i have a problem in my eigrp configuration that the other branch only see the network that i am advertised in eigrp and can't see the the redistibuted static route inside eigrp .. i dunno why is thatand that's my running.
View 16 RepliesIs it possible to track a IPSLA operation and if it goes down track a static route which will be removed from EIGRP process. I have read through documentation and have come stuck. I have the below configured and have shown the features installed. How would I go about getting the below static route injected into EIGRP only if the IPSLA operation in ok?
track RMB
type rtr 100 reachability
ipsla
[Code]....
I have an issue with my setup of a 6500 switch (12.2(33)SXI9).We have a 6500 switch with several VRF's. For a certain VRF I would like to redistribute a static route in EIGRP. After doing so I don't see the static route on my eigrp neighbor.
This is a overview of my config. I'm basically redistributing only my static route for this vrf in eigrp.
I found a similar case in which the solution was adding a metric to the static route. (eg. redistribute static route-map static-eigrp-pp metric 10000 100 255 1 1500). But the strange thing is that we don't have this issue on a similar machine (same IOS, same config setup). [code]
Is there a way in EIGRP to prefer external routes versus internal routes. EIGRP always picks up internal routes as long as they are available, no matter if external routes have better metric. Our Scenario is that we have DMVPN hub and spoke topology running EIGRP 101. The Core routers also on EIGRP 101 prefer EIGRP 101 routes. We have the new MPLS network running BGP and redistributing these BGP routes into EIGRP 101. The core routers prefer EIGRP 101 routes (internal) to redistributed BGP (external) routes.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI was reading my book when I found :
redistribute ospf 2 external 2
The book says only ospf external routes of type 2 will be redistributed.But when I tried to configure the above command on router, I was not able to configure it; there was no external or internal option available with redistribute ospf command.
Below is the output:
R2(config)#router rip
R2(config-router)#redistribute ospf 1 ?
match Redistribution of OSPF routes
metric Metric for redistributed routes
route-map Route map reference
vrf VPN Routing/Forwarding Instance
<cr>
R2# show version
Cisco IOS Software, 2600 Software (C2691-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Do we have such command for eigrp? For example If i want to redistribute only external routes from eigrp into ospf, do we have any command such as :redistribute eigrp 1 external ?I understand there is several ways to achieve to same goal however I am just curious if we could acheive the same goal using single redistribute eigrp command without any route-map.
I got remote offices connected to our DataCenter some via MPLS and some via VPN terminated on Cisco ASA 5510. I am running OSPF on LAN and BGP for MPLS sites. To have reachability to VPN remote offices I added 'redistribute static in OSPF' and to have rechability to sites connected via metro link i added 'redistribute connected'
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 3825 running c3825-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8. It is configured as an eigrp stub advertising only its connected and static routes. There are three WAN connections using a metro ethernet service. Two are data, one for voice traffic. The primary data connections run to two WAN edge ASR1002 routers.
The primary data connection (Gi0/1.943) is 20 Megs, the secondary data connection (Gi0/1.944) is only 15 Megs. Before the secondary connection was in place I only had routes to our backbone via Gi0/1.943 and everything was working great. Some time after the secondary data connection was turned up the routes to the backbone through Gi0/1.943 disappeared from the eigrp topology table causing all data traffic to flow through the less desirable secondary Gi0/1.944 interface to our backbone.
There is a good eigrp neighbor relationship between the 3825 and the ASR connected to Gi0/1.943, but if I show ip protocols it does not list the ASR as a data source. I know that the ASR is advertising its routes because I can see the updates coming from it if I debug ip eigrp. For some reason they are just not being added to the topology table by the 3825, not even as a feasible successor.
I have shut/no shut the interface multiple times at both ends during troubleshooting and I also reloaded and upgraded the code on the 3825 from 12.4(24)T to 12.4(24)T8. We also contacted the metro ethernet carrier to see if they had a policy that could potentially be blocking the traffic (no). My colleagues and I are just not seeing any feasible reason why these routes are not being added.
We've put in a 3750 at our corp hq (Detroit). We did this to break up the current flat 172.16.0.0 /16 network into separate VLAN's for various purposes. We plan on doing that at another site (Farmington), which will become a DR site. We are running EIGRP throughout the organization over an OPTEMAN netowrk and also sending routes to a managed MPLS network which uses BGP. BGP redistributes into EIGRP and vice versa. I've attached a pdf of the network. The 3750 core at the corp hq is a temp core, hopefully upgrading to Nexus within a year or two. This problem didn't exist until the 3750 was introduced and became the gateway for the site. The OPTEMAN router was the gateway and was on the same VLAN as the MPLS router.
