Cisco :: EIGRP / Static Route In Same Topology?
Oct 13, 2012
I config the routers with EIGRP and also write Static route between two PC before remove the link between router0 and router1 , destination is reachable , but when remove this connection , packet from pc1 to pc0 will drop in a loop and never reach to destination , is it possible to have a Link state routing protocol and static route at the same network like this scenario , how to prevent loop in this topology static route is configure as bellow :
router0 <==> router 1 <==> router2 <==> router3 <==> router <==>pc1
View 6 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 13, 2013
I'm attempting to redistribute a static route into EIGRP on a 3750 switch and pass it to an upstream router, sadly however this isn't working, or at least the route isn't being recieved on the upstream router. [code]
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2011
Is it possible to track a IPSLA operation and if it goes down track a static route which will be removed from EIGRP process. I have read through documentation and have come stuck. I have the below configured and have shown the features installed. How would I go about getting the below static route injected into EIGRP only if the IPSLA operation in ok?
track RMB
type rtr 100 reachability
ipsla
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
I have an issue with my setup of a 6500 switch (12.2(33)SXI9).We have a 6500 switch with several VRF's. For a certain VRF I would like to redistribute a static route in EIGRP. After doing so I don't see the static route on my eigrp neighbor.
This is a overview of my config. I'm basically redistributing only my static route for this vrf in eigrp.
I found a similar case in which the solution was adding a metric to the static route. (eg. redistribute static route-map static-eigrp-pp metric 10000 100 255 1 1500). But the strange thing is that we don't have this issue on a similar machine (same IOS, same config setup). [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
I have a 3825 running c3825-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8. It is configured as an eigrp stub advertising only its connected and static routes. There are three WAN connections using a metro ethernet service. Two are data, one for voice traffic. The primary data connections run to two WAN edge ASR1002 routers.
The primary data connection (Gi0/1.943) is 20 Megs, the secondary data connection (Gi0/1.944) is only 15 Megs. Before the secondary connection was in place I only had routes to our backbone via Gi0/1.943 and everything was working great. Some time after the secondary data connection was turned up the routes to the backbone through Gi0/1.943 disappeared from the eigrp topology table causing all data traffic to flow through the less desirable secondary Gi0/1.944 interface to our backbone.
There is a good eigrp neighbor relationship between the 3825 and the ASR connected to Gi0/1.943, but if I show ip protocols it does not list the ASR as a data source. I know that the ASR is advertising its routes because I can see the updates coming from it if I debug ip eigrp. For some reason they are just not being added to the topology table by the 3825, not even as a feasible successor.
I have shut/no shut the interface multiple times at both ends during troubleshooting and I also reloaded and upgraded the code on the 3825 from 12.4(24)T to 12.4(24)T8. We also contacted the metro ethernet carrier to see if they had a policy that could potentially be blocking the traffic (no). My colleagues and I are just not seeing any feasible reason why these routes are not being added.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2011
I'm trying to figure out if the multi-layer Route-Reflector topology would work for me. Let say we have 2 Route-reflectors RC-RR1 and RC-R2 and all other router are their reflect-clients. Now I'm getting a new router RC-.E001 and would like to set new level of Route-reflectors. I'd like that now the router RC-E001 is a route-reflector client of RC-E002 (new level of RR) and RC-RR1, e.g. it will be a client of route-reflectors from different levels.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2012
We have problem con EIGRP and two ASR 1001 in High Availability. ASR2 have received all route (100 route) from PE, but in ASR1 doesnt received all route (75 route) from PE or from other ASR02. All PE have all route. The ASR1 when modify or lost some route dont update to the ASA. see diagram.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2012
I have an ASA 5520 connected to a Cisco 6509E, and we're turning up EIGRP between the two. The problem that I'm running into is that there a few static routes (including a 0.0.0.0) on the core that's being redistributed into the EIGRP AS, and I need to block this from being propagated to the ASA. The ASA only has the capability to use an ACL in conjunction with a distribute-list, and I can't find a way to filter the default route (0.0.0.0 /0), while allowing everything else.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
I have a customer with a primary datacenter and DR datacenter, that has a P2P 100Mbps link connection between them. At the primary Datacenter there will be a Nexus 5596U with a L3 card running EIGRP, it will have three connections, one nothbound to the Internet not a problem, the other is north bound to an MPLS SP managed ISR router. Both datacenters will have MPLS SP managed ISR router, the MPLS service provider will be redistributing BGP into EIGRP from their ISR routers at both datacenters. This means we will learn external EIGRP routes with an AD of 170.
