in a customer project we are evaluating if it's possible to connect from cisco ios switches via "ssh -l <user> <ip address>" to an enterasys n series dfe modul which is running a ssh server v2.
Unfortunately this doesn't work as expected, every connection attempt is resetted.We did a trace of the ssh connection attempt where you can see that there is some problem in the algorithm negotiation (see attachment).
I have Some Alcatel Switch and I want to use ACS 5.2's tacscs+ for Alcatel Switch admin authentication.the Failure Reason:13011 Invalid TACACS+ request packet - possibly mismatched Shared SecretsBut I was check the share secret is correct.Before I was tried associated ACS with vision 4.2 is work.
how ISE support on third party LAN switch, if the requirement is doing 802.1X based flexauth.Refer to the diagram i attached; 01 topology.png
Concern 1: if the 3com switch with 802.1X feature, but still without the full feature to support FlexAuth, policy encforcement, DACL etc. In this kind of situation, will user still able to authenticate (using method PEAP-MSCHAP v2), but authorization just grant with permit any any?
Concern 2: Can i assume i authenticated the 3com switch using MAB? But this will cause endpoint with no 802.1X, am i right?
Concern 3: cisco switch C4507-E, loaded with IOS version Cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M, version 03.04 and Supervisor Engine :WS-X45-SUP7-E, is this platform is supported in Cisco TrusctSEC?
Two C2911 routers are connected to LAN and have HSRP configured. HSRP is negotiating successfully (active/standby), but LAN switch Enterasys Matrix E1 has problems accessing the virtual HSRP address. The switch can ping HSRP IP, and the virtual HSRP MAC is visible in its MAC table. But the static routes configured on the switch towards the HSRP IP seem to refuse working. Workaround to enable users to access network was to direct the static routes to the physical IP of one router. Is there a known incompatibility between Enterasys with Cisco HSRP?
Two c2911 routers are connected to LAN and have HSRP configured. HSRP is negotiating successfully (active/standby), but LAN switch Enterasys Matrix E1 has problems accessing the virtual HSRP address. The switch can ping HSRP IP, and the virtual HSRP MAC is visible in its MAC table. But the static routes configured on the switch towards the HSRP IP seem to refuse working. Workaround to enable users to access network was to direct the static routes to the physical IP of one router. Is there a known incompatibility between Enterasys with Cisco HSRP?
As we know that WLC (i.e. 5508) does not support MAB (MAC Auth Bypass) and it supports CWA in 7.2.x. CWA is a result of successfull MAB. So how CWA work for wireless? So it means WLC support MAB?
How Cisco Identity Service Engine (ISE) can work with WLAN controller 5508 to do the Local Web Authentication, on behalf tje guest profile is create using Cisco ISE guest management?
As i check Cisco ISE caveat wireless only support on LWA, and LWA not supported on Authorization's VLAN assignment.
what i need to concern abou the ISE authentication and authorization policy on behalf on Wireless LWA with use of ISE guest management case?
I'd like to configure ASDM access to ASA-SM using RSA SecurID authentication.I've followed instructions in this documen [URL]When I test access from CLI everything looks fine:
asa-vss/admin/act# test aaa-server authentication RSA Server IP Address or name: xx.xx.xx.xx Username: testuser Password: ********** INFO: Attempting Authentication test to IP address <xx.xx.xx.xx> (timeout: 12 seconds) INFO: Authentication Successful
[code]....
When I try to use ASDM, I'm unable to login and I can see lot of authentication error (Token reuse) messages on RSA server monitor window.It looks like ASDM 6.5(1) for ASA-SM doesn't support RSA/SDI authentication.
we have installed nac for our customer and it works fine ,but the customer want the change the version of kaspersky antivirus from 6 to 8 end point security ,when we have try this the nac agent does not find the antivrus on the the workstation . i want to know if this version of kasoersky (end point security ) is supported by nac ,if no is ther a solution to make it works with the NAC .
is it possible to use wildcards in Compund Conditions in ACS 5.2? i've been suing the following to try and match a username that contains @*.*:
This would hopefully match a username like j.blogs@somewhere.com but doesn't work as expected - am i doing something wrong or are wildcards not supported in compund conditions?
