There is a strange problem with :c880data-universalk9-mz.150-1.M4.bin IOS. I can't ping gateway IP address and "sh ip route" does not show any routes.
interface FastEthernet4
ip address a.b.82.66 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
The pppoe on IOS (15 version) does not work (when using 12.4 version- everything is OK)I have tried it with c880data-universalk9-mz.151-1.T.bin, c880 data-universalk9-mz.150-1.M3.bin, c880data-universalk9-mz.150-1.M2.bin - DOES NOT WORK.But it DOES WORK with c880data-universalk9-mz.124-24.T4.bin.The configuration interface FastEthernet4 no ip address duplex auto speed auto pppoe enable pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 service-name "xxx" interface Dialer0 ip address negotiated ip mtu 1452 encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap callin ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx.
View 10 Replies View RelatedIs there a way in EIGRP to prefer external routes versus internal routes. EIGRP always picks up internal routes as long as they are available, no matter if external routes have better metric. Our Scenario is that we have DMVPN hub and spoke topology running EIGRP 101. The Core routers also on EIGRP 101 prefer EIGRP 101 routes. We have the new MPLS network running BGP and redistributing these BGP routes into EIGRP 101. The core routers prefer EIGRP 101 routes (internal) to redistributed BGP (external) routes.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI got a Cisco C880 router( IOS version: 15.1(2)T1 ) with PCEX-3G-HSPA-G card installed When I insert my 3G card and issue show cellular 0 network, I found that the network is not my 3G card ISP, may i ask how can I manual select the ISP?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a pair of ASA 5520s operating in failover pair as active/standby, having two contexts on them. I am planning to share the load and make it active/active making first context active on the primary unit and second context active on the secondary unit. My question is if this will disrupt any connectivity thru these firewalls when I do "no failover" on the active/standby and assign the contexts to different failover groups and enable the failover back.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am looking at deploying a pair of 5585X's in an active/active multiple context state. I am creating Mulitple contexts that need to be able to route to each other. I was going to deploy a type of Gateway context that has a shared interface to all of the other contexts, instead of sharing interfaces directly between the contexts, i beleive this will work as basically i am just cascadng the contexts and sharing interfaces.
The main problem i have come across, is that if i deploy active/active across two appliances using 2 failover groups i can not see a way to route between them, for example.
I have Context 1, Context 2 and Context GW A including the shared interfaces of Con1 and Con2 in failover group 1 on appliance A with the respective standbys on Appliance 2. I have Context 2, Context 4 and Context GW B including the shared interfaces of Con 3 and Con 4 in failover group 2 on appliance B with the respective standbys on Appliance 1.
I need to be able to route traffic between Context GW A and GW B so that the contexts can communicate in normal operation and in failover. I do not beleive that I can share an interface between contexts in two separate failover groups and to be honest without adding a L3 device between the appliances i am not sure if this is possible.
I have two ASA 5510s running in Active/Active mode. I need to make config changes on them. How do I go about it? Do I power off the secondary ASA and make the config changes on the primary and then power on the secondary ASA ? Or this another way to do this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA5520 in location A with an ISP connection and a matching ASA5520 in location B with a separate ISP connection. We have fiber connecting the two locations and vlans passing back and forth so I will be able to configure the failover via a vlan as well as extend the ISP's to each location via vlans. The Active/Active configuration with the multiple security contexts does not seem to be an issue but how is a redundant ISP configured in this mode?We want to have context A using the ASA in location A with ISP1 as the primary and failing over to ISP 2 in locaiton B We also want to have context B using the ASA in location B with ISP 2 as the primary and failing over to ISP1 in location A Would route tracking provide the desired result? Is there a better option?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe 6509 Series Switches support the scenario VSS Active-Active Chassis, I would like to setup both switch's as one virtual switch but working at the same time, not with Active - Stand By Chassis.
My plans it to create PortChannel accross both Switches 6509 in order to have 2 links one connected to one slot/switch and the other connected to slot/switch in the second 6509 for servers redundancy.
I am working on a network which has two ISP connections (Active/Active) terminating on router (ASR1000). From the LAN side (6500 switch) all the traffic need to be route on ISP1 but some of the specific subnets like 10.250.0.0/16 need to be route on ISP2 connection.
I am planning to use PBR and NAT with route maps. any documents or refrences are provided.
