I got remote offices connected to our DataCenter some via MPLS and some via VPN terminated on Cisco ASA 5510. I am running OSPF on LAN and BGP for MPLS sites. To have reachability to VPN remote offices I added 'redistribute static in OSPF' and to have rechability to sites connected via metro link i added 'redistribute connected'
View 5 Replies
i have a problem in my eigrp configuration that the other branch only see the network that i am advertised in eigrp and can't see the the redistibuted static route inside eigrp .. i dunno why is thatand that's my running.
View 16 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to track a IPSLA operation and if it goes down track a static route which will be removed from EIGRP process. I have read through documentation and have come stuck. I have the below configured and have shown the features installed. How would I go about getting the below static route injected into EIGRP only if the IPSLA operation in ok?
track RMB
type rtr 100 reachability
ipsla
[Code]....
I have an issue with my setup of a 6500 switch (12.2(33)SXI9).We have a 6500 switch with several VRF's. For a certain VRF I would like to redistribute a static route in EIGRP. After doing so I don't see the static route on my eigrp neighbor.
This is a overview of my config. I'm basically redistributing only my static route for this vrf in eigrp.
I found a similar case in which the solution was adding a metric to the static route. (eg. redistribute static route-map static-eigrp-pp metric 10000 100 255 1 1500). But the strange thing is that we don't have this issue on a similar machine (same IOS, same config setup). [code]
I've studied and labeled out MPLS and MPLS VPNs several times. The situation I'm presented with is a little different from most of the case studies I've seen in my MPLS books. I've attached a diagram.
We have a IPsec site to site tunnel from our main HQ router to a Cisco ASA 5510 in the core network in the colo. This allows our HQ office to reach the private sub nets in our core without using a Cisco VPN client. The problem we are running into is that this seems to be putting undue strain on the Cisco 2811. I feel like the 2811 should be able to handle it but doing any kind of upload or download through the tunnel spikes the CPU/Interrupts and makes the router CLI basically stop responding until the traffic transfer is stopped or completed. During this time, certain Cisco SCCP phones on our Broad works platform cycle while the SIP phones on the same platform are OK. We are trying to alleviate the load on the 2811 by setting up a VRF from the HQ network to the private VRF used in the Core for private sub net communication. The problem I'm having is the the HQ also has some public traffic that I do not want to include in the VRFs and would like to have it travel through the P2P circuit we have and access the internet or other public devices through the core public IP Internet routing table.
The flow would be this:
-going to a public address use the public internet routing table
-going to private address in the 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x - use VRF to core Private network.
This is a little different of a set up from most of the VRF VPN examples I've seen. Most of those the CE devices is completely private. This is not the case at our HQ.
Our current router is setup to redistribute our BGP routes into OSPF using the following code:
-router ospf 60
-log-adjacency-changes
-redistribute bgp 65199 metric 1500 metric-type 1 subnets
I want to filter down the routes so only a set of specific routes is redistributed.. we have done this in the past with EIGRP by doing a route-map / prefix-list to manage the routes passed into EIGRP.My question is I can replicate the metric and the metric-type in the route-map by doing the following: [code] Do I need to be concerned witht the "subnets" command in this design? What I understand "Subnets".When redistributing routes into OSPF, only routes that are not subnetted are redistributed if the subnets keyword is not specified. I suspect I need to add it! So my final code should look like this..
I'm trying to figure out how to get two 5510 ASA's to establish a Site-to-Site VPN.The version with two static IP's is working perfectly and stable but I haven't figured out how to get a VPN running between a static and a dynamic IP
View 12 Replies View RelatedMy dynamic ASA is trying to use a Cradle point 4G connection to a head end ASA-5510. The remote end with the Cradle point 4G is not even initiating the tunnel! I need another set of eyes. it was initiating the tunnel last week but not completing the connection. Now its not doing anything. i am going backwards. Below is my remote ASA config.
ASA5510(config)# sh run
: Saved
ASA Version 8.2(2)
host name ASA5510
enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted
password 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
[code]...
I have a laptop directly attached to the inside interface. The PC and ASA can ping each other. The test interface is the one I am trying to use. Does my default route need to point to 192.168.0.1? Or is the remote peer correct? I thought the remote peer was correct? The 4G modem is like a pass-thru device. If I connect my laptop to it I can get out to the internet.
I have an internal application which requires operators to have a static IP address. I'm looking for a way to do this for our VPN users. At the moment they are given a random DHCP address from a pool. Is there an easy way to get a static address assigned to VPN users on a Cisco ASA5510 any connect VPN?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an Metro network running ISIS to different locations. There are severals vrf's on different VLAN's with separate ISIS routing processes. ISIS is running in L2-Only There are two redundant hub routers (ME3600X) that are placed centrally.Connected to each of the ME3600X is an ISR2951 that connects to the internet and handling backup connections over DMVPN. Over those DMVPN tunnels I run MPLS over GRE and routing with BGP. The leaves are IBGP neighbours, and the central ISRs are route-reflectors. In those routers I redistribute from BGP to ISIS and vice versa. The IBGP has an admin distance of 200 and the ISIS route has 115, so in normal operations the ISIS route is installed in the FIB.
