Cisco :: Dual ISP On A 5510 With Static Nat To A Mail Server?
Sep 2, 2011
Only trying to have the mail server reachable via the secondary ISP link if the primary ISP link goes out. The public MX records with priority markings should make it so any outside hosts tries the first ISP address then the second ISP address if the first is unavailable. I would be using object tracking to control the default gateway in the ASA. I'm just a bit fuzzy on the NAT with a dual ISP config on single box.It shouldn't happen but... if traffic comes in on ISP2 while ISP1 is still up (and the current default gate) that traffic should return out the ISP2 interface (using the ISP2 address and avoiding asymmetric routing) since there already an existing connection present inside the ASA. Any server initiated traffic would still use the current default gateway defined via object tracking on the ASA.
I'am using ASA 5510 and I try to understand how PAT is working.I want to add a Mail Server in the LAN and a webmail using port 3000 on the server. ( webmail must be reachable from the WAN)This is my Configuration :actually LAN users access internet using NAT with one global IP ( 194.x.x.69) which is the ASA WAN interface.
WAN ----- ISP Router ---------- FW ---------- LAN -------- Mail Server + Webmail | (25) | (3000) 194.x.x.69 192.168.1.254 192.168.1.6
I need to forward port 3000 and port 25 from outside to inside.For example, from the WAN : [URL] must be redirect toward 192.168.1.6:3000 . What is the Correct Configuration ? And what about the Inside/Outside Traffic,Is there any configuration to add ?
I've got some problem with my Mail Server since I've migrated to an ASA5510.Actually the server is in a DMZ with a private Ip ( 10.x.x.2) and it is translated to a Public IP ( 194.x.x.65).I use these configuration :
I got the charge of a ASA 5510 running with 8.3(1) version.Found that this is simple config with Patting for inside host and couple of Static Nat for web servers and FTP server as well.
There is lots of other configuration being done,I assume for the purpose of just R&D by the previous administrator.I need to understand if the following Nat statements holding any relevance?
Where we are running Only NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.0.0/23 subnet at inside and there is no other subnet defined in rest of the statements.i.e 10.0.0.0/27 and 192.168.1.128/27 doesn't exist at all.
I use a RV082 with dual Wan and I cannot configure two SMTP.
Without authentication; a SMTP is specific of the provider.
When WAN1 comes down, SMTP to be used is the SMTP corresponding to WAN2 and vice versa.
Implementation of authentication with the mail server wil be useful. Possibility of two mail servers with indication of the corresponding WAN is also useful.
Configured ASA 5510 with CSC module and working fine.Here i likes to configure, Whenever any users from outside accessing my firewall (like VPN users) that logging information i need to send one particular mail ID.Simply, i likes to enable my fireawall to send logging information to one particular mail id.
Configured ASA 5510 with CSC module and working fine.Whenever any users from outside accessing my firewall (like VPN users) that logging information i need to send one particular mail ID.
Simply, i likes to enable my fireawall to send logging information to one particular mail id.
I write here to see if some kind soul can not solve my problem (which is common to seeso many people around the world). problem: I have a mail server (192.168.1.17) configured static NAT because it is accessible byPublic IP (PPP.PPP.PPP.PPP). Everything works properly from the outside, but if I get my Mail server (on port 443) from the internal network (192.168.1.xxx) there 'verse. This configuration is called Nat inside-to-inside is done by default by some SOHO routers(such as the TPLINK from 25 euros) but Cisco did not succeed. I search on the internet for 2 days without a get nowhere. PS: I have a Cisco 1801 router. (or 1941 as another router).
i have a network setup like the image in the link(url) and am asking how to make the PC's behind the router to reach the mail server??,when i ping the ip of the server i get timeout.
When I'm pinging my mail server, it gave me different IP's at different times. As the mail server is actually owned by us, I would like to know if that is possible without the IP actually being changed by someone. This is really critical for me. I didn't mean to cross post so providing the URL of the other place where I posted..
If you'd like I may attach the screenshots for the same, but don't think that will server any purpose.
When I'm pinging my mail server, it gave me different IP's at different times. As the mail server is actually owned by us, I would like to know if that is possible without the IP actually being changed by someone.
