Ok I realise that the 825 doesn't have the ability to create static LAN routes. Is there a workaround or is this somthing that may be implemented in the future. It's a real let down to find this feature missing in an expensive router such as this.
View 1 RepliesWill there be a way sometime in the future to add static IPv6 routes? I have a routed /64 and a routed /48 from a tunnel broker that terminates on my DIR-815, and I want to hang the /48 off of another router that I have attached to my LAN interface(goes to my home lab setup that I use for my job). I could just move the tunnel endpoint to the other router, but I like having IPv6 access for all my other PCs on the LAN segment.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having some trouble configuring dual NAT on a Cisco 1841.
The 1841 has three interfaces.
Fa0/0 - LAN
Fa0/1- Different private network
Fa0/1/0 - Connection to DSL modem
NAT overloading is configured on Fa0/1 and we have traffic that must be router there. We would like to have all internet access go through the DSL modem. Currently internet access is obtained through fa0/1 but is not ideal. I have floating static routes configured if the DSL link goes down. (Which is currently unplugged) I do not have physical access to the router at this moment. We would like to keep the config a simple as possible. It seems like route-maps may be one of our only options.
I am trying to create a static route on the TP-Link TD-W8950ND router, however am a little confused about the interface I should use. The default gateway on the route is another router on the LAN. I have a choice to use interface pppoe (telstra), LAN/br01 (bridge) or no interface. I was assuming I didn't need to use any interface as this is not a bridge setup and is on the LAN, but when I select "no interface" it doesn't save the static route settings.Also, when I select LAN/br01, the routing saves but doesn't actually work (tracert shows not going through the right router).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am running an ASA with 8.4(3) and am trying to setup a dynamic VPN tunnel. We are having a business reason to establish a VPN tunnel to customers who do not have nailed down IP addresses. Now I found a number of documents that outline the steps involved. It seems the basic steps were to Establish a regular tunnelAdd dynamic crypto mapAssign the dynamic crypto map to the tunnel created under step 1. While this sounds pretty straight forward and simple, while prepping for doing just this I hot a road block while thinking it through. In order for my ASA to put anything into the tunnel it has to have a route to the remote network pointing at my VPN peer at the end of the tunnel. How do I do this in a dynamic tunnel? How do I add a dynamic route so the ASA knows which tunnel to stuff the traffic into? How do I stop the traffic from just being send to the Internet?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn my live VPN concentrator at work, my 5520 is showing a static route for each VPN client that is connected to my SSL vpn right now. This kind of confused me because wouldn't only one route to the address pools subnet be needed for my vpn users?
View 12 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco 7301 concentrator, well two of them in HSRP configuration. We have multiple VPN's setup on that router (crypto map based). Recently we noticed the following:
- There is one IP address that has hundreds of static routes for some reason
- VPN for this customer is working, but I'm trying to find out why this is happening.
Here is how it looks like: S 0.0.0.0 0xF5FFFF2C [1/0] via "ip-address".There are hundreds of entries for a single IP there.
i have a problem in my eigrp configuration that the other branch only see the network that i am advertised in eigrp and can't see the the redistibuted static route inside eigrp .. i dunno why is thatand that's my running.
View 16 Replies View RelatedI have the cisco 1841, where I am trying to put the static routes on it, it does execute the route commnad but does not show the static route
Below is the out come
lab_router1(config)#ip route 192.168.1.24 255.255.255.248 fas 0/0
lab_router1(config)#ip route 192.168.1.32 255.255.255.248 fas 0/1
lab_router1(config)#exit
[Code].....
Can it be done? Load balancing across static routes with different administrative distance? Like EIGRP.
View 9 Replies View Relatedhow to configure it. So far googling and using the router's built-in help feature hasn't been of use. First off, here's my setup:NETWORK A with default gateway of 192.168.0.1 and a subnet of 255.255.255.0
NETWORK B with default gateway of 10.10.100.1 and a subnet of 255.255.255.0
I want B to connect to A since that's where I have my domain setup with active directory.
Now from my understanding the Destination LAN IP should be the network I want to connect to, in this case 192.168.0.1. The subnet mask should be 255.255.255.0 and the default gateway should be 10.10.100.1. However, when I do this, the LinksysE200 throws out an 'Invalid Static Route" error. What am I doing wrong? Also, here is the routing table as given by the E200:
I have a Cisco 876 router running 12.4.(15)T5, configured as DHCP client. This works nicely.
