I believe that the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express matches the outbound VoIP dial peer digit-by-digit, because:
1. when using the debug command it shows how it works digit-by-digit till it match a pattern
2. It says in the study guide ( If a match is found, the router immediately processes the call - chapter 6) so I understand its not en bloc
I have another odd issue (I get those alot) I have an asterisk box that moves around between 2 IPs, thus the dial-peers are unpredictable as to their target IP. They work as the dial-peer will eventually (after 1 min) time out and go to the other dial peer, but waiting 1 min sucks, and it's a tiny network, 5-10 sec would be WAY more than enouph. Does anyone know off hand a way to get them to time out faster?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a network with multiple voip gateways run by an Asterisk server. Among others, I'm using a Cisco 1760 with a VIC-BRI as ISDN gateway.To standardize the dial patterns between these different systems, I have decided to systematically translate them to e.164 before sending them from one system to the other.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am working on wi-fi networks (ISP), So I need to block the peer to peer on my network.My network involves cisco switch 2950/2960, cisco 2800 routers and Access Points, config for peer to peer blocking, for this where I need to config either switches or router.My network basic setup is, The internet will pass from router to switch and then Access Points.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI got ASA 5510 with base license, can I block all Peer-2-Peer traffic from inside to outside.
ASA Giga 0/0 connected to ISP Router 2811
ASA Giga 0/1 connected to LAN switch 3560
I see that Application protection - blocking peer-to-peer file sharing traffic is a capability of Cisco IOS Firewall. How do i configure my Cisco 2911 ISR to block peer-to-peer file sharing traffic?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am facing issues in blocking Peer to Peer applications in LAN. I am using 881 Cisco router and below is the config done. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently bought the WAG320N can I block Peer to Peer file sharing on my Network?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI bought my WAG320N, I too have the internet drop out and from reading in here is a very common problem. Cisco really should bring out a new firmware version and address this issue. Any way you can block peer to peer file sharing with the WAG320N? If so how do you go about it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedOne of the schools whose networks I administer has a peer to peer network running about 30 xp machines. DHCP is achieved and DNS settings distributed via a basic Linksys router; is there any way of distributing proxy server address and port short of entering manually in LAN settings of IE on every terminal - there is no budget to install a server.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi just set up my 2Xp pc's and one windows7 laptop peer to peer for file and printer sharing but i can not configure internet connection for those pc's
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to purchase an 64K dial up modem or a 64K dial up external adapter
View 1 Replies View Relatedi want to set up my two computers /win xp/ installed using peer to peer network , just tell me the needed steps
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to prevent guest from doing peer - peer communication on my Guest (5508) controllers. Is this a feature on the WLC or only by applying an ACL on the router interface?
View 2 Replies View Relatedmy config and all the show's ive run sofar tryign to figure this out, but the policy map isnt matching the traffic for some reason
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco ASA running 8.2 in routed mode.The ASA has three interfaces, inside, outside and DMZ. They connect to the following three networks:
Inside: 10.1.1.0/24
Outside: 10.1.2.0/24
DMZ: 100.1.1.0/24
I have the following dynamic PAT configuration:
nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
global (outside) 100.1.1.1
nat control is turned off.
By my understanding any traffic from the inside to outside interface will be PATted to 100.1.1.1. However, communications between inside and the DMZ will not be PATted, and should work with no problems.This seems to be corroborated by this document: [URL]Which states:"The adaptive security appliance translates an address when a NAT rule matches the traffic. If no NAT rule matches, processing for the packet continues."EDIT: I may have misunderstood the above statement.I found this guide to configuring NAT/PAT: [URL]It states:"When you specify a group of IP address(es) in a nat command, then you must perform NAT on that group of addresses when they access any lower or same security level interface; you must apply a global command with the same NAT ID on each interface, or use a static command. NAT is not required for that group when it accesses a higher security interface because to perform NAT from outside to inside you must create a separate nat command using the outside keyword. If you do apply outside NAT, then the NAT requirements preceding come into effect for that group of addresses when they access all higher security interfaces. Traffic identified by a static command is not affected."My problem is that packet tracer does not seem to bear me out. It tells me the packet is dropped due to "no matching global" when I source traffic from the inside interface and send it to the DMZ.
I have a command line from ASA 5505 like below :
nat (inside) 0 access-list NO_NAT
The problem is I cannot see any matching ID of 0 at the (outside) like :
nat (outside) 0 xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Another problem is there is also no any access list with the name of NO_NAT.
Got to set up a site to site VPN to one in a clients office and we're struggling to get Phase 2 working, just seems to loop around saying "Received encrypted packet with no matching SA, dropping" which to me means the ACLs arent mirrored correctly?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have firwall ASA5400, and the outside interface connected to internet router but i noticed that the interface speed in the outside interface is 1000M, but on the internet router is 115 M. so the interface in the router is highly utilized and also the firwall cpu highly utilized. [code]
View 0 Replies View RelatedI am trying to set up remote access vpn on an asa 5520 running 8.4.1. I have the ipsec group, policies, and ip pool set up. When I try and connect with the cisco vpn client I see the following in the logs. Deny icmp src outside:214.67.39.42 dst outside:24.252.51.73 (type 3, code 3) by access-group "acl_inbound". Do I need to put in some firewall rules to allow this traffice so that the VPN can connect?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am trying to remove a static route I added: [code]
I was practicing setting up static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1(2600xm) via T1 module cards on the serial ports. connected to r1 is an old 2500 router called PC.
