Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Unable To See Matching ID Of 0
Sep 20, 2011
I have a command line from ASA 5505 like below :
nat (inside) 0 access-list NO_NAT
The problem is I cannot see any matching ID of 0 at the (outside) like :
nat (outside) 0 xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Another problem is there is also no any access list with the name of NO_NAT.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 23, 2012
We are configuring a twice-nat to send traffic for scansafe, its on a asa5505 ve 8.4(3) on a remote location for the customes. The nat redirecion is working but we also have a VPN tunnel to the corporate network. Through the tunnel we need to reach a http server. The problem we are having is that when we add the scan-safe nat, all http traffic gets redirected to scansafe, includind the traffic to the http server on the corporate network.
10.2.1.0 ---<ASA5505> ---Internet,scansafe ---- <Corporate> --- 10.1.1.0
the http server is 10.1.1.75
the remote location network is 10.2.1.0/24
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA running 8.2 in routed mode.The ASA has three interfaces, inside, outside and DMZ. They connect to the following three networks:
Inside: 10.1.1.0/24
Outside: 10.1.2.0/24
DMZ: 100.1.1.0/24
I have the following dynamic PAT configuration:
nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
global (outside) 100.1.1.1
nat control is turned off.
By my understanding any traffic from the inside to outside interface will be PATted to 100.1.1.1. However, communications between inside and the DMZ will not be PATted, and should work with no problems.This seems to be corroborated by this document: [URL]Which states:"The adaptive security appliance translates an address when a NAT rule matches the traffic. If no NAT rule matches, processing for the packet continues."EDIT: I may have misunderstood the above statement.I found this guide to configuring NAT/PAT: [URL]It states:"When you specify a group of IP address(es) in a nat command, then you must perform NAT on that group of addresses when they access any lower or same security level interface; you must apply a global command with the same NAT ID on each interface, or use a static command. NAT is not required for that group when it accesses a higher security interface because to perform NAT from outside to inside you must create a separate nat command using the outside keyword. If you do apply outside NAT, then the NAT requirements preceding come into effect for that group of addresses when they access all higher security interfaces. Traffic identified by a static command is not affected."My problem is that packet tracer does not seem to bear me out. It tells me the packet is dropped due to "no matching global" when I source traffic from the inside interface and send it to the DMZ.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2011
I just tried to configure my ASA but unable to ping. My setup is as follows:
Cable Modem (DHCP from IPS)---> ASA (192.168.1.1)--->Belking Router (192.168.5.1)--->Switch (192.168.5.14)--->
ASA Version 8.2(3)
!
hostname WoodHomeASA-1
[Code].....
View 30 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2011
First time attempting to set up a 5505. Trying to replace a snapgear firewall and replicate the settings to the 5505.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
I am using ASA 5505.Below are my sh run.I am not able to ping my gatway i.e 182.73.131.89
interface Ethernet0/0
description Internet Interface
switchport access vlan 61
!
interface Ethernet0/1
description office Internet
switchport access vlan 50
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
I have ASA 5505 and I save the configuration in the ASA 5505 using write memory or using copy run start but whe i unplug the power cord and plug it back in the ASA gets its factory default configuration.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2012
I have config ASA 5505 and it is conencted to layer 3 switch that connects to cable Modem.
ASA is config with DHCP option and PC is able to get the IP from ASA. But from PC i am unable to access the internet. From ASA itself i am able to ping the Websites fine.
ASA has config with DHCP for inside and also it is doing NAT.
When i connect the ASA directly to Cable modem then pc is able to access the internet.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2013
I have setup 5505 ASA for Testing purposes. It has static route to layer 3 switch on outside interface that goes to the internet.
ciscoasa# sh route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
[Code].....
View 20 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2012
We have a cisco asa 5505 on which we have setup a group VPN. The VPN connections from all cisco vpn clients works fine except one. The keep getting the below error
"Secure VPN Connection terminated locally by the client. Reason 412: The remote peer is no longer responding. Connection Terminated".
