I have Cisco RV180. I can not set static route with destination to all IPs (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0). It always shows errors. It asked me to input non zero number. I can do this on Cisco RV042 without any problem.
View 3 RepliesIs it possible to assign a static route to an interface and not globally on a ASA 5510 ver 8.3.
I have two links between my offices one for Data via a VPN and one for video traffic which is a secure connection with QOS end to end.
All interfaces are on the same security level of 100 except Outside which is 0.
Office 1 Interfaces ASA 5510
VLAN 1 vOffice1Data 10.40.1.0/24
VLAN 3 vOffice1Video 10.40.2.0/24
VLAN 5 vInterOffice 10.40.5.0/24 (QOS connection Between Offices)
[Code]....
At the moment if I try and access data from VLAN 1 to VLAN 4 it gets to the destination ok going through the static route and over the vInterOffice connection but the problem is VLAN 4 returning the traffic. This fails because there is no static route back to VLAN 1. If I create a static route from Office 2 to VLAN 1 then it will route all my data traffic over it as well.
I have a static IP for the host RV180, however do I need a static IP for the remote RV180 ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have five static IPs that I would like to fully utilize, by NAT'ing them to internal VLAN subnets.I read that the RV180 can do this, but I am having difficulty in finding a working recipe.I have assigned xxx.xxx.xxx.2 to the RV180 WAN interface.
I have created four additional VLANs 2-5 and assigned to ports 1-4 with subnet interfaces 192.168.2.254, 192.168.3.254, 192.168.4.254. and 192.168.5.254,I have set the default VLAN to untagged on all ports. VLANs 2-5 are set to tagged for their respective port (1-4) and exclude for other ports.I have set DHCP relays to 192.168.1.202 which is my DHCP, DNS, AD services.
I read some months ago that when the first static IP address is assigned to the WAN port, that the VLAN ports will accept tagged packets on their ports and NAT them to the respective successive static IP (sounds a bit like magic to me). Regardless, I read that the RV180 can provide VLAN subnet NAT to up to 5 static IP address. I am not looking for 1 to 1 NAT, not the same. I want to perform NAT on the four additional VLANs in the similar manner that VLAN 1 (default DMZ) IPs are NAT'd to the static WAN address. As in everything outbound on 192.168.1.0 is NAT'd to xxx.xxx.xxx.2
Additionally I would like all DHCP assigned by my DHCP server which I believe is accomplished with the DHCP relay setting on all five VLAN subnets, which point to the DHCP server 192.168.1.202
Lastly, I am trying to configure VPN connectivity into my DMZ network. I have configured a few accounts, enabled for PPTP. I have configured PPTP and am issuing 192.168.1.70-80. The VPN connection seems to work great without the use of Cisco quick VPN. I can see the remote picking up the 192.168.1.71 IP address as the VPN connection is made. From the remote I can ping IP addresses on the DMZ subnet 192.168.1.X How can I configurer the Cisco RV180 PPTP server to provide the DMZ DNS ipaddresses? These addresses need to be 192.168.1.201 and 192.168.1.202
I feel I am almost there, in working out the VLAN subnet to Static NAT. I suspect it will be some routing configurations. The ISP business gateway on the WAN side that I point my router to which is owned by Verizon, is xxx.xxx.xxx.1 I have a /29 making IPs xxx.xxx.xxx.2-6 available to me.
I've been playing around with the Cisco RV180s for a while now and have come across a problem with the subnet calculation in the static routes and routing table. Essentially, if I configure up a static route for a /16 it's entered in the routing table as a /13. If I add a /24 it's entered in the routing table as a /16. I haven't tested every subnet size and combinations but this looks like a fairly fundamental maths bug.
As a side note, I notice that the 1.0.1.9 release notes state the removal of SSH Server, however, I can not find any reference to it's existance prior to 1.0.1.9, did/does it exist in 1.0.0.30 and if so where? .
Screenshots are below and an extract from the configuration file for reference.
From the config file:
route = {}
route[1] = {}
route[1]["active"] = "1"
route[1]["dstIpAddr"] = "8.8.0.0"
route[1]["gwIpAddr"] = "192.168.1.250(code)
I defined a static route: 192.168.0.0 / 255.255.255.0 / 192.168.1.201 (gateway), I can connect from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.0.0 but we cannot ping in this local network. We have a CISCO 18000 as a VPN IP configured between this two local network.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to re-route our Site 2 Site VPN over our Static Route (T1) if the WAN fails?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a RV082 connected to a Comcast business-class internet with 6 static IP's one-to-one routed to specific internal hosts. This configuration has been stable for several years.
