In my Cisco PIX-515E Version 6.3(5), I have a IPSec VPN tunnel and also to the same firewall home users connect through VPN client. I am unable to find a solution that allows my home users to connect to office network and again access the remote network through the IPSec tunnel.
View 1 RepliesWe have two sites connect with an IPSec L2L VPN.
-Site A: 192.168.13.0/24
-Site B: 192.168.2.0/24
On both sites we have a ASA5505(Base license) to terminate the tunnel.On Site B we also got a remote access vpn to which we can connect using the vpn client.The lan2lan tunnel works fine and so the remote access vpn.Now i want to connect to Site A using my vpn client connected to Site B. [code] There are no vpn-filters or other special policys in place..If tried to ping from my vpn client to Site A while i was debugging ipsec 255 on site B: the asa matched the l2l-tunnel for traffic sourced from 192.168.25.x to 192.168.13.x but when im doing a show crypto ipsec sa detail there are no packets getting encrypted..so of course no packets reaching my asa on site a.
The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
We have ASA5500's deployed for remote access concentration.We use Cisco IPsec vpn client with a group policy the chacks for Network ICE BlackIce ersonal firewall.The powers-that-be wish to change to McAfee presonal Firewall ok..Now the Group Policy allows you to check for several pre- configured Firewalls, Cisco Integrated, Sygate, Zone Labs etc.So as McAfee are no listed then I am to assume we go for "Custom Firewall" and this is where I am struggling.To configure checking for a Custom Firewall I must have the Vendor ID and the Product ID.McAfee haven't the faintest idea what we're talking about when we ask them for these details.Or is there a way to extract them from the registry of a machine with the McAfee product installed?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm having a Issue getting my VPN up from out remote site . We have a ASA5505 at the remote site and the Main office we have a PIX-515E.. I followed this temp config I found on line but Im still not able to get the VPN UP..
This script can be used to get you started on a site to site vpn using the older Cisco PIX code. PIX running 6.3 ! ^^^^ Set ISAKMP (phase 1) parameters ^^^^^ {code]...
When I log into the ASA and run these commands This what I get
Colort2# sh run crypto isakmp
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
[code]...
We have a scenario where the Cisco ASA 5505 will be one end of a site-to-site VPN. The same ASA 5505 also allows Client VPN connection. The question is around IP pooling. If I assign a pool of IP's (192.168.1.20 - 192.168.1.30) for Client VPN connections - do I need to be sure that those same IP's are not used on the other side of site-to-site VPN ?
There could be PC's/Servers running 192.168.1.0/24 on the other side of site-to-site VPN. Would this cause an address conflict ?
I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
A user with Easy VPN client connects to a 876 ISR (router A). This router also has a site-to-site VPN to another 876 ISR (router B). What I want to achieve is that the user dials in to router A and can access the network on the remote end of the site-to-site tunnel (router B) In diagram:
user (192.168.18.x) - Easy VPN - Router A (192.168.16.x) - sitetosite - Router B (192.168.17.x)
I have added routes in router B to the 192.168.18.x network with router A as next hop, but I can't reach the other segment.
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe already have IPSEC VPN connectivity established between sites but would like to introduce some resilience/redundancy at a remote site.
Site A has an ASA with one internet circuit.
Site B has a Cisco 2911 with one internet circuit and we have established site-to-site IPSEC VPN connectivity between the 2911 and the ASA.
Prior to getting the new internet circuit, Site B had a Cisco 877 with an ADSL line which are still available but aren’t currently in use.
The internet circuit at Site B has dropped a few times recently so we would like to make use of the ADSL circuit (and potentially the 877 router too) as a backup.
We thought about running HSRP between the 877 and 2911 routers at Site B and, in the event of a failure of the router or internet circuit, traffic would failover to the 877 and ADSL.
However, how would Site A detect the failure? Can we simply rely on Dead Peer Detection and list the public IP address of the internet circuit at Site B first with the public IP address used on the ADSL line second in the list on the ASA? What would happen in a failover scenario and, just as important, when service was restored – I’m not sure DPD would handle that aspect correctly?
I’ve read briefly elsewhere that GRE might be best to use in this scenario – but I can’t use GRE on the ASA. I have an L3 switch behind the ASA which I may be able to make use of? But I don’t want to disrupt the existing IPSEC VPN connectivity already established between the ASA and the 2911. Can I keep IPSEC between the ASA and 2911 but then run GRE between the L3 switch and the 2911? If so, how would this best be achieved? And how could I also introduce the 877 and ADSL line into things to achieve the neccessary redundancy?