Not sure why only one client won't be able to connect. The version we are using is 5.0.02 for VPN client.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
I am unable to Telnet/SSH/RDP from my inside network to my DMZ. I am not sure where the problem lies, I am able to use VNC from the inside to the DMZ (ports 5800, 5900), and also establish connection on Ports (26700-26899). I have a computer connected directly to the DMZ and those services work to all networks on the DMZ.I have attached Logs of successful VNC connections, unsuccessful RDP and Telnet sessions, and the running config.
View 23 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2012
I configured a new Asa 5505 with Ios 8.44-1-k8.bin and when I installed the Asa the client's after about 1 hour were unable to ping or map drives to the Asa. I got the following error,%ASA-2-106007: Deny inbound UDP from XXXX to XXXX due to DNS Query. I added the command same-security-traffic permit intra-interface they were then able to ping the server and connect to the Internet, but still unable to map drives i could see the connections from the Pc's to the server in a show conn with was tcp port 445 with Saa? I reverted back to Ios 8.25 and everything works.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2011
When I have a computer directly connected to the Cable Modem I get 9.84MB Down and 1MB Up. When I put it behind the ASA 5505 with policing on the interface, I only get 4MB Down and 660Kb Down.What I'm wanting to do is setup this up to enable my VoIP to have a higher priority and shave 128kon both the Up/Down for the VoIP traffic. I also want to make sure I don't exceed the inbound and outbound thresholds.I''m using a 5505 Security Plus?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2012
I have 2 subnets bought from my provider 194.102.98.128/27 and 194.102.98.160/27.
From my provider a have the following setup:
IP Address: 86.120.151.66
Netmask: 255.255.255.128
Gateway: 86.120.151.1
DNS (1): 213.154.124.1
DNS (2): 193.231.252.1
My IPs are static routed by my provider thought 86.120.151.66 .
On the firewall I have the following set-up:
Outside Interface: 86.120.151.66/25 security level 0
DMZ interface: 194.102.98.129/27 security level 50
Inside Interface: 194.102.98.161/27 security level 100
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 86.120.151.1, outside
Everything works perfectly except when I try to sent an email. The email gets sent (eventually), but afert a long waiting time, 45-60 sec. The connection is opened instally to the server but then just hangs there for 40-50 sec. The problem is that a have an aplication on a server that has to send confirmation emails, and that aplication is limited to a 30 sec timeout for conecting to the mail server, much less then the 45-60 sec that I have now. The mail server is hosted by a data center, it is not in my networks (location).
I have tried deleting the ESMTP inspection, that doesn't work. Pinging my mail server rezults in a average time of 20 ms. And when a do a tracert the hight value in a hop doesn't usually pass 80 ms, the average is 20-25 ms.
The problem is ONLY when sending emails. Everything else works perfect, including receiving emails from the same server.
My running config is:
hostname ASA-Adisys
domain-name Intern.ro
enable password 0./39zRW9yhKK/bO encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
Remote LAN pool is configured as inside. Route is proper. I am able to open 443 port from the remote LAN pool on the ASA. That means, the port is open from the remote pool. No response if I try https on the browser.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2011
I found a tricky task for our ASA 5505 firewall. I am not able to go internet when using DHCP but I can access by using fixed IP address in client PC.Same IP, Same Mask, Same DNS, Same Gateway. All the same but no hope. Any configuration i missed in firewall?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2011
I'm unable to have any internet connection for my new setup.
here's the overview.
Current setup is
Internet -> Router -> PIX 501 -> Switch -> clients
Internet -> static ip given is 210.193.34.1 - 210.193.34.6
Router -> Static ip assigned for NAT/External is 210.193.34.1, Local ip is 192.168.1.246
PIX 501 setting ->
IP to Router, According to router screen is 210.193.34.2, but not sure what settings are done in the PIX itself as I'm unable to access it.
local ip is 192.168.1.1
Clients - > 192.168.1.0
Old setup is working fine and connected to internet. for the new setup, as i do not want any downtime for the old setup.
As you can see, there are two firewalls connected concurrently to the router. I've configured it this way.
