Create A Static Route On The TP-Link TD-W8950ND Router?
Jan 26, 2011
I am trying to create a static route on the TP-Link TD-W8950ND router, however am a little confused about the interface I should use. The default gateway on the route is another router on the LAN. I have a choice to use interface pppoe (telstra), LAN/br01 (bridge) or no interface. I was assuming I didn't need to use any interface as this is not a bridge setup and is on the LAN, but when I select "no interface" it doesn't save the static route settings.Also, when I select LAN/br01, the routing saves but doesn't actually work (tracert shows not going through the right router).
I'm trying to create a route from a VPN ip to the VPN server in my LAN. Anyhow, the DIR-655 does not let me create routing within the LAN (since only the WAN interface option is available).I have tried with the following firmwares: 1.11, 1.21, 1.30.
Region : Australia Model : TD-W8950ND Hardware Version : V1 Firmware Version : 1.2.9 build 110212 Rel.22296n
I made some changes on my wireless modem router to stop dhcp and dns provided by my device. A server is now doing it, but at the same time I appear to have connection issues where I didn't before. In an attempt to resolve the issues I looked at the System Log and a number of things were coming up that concerned me. These are as follows:
-user: tr69c: Unable to retrieve attributes in scratch PAD
-user: Stored Parameter Attribute data is corrupt or missing
Additionally I'm getting a lot of kernel: Intrusion alerts which I can't determine how serious they are. Where to start tracking down these issues (if they even warrant investigation).
I have the above router on 10.10.10.1 which I'm quite familiar with but I need reaching a VM residing on one of my internal MAC's. My cisco route table is as follows:
Gateway of last resort is 93.97.20.1 to network 0.0.0.0
93.0.0.0/21 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 93.97.16.0 is directly connected, ATM0.1 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, BVI1 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 93.97.20.1
The internal physical machine that contains the VM is 10.10.10.9 whose routing table is:
The VM has a static IP of 10.211.55.5 and can obviously ping out to the rest of my lan but as of yet my router and other machines on the 10.10.10/24 subnet cannot reach the VM. I sort of presume this is a simple task of adding some kind of static route on my router and then all other machine will know how to get to the VM. So what do I need to do as I have about 40 or so customers already connected of whom I do not wish to suddenly halt their access due to my inexperienced attempts to create this route or new link(s)
Ok I realise that the 825 doesn't have the ability to create static LAN routes. Is there a workaround or is this somthing that may be implemented in the future. It's a real let down to find this feature missing in an expensive router such as this.
I am trying to create a static route on the TP-Link TD-W8950ND router, however am a little confused about the interface I should use. The default gateway on the route is another router on the LAN. I have a choice to use interface pppoe (telstra), LAN/br01 (bridge) or no interface. I was assuming I didn't need to use any interface as this is not a bridge setup and is on the LAN, but when I select "no interface" it doesn't save the static route settings.Also, when I select LAN/br01, the routing saves but doesn't actually work (tracert shows not going through the right router).
I have my internet connection connect to my main Linksys router WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.My 2nd Linksys router connect to the first one as Gateway as well.The 2nd router has its WAN ip of 192.168.1.100 and it's local subnet as 192.168.2.x.My machines at 192.168.2.x can get to the internet and connect to all machines in the 192.168.1.x network.However, the 1.x network can't access the machines on the 2's network. And because of that, i can not sharing or printing between two network.I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the route: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and defaute gateway 192.168.1.100However, the route not work still.anyway to make sure that the 1.x network able to access the 2.x network and from 2.x access 1.x for sharing files and printing.
I have a problem when trying to configure my wrt320n , I put in the exact same config. as I had with my wrt54g, and I do mean the exact same, even the name and all, but when I try to save the config on Advance Routing I get the message "Invalid static route", I think it's a bug
Your product is stable but not profitable For the price your customers is easier to buy a model Zyxel Correct firmware for the static route, or Dynamic Routing (RIP)LinkSys E1000 Enabled - Dynamic Routing (RIP) NO RESULTS!ZyXEL KEENETIC LITE - automatic routing!