I have a site-to-site VPN configured between a 5520 at our data center, and a 1700 at a client's site for site-to-site connectivity. What I've noticed is, is that the VPN can only initiate from my Data Center, never from the client router. I can telnet into the router and start a telnet session sourced from the "inside" interface and it fails, yet I can see the NAT translations get created in the state table that should match the crypto-map. However, if I ping a host on the inside of the remote LAN from my workstation (behind the 5520) to bring the tunnel up, and run the exact same command on the client router once the tunnel is up, it works. Right now I have a continuous ping running from my workstation to keep the tunnel up, but obviously that's not the best solution
I had to modify this config to NAT the LAN addresses at the client to a non-overlapping subnet, so anything coming from 128.1.0.0/16 should be NAT'd to 192.168.105.[50-200]/24. I've also got two static NATs for inbound access from the data center and those seem to work fine.
Current configuration : 2787 bytes
!
! No configuration change since last restart
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
[code]...
I configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
How can I NAT the same set of four hosts and give them access to two different networks across an IPSEC site-to-site VPN tunnel? I'm using an ASA5520 running 8.04.
I have four hosts say: 10.240.1.1-10.240.1.4
They need access to two different networks:
205.100.150.0
140.175.200.0
I woud like to NAT them as something like:
7.5.210.1
7.5.210.2
7.5.210.3
7.5.210.4
I have difficulties with configuring Remote IPSec VPN with Cisco ASA 5505 and Windows 7 native VPN client. My client PC gets VPN pool IP address, and can access remote network behind ASA, but then I lose my internet connectivity. I have read that this should be an issue with split tunneling, but I did as it is told here and no luck.On Windows VPN Client settings, if I uncheck "use default gateway on remote network" I have internet connectivity (since client is using local gateway), but then, I cannot ping remote network.In log, I see this warnings of this type:Teardown TCP connection 256 for outside:192.168.150.1/49562 to outside:213.199.181.90/80 duration 0:00:00 bytes 0 Flow is a loopback (cisco)I have attached my configuration file (without split-tunneling configuration I tried). If you need additional logs I'll send them right away.
View 4 Replies View RelatedMy employees connects with a cisco ipsec vpn client to asa1,They can connect the network 192.168.1.0/24 from the employee location.(192.168.3.10 - 192.168.3.15) ip pool.Some people must also have a connection to the 192.168. 2.0/ 24, is it possible when they connect to asa1 with the ipsec vpnclient and that the 192.168.2.0/24 network also is avaible.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe environment is:
ASA 5505 running 8.2 with ASDM 6.2.
VPN Client Version 5.0.05.0290
I've installed both the anyconnect and ipsec VPN clients and successfully connected for remote VPN server access; however, the client shows no packets being returned. Thinking that I misconfigured, I reset to the factory default and began again. Now I only have the ipsec vpn configured and I have exactly the same symptoms. I followed the directions for configuring the ipsec vpn in Document 68795 and rechecked my configuration and I don't see what I've done wrong. Given that I can connect to the internet from the inside network, and I can connect to the VPN from outside the network (and the ASDM Monitor shows an active connection with nothing sent to the client) I have to believe it is either a route or an access rule preventing communication but I can't quite figure out where (and I've tried static routes back to the ISP and a wide variety of access rules before flushing everything to start over).
[Code] .....
i am just installing my ASA 5510 and i want to configure it for remote access VPN IPSEC client.i use this doc : URl,When i start the connexion, the Client uses the first address of the pool and not the dedicated address ?,i have forget something ?