I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 which I am connecting to via console cable from another 2500 that I use for an access server I get the above error. all the IPs are just generic subnets I created to play around with static routing. I
ASA is the server, 2651 is the client. Phase 1 is negotiating, after entering XAUTH on the 2651, the ASA is showing:
Rejecting IPSec tunnel: no matching crypto map entry for remote proxy 10.250.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 local proxy 10.10.3.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 on interface Outside
Not sure what this means in this instance, the maps are setup the same as the article below. I guess I more expected that sort of error if this was a static tunnel and there was an ACL issue. I don't have a lot of knowledge on the Easy VPN with the ASA. [code]
We are configuring a twice-nat to send traffic for scansafe, its on a asa5505 ve 8.4(3) on a remote location for the customes. The nat redirecion is working but we also have a VPN tunnel to the corporate network. Through the tunnel we need to reach a http server. The problem we are having is that when we add the scan-safe nat, all http traffic gets redirected to scansafe, includind the traffic to the http server on the corporate network.
10.2.1.0 ---<ASA5505> ---Internet,scansafe ---- <Corporate> --- 10.1.1.0
the http server is 10.1.1.75
the remote location network is 10.2.1.0/24
[Code].....
I'm performing tests with following desired scenario: We have several remote offices, connected to our HQ via MPLS. In these remote offices, we have several vlan's. Each vlan has it's own ip-range. The MPLS cloud is routed, so we cannot switch our HQ vlan's to the remote offices. In this case, the client pc is in a guest vlan which allows him internet access. The uplink for this internet access is hosted in our HQ datacenter.
basic scheme:
client pc --> MPLS cloud (managed by ISP) --> 6500 switch LAN --> Checkpoint Firewall --> 6500 switch DMZ --> ASA Firewall
My test scheme:
Client pc is in a subnet A (guest vlan range office).
We receive this traffic on our first LAN 6500.
[Code].....
My company is composed of three different campuses, all with a similar network topology. We currently are experiencing high bandwidth on our serial interface at one of the campuses in particular. The network is composed of about 20 VLANS routed internally using a Cisco 6509. Traffic to the outside is PAT’d by an ASA 5510 and then forwarded through our edge router interface. Each VLAN is PAT’d to a specific public address.Due to the PAT, how would you recommend determining what specific private addresses are consuming our resources on the serial interface. When I look at our NMS, it reports the public address, but that only narrows it down to a VLAN. For example, all the devices in VLAN 6 are translated to 146.34.118.245, and 146.34.11.245 is a top talker.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRV220W - I'm trying to create a one-to-one NAT connection to a PC on my network. I have 5 static IP's assigned by my ISP. I've gone through the step of 'registering' each IP in turn on the WAN port, and pinging that IP from an external device until it starts to respond, then I set the WAN IP back to the one I want to use to manage the device.
I think what I want to do is simple. I simply want to NAT ALL traffic hitting my 2nd IP address, let's call it 24.15.120.73 (not the real value) to 192.168.1.10 internally. I want ALL ports both UDP and TCP to be forwarded. This Server is then going to be one end of a VPN tunnel going to another site, but I don't want to complicate things with that for now. So I can't even seem to get one-to-one NAT working! I created the one-to-one NAT on the Advanced tab of the firewall and created rules for all ports for UDP and TCP, but I can still never 'see' the internal server from the Internet. Also, the server will not get out to the Internet (can't hit Google, etc).
My router password is "55xxxxx"
But when I want to change the router password in CCC, it warns me "Current password is not match"
Im having a (from google-fu) seemingly unique issue with load balancing. So for background, I am running the ACE 4710 device in "on a stick" mode, so I am using NAT and all that good stuff. I am also utilizing class maps and host header matching so I can save on IP space. [code]
Basically, as soon as I add that ACL_CLASS_beta.mainsite.com class map, all I get back from the ACE is RST packets and it comes back with an L7 LB Policy Miss.
It SEEMS like it should work, but it doesnt seem to like matching on those source addresses at all.
What is difference between Peer to Peer network and point to point network???
View 5 Replies View Relatedwhat or where is the ethernet port
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe servers are calibrated to allow this, however I'm not sure how to connect from my end. I have an assignment where I have to dial into both a Windows server and an Ubuntu server to conduct some tasks (the actual process of dialing into the servers is not part of the assignment). I've been given the username, password, IP address, and protocol for each server. However, I cannot figure out how to use these to "dial into" them.I am running Windows 7 on a wireless connection
View 6 Replies View RelatedMy wifes Wifi is down. Need to connect to AOL via dial up.How can I get to internet to do so.
View 1 Replies View Relatedcan i use a AT&T Router for dial up
View 1 Replies View Related