It seems the 7.3.101 version Mobility group peer cannot up,: refer to the attach,
Peer 1: version: 7.3.101
Peer 2: version 7.0.98
Peer3: version 7.2.103
Today we got new two WLC for Anchor use, and config the mobility group, but it's failed and cannot up, the ping is ok.
I recently add a second CT5508 to the network, but when I tried to add the first 5508 to the mobilty group I received a message like this:
"error in creating member"
I've tried different mobility names, via GUI, via CLI and always the same error.
I've verified twice or more than twice connectivity issues or any error on the entering the MAC and IP of the controllers, everything is fine.
I'm using version 7.0.116.0
I have to WLC's a 4402 and 5508 in a mobilty group. they are both running 7.0.116.0. They are configured to use Web Authentication. We are having complaints that Users are having to re-authenticate when moving around the office. My theory is they are moving from one WLC to the other and then requiring to re-authenticate.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI read the configuration guide about the 7.3 release. And I figured out that you will need a hash key for establishing a mobility group relation between a controller and a virtual controller. The 7.3 release for the 5500 series works fine for me.But the latest release 7.0.235.0 for the wireless lan controller series 4400 does not have a functionality to add a hash key while creating a new mobility group member.The command "config mobility group member hash" is totally missing. How to establish a mobility group between a 4400 controller and a virtual then ?
View 2 Replies View Relatedfor some reason our wlan-controllers were build up to be standalone instead of beeing one mobility-group. I would like to change this in order to use all features of HA.
let me describe our scenario: two WLCs 5508 running SW ver. 6
- same subnet
- both are running in master controller mode
- different hostnames, ip-addresses, etc
- all settings for WLANs and AP-groups (exept the APs themselves in these groups) are the same
- in total at this moment we are running around 100 LAPs configured one half on WLC#1, the other half on WLC#2
I don't know exactly why, but when that setting was installed, someone already configuredHA for each accesspoint... e.g.:
- AP#1 primary WLC#1, secondary WLC#2
- AP#2 primary WLC#2, secondary WLC#1 but without WLC#2 knowing the configuration for AP#1 it makes no sense, correct?
so my question is: how should I do the migration in the best way?
is it easy as:
- disabling master controller mode on WLC#2
- configuring both WLCs into one mobility group
--> WLCs are negotiating their configurations for the APs
I have a 4400 and a 5508 WLC in the same location We want to be able to roam between ap joined to both the 4400 and the 5508 using only one ssid
Do I only need to create a mobility group and add both WLC then create only one WLAN on one of the controllers and it will be shared across bot WLC.
I have a customer buys 12 x WISM and build up a mobility, when I add the final WLC to mobility, it prompts that there mobility group has reached the max of mobility member, but the total member is 23, according the configuration guide, it should be allow to 24 member, do I hit some bug? My using version is 7.0.98.0.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI read the configuration guide about the 7.3 release. And I figured out that you will need a hash key for establishing a mobility group relation between a controller and a virtual controller. The 7.3 release for the 5500 series works fine for me.
But the latest release 7.0.235.0 for the wireless lan controller series 4400 does not have a functionality to add a hash key while creating a new mobility group member.
The command "config mobility group member hash" is totally missing.
how to establish a mobility group between a 4400 controller and a virtual then?
I have a Question i am testing mobility group with Failover for redundend connection between 2 Cisco 5500 Wlc.On both the controllers i got the mobility working And both the controllers have the same version.And configuration. But when i unplug the main controller the access-Points don't convers to the second one .The just keep on creaming can't find the main controllerAlso with this thus the second wlc need to have the same.Interface ip address like management.
View 8 Replies View RelatedHow many WLCs 5508 can you add to the mobility group?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am setting up officeexten. I have placed the officeextend wlc in the dmz with an mgmt ip of 192.168.10.2. in the process of anchoring this to the internal wlc. Also the ip on the firewall for this interface is 192.168.10.1
1. does the mobility group need to match the same on the internal wlc ?
2. Now do i need a NAT transnational on the firewall for the external WAN ip (AP primed address say 66.10.10.10) to NAT back to 192.168.10.2 ?
3. The 5508 WLC is running on ver6.0.199.4 (license level base) - will this support office extend?
I am working on wi-fi networks (ISP), So I need to block the peer to peer on my network.My network involves cisco switch 2950/2960, cisco 2800 routers and Access Points, config for peer to peer blocking, for this where I need to config either switches or router.My network basic setup is, The internet will pass from router to switch and then Access Points.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI got ASA 5510 with base license, can I block all Peer-2-Peer traffic from inside to outside.