On 1811W Router i have OSPF running and i do not need this static route.ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.3,when i try to delete i get error ,1811w#,config t,Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.,1811w(config)#no ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.3,%No matching route to delete,1811w(config)#.
Currently i am having a scenario where i have setup RV042 and which is connected to Microsoft Forefront 2010. PPTP works fine only on rv042 subnet but i am not able to access the "internal" network of TMG.RV042 (172.16.1.1) ---> TMG [external] (172.16.1.2) ---> TMG [internal] (192.168.1.1) Is there any way through static route to access the TMG internal network through RV042 pptp server?
My laptop have 2 NIC attach it, the cable NIC and Wireless NIC, the cable one connect to my lab network environment and the Wireless connect to office network environment (connect to internet) which both have differen segments [code] when my Wireless was turn off my pc can ping to all segment on my lab network environment, but if the wireless was turn on, i cant ping to others segment but only my laptop segment and i still could surfing to the internet without any problem.then i tried to add a new route from my laptop using "route add x.x.x.x mask x.x.x.x (gateway)" in command line and after that i can ping back to all segment in my lab network environment eventhough my wireless was onwhy i have to create a manual route into my laptop so that i can have connection between my laptop and my lab environment in the condition my wireless turn on ??
Basically I have a bunch of computers that are being routed through a specific gateway in order to access a web page that is hosted internally on a separate subnet. I set up static routes on all of the computers, and they all work... except one.Here's what a route print -4 looks like for a working computer (Windows 7):
Code: =========================================================================== Interface List 14...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Broadcom 802.11n Network Adapter 11...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller 1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
[code]....
Both of these stations are running Windows 7.So essentially what I am trying to do here is route all traffic to the 10.zzz.zzz.0 subnet through the 10.xxx.xxx.147 gateway. Everything else should go through the 10.xxx.xxx.230 gateway. This is the intended behavior, and again it is working everywhere but that one station.
I'm trying to create a route-map for an EIGRP Distribute list on a N7K, the goal is to not advertise a 10.0.0.0/8 and 172.31.30.20/32 networks out a link to a remote site while permitting all other traffic to the internet (default). I configured the ACL/route-maps below and applied them outbound on the N7K interface but no subnets at all are being received on the remote site router.
ip access-list DENY_10.0.0.0 10 permit ip any 10.244.244.20/30 <<--WAN interface network 20 deny ip any 10.0.0.0/8 25 deny ip any 172.31.30.20/32 30 permit ip any any
VPN 1841, and static nat. I have to create VPN to connect to remote network, but problem is that they already use same subnet as mine. How to configure static nat on cisco 1841 so static nat will work and address will be translated in different IP when connection trough VPN.I have address 192.168.235.1 and I want to translate to 192.168.100.1,This 1841 is border router, and all VLNAs and VLANs routing is on 3650.
I need urgent support on creating SSID as layer 2.We have cisco WLC2504 and 1602i access point. In our network we have in gate for guest.I want to create one ssid and bind with vlan only. We can not creat interface on WLC b/c of static IP.
First of all, I want you to know that I do understand that it's not a good design at all, but I still need to implement it.My ACE20 in 6500 works in routed mode with VLAN 101 (10.0.101.0/24) as the client-side VLAN. I therefore have Vlan101 SVI (10.0.101.1/24) on 6500.I also have VLAN 200 (10.0.200.0/24) on 6500 with SVI Vlan200 (10.0.200.1/24) and I want to create a static bidirectional NAT so that clients, connecting to IP address in VLAN 200 (10.0.200.64) would be NATed to VIP (10.0.101.10).Let's say we have clients (10.0.500.0/24) connecting through gig1/0/1.Here is my current setup on 6500.