(access switches)---------(core switch)----------(routers)----------------(ISP1)
----------------------(ISP2)
I faced one problem in our core switch 4507 R . Active sup lost connection and standby came active. We got lot of errors/alerts on console shown below. [Code] Also when I reloaded the switch with reload command only both sups got reloaded but I want to reload all the modules but reload command do not gives any options for that.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2 asa 5520 firewalls including and 1 AIP-SSM-10 module in each of them. the configuration is set using active/active failover and context mode.
Both of them run individualy the IPS module. The IPS is configured using inline mode and fail-open option. However when one of the module fails and the state is changing from up to init or anything else making the IPS to fail then failover is detected and ASA consider it as failover and bounce context to the other unit.
IPS soft is 6.0(4) and ASA soft is 8.0(3)
I have checked cisco doc and it is confusing to me. it says: "The AIP-SSM does not participate in stateful failover if stateful failover is configured on the ASA failover pair." but it really does participate. Running is not really an option because of production network impact matter..
We have an Active/Active ASA 5520 setup, as i know in Active/Active setup there is no remote VPN access, So i could overcome this limitations?I have a solution but i dont know if it is ablecable or not? we have a spare ASA 5510, so i can use it behind Active/Active Firewalls and assign a public static NAT IP address to it and open all IPSEC and VPN ports and let the remote users to connect to it, is this ablecable setup or not?
View 1 Replies View Relatedits possible to set up active/active failover using etherchannel on 5585s?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to Configure ASA5520 for Active/Active
View 8 Replies View Relatedour application team is mandating, that the solution we should come up with for SLB, should support Active/Active mode of SLB operation.
My question, is this mode of operation supported/accredited by Cisco, and what is the draw back from the traditional active/standby.
We have a BGP / OSPF configuration as shown in the topology picture. When the connection towards Internet is taken down, we expect the traffic to be forwarded toward WAN 2 (preferred) or WAN 1. The problem is that the BGP learned routes disappears when the Internet connection is taken down. The IP routing table on R2 only shows internal networks and the networks between R2 and WAN 1 and 2. No routes to internet is shown. We run "show ip bgp neighbors <ip-to-wan-1-router> received-routes" it contain internet routes. And when we run "show ip bgp neighbors <ip-to-wan-1-router> routes" it contains no routes at all.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow many routes support 7206VXR with NPE-G2?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to know the number of routes supported by CISCO3825-HSEC/K9(512MB DRAM).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5510 that is configured for a remote access VPN
When users login, they are given an address from a locally defined pool (172.16.101.1-254 /24). Users can log in fine.
I have enabled EIGRP on the ASA and I have configured the following to be advertised:
1. 0.0.0.0 (default)
2. 172.16.100.0 /24 (dmz network)
3. 172.16.101.0 /24 (vpn pool)
I have also enabled reverse-route injection.
The problem I am having is that the VPN pool network is not being advertised via EIGRP, but the other networks are.
The other issue I am having is that even though I have created access-lists that allow the inside network (10.0.0.0) to ping the DMZ interface (172.16.101.1) on the ASA, the ASA is not allowing it. I have also created an ACL that allows the DMZ interface to ping inside, but this fails as well.
I am running an ASA with 8.4(3) and am trying to setup a dynamic VPN tunnel. We are having a business reason to establish a VPN tunnel to customers who do not have nailed down IP addresses. Now I found a number of documents that outline the steps involved. It seems the basic steps were to Establish a regular tunnelAdd dynamic crypto mapAssign the dynamic crypto map to the tunnel created under step 1. While this sounds pretty straight forward and simple, while prepping for doing just this I hot a road block while thinking it through. In order for my ASA to put anything into the tunnel it has to have a route to the remote network pointing at my VPN peer at the end of the tunnel. How do I do this in a dynamic tunnel? How do I add a dynamic route so the ASA knows which tunnel to stuff the traffic into? How do I stop the traffic from just being send to the Internet?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to set up a Cisco ASA 5505. I'm mainly setting things up through ASDM but I also have console access. Right now while I'm setting it up I have the outside/Vlan2 port attached to my existing network and a laptop connected to the inside/Vlan1 port. More info about that:
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
[Code]....
Before I added that last "0.0.0.0" entry, the ASA would not see anything on the internet. Now I can ping any external IP address from the router's console. However, the laptop I have connected to the 'inside' port still cannot reach any IP address outside the 10.10.153.0 network. Every time I try to add a similar route for the 'inside' interface, I get the following error: "You have another route configured for this network any which has same gateway 10.10.152.1 and same metric 1. You cannot add a duplicate route." I know I'm misunderstanding something here. In order to make devices connected to the 'inside' port connect to the internet, I need to set up a new route that will direct these devices to 10.10.152.1, right?