My problem is that when an primary connection goes down, I want the backup route via the DMVPN to be redistributed from BGP in to ISIS, and the traffic to go over the DMVPN instead. But what will happen is that when the ISIS route over the primary connection disapear both my ISR's will compete in advertising the route, and as one of the ISR's is advertising it the other one recives it and since ISIS distance are better it will prefer that one, and the other way around. So my routes are coming and going, and everything is unstable. With just one ISR, it works as it should.I tag the route redistributed in to ISIS, but there is no way to add a incoming distribute list to the interface of the ISR in ISIS, otherwise I might have stopped the route in to the ISR if it was advertised by the other ISR.
Also tried to put the ISR's in different L1 areas in ISIS and redistributed L2 to L1 in the ME3600X with an route-map filtering the routes learned from BGP from the ISR's. That works for failing over, but then I'm stuck on the DMVPN bacause when the primary way comes back again, the L1 learned from the ISR is prefered before the L2 learned from the neighbor over the Metro network.
I was thinking of extending the BGP in to the ME3600X, I could of course use EIGRP with distribute-list's between the ME end the ISR. [code]
I have a ASA 5510 that uses Radius for Authentication. What I am trying to do is assign each user that logs into VPN to have a specfic static IP based on userid. I have about 30 to 50 users. I don't want to complicate this by having them select a different profile when logging into the ASA. What is a clean and simply way to assign user static ip and not use local database for login?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 5510 that i have configured for L2TP over IPSEC, not using AnyConnect. The first, and most prevelant being, VPN clients are unable to ping/access any of the hosts that are assigned a static NAT from the inside interface to the outside interface. I was able to circumvent this by adding another static NAT to the public interface for the incoming clients, but this caused intermittent connectivity issues with inside hosts. The second issue involves DNS. I have configured two DNS servers, both of which reside on the internal network and are in the split_tunnel ACL for VPN clients, but no clients are using this DNS. What is the workaround for using split tunneling AND internal DNS servers, if any?
i've had two different CCNA's look at this numerous times to no avail. A ping from a VPN client to any internal host works fine, unless it is one that is NAT'd. You can see in the config where i added the extra STATIC NAT to try and fix the issue. And this works perfectly across the tunnel but only intermittenly from the internal 10.1.4.x network. [code]
One of our customers has asked us to Nat from the LAN to the Voice LAN based on destination IP address in order to access a public phone server through a vendor managed voice router..
Internet for everything else
|
|
Inside ------------------------> ASA 5510 -----------------> Voice router ------> outside to public phone server only
10.10.1.0/20 10.10.1.7/320 172.16.20.1/24
Voice------------------------->
172.16.20.0/24 172.16.20.254/24
Here the ASA5510 has an interface in both networks and the inside network can ping the voice network through the firewall by using non at acls. The phone server can only talk to the 172.16.20.0/24 network. So I need to nat the 10.10.1.0/20 network to the Voice interface on the ASA 172.16.20.254/24.
So I think I need the following static but I get the error below:
static (Inside,Voice) interface 10.10.0.0 net mask 255.255.240.0
WARNING: All traffic destined to the IP address of the Voice interface is being redirected.
WARNING: Users will not be able to access any service enabled on the Voice interface.
ERROR: Invalid net mask with interface option
[Code] .......
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 with static IP and a Remote site with dynamic IP and i want to setup VPN between these 2 sites. i tried it many times but it doesn't come up.
I want to know how to do it?
have a question. I have a ASA5510 with IOS version 8.2 . I have my firewall and behind it also have a mail server eg 192.168.1.x. When i send email from inside network it doesn't show as if it's coming grom the out side nated public IP of my server but IP of firewall. What am i missing my example nat statements are . Nat-control is disabled.
static (inside,outside) 196.68.99.x 192.168.1.x netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list inbound extended permit tcp any host 196.68.99.x eq 225
accesslist outbound extended permit host 192.168.1.x host 196.68.99.x
I have an issue, of two parts. The first part I believe I have figured out, just the second part I am unsure of. I have an ASA 5510, currently, there is a mailserver that is static NAT'ed to one of my ISP routed IPs (not the IP of my main Dynamic PAT/Outside interface). I need to convert this over to PAT for ports 25,80,443, etc (standard ports). I know I need to remove the static NAT statement and add in the PAT statements, but I need traffic from that machine to continue to go out the IP assigned to it by the static NAT.
