I am trying to find out wether it is possible to allocate bandwidth on a per-vlan basis.
We have multiple satellite connections coming into our infrastructure over a single gig ethernet cable from another service provider. The provider provides the connectivity on layer 2 and we are responsible for layer 3 connectivity for the clients on the other side of the satellite connections. The single gig ethernet cable is currently plugging into a Mikrotik 1100 router on our side, setup with VLAN ID and IP Addresses and everything works perfectly. The challenge now is that whilst we only have the one satellite client connecting, we can limit the bandwidth on the ethernet port to 512k for example which limits the client to only have 512k internet breakout. In the future, we need to be able to limit bandwidth as multiple VLAN IDs will be coming over that single ethernet cable and I'm not sure if one can do this at all.
I have my wan connection on the eth0. The bandwidth is 2mbps. I am running qos on that interface saying 192.168.200.0/24 can use 80% of the bandwidth and 192.168.201.0/24 can use 20% of the bandwidth. I Also have vtun VPN inteface to our branch office. I also wan to run some qos on that interface. How do i go about allocating the bandwidth on this interface? it is actually going via the eth0 interface, but the system actually see's it a an independent interface on its own right, so it requires it's own qos policy.
I have an internet connection (landline and wifi modem) at my parent's summerhouse as I need it for work. Nobody else does around here so I get constant nagging from neighbours to give them the password. I can't say no however I'm afraid they may use up too much of my bandwith connection which could lead to alot of money being lost from my part. Constant and stable internet is a must for my work. how can I limit the bandwith I give to them? Can I create a second public network with limited bandwith or something like that?
We have a DSL line at work which a few people share for Internet access.Sometimes if someone is doing a Windows Update or big download etc, the connection is maxed out and slow for everyone else.Is there a way to give everyone a set amount of bandwidth via a Cisco router (2811) or will I need to use something like a packeteer?
I have a cisco ASA firewall 5510.Just i have configurd for 1st port as nameif ouside witch public ip, 2nd port as a nameif inside with local ip, and done the nating, dhcp and dns. now i am able to get internet from inside port, which is getting dhcp.up to that it is ok.
And I want to restrict bandwidh 1Mbps for local port (2nd port) how to config 1Mbps banwidth allocation for port no 2, I mean nameif inside should have 1Mbps limet.
I have Cisco 2851 router & need to allocate bandwith based on IP's. eg. 192.168.1.1 should use 7 Mbps & 192.168.1.2 should use 2 Mbps & 192.168.1.3 should use 1 Mbps. Let me know the configuration on how to execute it on a router.
I am using Linksys WRT54G router on my broadband internet connection. I want to know, is there any way to allocate more or less bandwidth to any PC connected to my network?
limit the bandwidth used by certain wireless devices on my network. The problem I'm having is of priority. For some reason when someone is watching Netflix on my laptop (wireless) no other device has any bandwith available to it, so while someone is watching Netflix my hard wired desktop can barely load Google.com much less do anything useful.I'm using a Cisco ValetPlus M20 wireless N router.allocating at least a minimum amount of bandwidth to wired devices?
I have a tale of woe for you who may be considering Hybrid REAP with local switching.
My client has a varied configuration, but the requirements basically screamed HREAP with local switching. They have 15 sites, had already purchased a single WLC 4404 and they needed between 4 and 24 APs at each of the sites. Each of these locations are connected by a WAN link of good quality, but only a single link so there is no assurance of availability; the client has local resources so it would be useful if wireless stayed working during an outage.
So I setup the WLC for HREAP local switching. I setup AP Groups VLANs, but I noticed it had no effect on the VLAN allocation for HREAP. This was unfortunate, because not every site has the same VLAN configuration - some sites had a L3 switch and others only a L2 switch. But I suffered through this and configured each AP manually with the appropriate VLAN mappings.
The infuriating thing, is now that they have bought a second WLC 4404 (they expect to increase the number of APs beyond 100) all these VLAN mappings are messed up when APs connect to the second WLC. I've been going through them one by one again - it is really unfortunate that the AP Groups VLAN mappings don't apply to HREAP local switching.
I'm going to get back to the next 80 APs - but if some of you have a system for handling the VLAN mappings of a large number of APs.