Internet -> Router -> ASA 5505 -> Switch -> clients
ASA 5505 setting ->
IP to Router NAT/External/ Outside Interface, 210.193.34.6 (Or do i set as 192.168.1.0?),
local ip/ Inside Interface is 192.168.2.1
Clients - > 192.168.2.0
some setup details.
security policy, NAT, set to default. routing is route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 210193.34.6
I'm unable to access after a week of troubleshooting.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2012
I have ASA 5505 with base license. I created 3rd vlan on it.it was created. but i am unable to assign IP to it. i assign ip address it takes it. But when i do sh int ip brief it does not show any ip.
Code...
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2013
i can't get it working to expose on internal server to an outside interface.I used the public server function in ASDM.Internet access works if i nat my private adress to one of the available ipadresses provided by our isp.
Internal Server : owncloud 172.10.0.4
External Server : ext181 46.245.171.181
I can't see the error in the configuration,
: Saved
:
ASA Version 9.1(1)
!
hostname rhedetest
domain-name xxxxx.de
enable password 59t92OvRofWL9yf3 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
[code]....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2012
I have upgraded an ASA 5505 to 9.0(1) as I would like to use ipv6 version of dhcprelay. That said, I am unable to obtain a global unicast address but the link-local address is able to communication with the ISP's gateway/DHCP provider which I hope will allow v6 dhcprelay provide internal clients with IP's from the ISP. Trouble is, unsolicated inbound ICMPv6 messages from the ISP's gateway are being dropped on the way into outside interface.
%ASA-3-313008: Denied IPv6-ICMP type=129, code=0 from fe80::201:5cff:fe3b:3c41 on interface outside
%ASA-3-313008: Denied IPv6-ICMP type=131, code=0 from fe80::201:5cff:fe3b:3c41 on interface outside
%ASA-3-313008: Denied IPv6-ICMP type=131, code=0 from fe80::201:5cff:fe3b:3c41 on interface outside
[Code]...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2012
I have assigned a task to configure a vpn between windows 2008 server and cisco asa 5505, what kind of vpn should i go with as the windows 2008 server r2 is on cloud and is it possible to configure site-to-site vpn for this network senario or not.. i have try ikev1/ipsec remote access vpn with l2tp with (CHAP, MS-CHAP v2) and couldn't find any document which will allow me to configure windows 2008 server to behave a client and connect it to asa, well what i did is that i configured a dail-up connnect with l2tp and found the following debug message
Sep 09 20:04:02 [IKEv1 DEBUG]IP = 172.16.32.5, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Sep 09 20:04:02 [IKEv1 DEBUG]IP = 172.16.32.5, IKE SA Proposal # 1, Transform # 1 acceptable Matches global IKE entry # 1
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2011
I have a issue that i am at a loss as how to solve it. I have an ASA 5505 as my firewall. I have users from other companies who visit from time to time and are unable to use their outlook email to send messages. They can however receive messages without a problem. I also have a situation where users who use windows live to access gmail are unable to send messages.
I have narrowed it down to the fact that these uses are using ssl/tls to send the mails. I did some research and found out about the inspect esmtp setting in the ASA. I have disabled it and i still have to problem. I have also removed all outbound deny statements and still no luck.
Of note is that i can send emails without attachments. They take a long time to go out ( from minutes to hours) but eventually they do. Emails with attachments of even 10k do not go at all.
I was running image 8.2.3 and i downgraded to 8.0.5...still did not work...i upgraded to 8.4.3...still did not work. I am now back at 8.2.3.
My Firewall config is attached. I am at my wits end as to what else to try. The company has not renewed support for the device so i am on my own here!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2011
I am using two firewalls to connect two different offices. Firewall 5510 is running ASDM 6.3 and 5505 is running ASDM 6.2, Problem is that even after connecting two sites, i am unable to ping remote network from either side. I am mentioned static route as tunneled.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2013
We have a client that has a Cisco 1801W Firewall that is setup as a site to site VPN terminating to a Cisco ASA 5505. The tunnel is up and established, I can ping from both sides of the tunnel.