A Cisco 886 router, running 15.1 software also works with the DHCP client. This also works but has the following strange beheaviour: In the running-config an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <dhcp assigned address> appears. Also - some other static routes that are in the config using the dhcp keyword are duplicated with the dhcp-assigned address
Now - when a write mem is done, these dhcp-generated route entry's are stored in the startup-config...
This beheaviour is completely different and VERY unwanted. After a change from DHCP server the config will simply stop working, when a write mem was done at the first DHCP situation.
Should we stop using write mem commands when a DHCP client is active in IOS? Is it a bug? Is it a feature?
I have just purchased an ASA 5505 for my remote users to access our internal network. I have followed all the setup instructions I can find. I am able to establish a VPN connection using the Anyconnect client and can see some of my internal network. (Basically, only the subnet of the internal interface) However, I have several subnets inside my LAN which are routed by another switch inside my LAN. I have built in the correct static routes so that the ASA will send traffic to that intenal routing switch for any subnets not part of it's inside interface subnet. I can see and ping those subnets from the ASA itself but the AnyConnect clients cannot.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 sites with 2 internet connections at each site. All are SRP527w routers. 1 is for internet and 1 is for a site to site VPN as,Currently we are using Static Routes on the PC's so they can access each server no matter what site they are at. I have looked at using the Static Routes section on the SRP's but cannot get it to work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 1841 router attached to 2 ISP's. Each ISPs provides different bandwithd. I want to do load balance between them, but I want to do some sort of weighted load blance, so as to assign more traffic to one ISP than the other. A kind of 70/30 (70% of traffic via ISP1, and 30% of traffic via ISP2).Is there a way to acomplish that? I already tried creating bogus /32 routes, but "cef" seems to be more clever and groups the bogus routes as one gw.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI was checking out the config on my ASA and noticed a bunch of static routes configured when I did a show route. With the exception of two that I expect to be there, the remainder point traffic destined for specific internal hosts to the outside interface, i.e.
S private_ip 255.255.255.255 [1/0] via public_ip, outside
I verified that I cannot ping those hosts from the firewall. I logged in to the ASDM. When I check the Configuration>Device Setup>Routing>Static Routes it only shows two static routes, the ones I expect to see. If I look under Monitoring>Routing>Routes, I see the same output as I did on the CLI. I looked around to see if I was missing a key location for this information, and I was able to see the same static routes output in Monitoring>Routing>Routes. Since this is under monitoring though there's no way to delete these routes, and I still don't know where they were configured originally. Then I happened to check under Monitoring>VPN>VPN Statistics>Sessions, and I see several of the private IPs used in the static routes being used by VPN users, including my own! I know I didn't assign myself a static IP for VPN use or anything like that. So, what are these static IP routes? Why do I see them in the CLI and not under the Configuration tab? I mean, I know I can delete them from the CLI but I'm trying to figure out why the info is not synced. Am I seeing dynamically created content based on the VPN connections?
My client has MPLS network via eBGP to communicate with all the sites. Here is the basic config on the router.router eigrp 65210.neighbor 192.168.1.2 remote-as 13939
When they installed the internet on the local router, and added the static route on the router to hit the internet, they need to add the static route (2nd one) to communicate to the other sites.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.75.75.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.2
ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.2
They want to route all the traffic out thru the local intenet besides their private networks ( 192.168.0.0/16 and 172.20.0.0/16). Are there ways not to add last two static routes and communicate the other sites via eBGP?
I have two 7604 routers running IOS 12.2(33)SRB5a as ASBRs in my network. They both connect to a common AS via DS3 lines.FR01 is considered my main circuit, FR02 is the backup. But I have some heavy disk sync traffic I want to route via the backup unless that circuit is down.How could a static redistribution possibly influence all my routes ?
Here is the remote AS config on both routers. We summarize the routes and only change the redistribute metric to distinguish main from backup circuit :
[code]...