For ASR1000 to support 4M routes, RP2 must be used.
1) RP2 need to have 16GB memory in order to support 4M routes?
2) Need to use ESP20/40 together with RP2?
3) If RP2 + ESP10, supporting route table size down to 1M?
4) 4M routes is shared for both IPv4 an IPv6?
5) SIP card will affect route table size?
I'm using a Catalyst 4500 switch (C4507R+E) with Sup 7E. Cisco Datasheet of this switch says that it can learn maximum 256K IPV4 routes. Currently it just learns 10330 ipv4 routes. However when I show platform hardware ip route summary, it seems that the FIB is just free 100K routes as below output:
Entity total used free util%
Entries 260096 10332 249764 3
UC Ipv4 110592 10331 100261 9
unused 147456 147456 0 100
My question is: Can I make use of all 147456 unused routes? Or these ones have to use for any special purpose?
In my live VPN concentrator at work, my 5520 is showing a static route for each VPN client that is connected to my SSL vpn right now. This kind of confused me because wouldn't only one route to the address pools subnet be needed for my vpn users?
View 12 Replies View Relatedviewtopic.php?f=33&t=24000
How can you remove these "L" routes in routing table?
I bought the SG300-10 Switch a few days ago and updated it to firmware 1.3.0.59, but i think there's a bug in this firmware. If I go to "IP Configuration" IPv4 Routes" in L3 Mode nothing is displayed. In the log file i see that:
21474773112013-Mar-16 09:51:34Error%HTTP_HTTPS-E-DIAGNOSTICS: ERROR - in <RL_vtLeadTableGet> tag, can not find the table rlInetRoutingDistanceTable in the MIB. 21474775182013-Mar-14 22:39:22Error%HTTP_HTTPS-E-DIAGNOSTICS: ERROR - in <RL_vtLeadTableGet> tag, can not find the table rlInetRoutingDistanceTable in the MIB., aggregated (1)
Reset of the Switch doesn't work.
We have a Cisco 7301 concentrator, well two of them in HSRP configuration. We have multiple VPN's setup on that router (crypto map based). Recently we noticed the following:
- There is one IP address that has hundreds of static routes for some reason
- VPN for this customer is working, but I'm trying to find out why this is happening.
Here is how it looks like: S 0.0.0.0 0xF5FFFF2C [1/0] via "ip-address".There are hundreds of entries for a single IP there.
I am working on a network that has four nodes/Currently I have RIP running in between R1 and R2, and between R3 and R2. These are shared and R1 can access R3 just fine.R3 is running BGP and communicating with R4.R3 can ping everything in R4's network with no difficulty.Currently R3 is not rebroadcasting the BGP routes into RIPv2 as needed.I have tried clearing my BGP session and am still not able to get the BGP routes from R4 to R1.
View 1 Replies View Related<RouterA1>-Network2-<RouterA2>-AS65100-<RouterB1>-Network1-<RouterB2>
| |
| AS65101 |
<Router1>--------------------Network3----------------------<Router2>
Routers A1,A2,B1,B2 are in AS 65100
Routers 1 and 2 are in AS 65101
Routes from the network2 to network3 should go through RouterA1-Router1
Routes from the network1 to network3 should go through RouterB2-Router2
As for now all routes within AS 65100 to AS 65101 goes through RouterB2/Router2
a customer of us asked if C2911 (to be bought) is ok for partial BGP routes.This is the situation: 2 cisco 2911, each peering with 3 other AS (AS1, AS2, AS3), and maybe, in the future, at a small IXP (AS4, AS5, AS6, AS7).They will accept defaults plus partial routes from upstream AS1, AS2, AS3.When deployed at the IXP they also will accept partial routes from AS4-7.So, is 2911 ok for that configuration?the default route is included in the first row of as-path, isn't it?I have no experience with partial routes, only with full (for our datacenter) and default only (for other customers).
View 5 Replies View Relatedi been filterin LSA type 3 and the table route localy routes en ospf v2 ipv4 whit the commands distribute-list , area filter-list route-maps ACL and prefix-lis ¿but how can i do the same filterin in ipv6 whith OSPFv3?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are planning to run BGP on our pair of 3560G switch, I would like to know how many bgp routes it can support? it currently running on advance IP service.
View 4 Replies View Related