Just installed a RV042 with dual wan connections. Would like to make the WAN 2 (new cable modem as well) the primary connection over WAN1 (DSL), however whenever I switch from WAN1 to WAN2 in Smark Link set up, our email server will not send mail out, even though nothing is blocking the connection.
Region : Denmark Model : TL-MR3420 Hardware Version : V2 Firmware Version : 3.13.27 Build 121206 Rel.60215n
I have a TL-MR3420 router placed in a remote location. The internet connection is via 3G, and since the telco is shifting the IP every 24 hours, the router is configured with DDNS from no-ip.org. This is working OK most days, but sometimes the DNS fails to update. To be able to trobleshoot it, I am trying to make my router send a mail with the logfile every hour. This function seems to be easy and out-of-the-box, but it doesn't wiork. Whenever I try to mail the log I get the error message "Fail to Connect the mail server.".
It is not possible to enter another SMTP-port, so I asume the standard port 25 (like this thread). Most ISP-mail services require SSL/TLS and/or use an alternative port, so I have made my own server. This server is visible on the Internet, and I (and others) are able to connect and send mails using smtp on port 25. But, still my remote TL-MR3420 keep saying "Fail to Connect the mail server.". I have tried nearly everything, including disabling authentication and giving the IP-address of the smtp server directly instead of the URL.
I replaced a similar router from a competing company with the AC900 N900 router. I open Live Mail (IMAP) and keep it open during the day. Since switching over, when I periodically look at email on Live Mail, I frequently get a "Windows Live Mail" message saying "Your server unexpectedly terminated the connection. Possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity." I have never received this message from either one of the previous routers - LinkSys, Netgear.
Looking to have an ASA5510 with two internet feeds. Moreover, I would like to have my static nat translations continue to work on the backup feed. I have outbound nat working, however I cannot get the inbound nat to work. I had this all figured out in 7.x but now with 8.x I cannot seem to get it working. If anyone has a 8.x example config.
Context:1- My company has one ASA 5510 configured with Site-to-site VPN, Ip sec Cisco VPN and Any Connect VPN.2- We use ASA to connect to the single ISP (ISP 1) for internet access. ASA does all the Na Ting for internal users to go out.3- A second link is coming in and we will be using ISP 2 to load balance traffic to internet (i.e. business traffic will go via ISP1 and “other” traffic will go via ISP2).4- A router will be deployed in front of the ASA to terminate internet links.5- No BGP should be used to implement policy (traffic X goes via ISP1, traffic Y goes via ISP2). Questions:How do I get this done, particularly, how do I tell the router, for traffic X use ISP1 and for traffic Y use ISP2? PBR is my friend?Since I will be having 2 public Ip Addresses from the 2 ISPs, how do I NAT internal users to the 2 public Ip addresses ?. Finally, which device should be doing the Na Ting? The ASA just like now or move Na Ting to the Router?
i have two branch offices A & B both connected by a vpn. i am planning to add another isp on both the locations and have it just for the vpn. i.e have the second isp do just vpn and all other traffic go through the older ISP.. what are my options ? am not planning to add any extra hardware and also am not planning on acheiving any fail-over or load-balancing because i know ASA 5510 does not do load-balancing.
I'm trying to figure out how to get two 5510 ASA's to establish a Site-to-Site VPN.The version with two static IP's is working perfectly and stable but I haven't figured out how to get a VPN running between a static and a dynamic IP
My remote office staff are stating it takes "forever" to open simple work/excel files.I think forever really means more than 5 seconds.My main office has a 5510. I have a brand new server in place here that my remote offices vpn into. Those remote offices have 5505.
Each office has a dsl connection. Their download speeds range from 7mb to 10 mb and their upload speed are 0.5 mb to 0.8 mb.My first thought was to add a second dsl line to my main office. Then have dsl line #1 serve my main office and office 2.Then have dsl line #2 serve offices 3, 4 and 5.
Would this speed up the opening speeds of my remote offices?If so how challenging is adding the second dsl line into my 5510?
My dynamic ASA is trying to use a Cradle point 4G connection to a head end ASA-5510. The remote end with the Cradle point 4G is not even initiating the tunnel! I need another set of eyes. it was initiating the tunnel last week but not completing the connection. Now its not doing anything. i am going backwards. Below is my remote ASA config.