I config the routers with EIGRP and also write Static route between two PC before remove the link between router0 and router1 , destination is reachable , but when remove this connection , packet from pc1 to pc0 will drop in a loop and never reach to destination , is it possible to have a Link state routing protocol and static route at the same network like this scenario , how to prevent loop in this topology static route is configure as bellow :
i measured with Iperf over two Cisco 1811 router, that bandwidth speed is higher then is used IPsec+GRE tunnel between two routers, than just using a static routes.Bandwidth over GRE in average is about 91389Kbit/sec Over static routes is about 88474Kbit/sec.
I have a new Cisco 819 router wtih Verizon 3G built in. I want to use this router to provide 3G backup Internet access for a customer kiosk. The 3G is perfectly stable when I use it as a primary, static routed connection. When I use a floating static route, the link goes up and down constantly. The 3G link works for a about 20- 30 seconds, then goes to reset, down, then dials up and reconnects.
I have a nat and vpn setup on my Cisco 2801 router.Everything is working as expected except the NAT. I have a single static nat translation but it only works for inbound and not outbound. Going outbound, it uses the default overload nat address of the outside interface. [code] I want to add another mailserver. But I fear if one mailserver were to get black-listed, they would both be reporting there ip address as the same address (the one on the ethernet interface) which would blacklist both mail servers.Again, inbound nat works ok, but outbound is just using the IP of the ethernet0/0 address.
Got an ASA5505 Sec+ with ip 10.45.10.1 on inside interface. Firmware 8.3(1). Got another Cisco router (From my ISP) with ip 10.45.10.254 - This one creates an L2L tunnel - To the 10.45.20.0/24 net.
On the 5505 ive got "route inside 10.45.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.45.10.254 1", and trafic is being directed to 10.45.10.254 as it should.
I know cause I can ping everything one the 10.45.20.0/24 net - But thats it... Cant RDP, connect to fileshare... Nothing.
When i test a PC and set it to gateway 10.45.10.254 I can access everything on the remote network. Do I need some NAT command or an access-list? I've setup AnyConnect VPN on the ASA and I can connect to both networks without any problems.
In my Lab environment in GNS I have connected two 7200 series router through fastethernet on router A I have given IP adress 192.168.10.54 and router B I have given IP address 192.168.10.53 and default route as 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.53 and when I run the command on router A it shows result as follows "C 192.168.10.52/24 is directly connected ,Fast ethernet 2/0".
So I need to know why it's showing the result of .52 at last why not .53 or .54 at last what is the reason it's showing .52 which I have not mentioned in my IP address.
Each FW have a LAN behind it. The D-Link and the unknown device are both working perfectly and clients on each subnet can connect to the internet?However when I connect the ASA 5505 to the 2960 SW with a configued static route: Route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.202.1 1 is says it has no route to host?
If I connect the ASA5505 to the LAN of D-Link DSR-1000N and give it a static address and a static route match the D-Link LAN network, it works perfectly, however not when I connect it the the Cisco 2960 Switch
I have a Cisco 1841 with a DSL and 3G HWIC interface. I would like to setup the DSL as the primary link and then use the 3G as a backup interface. I am trying to accomplish this using the Floating Static routes with SLA object tracking.
I have tried various options, like having two tracked routes, one tracked route, changing administrative distances, multiple SLA's, etc etc.
My problem basically is that when the DSL (Dialer0) goes down and the 3G (Cellular0/1/0) takes over, that the SLA never changes back when the DSL is available again, so that the DSL can take over as the primary link again. [code]
I just upgraded my firewall to ASA 5505. Now, my original static ip address cofiguration is gone. Apperantly, Cisco went away from static ip address to something like nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface. how to create a static ip address under version 8.4? By the way, I am sharing what my configuration used to look before upgrading.
At first I use ACS 4.2 to create static ip address user for remote access VPN,It's easy,just configuration it at user set>Client IP Address Assignment>Assign static IP address,but when I use ACS 5.2 I can't find it.I try to add IPv4 address attribute to user by read "ACS 5.2 user guide" ,it says this: [code] I do this,but it's not work.When I use EasyVPN client to connect ASA 5520,user could through authentication but will not get that static IP address which I configuration on Internal Users.so,what should I do,if anyboby knows how to use ACS 5.2 to create a static ip address user for remote access VPN.