The problem is the clients behind the Cisco ASA (192.168.2.x) cannot reach certain ports behind the Router (192.168.1.x). The main thing we're trying to do is browse via UNC path (ex: \192.168.1.120 from a 192.168.2.x machine).
I got 3389 working after I changed the - ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.120 3389 y.y.x.x 3389 route-map DM_RMAP_1 extendable Modified the command to include the public IP instead of interface FastEthernet0
I believe it has something to do with the way NAT and route-maps are setup currently but I'm not familar enough with them to make the changes. I worked with Cisco to ensure the VPN tunnel was fine and it's something security related on the Router.
Here is the configuration (removed a few lines not necessary. y.y.x.x = WAN IP of Router x.x.y.y = WAN IP of ASA).
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 23648 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2012
I believe that the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express matches the outbound VoIP dial peer digit-by-digit, because:
1. when using the debug command it shows how it works digit-by-digit till it match a pattern
2. It says in the study guide ( If a match is found, the router immediately processes the call - chapter 6) so I understand its not en bloc
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2011
my config and all the show's ive run sofar tryign to figure this out, but the policy map isnt matching the traffic for some reason
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2011
Got to set up a site to site VPN to one in a clients office and we're struggling to get Phase 2 working, just seems to loop around saying "Received encrypted packet with no matching SA, dropping" which to me means the ACLs arent mirrored correctly?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2012
i have firwall ASA5400, and the outside interface connected to internet router but i noticed that the interface speed in the outside interface is 1000M, but on the internet router is 115 M. so the interface in the router is highly utilized and also the firwall cpu highly utilized. [code]
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2011
I am trying to set up remote access vpn on an asa 5520 running 8.4.1. I have the ipsec group, policies, and ip pool set up. When I try and connect with the cisco vpn client I see the following in the logs. Deny icmp src outside:214.67.39.42 dst outside:24.252.51.73 (type 3, code 3) by access-group "acl_inbound". Do I need to put in some firewall rules to allow this traffice so that the VPN can connect?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2012
I am trying to remove a static route I added: [code]
I was practicing setting up static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1(2600xm) via T1 module cards on the serial ports. connected to r1 is an old 2500 router called PC.
I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 which I am connecting to via console cable from another 2500 that I use for an access server I get the above error. all the IPs are just generic subnets I created to play around with static routing. I
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
ASA is the server, 2651 is the client. Phase 1 is negotiating, after entering XAUTH on the 2651, the ASA is showing:
Rejecting IPSec tunnel: no matching crypto map entry for remote proxy 10.250.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 local proxy 10.10.3.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 on interface Outside
Not sure what this means in this instance, the maps are setup the same as the article below. I guess I more expected that sort of error if this was a static tunnel and there was an ACL issue. I don't have a lot of knowledge on the Easy VPN with the ASA. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
I'm performing tests with following desired scenario: We have several remote offices, connected to our HQ via MPLS. In these remote offices, we have several vlan's. Each vlan has it's own ip-range. The MPLS cloud is routed, so we cannot switch our HQ vlan's to the remote offices. In this case, the client pc is in a guest vlan which allows him internet access. The uplink for this internet access is hosted in our HQ datacenter.
basic scheme:
client pc --> MPLS cloud (managed by ISP) --> 6500 switch LAN --> Checkpoint Firewall --> 6500 switch DMZ --> ASA Firewall
My test scheme:
Client pc is in a subnet A (guest vlan range office).
We receive this traffic on our first LAN 6500.
[Code].....
View 29 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2012
My company is composed of three different campuses, all with a similar network topology. We currently are experiencing high bandwidth on our serial interface at one of the campuses in particular. The network is composed of about 20 VLANS routed internally using a Cisco 6509. Traffic to the outside is PAT’d by an ASA 5510 and then forwarded through our edge router interface. Each VLAN is PAT’d to a specific public address.Due to the PAT, how would you recommend determining what specific private addresses are consuming our resources on the serial interface. When I look at our NMS, it reports the public address, but that only narrows it down to a VLAN. For example, all the devices in VLAN 6 are translated to 146.34.118.245, and 146.34.11.245 is a top talker.
View 1 Replies
View Related