We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
i have a small network with Polycom phones connected to the sf300 switch and have the pc's daisy chained via the second switch port on each phone. i have the pc traffic running on the default vlan 1 and the voice traffic running on the voice vlan 100. can i do bandwidth management on a vlan/port basis or is that not necessary. i want to ensure that the voice traffic is never impacted by the pc traffic on the same cable.
I have a 2900 router at branch office. This router has a 4 port switch card and two gigabyte ports. The gigabyte port is use for wan connection and the 4 port switch card is use for lan connection. I have two separate networks on my lan side. (network 1 and network 2)
I have assigned port 0,1 of the switch card to vlan1 for network 1 Ports 2,3 of the switch card is assigned vlan 20 for network 2
My problem is I would like to applied a bandwidth restriction for all data coming out from vlan20 capping same to 384 kb.
Note I do not want use QOS because this will only kickin when saturation occurs,
Currently, we have a Cisco router (28xx), ASA 5520, and a core switch 4500. We have different vlans. We also have Auto QoS running for our Cisco IP Phones.My manager just asked me to see if I can either reserve some certain bandwidth for one vlan, or give that vlan higher priority on internet traffic than the others.
1.) Anyway we can reserve some more bandwidth for one vlan than other vlans?
2.) If #1 cannot be done, how can we provide higher priority on the internet traffic to one vlan than the others?
3.) Is #1 or #2 the same config? If not, which one would be easier (without changing our current QoS settings)?
4.) If 1 or 2 can be done, which device I should config the settings on?
5.) This question may be duplicate, but do we need to reset our current QoS to achieve the goal?
Starting a project where they customer has ASA 5585X with SSP40 with 10K SSL Premium Lic and ACS5.1.The cust wants IPSec, and Anyconnect Client terminations. The number of users will be close to 6000 and will scale.Due to the huge scale of users, i am not able to finalize a design. Have the following doubts.
1. Will ACS have any issues in supporting a database this huge. OR is it better to go with the AD/LDAP integration.
2. What is the best way to allocation IP address. Does ACS 5.1 support dynamic allocation form an IP pool.
I have been browsing through the forum, couldnt find anything concrete.
We have a WLC 5500 connected to a 2960 acting as core switch. there is a server attached to the switch , bearing all dhcp pools for lan and wireless users. Can the wlc or the switch be configured in such a way that the wireless users associating to the wlc get their ip addresses from the dhcp pool configured on the server. Can the configuration can be shared for such a setup.
I am running IOS version 8.0(5) in cisco ASA 5520. This issue i am facing is that when the memory utilzation reaches 49 percent, the web-vpn users are not able to login as they are getting a blank page. The only error which is getting in the output " sh mem webvpn allobjects" is ERROR: Memory allocation failed?
I am using a Pix515E with 8.0(3) and 128MB RAM. It ran OK for months but has recently had several episodes during which it produced streams of memory allocation failures (syslog 211001). When in this condition I could not log into the VPN. It was still operating but some users were having problems and I eventually had to restart it.
The traffic load is typically 10Mbps, and the max number of connections is around 10,000 but typically 5,000. The CPU usage is 10%-20%. There is 1 VPN with normally 1 client. The memory usage is always high, between 115MB and 120MB but during these problems it creeps higher.
Why might the memory usage be so high when my network load is quite light for the 515E? What circumstances cause the memory usage to increase during operation? Is there anything I can do to prevent the memory usage increasing to the point where the PIX crashes?
I have a second 515E with 8.0(4)32 and 64MB RAM, loaded with the same config. I have not had this one in service, but off-line it is using 53MB of memory. If the spare pix needs 53MB to load the firmware and my config, why does the other one use 115MB?
using ACS 4.2 and I can't find a way to bind an incoming NAS port to a specifc IP Pool:
When a user connects the request to auth comes from 2 possible NAS ports randomly (this cannot change). Depending on which NAS makes the requests determines the IP range required, so I need 2 IP Pools. There is no way to say 'if request comes from NAS1 give IP from Pool1 and if request comes from NAS2 give IP from Pool2'
I have gone around and around with NAFs and NARs, but cannot do this.I can create 2 ACS groups with the specific NAS and specific IP pool within, but then I cannot have a single username bound to both groups.
I moved the auth to an AD group in the hope that I could bind that single AD group to the 2 ACS groups; and so have a single username, but no joy.