View 2 Replies View Relatedwe have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
Have asa 5520 ver 8.0(4) I have vpn client access created and working I have l2l vpn created and working with another set of asa The issue at hand VPN client from internet connects and authenticates, this client can access Site A's networks with no problems. However vpn client on Site A ASA can not access Networks through l2l tunnel located at Site B.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am considering to buy two RV180Ws and place them on two separate locations. But before buying I would like to make sure that the units meets my requirements. Lets call the locations A and B. I would like to connect location A with full network access to location B. But at the same time I would like to have that location B also gets full access to the network at location A.Besides this I would like to be able to connect to one of the networks from remote with my laptop.Preferably all connections should be made using IPSEC and not PPTP.I would like to know if it is possible to make such a configuration, and eventually if there is a smarter way to do e.g. only letting clients connect to location A or B and granting them access to all ressources at both location A and B from there.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
I'm attempting to configure an for both site-to-site and remote access VPNs. The site-to-site is working fine, however when I connect using the Cisco client, after initial connection and password prompt I get a "not connected" status. The log states that a policy map match could not be found. I have successfully set the unit up for remote access with no site-to-site and ran into another host of issues when adding the site-to-site to the working remote access config, so I started over setting up site-to-site first. I've attempted this through ADSM (hate it) - the current configuration is via CLI. I'm certain I'm just missing a piece or two.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to implement IPSec Authenticated Firewall Bypass on windows vista clients within my microsoft domain to avoid implementing numerous windows firewall port exceptions for each client.
This is working internally on our network, between services servers (i.e AV server), and desktop clients. However i am having a problem when the clients are remotly accessing the domain via the VPN client.I have open traffic ports (IKE-UDP500, ESP - IP Prot 50, AH - IP Prot 51) bidirectionally between the remote vpn clients subnet and the services servers, however when the endpoints initiate traffic to the services server, the IKE traffic is unencrypted?
can I configure Site-To-Site VPN and Remote Access VPN at the same time in one ASA 5510?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI experienced a weird issue with my old PIX 515E last weekend. This PIX is running version 6.3, and has no support contract, so I'm in somewhat of a bind.
We were planning an internet connection changeover, and I began execution last weekend. I connected the new connection to the outside interface, gave it a new IP, and began the process of updating our external DNS and port forwarding/ translation rules. Everything went smoothly, and email, external ftp, web browsing, and PPTP VPN connections were restored within 30 minutes or so.
However, we also have a site-to-site VPN that terminates at this PIX from a Cisco 871 on the other end. I modified the 871 to have the correct peer address. The PIX already had the correct peer entered in its config, because the external site did not change. When I performed a "sho crypto isakmp sa" on the router, it showed the tunnel as connected, with the correct source and destination IP addresses. However, it also showed a return tunnel with a source of the PIX external IP, and a destination of the router external IP, and it was not connected.
When I did the same sho isakmp command on the PIX, I noted that it showed the tunnel from the router correctly connected with the right IPs, however, it showed the outbound tunnel connection with a destination of the router external IP, but a source of the OLD pix external IP. I reviewed the config, and nowhere in any spot on the PIX config was this old IP address present. I contemplated saving the pix config and rebooting to see if that resolved the issue, but given the short outage window i was given, I made the decision to do a quick rollback by rebooting both the PIX and the router (I had not yet saved the running config of either), and reconnecting the old connection to the PIX. This let me simply reset the DNS records and service was restored.
I did not have time to troubleshoot this properly, and the PDM version is out of date on the PIX, so I can't view any tunnel settings on it apparently. While I am pushing to move to an ASA as soon as possible, I wanted to see when updating tunnel settings on a remote site VPN endpoint. Would a simple save and reboot possibly have fixed this "ghost" tunnel source IP address?
I have Cisco ASA 5505 and i want to create vpn remote access ...l
so i created and connected to the vpn ...my problem is to reach my Local connection of 192.168.1.0 /24 i put the WAN Connection in the FA0/0 and put my LOCAL AREA CONNECITON into FA0/1 .. so how i can route or translate my connection , and using cisco ASDM 6.1 in GUI ,,,
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies View Relatedcisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View RelatedI've read on Cisco AnyConnect 3.0 Q&A that it supports IPSec remote-access VPN: url...I've downloaded and installed AnyConnect 3.0.0629 Secure Mobility Client, but I'm not able to get IPSec VPN working. There's also no option to use PCF files from the previous Cisco IPSec VPN client. How to get IPSec VPN working on AnyConnect 3.0?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm running FW 1.2.4 and how to setup Remote Web Access over my IPSEC vpn tunnel. I would like to be able to remotely access these routers and make configuration changes from my main office but I cannot seem to figure out how to get it to work. If I try to access the internal router IP from across the VPN, I cannot. My VPN tunnel is up and operational and I can ping various devices across the tunnel but I cannot access the web management of the router.
View 4 Replies View Related