Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: Method To Control Access To Different WLAN On Same ACS 5.2 And WLC
Aug 6, 2012
is there any method to control an access to the different WLAN(PEAP) on the same ACS 5.2 and WLC?That is, there is two AD groups the one have access to domain network only the other group have access to internet only and may be third group that have access to both networks.Currently if i add new authorization policy the user will have access to both networks.
We recently deployed ACS 5.3 on a VM, while the main purpose of implementation was to control access (authentication/authorization) on network devices; Can we use the same user to authenticate users' access to our wired network? So only users with a valid credentials on our Windows AD can have access to the network?
I am configuring an ASA 5520 for VPN access. Authorization & Authentication use an LDAP server. I have the tunneling configured successfully, and I can access internal resources. What I want to do now is to restrict access to a specific AD Group membership. In the absence of that group membership, a user should not be allowed access to the VPN.
My test VPN client software is Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.05.0290. The group authentication is configured into a Connection Entry that identifies the Tunnel Group. I think I worded that correctly.
The Software Version on the ASA is 8.3(1).
My current challenge is getting the VPN to stop letting every access request through regardless of group membership.
[URL]
The configuration (AAA LDAP, group policy, and tunnel group) is below.
Configuration: VM with ACS 5.4 with patch 3. (upgraded from 5.2.0.26 patch 10)When I go on "System Administration" - "Administrators" - "Administrative Access Control" - "Authorization", I got this error:
What I tried:
"acs backup" on this server and shutdown Install an ACS 5.4 with patch 3 on new VM --> I don't have the problem on GUI "acs restore" to restore my configuration on new server --> I got this problem again...
I want to use this feature...After this error, others pages generate this error: I have to reload server or restart management service to get him back...How could I solve this? (I don't want to reconfigure manually the server )
we currently have 4x ACS 4.1 (1) build 23 windows based and we are going to migrate to ACS 5.2 appliance 11211.the first pair we are using simply local authentication for multiple vendor firewall and routers, with one custom radius vendor-specific attributes, with now she exec.the second pair we are using for wireless clients authentication through AD, with dynamic mapping.
in order to migrate what would be the most suitable migration, whether to use Migration utility or export those ACS objects and import them into the new ACS 5.2.
I need to move our (secondary instance, version 5-2) ACS server to a different server rack and I have not been able to find a gentle way to shut down the appliance (not the windows version). Does one exist or is it just the power button/cord?
This is my second post today trying to fix the NAT types for my 2 xbox 360. I tried the port forwarding method but with this router when I enable the ports I lost internet access in my wired devices but my wireless devices still have internet access. I even lost internet access on my computer. I never had manu problems with a router trying to get my NAT type open on my 2 xbox.
I've configured an ACS 5.3 system and all my groups etc fucniton corrcetly both for Network Access and for Device Administration.
However I'm stuck trying to allow clients to authenticate against the router's web-page i.e. Web-Authenticaiton, using TACACS+ between the router and the ACS5.3.
I've looked into this and I need to configure a custom-attribute of "service" with type Outbound and link this to an Authorization policy.
I have a client that has 3 AP541N's and they want to enable guest wireless access. However, their VOIP provider has their managed switches locked down so we can't add VLANs, etc.So I cannot touch the switch or router config on this LAN.
Looking into AP541N documentation I see VAPs mentioned, can I enable those and have secure guest wireless access with the same private IPs that the rest of the LAN use right now? (That is, the employees are 192.168.2.x and the guest wireless users would also be 192.168.2.x.)
Or do I need to do something else to properly enable guest wireless? Like add another piece of equipment? I did try to add a Cisco RVS4000 to the mix but it wouldn't pass the VLAN across the switches that I setup for the guest wireless SSID. goal is to leave the switch and router in place, and work with the AP541N's that I have and get secure guest wireless.
We have a small office and already have a firewall in place that uses content filtering. I am looking for a low cost wireless access point that I can place behind my firewall that will allow me to control access by a username and password list, not just the passkey.
Does this exist without having to go to an Aruba or Ruckus type enterprise WIFI product?
We are forced to rush a installation of a WLC 5508 various reasons in a testing lab. I eventually want to configure RADIUS and such but cannot do it at this immediate time. What I would like to do is implement straight forward MAC filtering. The problem I am having is the controller allows either any W LAN or only one W LAN, and a interface setting. I need to have each MAC be able to access several W LAN's but not all of them. Can anyone point me to a article or give me a quick idea of what I can do.I have basic W LAN's configured and have MAC filtering generally working. I cannot just use a user authentication because each user may have 20-30 devices, but not all of these devices should be allowed on all W LAN's and I do not want to rely on the user.
Using Microsoft IAS as the auth server, how do I get the ASA (v.8.2.1) to take different user groups defined in AD, and control access to different group policies on the VPN? We're setting up the ASA for many different vendors, and need to control access for each vendor with different policy.
For example, Vendor one is in AD group Vendor1 and will only be permitted access to a specific group of defined IPs in our network. Vendor two is in AD group Vendor2 and will only be permitted access to a different group of defined IPs in our network from Vendor1.
I have setup clientless SSL VPN on my ASA. User authentication is done by RADIUS using ACS 5.2, I have created two portal one for IT department and the other for auditing department but the user in auditing if the select IT group from the drop down list they can login to it, my question is how can I make them login to their group only and prevent them from accessing other groups ?
I have a D-Link DIR-615 and am trying to set up the Access Control so that I can restrict Internet connection from midnight till morning (to keep my teenage kids from staying up half the night on the Internet)I can step through the Access Control set up, but I don't see how I can block only one MAC address or computer from accessing the internet at specific times.