So, in detroit we have an Detroit-MPLS router, Detroit-3750, and Detroit-OPTEMAN. What I'm seeing is that the routers I'm getting from the MPLS router make it to the 3750. The 3750 advertises those routes to the Detroit-OPTEMAN router. However, the OPTEMAN router doesn't advertise these routes any further..
In Farmington, it is currently set up like Detroit used to be set up. There is a flat network and both routers are on the same VLAN, no L3 core switch. Routes come in from the MPLS, get advertised to the Farmington-OPTEMAN router, distributes the routes out to all OPTEMAN connected routers, including Detroit. However, Detroit is not passing that route to the 3750.
When we made the 3750 stack the core, we didn't change anything else, except for some IP changes. Why these routes aren't fully redistributing?
Detroit-3750 Stack
WS-C3750G-24TS-S <-Stack master running c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE7.bin
WS-C3750X-12S-E <-Running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE7
show sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop routing" template.
[Code]...
Is it possible to issue eigrp leaking routes on catalyst 6500 running IOS 12.2-33SXI9 on gigabitethernet interfaces? or is there another way to acomplish this?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a 3560 with IP base that is acting as a true EIGRP stub router today. It advertises local routes to the upstream service provider router and receives a default route.
Now I want to connect a 3900 ISR as a voice gateway. The 3560 does not seem to be advertising any routes to the 3900. Ok the EIGRP stub doc says this:
Only specified routes are propagated from the remote (stub) router. The router responds to queries for summaries, connected routes, redistributed static routes, external routes, and internal routes with the message "inaccessible." A router that is configured as a stub will send a special peer information packet to all neighboring routers to report its status as a stub router.
# Any neighbor that receives a packet informing it of the stub status will not query the stub router for any routes, and a router that has a stub peer will not query that peer. The stub router will depend on the distribution router to send the proper updates to all peers.
I guess I don't understand why the stub advertises local routes to the upstream ISP router but does not seem to advertise routes to the 3900. Does the stub identify the ISP router as the distribution router somehow, thus differentiating it from the 3900? If so, how is this done?
show ip eigrp neighbor detail on the 3900:
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100)
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
[Code].....
If a router receives EIGRP (AD90) routes, and is configured to redistribute thoes routes into BGP(AD20), why does the RIB show only the incoming EIGRP routes and not the redistributed bgp routes? Are redistributed routes considered for RIB entry in the router that is doing the redistribution
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am running an ASA with 8.4(3) and am trying to setup a dynamic VPN tunnel. We are having a business reason to establish a VPN tunnel to customers who do not have nailed down IP addresses. Now I found a number of documents that outline the steps involved. It seems the basic steps were to Establish a regular tunnelAdd dynamic crypto mapAssign the dynamic crypto map to the tunnel created under step 1. While this sounds pretty straight forward and simple, while prepping for doing just this I hot a road block while thinking it through. In order for my ASA to put anything into the tunnel it has to have a route to the remote network pointing at my VPN peer at the end of the tunnel. How do I do this in a dynamic tunnel? How do I add a dynamic route so the ASA knows which tunnel to stuff the traffic into? How do I stop the traffic from just being send to the Internet?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 2901 ISR G2 router, with IOS 15.0.1M3 , this router is not working with static NATing, I have tried to configure this router with one internet link and make few static translations with it. But this configuration is perfectly working with 1841 ISR router.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn my live VPN concentrator at work, my 5520 is showing a static route for each VPN client that is connected to my SSL vpn right now. This kind of confused me because wouldn't only one route to the address pools subnet be needed for my vpn users?
View 12 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco 7301 concentrator, well two of them in HSRP configuration. We have multiple VPN's setup on that router (crypto map based). Recently we noticed the following:
- There is one IP address that has hundreds of static routes for some reason
- VPN for this customer is working, but I'm trying to find out why this is happening.
Here is how it looks like: S 0.0.0.0 0xF5FFFF2C [1/0] via "ip-address".There are hundreds of entries for a single IP there.