Connected to my 5596 southbound will be the SAN for the EMC storage traffic, the DR also has a SAN with EMC storage as well. The 100Mbps P2P link is primarily for replication traffic.
Since the Nexus 5596U with L3 module doesn't support PBR I have to figure a way for replication traffic to prefer the 100Mbps P2P link vs the MPLS cloud. I was thinking of running iBGP over the P2P link with the Nexus 5596 being a route reflector and it's iBGP peer which will be a Catalyst 3750X at the other end of the P2P link being the route-reflector client. That way both iBGP peers will exchanged learned routes.
I have to come up with a way for the replication traffic that comes sourced from the IP addresses of the EMC/storage to prefer the P2P link which will have an AD of 200 from iBGP in the routing table vs the external EIGRP traffic that has an AD of 170 in the routing table. All other traffic will route normally across the MPLS cloud. All other traffic will include client server traffic as there are application servers that sit south bound of the Nexus 5596, the client traffic will come inbound to the datacenter via the MPLS cloud.
I don't have a Nexus 5596 to do a mock lab. My thought is to redistributed connected with a route-map in EIGRP on the Nexus 5596 with a two match statements then set the IP next hop to the IP of the 3750X. I would need to select only replication traffic, so I was thinking if I can match on vlan and next-hop then my set command would be the next-hop of the 3750X.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
I have a mixed WAN environment with both eBGP and EIGRP routes. The BGP routes should always take precedence, when they exist. If no BGP routes exist I want the router to fail over to using the EIGRP routes. So far, this works fine.
The problem is, when the BGP route again becomes available (and the associated entry appears in the "sh ip bgp ... received-routes" output) the router is NOT relinquishing the EIGRP route. It remains in effect, showing as a "D" route int the route table even though there is a better ("B") route available. If I bounce EIGRP or the interface associated with it, the EIGRP route disappears and the BGP route reasserts itself, and everything will run correctly until the next time the BGP route disappears due to maintenance, line failure, etc.
My router is (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.3(1)T
Here's the associated config
interface Tunnel101
description VPN backup WAN interface
bandwidth 7168
ip address 192.168.75.1 255.255.255.0
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
In EIGRP, if a router loses the successor to a route, and it has no FS, it goes active (starts asking all neighbors if they have a successor for that route).But if the neighbor did have a successor, shouldn't they have pro-actively told us about it when they learned it (so we already have it as the Feasible Successor?).
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I have a 3750 at a branch running EIGRP connected to two routers that both have configured:
access-list 1 deny 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 2 permit 0.0.0.0
access-list 2 deny any
router eigrp 1distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet0/0distribute-list 2 in FastEthernet0/0
Due to this recently applied config the switch become unreachable from the outside and cannot ping anything. Everything connected to it works fine. I was able to remote into it from a switch behind it and noticed that the 3750 has no default route in the routing table. I do see a default route in the eigrp topology table. How to make the switch learn a default route maintaining the existing configuration on the routers.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2012
I'm trying to create a route-map for an EIGRP Distribute list on a N7K, the goal is to not advertise a 10.0.0.0/8 and 172.31.30.20/32 networks out a link to a remote site while permitting all other traffic to the internet (default). I configured the ACL/route-maps below and applied them outbound on the N7K interface but no subnets at all are being received on the remote site router.
ip access-list DENY_10.0.0.0
10 permit ip any 10.244.244.20/30 <<--WAN interface network
20 deny ip any 10.0.0.0/8
25 deny ip any 172.31.30.20/32
30 permit ip any any
[code]....