ASA5510(config)# sh run : Saved ASA Version 8.2(2) host name ASA5510 enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted password 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted names [code]...
I have a laptop directly attached to the inside interface. The PC and ASA can ping each other. The test interface is the one I am trying to use. Does my default route need to point to 192.168.0.1? Or is the remote peer correct? I thought the remote peer was correct? The 4G modem is like a pass-thru device. If I connect my laptop to it I can get out to the internet.
I have an internal application which requires operators to have a static IP address. I'm looking for a way to do this for our VPN users. At the moment they are given a random DHCP address from a pool. Is there an easy way to get a static address assigned to VPN users on a Cisco ASA5510 any connect VPN?
I have existing Sonic FW in my company we are moving from sonic FW to ASA 5510 Security plus lice. I have two ISP currently connected to sonic Firewall I am planning to implement Dual ISP configuration on ASA5510.
I've finished a part of the configs on above equipments, please refer to the attached diagram.And I'm making a test in order to achieve the below features:
1. By default, packets from PC1 go out through ISP 1. Packets from PC2 go out through ISP 2 2. When ISP 1 is down, packets from PC1 changed its way to ISP 2 through the 2800 router. And when ISP 2 is down, Packets from PC2 changed its way to ISP 1 through ASA 5510.
I got remote offices connected to our DataCenter some via MPLS and some via VPN terminated on Cisco ASA 5510. I am running OSPF on LAN and BGP for MPLS sites. To have reachability to VPN remote offices I added 'redistribute static in OSPF' and to have rechability to sites connected via metro link i added 'redistribute connected'
I have a ASA 5510 that uses Radius for Authentication. What I am trying to do is assign each user that logs into VPN to have a specfic static IP based on userid. I have about 30 to 50 users. I don't want to complicate this by having them select a different profile when logging into the ASA. What is a clean and simply way to assign user static ip and not use local database for login?
I have a 5510 that i have configured for L2TP over IPSEC, not using AnyConnect. The first, and most prevelant being, VPN clients are unable to ping/access any of the hosts that are assigned a static NAT from the inside interface to the outside interface. I was able to circumvent this by adding another static NAT to the public interface for the incoming clients, but this caused intermittent connectivity issues with inside hosts. The second issue involves DNS. I have configured two DNS servers, both of which reside on the internal network and are in the split_tunnel ACL for VPN clients, but no clients are using this DNS. What is the workaround for using split tunneling AND internal DNS servers, if any?
i've had two different CCNA's look at this numerous times to no avail. A ping from a VPN client to any internal host works fine, unless it is one that is NAT'd. You can see in the config where i added the extra STATIC NAT to try and fix the issue. And this works perfectly across the tunnel but only intermittenly from the internal 10.1.4.x network. [code]
One of our customers has asked us to Nat from the LAN to the Voice LAN based on destination IP address in order to access a public phone server through a vendor managed voice router..
Internet for everything else | | Inside ------------------------> ASA 5510 -----------------> Voice router ------> outside to public phone server only 10.10.1.0/20 10.10.1.7/320 172.16.20.1/24 Voice-------------------------> 172.16.20.0/24 172.16.20.254/24
Here the ASA5510 has an interface in both networks and the inside network can ping the voice network through the firewall by using non at acls. The phone server can only talk to the 172.16.20.0/24 network. So I need to nat the 10.10.1.0/20 network to the Voice interface on the ASA 172.16.20.254/24.
So I think I need the following static but I get the error below:
static (Inside,Voice) interface 10.10.0.0 net mask 255.255.240.0 WARNING: All traffic destined to the IP address of the Voice interface is being redirected. WARNING: Users will not be able to access any service enabled on the Voice interface. ERROR: Invalid net mask with interface option
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 with static IP and a Remote site with dynamic IP and i want to setup VPN between these 2 sites. i tried it many times but it doesn't come up.
have a question. I have a ASA5510 with IOS version 8.2 . I have my firewall and behind it also have a mail server eg 192.168.1.x. When i send email from inside network it doesn't show as if it's coming grom the out side nated public IP of my server but IP of firewall. What am i missing my example nat statements are . Nat-control is disabled.