Will there be a way sometime in the future to add static IPv6 routes? I have a routed /64 and a routed /48 from a tunnel broker that terminates on my DIR-815, and I want to hang the /48 off of another router that I have attached to my LAN interface(goes to my home lab setup that I use for my job). I could just move the tunnel endpoint to the other router, but I like having IPv6 access for all my other PCs on the LAN segment.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI config the routers with EIGRP and also write Static route between two PC before remove the link between router0 and router1 , destination is reachable , but when remove this connection , packet from pc1 to pc0 will drop in a loop and never reach to destination , is it possible to have a Link state routing protocol and static route at the same network like this scenario , how to prevent loop in this topology static route is configure as bellow :
router0 <==> router 1 <==> router2 <==> router3 <==> router <==>pc1
I have the cisco 1841, where I am trying to put the static routes on it, it does execute the route commnad but does not show the static route
Below is the out come
lab_router1(config)#ip route 192.168.1.24 255.255.255.248 fas 0/0
lab_router1(config)#ip route 192.168.1.32 255.255.255.248 fas 0/1
lab_router1(config)#exit
[Code].....
Ok I realise that the 825 doesn't have the ability to create static LAN routes. Is there a workaround or is this somthing that may be implemented in the future. It's a real let down to find this feature missing in an expensive router such as this.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having some trouble configuring dual NAT on a Cisco 1841.
The 1841 has three interfaces.
Fa0/0 - LAN
Fa0/1- Different private network
Fa0/1/0 - Connection to DSL modem
NAT overloading is configured on Fa0/1 and we have traffic that must be router there. We would like to have all internet access go through the DSL modem. Currently internet access is obtained through fa0/1 but is not ideal. I have floating static routes configured if the DSL link goes down. (Which is currently unplugged) I do not have physical access to the router at this moment. We would like to keep the config a simple as possible. It seems like route-maps may be one of our only options.
I have a Cisco 876 router running 12.4.(15)T5, configured as DHCP client. This works nicely.
A Cisco 886 router, running 15.1 software also works with the DHCP client. This also works but has the following strange beheaviour: In the running-config an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <dhcp assigned address> appears. Also - some other static routes that are in the config using the dhcp keyword are duplicated with the dhcp-assigned address
Now - when a write mem is done, these dhcp-generated route entry's are stored in the startup-config...
This beheaviour is completely different and VERY unwanted. After a change from DHCP server the config will simply stop working, when a write mem was done at the first DHCP situation.
Should we stop using write mem commands when a DHCP client is active in IOS? Is it a bug? Is it a feature?
I have just purchased an ASA 5505 for my remote users to access our internal network. I have followed all the setup instructions I can find. I am able to establish a VPN connection using the Anyconnect client and can see some of my internal network. (Basically, only the subnet of the internal interface) However, I have several subnets inside my LAN which are routed by another switch inside my LAN. I have built in the correct static routes so that the ASA will send traffic to that intenal routing switch for any subnets not part of it's inside interface subnet. I can see and ping those subnets from the ASA itself but the AnyConnect clients cannot.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 sites with 2 internet connections at each site. All are SRP527w routers. 1 is for internet and 1 is for a site to site VPN as,Currently we are using Static Routes on the PC's so they can access each server no matter what site they are at. I have looked at using the Static Routes section on the SRP's but cannot get it to work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 1841 router attached to 2 ISP's. Each ISPs provides different bandwithd. I want to do load balance between them, but I want to do some sort of weighted load blance, so as to assign more traffic to one ISP than the other. A kind of 70/30 (70% of traffic via ISP1, and 30% of traffic via ISP2).Is there a way to acomplish that? I already tried creating bogus /32 routes, but "cef" seems to be more clever and groups the bogus routes as one gw.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI was checking out the config on my ASA and noticed a bunch of static routes configured when I did a show route. With the exception of two that I expect to be there, the remainder point traffic destined for specific internal hosts to the outside interface, i.e.
S private_ip 255.255.255.255 [1/0] via public_ip, outside
I verified that I cannot ping those hosts from the firewall. I logged in to the ASDM. When I check the Configuration>Device Setup>Routing>Static Routes it only shows two static routes, the ones I expect to see. If I look under Monitoring>Routing>Routes, I see the same output as I did on the CLI. I looked around to see if I was missing a key location for this information, and I was able to see the same static routes output in Monitoring>Routing>Routes. Since this is under monitoring though there's no way to delete these routes, and I still don't know where they were configured originally. Then I happened to check under Monitoring>VPN>VPN Statistics>Sessions, and I see several of the private IPs used in the static routes being used by VPN users, including my own! I know I didn't assign myself a static IP for VPN use or anything like that. So, what are these static IP routes? Why do I see them in the CLI and not under the Configuration tab? I mean, I know I can delete them from the CLI but I'm trying to figure out why the info is not synced. Am I seeing dynamically created content based on the VPN connections?