A few days ago, the RV082 stopped routing most of the external static requests to their specific internal hosts. External machines only display the "Can't connect to the webpage" error. Rebooting the RV082 re-enabled correct operation for about 30 minutes, then it failed again.
I pulled out my backup RV082, flashed it with the current configuration, and swapped it in. It acted the same - external statics route correctly for about 30 minutes, then it just stops.
I configured dns on the router on this command ip name-server 4.2.2.2when i tried to ping www.google.com showing no valid routeTranslating "www.google.com"...domain server (4.2.2.2) [OK]Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2800:3F0:4001:807::1013, timeout is 2 seconds:
View 9 Replies View Relateda) one router with two ethernet interfaces (LANs) and a serial interface. The serial interface is connected to the internet, dynamic nat is used for hosts in the two lans. A web server has a private address of 172.168.50.10 and it is being translated to the internet with serial's interface 68.32.x.x (public ip) with static nat. Clients in the internet type the public address to access the web server.
b)Problem: clients inside the LANs cannot access the web server by typing the public address, they use the server's private address instead, this create a problem with DNS static entries in the HOSTS file in the OS. It is a test server and is only available to authenticated users (lock and key ACLs), so no need to make a real DNS record. The entry in the HOSTS file points to the public address.
c)Question: how can a create a route map to change the public address in the HOST file to the private address of the test web server everytime a user in the LANs type the domain name.
I have 2 nexus 5000 switches configured with a trunk linking the two how can i do the follwoing
BOX 2
vrf context management
ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.162.88.9
BOX 2
vrf context management
ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.88.10
1. ping between the two boxes, i set up static route's but when i ping i get the error "NO ROUTE TO DESTINATION"
2. routing between the two
Is there any way to have my Cisco 877W Router alter from using one static route to another static route when another router on the network is reporting destination host unreachable?
Router 1 (192.168.2.253)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to internet
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 (192.168.2.254)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to managed VPN (172.16.28.1)
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 is connected to another network through a managed VPN and that network also has internet access. I want to be able to have two routes to the internet on Router 2. And when Router 1 internet goes down packets get routed through the VPN instead.
I currently have on Router 2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.253
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.28.5 250
Which does nothing when Router 1 has its Dialer0 interface shutdown, or goes offline completely.I suspect I could reverse the setup and have everything routed through the VPN by default and then if / when Dialer0 interface goes down it would switch to using Router 2, but if the problem is in the remote network and interface Dialer0 stays up, it would probably do the same thing... nothing.All devices mentioned are Cisco 877W routers with ADSL and a bunch of fast ethernet interfaces.
VPN 1841, and static nat. I have to create VPN to connect to remote network, but problem is that they already use same subnet as mine. How to configure static nat on cisco 1841 so static nat will work and address will be translated in different IP when connection trough VPN.I have address 192.168.235.1 and I want to translate to 192.168.100.1,This 1841 is border router, and all VLNAs and VLANs routing is on 3650.
View 12 Replies View RelatedBasically I have a bunch of computers that are being routed through a specific gateway in order to access a web page that is hosted internally on a separate subnet. I set up static routes on all of the computers, and they all work... except one.Here's what a route print -4 looks like for a working computer (Windows 7):
Code:
===========================================================================
Interface List
14...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Broadcom 802.11n Network Adapter
11...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
[code]....
Both of these stations are running Windows 7.So essentially what I am trying to do here is route all traffic to the 10.zzz.zzz.0 subnet through the 10.xxx.xxx.147 gateway. Everything else should go through the 10.xxx.xxx.230 gateway. This is the intended behavior, and again it is working everywhere but that one station.
I config the routers with EIGRP and also write Static route between two PC before remove the link between router0 and router1 , destination is reachable , but when remove this connection , packet from pc1 to pc0 will drop in a loop and never reach to destination , is it possible to have a Link state routing protocol and static route at the same network like this scenario , how to prevent loop in this topology static route is configure as bellow :
router0 <==> router 1 <==> router2 <==> router3 <==> router <==>pc1
I have a new Cisco 819 router wtih Verizon 3G built in. I want to use this router to provide 3G backup Internet access for a customer kiosk. The 3G is perfectly stable when I use it as a primary, static routed connection. When I use a floating static route, the link goes up and down constantly. The 3G link works for a about 20- 30 seconds, then goes to reset, down, then dials up and reconnects.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a nat and vpn setup on my Cisco 2801 router.Everything is working as expected except the NAT. I have a single static nat translation but it only works for inbound and not outbound. Going outbound, it uses the default overload nat address of the outside interface. [code] I want to add another mailserver. But I fear if one mailserver were to get black-listed, they would both be reporting there ip address as the same address (the one on the ethernet interface) which would blacklist both mail servers.Again, inbound nat works ok, but outbound is just using the IP of the ethernet0/0 address.