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
We are deploying a new office in the building next to our main office. The main office has a Cisco ASA 5510 behind that is a Cisco 3750 stack. In the new office we are deploying a new Cisco 3750, they will be connected via fiber cable. I have sliced off VLAN 800 as a transit link /30 with an address space of 10.249.249.1-4. The new 3750 only has two VLAN's 800 and 112 (10.112.0.0/24). VLAN 112 routes are advertised to the neighboring 3750 properly as seen in the routing tables of the 3750 stack:
D 10.112.0.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.249.249.2, 00:22:24, Vlan800
Traffic passes between all local VLANS with no issue. I found in order to get packets to pass between the ASA and the new 3750 I had to add a static route to the ASA:
S 10.112.0.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 10.100.0.1, inside
My question is why is EIGRP not advertising the 10.112.0.0 network to the ASA. Here are EIGRP configs on the switches
Existing 3750 Stack
router eigrp 100
network 10.0.0.0
redistribute static
[code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2011
this is a Nexus 5596 L3 with the latest code:
It looks like the deny statement is not working as I can see all routes I am redistributing. I even did a deny on a specific route and I still see it in the routing table on another router in the autonomous system.The same below works fine on IOS platform. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2011
i have a problem in my eigrp configuration that the other branch only see the network that i am advertised in eigrp and can't see the the redistibuted static route inside eigrp .. i dunno why is thatand that's my running.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
On 3750 switch with IOS c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin "eigrp stub static redistributed" command will be executable ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2012
VPN 1841, and static nat. I have to create VPN to connect to remote network, but problem is that they already use same subnet as mine. How to configure static nat on cisco 1841 so static nat will work and address will be translated in different IP when connection trough VPN.I have address 192.168.235.1 and I want to translate to 192.168.100.1,This 1841 is border router, and all VLNAs and VLANs routing is on 3650.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2012
Basically I have a bunch of computers that are being routed through a specific gateway in order to access a web page that is hosted internally on a separate subnet. I set up static routes on all of the computers, and they all work... except one.Here's what a route print -4 looks like for a working computer (Windows 7):
Code:
===========================================================================
Interface List
14...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Broadcom 802.11n Network Adapter
11...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
[code]....
Both of these stations are running Windows 7.So essentially what I am trying to do here is route all traffic to the 10.zzz.zzz.0 subnet through the 10.xxx.xxx.147 gateway. Everything else should go through the 10.xxx.xxx.230 gateway. This is the intended behavior, and again it is working everywhere but that one station.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2011
I have a new Cisco 819 router wtih Verizon 3G built in. I want to use this router to provide 3G backup Internet access for a customer kiosk. The 3G is perfectly stable when I use it as a primary, static routed connection. When I use a floating static route, the link goes up and down constantly. The 3G link works for a about 20- 30 seconds, then goes to reset, down, then dials up and reconnects.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2010
I have a nat and vpn setup on my Cisco 2801 router.Everything is working as expected except the NAT. I have a single static nat translation but it only works for inbound and not outbound. Going outbound, it uses the default overload nat address of the outside interface. [code] I want to add another mailserver. But I fear if one mailserver were to get black-listed, they would both be reporting there ip address as the same address (the one on the ethernet interface) which would blacklist both mail servers.Again, inbound nat works ok, but outbound is just using the IP of the ethernet0/0 address.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
Got a problem routing trafic to my L2L tunnel...
Got an ASA5505 Sec+ with ip 10.45.10.1 on inside interface. Firmware 8.3(1). Got another Cisco router (From my ISP) with ip 10.45.10.254 - This one creates an L2L tunnel - To the 10.45.20.0/24 net.
On the 5505 ive got "route inside 10.45.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.45.10.254 1", and trafic is being directed to 10.45.10.254 as it should.
I know cause I can ping everything one the 10.45.20.0/24 net - But thats it... Cant RDP, connect to fileshare... Nothing.
When i test a PC and set it to gateway 10.45.10.254 I can access everything on the remote network. Do I need some NAT command or an access-list? I've setup AnyConnect VPN on the ASA and I can connect to both networks without any problems.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2013
In my Lab environment in GNS I have connected two 7200 series router through fastethernet on router A I have given IP adress 192.168.10.54 and router B I have given IP address 192.168.10.53 and default route as 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.53 and when I run the command on router A it shows result as follows "C 192.168.10.52/24 is directly connected ,Fast ethernet 2/0".