My client has MPLS network via eBGP to communicate with all the sites. Here is the basic config on the router.router eigrp 65210.neighbor 192.168.1.2 remote-as 13939
When they installed the internet on the local router, and added the static route on the router to hit the internet, they need to add the static route (2nd one) to communicate to the other sites.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.75.75.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.2
ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.2
They want to route all the traffic out thru the local intenet besides their private networks ( 192.168.0.0/16 and 172.20.0.0/16). Are there ways not to add last two static routes and communicate the other sites via eBGP?
I have two 7604 routers running IOS 12.2(33)SRB5a as ASBRs in my network. They both connect to a common AS via DS3 lines.FR01 is considered my main circuit, FR02 is the backup. But I have some heavy disk sync traffic I want to route via the backup unless that circuit is down.How could a static redistribution possibly influence all my routes ?
Here is the remote AS config on both routers. We summarize the routes and only change the redistribute metric to distinguish main from backup circuit :
[code]...
Is there a way to set static routes per VLAN?Example VLAN 100 sends all traffic to 192.168.1.1 and VLAN 200 sends all traffic to 10.1.1.1. (2800 Series RTR)I have 5 networks that have their own gateway to the Internet via satellite link. Those networks run over the same infrastructure on separate VLANs. They frequently send traffic to each other, which gets sent over a slow SAT link. I introduced a router to the network and would like to set all my hosts default gateway to the local routers sub-interface then have a static route that send all traffic that is not on one of my 5 networks back to that VLANs respective SAT modem to get routed out over the Internet.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a Routing issue with one of my SG300-28P units. It has several Trunked VLANs. I think I habe Narrowed it down to a Default Route on the offending SG300 though I cannot see to change or delete any of the Static Routes on the unit. I can Add Routes with no issues, but once Added I cannot Edit or delete them.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have several pairs of ASA5510s in failover A/P mode, some running 8.3(2) and others running 8.4(1).
e0/0 = outside
e0/1 = inside
m0/0 = management
The problem we're having is we can't get anything to route out of the management interface unless we put in a static route at least to the subnet level. For example, we want syslog traffic to exit out m0/0 to our syslog server 10.71.211.79. Our 'gateway of last resort' points to the next hop out e0/0, and a second static route with a higher metric and a more distinct network space is for m0/0 as in:
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.49.129 1route management 10.72.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.72.232.94 10
This doesn't work, and ASDM loggin gives this error: ".....Routing failed to locate next hop for udp from NP Identity Ifc:10.72.232.89/514 to management:10.72.211.79/514"
If I put in a more granular subnet route, or a host route of the syslog server it works, such as:
route management 10.72.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works
route management 10.72.211.79 255.255.255.255 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works too
Why won't a static route for 10.71.0.0 255.255.0.0 work in this case?
We are going to have numerous hosts access and be sent messages though the management interface of these ASAs, and it would be very burdonsome to have to add a host, or even a subnet, route for every one. I've removed all static routes and tried to rely on EIGRP, but that doesn't work. I also had to put 'passive-interface management' under the EIGRP for this to work.
Here is the pertinant ASA config concerning syslog, routing, and interfaces:
interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address 192.168.49.140 255.255.255.128 standby 192.168.49.141 !interface Ethernet0/1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.128 standby
[Code].....
I have a internet router 2921 .my isp is providing 100 mbps internet link with static public ip network .I am using a default static route to the isp wan ip .I am planning to upgrade 100 mbps to 114 mbps .Unfortunately my isp doesnt have gig port in their side .So they are ready to provide two 57 mbps line .Isp agreed they will route my public ip networks in both the links .
As a result i have two 54 mbps link with same network with two wan networks .My question is whether two default static route to both wan ip will carry out the load sharing correctly ?
Eg :
172.24.66.0 255.255.255.252 -first link my fa0/1 172.24.66.1
172.24.66.4 255.255.255.252 -second link my fa0/2 172.24.66.5
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.6
I have 2 connections a single T1 for voip traffic only and a DSL line for data traffic.the dsl was migrated to a 2811 with out any issues now comes the time to move the T1 over.
on the T1 side I am able to ping the WAN router and the LAN router IP address but nothing behind it.
currently this is the only statment on the router:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
as a quick a dirty to remove the above i tried:
no ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
ip route 66.55.110.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer1
but the DSL side dropped. we have a 66.55.110.152/29
for the T1 i would use the following statement.. we have a 209.98.53.192/27
ip route 209.98.53.0 255.255.255.255 65.32.70.177
Can it be done? Load balancing across static routes with different administrative distance? Like EIGRP.
View 9 Replies View Related