I'm using a Catlyst 3550 to supply power to a IP network surveliance camera. By default, the predecesor to POE, Cisco Inline Power allocates 15.4 W of power to a port ... What is the process for reducing this power output?
"For an IEEE device, the switch always allocates 15.4 W to the port. The switch does not display the IEEE class type in the show power inline privileged EXEC command output. Instead, it displays n/a."
I have one cisco Nexus 7000 with version 6.1(2).I created 3 VDC
ADMINCOREsecurity
I have configured 1 - 45 ports for Core and 46 - 48 ports for Security.Now I am not using the VDC Security and I tried to move the assigned ports 46 - 48 from Security to ADMIN.Switch accepted the command .But the ports are not visible on ADMIN VDC.Now it is not showing on Security VDC also. I need this ports in ADMIN VDC
We have a Cisco 881 router, which is crashing. We have seen that the ARP cache fills up so much it causes things to crash, our phones go down.. We dont know why this however IP CEF seems to be doing it, when we disable it goes away however disabling IP CEF causes our L2TP tunnel to become inoperable also. So why does IP CEF cause thousands of AR entries and how can we limit that!? Below is the error, sample of the ARP cache and our config. You will notice we also have a /31 given to us on WAN interface, this was given to us by our service provider. This is really strange I cant find other examples on internet.
The error:
Nov 1 04:21:57.474: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 65536 bytes failed from 0x81F083F4, alignment 16 Pool: Processor Free: 55176 Cause: Not enough free memory Alternate Pool: I/O Free: 2352 Cause: Not enough free memory
I just bought a Catalyst 2960S to test out the feature "Port-Based Address Allocation" which is required for our factory. I followed the instruction from Cisco IOS and did all the steps but I could not get it to work, my network client did not received the expected IP address that I configured.
We have 1 mpbs bandwidth line, but most of the time we are getting only 300-500 kpbs download speed, i want to send statistics report to our ISP, what will be best procedure to test the bandwidth report, i have checked in some websites like bandwidthplace and speedtest but these sites are not accurate, how to check the actual bandwidth we getting from ISP against 1 Mbps. We have solarwinds monitoring tool in this i have configured the WAN interface for 1 mbps
We are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
Between our hosting and a customer we have an extended vlan, traveling on a fiber, between two cisco 3560 switches.The thing is, that we want to create one or more vlans inside that extended vlan, in some way if possible?
I have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50 10.10.50.0/24
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50 10.20.50.0/24
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.
We have 6509 VSS with FWSM Module and we have created two context on it, one is INTERNALL CONTEXT othe is EXTERNALL Context? We have spanned various VLANS in switches and FWSM context level. All VLAN Gateways are configured in context level.
Activity description : We had planned migration of these devices into a new Datacenter, it was a planned activity. During migration of devices from one Dc to a new DC we broke the VSS and kept the primary running and removed the secondary switch and migrated this secondary to new DC and powered this device ON in the new DC and checked all the config was very much fine but this device was OFF network as secondary was brought to new DC just to limit the downtime during the primary switch movement.
During the activity ( Primary switch movement )We powered off the Primary switch and mean time before shifting into new Data center We had brought up secondary switch which was already existing in the DC was put live in the network and it was working fine without any issues.
Later we had moved Primary into new data center and tried to put into VSS with the secondary , during this period the secondary device into went into RECOVERY MODE and primary device was not responding and devices went off network and immediatly we removed the VSL link and brought up primary into production network without secondary online in the network ( Without VSS just stand alone switch ) network started working, but bringing up the primary we found that some of the VLANS in the FWSM was deleted and some VLAN had misconfiguration ( example : say original VLAN ip 10.200.112.1 has become 10.300.13.1 ) also some of the access list as well as SVI was deleted making configuration mismatch.
Wanted to know while syncronization b/n primary and secondary switch in VSS if we pull out VSL link would create this type of issues.
I have set up 2 DHCP pools and 2 VLANs (1 *the native* for data / 1 VLAN for voice). When I use the command "switchport voice vlan 20" the port disapear from the show vlan brief list. When I use the "switchport access vlan 20" it shows up in the show vlan brief in the correct VLAN and gives the phone an IP. I assume that using the access instead of the voice is wrong and the phones would not configure correctly. But when I use the access the phone goes to the next step and tells me the TFTP files are not found. Why does the port disapear from the VLAN list?