So I need to know why it's showing the result of .52 at last why not .53 or .54 at last what is the reason it's showing .52 which I have not mentioned in my IP address.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2013
We have a customer, who has the following setup:
ISP router with ip range: x.x.202.1/ 28
That is connected to a Cisco 2960 switch, that doesn't do much but:
Vlan5: x.x.202.14 /28
Port 1-12 is switchport mode access to vlan 5 There are 3 firewall's connected to the 2960
1: D-Link DSR-1000N with ip x.x.202.2 /28
gw: x.x.202.1
2: Uknown
3: Cisco ASA 5505 with ip: x.x202.7 /28
static route: x.x.202.1
Each FW have a LAN behind it. The D-Link and the unknown device are both working perfectly and clients on each subnet can connect to the internet?However when I connect the ASA 5505 to the 2960 SW with a configued static route: Route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.202.1 1 is says it has no route to host?
Sanitized Config for the ASA 5505 is:
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name network.local
names
!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
[code]....
If I connect the ASA5505 to the LAN of D-Link DSR-1000N and give it a static address and a static route match the D-Link LAN network, it works perfectly, however not when I connect it the the Cisco 2960 Switch
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
I have a Cisco 1841 with a DSL and 3G HWIC interface. I would like to setup the DSL as the primary link and then use the 3G as a backup interface. I am trying to accomplish this using the Floating Static routes with SLA object tracking.
I have tried various options, like having two tracked routes, one tracked route, changing administrative distances, multiple SLA's, etc etc.
My problem basically is that when the DSL (Dialer0) goes down and the 3G (Cellular0/1/0) takes over, that the SLA never changes back when the DSL is available again, so that the DSL can take over as the primary link again. [code]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
Add static route for new exchange server?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2011
I am setting up a remote site to provide a backup internet circuit for outbound traffic. Everything is working from the main site by redistributing a static route and using default-information originate within BGP to my MPLS provider.Now on the remote site I setup a static route with an AD of 250 which is higher than the AD of 20 we are getting from the main site over the MPLS network. When the route come up BGP uses the default route from the main site and everything works fine. When I clear the BGP routes at the main site the backup site installs the static route with a higher AD. The problem is when the BGP route comes back up the static route is not getting removed. From looking at some other posts it seems that the redistributed local route is still preferred by BGP. They mentioned setting the weight to 0 in a route map which I tried but I am not getting the results of removing the static route and using the BGP route.Remote site router config: router bgp 65011. [code]
View 24 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2011
My 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2013
I have Cisco RV180. I can not set static route with destination to all IPs (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0). It always shows errors. It asked me to input non zero number. I can do this on Cisco RV042 without any problem.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2010
Have a solution with PFR with two master controller in hsrp mode and two active border controller, betwen the MC and the BR i'm running EIGRP. The two BR have BGP to the ISP but i have default router for the parent route. Same weeks ago i notice some problems in reaching to specific public ip addr. During the trobleshooting i found that the two border controller have dynamic-pbr applyed to the inside interfaces and one of the satement on the dynamic route-map is setting the next-hop for the destination public ip addr yhe inside interface on the two border routers. This way the traffic is looping betewn the two BR. It's possibel do disable the PIRO (PBR) and only to use static route injection betwen the MC and BR.
The routers are running 12.4.24T
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2012
We use ASDM 6.2 to manage our Cisco ASA 5520 running ASA Software Version 8.2 (1). I just noticed that some static routes have "A-" when you view the static routes with ASDM e.g. A-172.24.0.0 or A-192.168.176.0 (pls see attached print screen). I haven't seen this before and dont know what it means.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2012
i measured with Iperf over two Cisco 1811 router, that bandwidth speed is higher then is used IPsec+GRE tunnel between two routers, than just using a static routes.Bandwidth over GRE in average is about 91389Kbit/sec Over static routes is about 88474Kbit/sec.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
I have a layer 3 switch with a bunch of SVIs all in the 192.168.x.0/24 range. I just want to advertise a 192.168.0.0/16 summary to the BGP neighbors. I can do this either by:
1) Redistributing connected into BGP and then using the 'aggregate-address' command to advertise the summary.
2) Specifying a network statement in the BGP config for every single SVI, then using the 'aggregate-address' command.
3) Create a static route to null0 (ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0) and put 'network 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0' command in the BGP config.All three fulfill the same purpose of summarizing all the SVIs, but creating the static route is much cleaner in this case. It seems like the aggregate-address command is mostly intended for routers that are aggregating connections coming from other routers and all of them share a common prefix.
View 4 Replies
View Related