Is there a way to set static routes per VLAN?Example VLAN 100 sends all traffic to 192.168.1.1 and VLAN 200 sends all traffic to 10.1.1.1. (2800 Series RTR)I have 5 networks that have their own gateway to the Internet via satellite link. Those networks run over the same infrastructure on separate VLANs. They frequently send traffic to each other, which gets sent over a slow SAT link. I introduced a router to the network and would like to set all my hosts default gateway to the local routers sub-interface then have a static route that send all traffic that is not on one of my 5 networks back to that VLANs respective SAT modem to get routed out over the Internet.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a Routing issue with one of my SG300-28P units. It has several Trunked VLANs. I think I habe Narrowed it down to a Default Route on the offending SG300 though I cannot see to change or delete any of the Static Routes on the unit. I can Add Routes with no issues, but once Added I cannot Edit or delete them.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have several pairs of ASA5510s in failover A/P mode, some running 8.3(2) and others running 8.4(1).
e0/0 = outside
e0/1 = inside
m0/0 = management
The problem we're having is we can't get anything to route out of the management interface unless we put in a static route at least to the subnet level. For example, we want syslog traffic to exit out m0/0 to our syslog server 10.71.211.79. Our 'gateway of last resort' points to the next hop out e0/0, and a second static route with a higher metric and a more distinct network space is for m0/0 as in:
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.49.129 1route management 10.72.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.72.232.94 10
This doesn't work, and ASDM loggin gives this error: ".....Routing failed to locate next hop for udp from NP Identity Ifc:10.72.232.89/514 to management:10.72.211.79/514"
If I put in a more granular subnet route, or a host route of the syslog server it works, such as:
route management 10.72.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works
route management 10.72.211.79 255.255.255.255 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works too
Why won't a static route for 10.71.0.0 255.255.0.0 work in this case?
We are going to have numerous hosts access and be sent messages though the management interface of these ASAs, and it would be very burdonsome to have to add a host, or even a subnet, route for every one. I've removed all static routes and tried to rely on EIGRP, but that doesn't work. I also had to put 'passive-interface management' under the EIGRP for this to work.
Here is the pertinant ASA config concerning syslog, routing, and interfaces:
interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address 192.168.49.140 255.255.255.128 standby 192.168.49.141 !interface Ethernet0/1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.128 standby
[Code].....
I have a internet router 2921 .my isp is providing 100 mbps internet link with static public ip network .I am using a default static route to the isp wan ip .I am planning to upgrade 100 mbps to 114 mbps .Unfortunately my isp doesnt have gig port in their side .So they are ready to provide two 57 mbps line .Isp agreed they will route my public ip networks in both the links .
As a result i have two 54 mbps link with same network with two wan networks .My question is whether two default static route to both wan ip will carry out the load sharing correctly ?
Eg :
172.24.66.0 255.255.255.252 -first link my fa0/1 172.24.66.1
172.24.66.4 255.255.255.252 -second link my fa0/2 172.24.66.5
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.6
I have 2 connections a single T1 for voip traffic only and a DSL line for data traffic.the dsl was migrated to a 2811 with out any issues now comes the time to move the T1 over.
on the T1 side I am able to ping the WAN router and the LAN router IP address but nothing behind it.
currently this is the only statment on the router:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
as a quick a dirty to remove the above i tried:
no ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
ip route 66.55.110.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer1
but the DSL side dropped. we have a 66.55.110.152/29
for the T1 i would use the following statement.. we have a 209.98.53.192/27
ip route 209.98.53.0 255.255.255.255 65.32.70.177
We have a 6509 series of core switches and 3750 series of L2 switches, There is no default gateway or any static routes to any IP.VLAN 1 is made admin down and another vlan is used for all communication here in this environment
Attached is configuration for reference But still I am able to take telnet or SSH. I want to know how telnet or SSH or tacacs authentication happens without any static or default route.
I've been playing around with the Cisco RV180s for a while now and have come across a problem with the subnet calculation in the static routes and routing table. Essentially, if I configure up a static route for a /16 it's entered in the routing table as a /13. If I add a /24 it's entered in the routing table as a /16. I haven't tested every subnet size and combinations but this looks like a fairly fundamental maths bug.
As a side note, I notice that the 1.0.1.9 release notes state the removal of SSH Server, however, I can not find any reference to it's existance prior to 1.0.1.9, did/does it exist in 1.0.0.30 and if so where? .