View 2 Replies View RelatedGot a problem routing trafic to my L2L tunnel...
Got an ASA5505 Sec+ with ip 10.45.10.1 on inside interface. Firmware 8.3(1). Got another Cisco router (From my ISP) with ip 10.45.10.254 - This one creates an L2L tunnel - To the 10.45.20.0/24 net.
On the 5505 ive got "route inside 10.45.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.45.10.254 1", and trafic is being directed to 10.45.10.254 as it should.
I know cause I can ping everything one the 10.45.20.0/24 net - But thats it... Cant RDP, connect to fileshare... Nothing.
When i test a PC and set it to gateway 10.45.10.254 I can access everything on the remote network. Do I need some NAT command or an access-list? I've setup AnyConnect VPN on the ASA and I can connect to both networks without any problems.
In my Lab environment in GNS I have connected two 7200 series router through fastethernet on router A I have given IP adress 192.168.10.54 and router B I have given IP address 192.168.10.53 and default route as 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.53 and when I run the command on router A it shows result as follows "C 192.168.10.52/24 is directly connected ,Fast ethernet 2/0".
So I need to know why it's showing the result of .52 at last why not .53 or .54 at last what is the reason it's showing .52 which I have not mentioned in my IP address.
We have a customer, who has the following setup:
ISP router with ip range: x.x.202.1/ 28
That is connected to a Cisco 2960 switch, that doesn't do much but:
Vlan5: x.x.202.14 /28
Port 1-12 is switchport mode access to vlan 5 There are 3 firewall's connected to the 2960
1: D-Link DSR-1000N with ip x.x.202.2 /28
gw: x.x.202.1
2: Uknown
3: Cisco ASA 5505 with ip: x.x202.7 /28
static route: x.x.202.1
Each FW have a LAN behind it. The D-Link and the unknown device are both working perfectly and clients on each subnet can connect to the internet?However when I connect the ASA 5505 to the 2960 SW with a configued static route: Route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.202.1 1 is says it has no route to host?
Sanitized Config for the ASA 5505 is:
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name network.local
names
!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
[code]....
If I connect the ASA5505 to the LAN of D-Link DSR-1000N and give it a static address and a static route match the D-Link LAN network, it works perfectly, however not when I connect it the the Cisco 2960 Switch
I have a Cisco 1841 with a DSL and 3G HWIC interface. I would like to setup the DSL as the primary link and then use the 3G as a backup interface. I am trying to accomplish this using the Floating Static routes with SLA object tracking.
I have tried various options, like having two tracked routes, one tracked route, changing administrative distances, multiple SLA's, etc etc.
My problem basically is that when the DSL (Dialer0) goes down and the 3G (Cellular0/1/0) takes over, that the SLA never changes back when the DSL is available again, so that the DSL can take over as the primary link again. [code]
Add static route for new exchange server?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am setting up a remote site to provide a backup internet circuit for outbound traffic. Everything is working from the main site by redistributing a static route and using default-information originate within BGP to my MPLS provider.Now on the remote site I setup a static route with an AD of 250 which is higher than the AD of 20 we are getting from the main site over the MPLS network. When the route come up BGP uses the default route from the main site and everything works fine. When I clear the BGP routes at the main site the backup site installs the static route with a higher AD. The problem is when the BGP route comes back up the static route is not getting removed. From looking at some other posts it seems that the redistributed local route is still preferred by BGP. They mentioned setting the weight to 0 in a route map which I tried but I am not getting the results of removing the static route and using the BGP route.Remote site router config: router bgp 65011. [code]
View 24 Replies View RelatedMy 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
View 3 Replies View RelatedHave a solution with PFR with two master controller in hsrp mode and two active border controller, betwen the MC and the BR i'm running EIGRP. The two BR have BGP to the ISP but i have default router for the parent route. Same weeks ago i notice some problems in reaching to specific public ip addr. During the trobleshooting i found that the two border controller have dynamic-pbr applyed to the inside interfaces and one of the satement on the dynamic route-map is setting the next-hop for the destination public ip addr yhe inside interface on the two border routers. This way the traffic is looping betewn the two BR. It's possibel do disable the PIRO (PBR) and only to use static route injection betwen the MC and BR.