We are running ACS 4.0 so understandably so we are looking to upgrading to a Cisco supportable version of ACS. The limitation of our current version of ACS does not support nested AD groups. The latest version of ACS (I think it is 5.4) will?
Whether ISE-3315-K9 with ise version: Service Engine: 1.0.4.573 , supports the command level accounting Bascially , we have integrated Cisco Switches with Cisco ISE for Device Authentication using Radius , we are able get the authentication logs on to the devices , but for any command changes or update done on Cisco devices we are not able to get the command accounting.
Critical voice vlan feature, used to place a newly authenticating phone when radius server is dead into appropriate voice vlan, seems to be a new feature and I find the documentation to be incomplete. Do the following switches support this feature in any IoS versions? WS-C4510R, 4506, 3560, 3550,2960s.
I'm looking to implement ACS 5.2 using 802.1X, we have two seperate AD domains.A single switch will need to support both ADs, so if a machine in AD1 is connected, it will be authenticated to the ACS using AD1 and applied to VLAN1, while a machine that is in AD2 will be authenticated to AD2 and applied to VLAN 2.
I'm looking at machine authentication, not user authentication, so I assume that I will need to import two certs from each AD.
How many newtork devices can Cisco Secure ACSv4.1 support is there any limit on the same? How to get the Specs of Cisco Secure ACSv4.1 on the above grounds...
I Have a requirement to migrate from ipv4 to ipv6, I have checked the scalability of all the devices for this migration except ACS 1113 Solution Engine, Version 4.2. I couldnt reach the proper documentation to check its support for ipv6.
I have number of 6500 switches and we are in the process of getting support contract renewed now when i buy support for my 6500 series switches i have to inform main module serial numbers (Only this one). or do i also have to inform about sub module serial numbers to my support vendor?
I acquired a 3560X-24P-L Switch which I wanted to use at our datacenter. However, I need a switch that supports OSPF. It came with a Universal IOS but there was no "Router" command under conf t. I downloaded and applied the latest "IP Base" IOS, but still no Router OSPF. Based on the matrix here > [URL] I thought "IP Base" supported OSPF, but what exactly is "OSPF for routed access" ? Do I actually need an "IP Services" IOS? From my download options, I do not see an IP Services IOS for the 3560X-24P-L so I'm left to assume that the switch does not support L3 / OSPF. So my question is this particular switch supports L3 / OSPF and what is Universal IOS?
I have cisco switch 3550 IOS Version 12.1(19)EA1c.
I can configure route-map commands on that. but i can not apply that into any vlan interface. while i try to apply the following command ( ip policy route-map PBR) on VLAN int i get an error msg saying that the command is not recognized.
I am looking for ways to avoid deleting files from the flash in a Switch 2960, I found some scripts TCL / EEM but this switch does not support EEM (IOS c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin).
I am having WS-C3560G-48TS switch with ios(c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.E2.bin) and I am trying to use IPv6 feature in this switch model. More over I've upgraded this switch with many ios but none of them not supporting IPv6 feature. ios which supports IPv6 feature?
I believe the answer is yes, but incorperating more layer 3 features of our 3750's, I want to know if they fully support EIGRP or OSPF?
Also for a small business of 4 locations, each with a 10mbps fiber and a 1.5mbps mpls... wouldn't you say EIGRP would be easier? Want to look at making the failover automatic if the 10mbps fiber goes down between a site, then the network fails over to 1.5mbps mpls. When the fiber returns in service then the network automatically preferr the fiber again.
Currently we use static routes and if there is a provider outage we have to manually edit the config to flip flop the routes.