Screenshots are below and an extract from the configuration file for reference.
From the config file:
route = {}
route[1] = {}
route[1]["active"] = "1"
route[1]["dstIpAddr"] = "8.8.0.0"
route[1]["gwIpAddr"] = "192.168.1.250(code)
I was trying to find if it's possible to add the option for static routes for DHCP clients on Cisco IOS DHCP config mode. I'm looking to add a settings as defined on RFC 3442, like this one, set on ISC DHCPd server:
Global settings:
option rfc3442-classless-static-routes code 121 = array of integer 8;
option ms-classless-static-routes code 249 = array of integer 8;
And for the subnet declaration:
option rfc3442-classless-static-routes 24, 192, 168, 30, 192, 168, 10, 1;
option ms-classless-static-routes 24, 192, 168, 30, 92, 168, 10, 1;
Is there any way to have my Cisco 877W Router alter from using one static route to another static route when another router on the network is reporting destination host unreachable?
Router 1 (192.168.2.253)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to internet
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 (192.168.2.254)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to managed VPN (172.16.28.1)
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 is connected to another network through a managed VPN and that network also has internet access. I want to be able to have two routes to the internet on Router 2. And when Router 1 internet goes down packets get routed through the VPN instead.
I currently have on Router 2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.253
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.28.5 250
Which does nothing when Router 1 has its Dialer0 interface shutdown, or goes offline completely.I suspect I could reverse the setup and have everything routed through the VPN by default and then if / when Dialer0 interface goes down it would switch to using Router 2, but if the problem is in the remote network and interface Dialer0 stays up, it would probably do the same thing... nothing.All devices mentioned are Cisco 877W routers with ADSL and a bunch of fast ethernet interfaces.
I have one Cable Modem/Router built in (Netgear CGD24N) and I wish to use two routers (the other being the DIR-655). The Netgear is a fantastic Cable Modem but a ****py router, but I wish to use both. One will be situated upstairs and the other downstairs.I have connected the two at different locations via the wall and the DIR-655 successfully went to the Netgear login page (as I went to 192.168.0.1) but internet connection was not working, whereas the Netgear internet was working. This was connected LAN to LAN.
Another procedure I have tried was connecting to them LAN - INTERNET (INTERNET being the D-link one) and received the following message: "The addressing of the Internet side learnt thru DHCP conflicts with the addressing selected for the LAN side. Internet communications will be disabled until you have changed the LAN side addressing to resolve the problem."
On the Dap1522 access point, in access point mode, would it be possible to have the following 2 features implemented?
1) Ability to simultaneously broadcast on the 2.4GHZ AND 5GHZ band.
2) Ability to specify a guest network.
is it possible to to create VPN between static IP and dynamic IP on netgear FVS318?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using a Cisco ASA 5505 Here is a description of my topology.
Headquarters = 192.168.201.0
Client X = 172.16.0.0
Datacenter = 10.12.0.0
Site to Site Tunnels:
Headquarters ---> Datacenter
Datacenter ---> Client X
I want to ability for computers in the Headquarters subnet to access the Client X subnet.I have tried setting up a static route to push all traffic destin for 172.16.0.0 to the datacenter, but was unsuccessful. how I can route all 172.16.0.0 through the tunnel.I have tried ading a static route on my ASA but without success.
I need urgent support on creating SSID as layer 2.We have cisco WLC2504 and 1602i access point. In our network we have in gate for guest.I want to create one ssid and bind with vlan only. We can not creat interface on WLC b/c of static IP.
View 3 Replies View RelatedFirst of all, I want you to know that I do understand that it's not a good design at all, but I still need to implement it.My ACE20 in 6500 works in routed mode with VLAN 101 (10.0.101.0/24) as the client-side VLAN. I therefore have Vlan101 SVI (10.0.101.1/24) on 6500.I also have VLAN 200 (10.0.200.0/24) on 6500 with SVI Vlan200 (10.0.200.1/24) and I want to create a static bidirectional NAT so that clients, connecting to IP address in VLAN 200 (10.0.200.64) would be NATed to VIP (10.0.101.10).Let's say we have clients (10.0.500.0/24) connecting through gig1/0/1.Here is my current setup on 6500.
View 14 Replies View Related