The routers are running 12.4.24T
We use ASDM 6.2 to manage our Cisco ASA 5520 running ASA Software Version 8.2 (1). I just noticed that some static routes have "A-" when you view the static routes with ASDM e.g. A-172.24.0.0 or A-192.168.176.0 (pls see attached print screen). I haven't seen this before and dont know what it means.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi measured with Iperf over two Cisco 1811 router, that bandwidth speed is higher then is used IPsec+GRE tunnel between two routers, than just using a static routes.Bandwidth over GRE in average is about 91389Kbit/sec Over static routes is about 88474Kbit/sec.
View 1 Replies View RelatedToday I installed the 1.0.2.6 Firmware on a RV180W. I only have now two problems regarding the Static DHCP support in the GUI.
1. Via the Networking > LAN (Local Network) > Static DHCP I have no buttons to Add a new static Lease.
2. Via the Networking > LAN (Local Network) > DHCP Lease Clients I can thick a Lease and click on Make Static IP. The result is an error: Operation failed.
I have a layer 3 switch with a bunch of SVIs all in the 192.168.x.0/24 range. I just want to advertise a 192.168.0.0/16 summary to the BGP neighbors. I can do this either by:
1) Redistributing connected into BGP and then using the 'aggregate-address' command to advertise the summary.
2) Specifying a network statement in the BGP config for every single SVI, then using the 'aggregate-address' command.
3) Create a static route to null0 (ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0) and put 'network 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0' command in the BGP config.All three fulfill the same purpose of summarizing all the SVIs, but creating the static route is much cleaner in this case. It seems like the aggregate-address command is mostly intended for routers that are aggregating connections coming from other routers and all of them share a common prefix.
I have inherited an ASA 5520. In doing some auditing of the setup, I have noticed a Static Route that has the inside interface of the ASA as the Gateway IP. I am trying to understand the purpose of this route or why a route would be setup this way.
Example Static Route:
Inside 10.xx.31.0 255.255.255.0 10.xx.xx.10 (10.xx.xx.10 is the inside interface of ASA)
I have a new MPLS circuit being stood up for my site; it’s going to replace a site to site VPN connection to our "Headquarters." I want to test this without affecting my production networks. Without getting into alot of details, the admin at the remote site is not very cooperative and basically doesn't want to set this up and I don't have access to his switching/routing. He is prepared to do minimal tasks if necessary. Ultimately, I am looking to test the new Vlan, once successful, route the traffic away from the Site to Site VPN connection to the MPLS circuit. Here is what I plan on doing, I need to determine if it is going to work.
LAN in my office uses EIGRP for routing. MPLS (10.1.1.253) uses OSPF (area 0) and BGP. Currently, traffic destined to headquarters (10.10.1.1/24) uses the default route on a CAT3750 pointing to the firewall (ASA5520) (10.1.1.254).Create new VLAN/DHCP scope to use as a test Vlan to test the new MPLS circuit. 10.1.199.0/24Create static routes on 3750 destined for headquarters for L2L VPN traffic pointing to firewall so traffic to headquarters remains on the L2L connection. ip route 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.254 (once I share routes with OSPF, routes to Headquarters will be advertised over the MPLS)Create OSPF instance on the 3750 advertising only the new subnet so that the MPLS network knows to route this traffic over the MPLS for return traffic from headquarters. (this is where it is grey as I don’t know OSPF at all) The switch has a L3 interface which the MPLS router uses as its gateway, so there is direct communication.router-ospf 0 network 10.1.199.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 4. On 3750 create a PBR for the new subnet so that it is routed over the MPLS, (imagine test PC is 10.1.199.100), the remaining production subnets will use the static routes and ignore the OSPF routes because of the shorter administrative distance.Will the PBR route win over the static route for that one subnet? Is that all I need in the OSPF configuration? I see some configs that have neighbor statements with costs, authentication types etc..
We have two sites: 192.168.100.x and 192.168.101.x currently connected via IPsec VPN. On each end we have a Cisco ASA 5505. However, each site also has an MPLS VPN with intentions to move all traffic to this link. Will this work on the ASA? We need to make sure traffic can hit the ASA @ site A on the inside interface and trafiic will forward to the MPLS VPN router which then handles the traffic. Too, will it cause any problems in bi-directional flow between the two sites?
View 3 Replies View Relatedthis is router 887, its vlan is 192.168.3.1/24. If I'd like to add a static route via different host within same vlan, rather than the router, like:
ip route 192.168.100.0/24 192.168.3.6
How can we achieve it? I tried adding it directly and failed:
(config)#ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.6
%Invalid next hop address (it's this router)