricted
Inside Hosts : Unlimited
Failover : Disabled
VPN-DES : Enabled
[Code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2012
Question on ASA VPN tunnels. I have one ASA 5510 in our corporate office, I have two subnets in our corporate office that are configured in the ASA in a Object group. I have a site to site IPSEC tunnel already up and that has been working. I am trying to set up another site to site IPSEC tunnel to a different location that will need to be setup to access the same two subnets. I'm not sure if this can be setup or not, I think I had a problem with setting up two tunnels that were trying to connect to the same subnet but that was between the same two ASA's. Anyways the new tunnel to a new site is not coming up and I want to make sure it is not the subnet issue. The current working tunnel is between two ASA 5510's, the new tunnel we are trying to build is between the ASA and a Sonicwall firewall.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2013
I am trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of my Cisco ASA.
find attached Network Diagram for the same. All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.
Both VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C too are up. I have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command also.
How do i enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a Seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2012
I have an issue with 2 site to site VPN tunnels from a RV042G router. The issue is for both VPN tunnels is that in the logs, it is showing that when the RV042G router is trying to establish the tunnel, it is getting a response from the remote gateway internal address and not the Public address of the remote gateways. On the remote gateways I have other site to site VPN's terminating fine and the tunnels are passing traffic. I only have an issue with the RV042. On the VPN Tunnel page it shows for both tunnels waiting for connection. This is an output from the log of the RV042G
Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.47.XXX.XX:500
VPN tunnel terminating on 203.43.XX.XXX is a Checkpoint firewall running R70 software version?VPN tunnel terminating on 203.47.XXX.XX is a Cisco ASA 5510 running ASA 8.2.4 software?As stated above, I have other VPN tunnels working fine. This RV042 is a replacement router as the original router suffered a power surge.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2011
I have a setup with a pair off ASA5510 on the central site, and approx 20 sites with ASA5505.A couple off network are configured as site to site tunnels to every remote site.Its very stable, but the last year or so ocassionally one of the tunnels go one-way.Just like one of the nat exeptions suddenly stops working.I can see the remote side transmitting packets, but no answer.Central site is running 8.22, want to upgrade but have to mount more RAM.The only cure i have found is to reboot the central pair off ASA5510, not very popular as all 20 tunnels goes down.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2011
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2013
I have vpn-concentrator on vyatta, 8 cisco 881w and 2 cisco 1941 with vpn site-to-site connected to vyatta. They all are in one ISP's vlan native L2 level.
I user pre-shared key, aes128 and md5 hash.
Traffic goes both sides, everything is okay, i strated cacti monitor of traffic and CPU, started netflow analyzer.
Sometimes one ipsec connection between any of branches go down, it doesn't have any extra CPU load, not more then 20-30%, no huge traffic but somewhy i recieve phone call like "i can't reach server" i check on vyatta - tunnels are down with one router, i do "reset vpn ipsec-peer N" and everything is ok.
I mentioned that when I added "keepalive periodic 10" on ciscos, tunnels started go down more often, for exmaple usually I recieve 1-2 phone calls during a day, whan I added this command, i started to recieve 4-5 phonecalls from branches.
it's always random tunnel down branch, today it was one 1941 and one 881w, yesturday it was 3 881w during all day
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
I'm trying to figure out how to get two 5510 ASA's to establish a Site-to-Site VPN.The version with two static IP's is working perfectly and stable but I haven't figured out how to get a VPN running between a static and a dynamic IP
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2011
I've been reading this site for a while, and finally decided to post I'm really interested to see what everyones opinion on this is.My company currently uses what i would call traditional site to site VPN's using crypto maps, main site has a pair of ASA's in HA and remote sites use ISR's like 1801's.I've recently been playing in my lab with GRE tunnels using IPSec protection (note this is config from my labs, so ip's and key's are just randomly selected)
View 17 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2008
I'm trying to monitor Tunnels activity. We want to gather statistics like bandwidth utilization per Tunnel and in the case of Remote Access also the user name associated with a tunnel. All this via SNMP
I've browse through the Cisco-IPSec-Flow MIB and found the TunnelTable, this seems to provide everything I need in Regards to Tunnels, I just need a tip in how to calculate or obtain the bytes Tx and Rx. I can obtain packets and Octets amounts but not actual bytes. Is there another OID I should be inquiring?
In regard to Remote Access I found the CRASSessionTable From here I can obtain the Group associated with the tunnel and I should be able to obtain the User name through the 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.392.1.3.21.1.1 OID, but I'm getting an UnSupported response when querying this particular OID.
What OID can provide the User name?
I know that Cisco Performance Monitor can in fact obtain all that info from the ASA so there must be an appropriate OID I can query to obtain this particular info.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2012
I have an ASA 5510 running ver 8.0(2) that has (4) Ipsec tunnels going from it to various other locations. I am having an issue with data transfer speed on only one of the Tunnels. This tunnel is between the 5510 and the 5555, on that link I am getting a dat transfer rate of a little over 120k a second, whereas if I pull the same set of files from another location I am seeing a transfer rate of 5m per second.
I have verified that it is not a capacity issue on the Internet bandwidth on both locations, and I can pull the same data from the same location to various other locations via Ipsec tunnels, I am only having an issue with a specific tunnel going from the 5510 to the 5555.