I have tried to setup access control by setting up a policy that restricts certain MAC addresses during a period during the day from certain websites. I set up the website filter and a schedule and selected them for the policy. Instead of blocking just the websites on the filter list during the time setup in the schedule, it blocks all websites all the time.I made sure that I setup the policy to 'block some access' NOT 'block all access'.The only thing that seems to work is that only the computers with the MAC address selected are effected.
I may be doing it incorrectly, but I'm trying to configure web access rules. I first set up access control and tell it to use the website filter. I've tried configuring it by both MAC address and IP address (separately, not simultaneously), but it still allows the listed sites in the web filter to get through. Is there something else I need to block or am I not doing something correctly? The network is on DHCP reservation, so IP addresses are always the same. MAC addresses, as I mentioned, don't work, either and they are fixed and logged in the router.
DIR655 with 1.33NA firmware. I'm trying to determine how to block access to the internet for a specific LAN computer when the user knows how to change a MAC address. I don't want to turn MAC control on and grant only to listed computers - the list doesn't accommodate enough MAC addresses, and the client has wireless and wired since it's a laptop. I also don't want to set static IPs on all of the devices since some cannot accommodate that feature.I'm thinking that reserving an IP address isn't ultimately the solution either, since assigning the IP isn't going to work if the MAC changes. how to use access control under these circumstances?
I've got a Cisco 1841 with 2 FastEthernet ports here. My Cisco isn't great, and I've been given a problem I don't seem to be able to crack.Essentially, I have one network with two sides. I've connected these to fe0/0 and fe0/1 on the router, and put them interfaces into a bridge group which as far as I can tell, essentially makes the router a 2 port switch...I know this won't make a lot of sense from a normal network point of view, but what we need to do is allow all traffic from fe0/0 to fe0/1, but not allow any traffic in the reverse direction. The traffic allowed to flow from fe0/0 to fe0/1 must include broadcast traffic (infact that is the most important traffic, its how the silly theatre application works). None of the traffic is IP addressed.... ie, each of the devices on the network assign themselves an IP address, and then throw broadcast traffic out on to the "dedicated physical network" that exists between them for communication[CODE]
I've been working on an application recently that practice ACL configuration, and since finishing I figured it should be put on the internet as there wasnt much more work to do to make it suitable for a website. It allows you to practice both standard and extended ACL configuration by generating a random number of ACL actions for you to configure, and provides the correct config to compare yours against to see if you were correct. It also emulates a router at a very basic level to allow practice when there is no equipment available.
I have an extended acl on my VLAN interface in bound and it is working like I need it to, securing one side of my network from the other allowing only what I want from my desktops to my servers. The acls look something like this:
Traffic is initiated from vlan100 not from vlan70 then back through so an established rule does not work. Also there are many more ports open in my inbound acl but this is simplified for ease of reading.I want to make sure if I place both an inbound and outbound rule on my vlan and that it is in the right place, both on the same vlan.
I have a sip gateway (AS5400) that is used to connect sip providers to our internal voice network.Internal gateway (10.1.1.2 LAN) -- SIP trunk -- AS5400 (10.1.1.3 LAN/ 8.23.23.43 WAN) -- SIP trunk -- Internet SIP Provider We encountered the following problem :A SIP call from internal gateway to the sip provider could establish but was muted on our side (sip provider could hear us)On the WAN interface of the AS5400, there is a ACL that filter traffic IN coming from SIP Provider
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 8.23.23.43 255.255.255.224 ip access-group 101 in
I log the deny on this ACL and I saw some udp packets denied with LAN addresses !*Mar 3 15:24:44.001: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied udp 10.1.1.3(0) -> 10.1.1.2 (0), 1 packet I did not bind anything on the sip config.When I changed the ACLs, calls went well.Why do I see LAN packets on the WAN interface ?
I have been asked to allow our employees to connect their own devices to a open wireless network. I want to control access to preauthorized devices and I am looking for solutions. We do to have access to any other control devices like an ACS and I would like to archive the result using just the 5508 controller.
just i purchase cisco access point and I tried to access control panel to setup wireless security but the page i issued not display 192.168.1.245, there is any wayes to connet device web base ??
I am having some issues with creating an ACL for my gateway router.I want to block external access to my network 192.168.1.0/24 from internet so i set up the ACL on the WAN port of my 7200 router asI am using named extened access list -
{ deny ip any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 log permit ip any any } and i applied this inbound accesslist on the WAN port of router as "ip access-group acl-in in"
Now i have blocked the external traffic to my network 192.168.1.0/24 but the issue i am having is i am also unable to reach outside now. All i want is to block external traffic on the router WAN port but allow internal traffic to outside. Did i miss anything in the access list?
I have a WRVS4400N, and need to apply access control to an IPSec tunnel that terminates at a client site, but can't seem to make the device comply.
I can configure ACLs on their device for the LAN to restrict packets coming back into my network, and can restrict packets outbound frm my LAN but that is hardly a secure method of doing this in my opinion.
I am copying files form one server to another using Bightserv ARCserve Backup, now the files copy over however the access control list to the files isn't.Does anybody no away around this?
I would like to have the ability to turn off the internet access to my teens computers without effecting myself. I have parental controls on my computer which work great, but this does not work to the other computers that are able to connect wirelessly. I have a router but I am not sure how to access it.
I am a part of small IT company and I need to know if there's a good program I can get to control file access on the network.
Here is my scenario : 5 users on a network with their own workstations, IT Technicians, Sales and Marketing, Admin, HR and Manager...All these users need to access different files on the network so here is what I want, I need for the IT guy to log on into his PC and only see files that he needs on his account and the same thing should apply for other users on their accounts..They should only see files and folders that are relevant to them.