ASA Giga 0/0 connected to ISP Router 2811
ASA Giga 0/1 connected to LAN switch 3560
I see that Application protection - blocking peer-to-peer file sharing traffic is a capability of Cisco IOS Firewall. How do i configure my Cisco 2911 ISR to block peer-to-peer file sharing traffic?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am facing issues in blocking Peer to Peer applications in LAN. I am using 881 Cisco router and below is the config done. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently bought the WAG320N can I block Peer to Peer file sharing on my Network?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI bought my WAG320N, I too have the internet drop out and from reading in here is a very common problem. Cisco really should bring out a new firmware version and address this issue. Any way you can block peer to peer file sharing with the WAG320N? If so how do you go about it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedOne of the schools whose networks I administer has a peer to peer network running about 30 xp machines. DHCP is achieved and DNS settings distributed via a basic Linksys router; is there any way of distributing proxy server address and port short of entering manually in LAN settings of IE on every terminal - there is no budget to install a server.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi just set up my 2Xp pc's and one windows7 laptop peer to peer for file and printer sharing but i can not configure internet connection for those pc's
View 2 Replies View Relatedi want to set up my two computers /win xp/ installed using peer to peer network , just tell me the needed steps
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to prevent guest from doing peer - peer communication on my Guest (5508) controllers. Is this a feature on the WLC or only by applying an ACL on the router interface?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI try to map LDAP Group to ASA Group policy following documentation:
[URL]
This is a config for ASA 8.0. I would have expected it to work on 8.4 as well but I do run into problems. The mapping as shown in LDAP Debug and ASA Log will actually happen but it is overwritten by the "GPnoAccess" Group Policy configured locally in the Tunnel Group. From earlier works with RADIUS I would have expected the user specific Attribute to be "stronger"?
ASA Log:
AAA retrieved user specific group policy (correct Policy) for user = XXX
AAA retrieved default group policy (GPnoAccess) for user = XXX
1) Is it possible for 2 WLCs installed in seperate data centres with L3 seperation to be joined in a mobility group? We will have aps in the branch offices split between controllers so we want to make sure roaming work ok. Also all guest access should be anchored to data centre 2.
2) in flexconnect local switching mode, do I need to create flexconnect groups if I'm only using radius servers in the data centre with no requirement to use local radius as a backup?
Can I configure a mobility groups between 2106 Wireless LAN Controller and 5500 Wireless LAN Controllers?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have two 5508, no anchor, only one SSID with internal web authentication using radius server.Under "Configuring Mobility Groups", Cisco guide says: "If a client roams in web authentication state, the client is considered as a new client on another controller instead of considering it as a mobile client".
I understand that if a client that has already autheticated via web roams between two LAPs that are associated with different WLCs, it has to reathenticate.
Do you know if the new 2500 series controller supports things like mobility groups? Could I use 2 of these and do inter-controller roaming. Also do you know if this would work with a 2106 controller and a 2505 controller or are they 2 completely independent controllers only knowing about their own APs??
View 12 Replies View RelatedI am unable to get my 4402 and 2504 to pair in mobility, I made short video to explain my issues.also do not worry there is no propritary information in this video, I am working on a lab that does not mirror any production networks.
View 6 Replies View RelatedAfter upgrading my 5508s to 7.2.110.0, they are reporting mobility data path errors to one of my WiSMs running 7.0.235.0.
I get these messages on the 5508s reporting that it can't send a ping to the affected WiSM:
*ethoipSocketTask: Aug 08 21:15:41.175: %ETHOIP-3-PKT_RECV_ERROR: ethoip.c:341 ethoipSocketTask: ethoipRecvPkt returned error
*ethoipSocketTask: Aug 08 21:15:41.175: %ETHOIP-3-PING_RESPONSE_TX_FAILED: ethoip_ping.c:312 Failed to tx a ping response to <ip address>, rc=5
But maybe there is another clue because I also see in the same log these errors referencing the same WiSM:
*bcastReceiveTask: Aug 08 21:15:45.310: %LOG-1-Q_IND: mm_dir.c:1969 Failed to recreate the SSH Rule for <ip address>.
*mmSSHPeerRegister: Aug 08 21:15:44.829: %MM-1-SSHRULE_CREATE_FAILED: mm_dir.c:1969 Failed to recreate the SSH Rule for <ip address>.
Why is the controller trying to SSH to another controller? Was some SSH related feature added to 7.2 that has been accidentally enabled?
deploying a DMZ wireless controller and I have a question regarding remote wired LANs. My 602OEAP APs support 1 or 2 of their LAN ports as being accessible across the DTLS tunnel.This works fine when they register across internet right to my internal WLC. However, now that I'm implementing a DMZ controller for this purpose, how will this work? I dont see the option for the Remote Wired LAN to be linked to a mobility anchor.Some of my users have printers connected to the LAN port on their 602OEAP and I need to maintain this functionality once I move their APs to the DMZ controller.
Software versions: 7.4.100.0
DMZ Controller: 2504
INT Controller: 5508
I have Cisco Wireless Lan Controller 5508 with 35 (3600 Series Access Points. Do i need to purchase Mobility Service Engine for this or no need? Do i need WCS server for this or no need?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 2 controllers as below one with 6.0 version and other with 5.2 version AIR-WLC4404-100-K9 6.0.202.0 AIR-WLC4402-12-K9 5.2.178.0 GUEST..Control path between controller flaps.All mobility anchors on wlan index 7 are down.All mobility anchors on wlan index 3 are down.Control path to mobility member x.x.x.x is down.No problem observed when i have software 5.2.178.0 on both the controller.
View 35 Replies View RelatedAfter I initial MSE with the wizard. MSE take so long to start the service (more than 1 hour) with "Starting MSE Platform, waiting to check the status"Then I decide to reboot the appliance, after that MSE shows the message "Traceback (most recent call last) File "/usr/sbin/yum-updatesd", line 40, in ?import gaminImportError: No module named gaming.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have 2 5508 controllers in a mobility group. Any good way to keep the configuration between the 2 controllers synched up?
I thought about copying the config from my primary controller to the secondary controller, but I would think there is a more elegant way to make this happen.