Since it is not affecting other tunnels on the 5510 nor is it affecting tunnels on the 5555 going to other locations, I am leaning toward a routing issue within the ISP? I will say the ISP is taking me a long way around to stay in the same Metropolitan area.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2012
I have a trouble with 2 IPSec tunnels on Cisco ASA 5510.Both of them are Site-to-Site tunnels.Both of them are established against the same public IP address on my site.It looks like they cannot run steadily in the same time. It looks like when one of them is actived, the other one could not be up.Is it some kind of limit of Cisco ASA?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
I configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2013
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2012
I've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic. When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2011
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2011
I have a ASA 5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.
Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.
how we immplement the same on ASA 5510.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2012
I have a ASA 5510 at our corporate HQ that has one site to site VPN. I need to add 6 additional site to site VPN's to this ASA for our remote branches. How can I add them without affecting the existing site to site VPN? The 6 site to site VPN's will all have the same settings however these settings are different from the existing site to site that I already have set up. How can I set it up so the 6 additional VPN's use their own crypto map and all use the same settings?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
I have a ASA 5510 that has multiple site to site VPNs. I need to create an additiona site to site VPN but only allow 1 host to access and traverse the tunnel. The network is on a 192.168.5.x but the host that will need to access this tunnel needs to be on a 172.16.33.x network. I dont want any other traffic allowed to access or traverse the VPN tunnel for this host. How can I set this up?
View 33 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2013
I have an ASA 5510 8.2(5) in Site1 and a ASA 5505 8.2(1) Site2 they are setup with a site to site tunnel.Each site has VPN clients that connect and I would like to allow clients from both sides access to servers on the other side of the site-to-site tunnel.
I enabled same-security-traffic permit intra-interface I also added the remote networks to access-list that is doing the split tunneling. [code]
View 33 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
I have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2012
I have a dynamic VPN site to site between ASA 5510 vs C880 with segment 172.23.191.0/25 for ASA side and some host in C880 side (e.g. 128.1.100.211, 128.1.115.181, 128.1.104.212) . The VPN is up, but only have communication with a host (128.1.115.181).
In the logs appears the next message when I try communication for all aother IP in the policy map configuration: IKE Initioator unable to find policy: Intf Inside, Src: 172.23.191.87, Dst: 128.1.115.182..ONLY WHEN I PINGING FROM SOME HOST IN C880 SIDE (e.g. 128.1.100.211) the communication is successfull.
What happen with this VPN, because I need to pinging from C880 IP host to ASA segment for establish communication?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
I am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2011
I tried to monitor via SNMP my ASA 5550&5510 my Active IPSEC tunnels , I want to receive Bandwidth for each tunnel interface.I’m running Version 8.2(1)? which OID to use?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2012
I'm setting up a Site-to-Site Cisco VPN between ASAs. I'm being told by the remote site engineer to set the maximum MTU at 1362. Is it possible to set the MTU for one specific site-to-site VPN on my ASA 5510 Security Plus to MTU 1362? I see my interfeces are all set at 1500. If not, would you recommend I setup a subinterface on my inside network router and a subinterface on the ASA with an MTU of 1362 to get around this issue? Then use this subinterface for traffic from my inside network to transverse through prior to hitting the VPN.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2012
Site A has an ASA 5510 and a single internet connection.Site B has two internet connections (primary and backup). If Site B also has an ASA, I can configure Site A's ASA to deal with a failover at Site B (set peer 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2). Does this work if Site B has an IOS router instead of an ASA? In other words will "set peer 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2" on the ASA work when it's talking to IOS on the other end?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2013
I am not very experienced with Cisco networking.
Here is the situation.
Site A - headquarters 192.168.1.x
Site B - remote office 192.168.20.x
Site C - remote office 192.168.30.x
Site A - ASA 5510
Site B - ASA 5505
Site C - ASA 5505
Site-to-site VPN is established and works between A and B, A and C. Users would like to establish a tunnel between B and C to work on a common project and the data is on Site B.
I tried configuring the S2S VPN with pre-shared keys on both firewalls at sites B and C but in the end it is not established (I cannot ping either side). I used the Wizard interface multiple times and one time the CLI. I generally followed the settings chosen between the headquarter and the individual remote sites and tried to replicate them. Obviously I have made a mistake somewhere.
Could there be any limitation on the ASA 5505 in terms of licensing and the number of S2S tunnels?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2011
I have a site to site tunnel (bidirectional) configured between two ASA 5510's (head office and remote office) running 8.2.2. I'm trying to upgrade one end (head office) of the tunnel to 8.3.2 but when I do that, traffic from the remote office to the head office isn't transported. Traffic from the head office to the remote office is still fine (remote desktop sessions, etc).
A quick comparison of the 8.2.2 config and the 8.3.2 config on the head office ASA look identical in terms of the crypto/site-to-site commands.Is there any Cisco guide created yet for creating site/site tunnels under 8.3.2? I'm able to upgrade both ASA at the same time if that's determined to be a prerequisite.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 at our main office that makes connection with a 5505 at our other office using site to site VPN. (works)
Now for the question,
we want to access our other office from the main office but we wont want them to have access to our servers etc. so basically we want to control them but they shouldn't have the rights to control us.
Is this possible with a site to site VPN? and how to do it.
View 7 Replies
View Related