E.G.
1.1.1.1 <- main public IP on outside interface, everything gets internet through this IP
1.1.1.2 <-> 10.10.10.10 static NAT to mailserver, secured with ACLs
I need to enable the mailserver to continue to appear to the world as living on 1.1.1.2, due to MX records and rDNS settings, etc...
The terminology for this setup escapes me at the moment.
Only trying to have the mail server reachable via the secondary ISP link if the primary ISP link goes out. The public MX records with priority markings should make it so any outside hosts tries the first ISP address then the second ISP address if the first is unavailable. I would be using object tracking to control the default gateway in the ASA. I'm just a bit fuzzy on the NAT with a dual ISP config on single box.It shouldn't happen but... if traffic comes in on ISP2 while ISP1 is still up (and the current default gate) that traffic should return out the ISP2 interface (using the ISP2 address and avoiding asymmetric routing) since there already an existing connection present inside the ASA. Any server initiated traffic would still use the current default gateway defined via object tracking on the ASA.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've got an ASA 5510 that has been working like a charm for some time now. Until now we've not had to nat any resources to the outside. I created network objects for an internal host and an external host. The internal host has to respond to requests on tcp/2001.
The internal host has no problem accessing the internet, but when I attempt to access the internal host from the outside, I get the following:
4 Sep 20 2011 16:20:33 fw_outside_ip 62678 outside_host 2001 Deny tcp src outside:outside_host_ip/62678 dst inside_host:inside_host_ip/2001 by access-group "outside_access_in" [0x0, 0x0]
When I try to use the packet tracer to simulate the outside traffic, I get the following
5 Sep 20 2011 16:17:41 inside_host 2001 Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for tcp src outside:outside_host/1065 dst inside_int:inside_host/2001 denied due to NAT reverse path failure
I've got over my NAT statement and access rule and can't find anything wrong with either.
Here are the pertinent NAT and access rule...
static (inside_int,outside) tcp interface 2001 inside_host 2001 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp host outside_host host inside_host eq 2001
ASA 5510I'm trying to add a static NAT for to allow access to an internal webserver on my DMZ. I've added the config, however i'm still unable to get to it from the outside. I'm able to ping and browse the server from the LAN and I'm also able to ping the external interafce from the outside, but just unable to browse.I've turned on logging and the error I'm getting is "Inbound TCP connection denied...flags SYN on interface outside"
View 0 Replies View RelatedI got a project where I have to provide NATTED addresses to customers for the internal servers and I found out that the outside address range /27 already in use. We are using 5510 with ver 8.1. We cant use PAT here. Any other option to accomplish this task.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI got the charge of a ASA 5510 running with 8.3(1) version.Found that this is simple config with Patting for inside host and couple of Static Nat for web servers and FTP server as well.
There is lots of other configuration being done,I assume for the purpose of just R&D by the previous administrator.I need to understand if the following Nat statements holding any relevance?
Where we are running Only NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.0.0/23 subnet at inside and there is no other subnet defined in rest of the statements.i.e 10.0.0.0/27 and 192.168.1.128/27 doesn't exist at all.
I have a Nexus 7K router, has 2 ospf process, ospf 1 and ospf2. OSPF1 has several subnets in 10.1.0.0/16 subnet range , OSPF2 has several subnets in 10.2.0.0/16 subnet range. I want to summary OSPF 1 subnets to 10.1.0.0/16 then redistribute to OSPF2.but OSPF 2 didn't receive 10.1.0.0/16. Below is the config
ip prefix-list all seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
route-map all permit 10
match ip address prefix-list all
router ospf 1
router-id 10.10.3.9
[code]....
I was reading my book when I found :
redistribute ospf 2 external 2
The book says only ospf external routes of type 2 will be redistributed.But when I tried to configure the above command on router, I was not able to configure it; there was no external or internal option available with redistribute ospf command.
Below is the output:
R2(config)#router rip
R2(config-router)#redistribute ospf 1 ?
match Redistribution of OSPF routes
metric Metric for redistributed routes
route-map Route map reference
vrf VPN Routing/Forwarding Instance
<cr>
R2# show version
Cisco IOS Software, 2600 Software (C2691-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Do we have such command for eigrp? For example If i want to redistribute only external routes from eigrp into ospf, do we have any command such as :redistribute eigrp 1 external ?I understand there is several ways to achieve to same goal however I am just curious if we could acheive the same goal using single redistribute eigrp command without any route-map.
This problem applies (in my case) to our ASA5510. The issue here is that the http service on the ASA is runnnig off of the standard port 80. Login to the firewall and run the following.no http server enable http server enable 8080,Now you should be able to add a NAT/PAT on port 443 to another server of your liking. Just remember when you attempt to use ASDM to manage the ASA in the future to specify the new port 8080.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI got a project where I have to provide NATTED addresses to cutomers for the internal servers and I found out that the outside address range /27 already in use. We are using 5510 with ver 8.1. We cant use PAT here.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to assign a static route to an interface and not globally on a ASA 5510 ver 8.3.
I have two links between my offices one for Data via a VPN and one for video traffic which is a secure connection with QOS end to end.
All interfaces are on the same security level of 100 except Outside which is 0.
Office 1 Interfaces ASA 5510
VLAN 1 vOffice1Data 10.40.1.0/24
VLAN 3 vOffice1Video 10.40.2.0/24
VLAN 5 vInterOffice 10.40.5.0/24 (QOS connection Between Offices)
[Code]....
At the moment if I try and access data from VLAN 1 to VLAN 4 it gets to the destination ok going through the static route and over the vInterOffice connection but the problem is VLAN 4 returning the traffic. This fails because there is no static route back to VLAN 1. If I create a static route from Office 2 to VLAN 1 then it will route all my data traffic over it as well.
I am trying to set up my ASA5510 the fail over of ISP when it can't ping three different IP. I create three different tracking to three different IP using sla monitor & track rtr. But when I do
route isp2 0 0 yy.yy.yy.yy 50
route isp1 0 0 xx.xx.xx.xx 31 track 1
route isp1 0 0 xx.xx.xx.xx 32 track 2
route isp1 0 0 xx.xx.xx.xx 33 track 3
the last route will replace the previous two and only the last route command takes effect.Is there anyway I can set up the fail over to ISP2 only when it can't ping three different IP from ISP1?
We have two Cisco ASA 5510 Firewalls at one site, and two non-Cisco firewalls at another. Both firewall pairs are configured for high availability (Active-Passive), and both have redundant links to the Internet via routers running HSRP. In the event that one of the Internet routers were to fail, we require the VPN to dynamically move from using the old path via the failed router to using the new router with minimal downtime.
I have been looking at using VPN load balancing to achieve this but the only configuration example I can find is for Cisco VPN Client url... Is it possible to define a static crypto map with the VIP of the load balanced group as the peer IP? So in the non-Cisco devices I will define the VIP of the load balanced group?
I have an ASA 5510 running version 7.0. I have a problem with an exchange server using a static map and its outbounc connectivity. It connects outbound through the global address even though inbound connectivity works fine through the static mapping. The recent changes are changing of the zero route through a different interface (there are to circuit connected to this ASA on different interfaces). So the idea was to get all workstations in the office using the global address and routing out through one circuit, and the servers connecting in/out through the other circuit. Shouldn't a static mapping ignore what the zero route is?
Here are what I believe to be the relevant configs.
interface Ethernet0/0
description New 6mb circuit
speed 100
[Code]....
So exchang2 server can be connected to from the outside properly via IP xxx.207.51.231/exchange2-outside, but all outbound connections from this server are going out via IP xxx.122.47.218/circuit-6mb as do all the workstations due to the global address statement.
I am having touble with a NAT concept. What I have is a 3rd party software VPN product that basically tunnels encapsulated traffic to/from a server sitting inside the network. Right now this traffic utiluizes a physical interface on the ASA5510, but I need the interface for another project.
What I have is this:
Internet<----->ASA<-->router<-->4507(layer3)
| |
| |-Vlan1
[Code]......
I'm trying to set up a site to site VPN link between the ASA5510 that we use exclusively as a VPN endpoint on campus and a D-Link DIR130 VPN Router off campus, at a local business with a dynamically assigned IP. We currently use the ASA for remote access users who use the Cisco VPN client on mobile devices, as well as for a single site to site link to our telecom provider for the purposes of monitoring telecom equipment remotely.We are looking for a way to cheaply deploy secure VPN connections to local businesses to allow them to use point of sale devices which connect back to systems on campus, so students can use their meal cards at local restaurants, similarly to how they use them at the on-campus cafeteria.
I have experience configuring Cisco switches, APs and routers, but this ASA device absolutely baffles me. I've futzed around with the ASDM 6.4 gui config and tried to match up configurations between the DIR130 and the ASA, but I can never get a VPN connection to come up.
Today I installed the 1.0.2.6 Firmware on a RV180W. I only have now two problems regarding the Static DHCP support in the GUI.
1. Via the Networking > LAN (Local Network) > Static DHCP I have no buttons to Add a new static Lease.
2. Via the Networking > LAN (Local Network) > DHCP Lease Clients I can thick a Lease and click on Make Static IP. The result is an error: Operation failed.
I have a 1-Port 3rd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 in a 2901 that I want to configure for data only (T1 connection to the Internet)I don't see any options in the IOS for using this thing as a serial interface (data), only options for configuring PRI/ISDN.
View 5 Replies View Related
