My 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
We have recently purchased a Cisco SG300 and have been configuring it. [code] The VLANs have ACLs set up to prevent any communication between the Holly and Tempo VLANs (and their associated WAN VLANs).Each VLAN has a WAN available for it's use, which connects to external networks (including the Internet).In order to facilitate this, we have set up all the necessary ACLs and routes and confirmed that this all works.However, the problem comes when we assign the static routes that specify the default gateways.We add the two static routes below:
-0.0.0.0 next hop 10.10.200.254 metric 1 -0.0.0.0 next hop 192.168.200.254 metric 1
In this case, only one of the VLANs has WAN access. It is either Holly or Tempo (it can be either if the order the static route is added is changed).What we need is to force Holly to use Holly WAN and Tempo to use Tempo WAN, but we cannot see a way of doing this.Effectively, we want the following static routes: [code]
A check out a network segment and want to know why SwA has a static route to SwB if SwA already has a Default GW to Core?
(SwA, SwB - Catalyst3560, Core - Catalyst4948)Note, there are distribute list on SwA - it does not has any OSPF route (exclude O*IA).
Does this mean when SwA send out packet with DA 10.5.64.0/26, Core will use only L2 switching (instead of L3)? Is this more effectively for Core Switch?
Pleace check my reasoning: 1. When use a static route: SwA receive packet from Vlan 20 with DA 10.5.64.0/26 it will strip out Dest. MAC and replace it with MAC of SwB. Core will switch this packet to SwB based on mac add. table (l2 switching)
2. When SwA has only Default gateway and receive packet from Vlan20 with DA 10.5.64.0/26 it replace Dest. MAC with Core MAC. Core receive this packet, lookup route table for 10.5.64.0 entry and forward packet base on this.
I am having touble with a NAT concept. What I have is a 3rd party software VPN product that basically tunnels encapsulated traffic to/from a server sitting inside the network. Right now this traffic utiluizes a physical interface on the ASA5510, but I need the interface for another project.
I have a mixed WAN environment with both eBGP and EIGRP routes. The BGP routes should always take precedence, when they exist. If no BGP routes exist I want the router to fail over to using the EIGRP routes. So far, this works fine.
The problem is, when the BGP route again becomes available (and the associated entry appears in the "sh ip bgp ... received-routes" output) the router is NOT relinquishing the EIGRP route. It remains in effect, showing as a "D" route int the route table even though there is a better ("B") route available. If I bounce EIGRP or the interface associated with it, the EIGRP route disappears and the BGP route reasserts itself, and everything will run correctly until the next time the BGP route disappears due to maintenance, line failure, etc.
My router is (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.3(1)T
Here's the associated config interface Tunnel101 description VPN backup WAN interface bandwidth 7168 ip address 192.168.75.1 255.255.255.0 [code].....
My client has MPLS network via eBGP to communicate with all the sites. Here is the basic config on the router.router eigrp 65210.neighbor 192.168.1.2 remote-as 13939
When they installed the internet on the local router, and added the static route on the router to hit the internet, they need to add the static route (2nd one) to communicate to the other sites.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.75.75.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.2
ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.2
They want to route all the traffic out thru the local intenet besides their private networks ( 192.168.0.0/16 and 172.20.0.0/16). Are there ways not to add last two static routes and communicate the other sites via eBGP?
I've enabled antispoof on all interfaces on asa 5510.If you start a traceroute to a network on the default route, everything works, since replies comes to an interface with route 0.0.0.0/0 defined.If you start a tracer route to a network that is NOT on the default route (let's assume coporate MPLS), you only get response from first carrier router, the other are discarded because of anti spoof violation.
I have ICMP inspection and icmp-error inspection enabled.
i have 2 routers 2811 interconnected together ,1 of these router running in circuit with 2 Mbps over Internet the 2nd one use MPLS Circuit with a bandwidth of 4Mbps,how configure the routing to route over the MPLS while IPSec act as standby
I m using ospf between HO and Branches for two links. branch router are 2811 and HO router 3845. when i enable ospf at branch i get all branch route like HO router and a default route. My requirement is each branch get only HO but no other branch. I have no default route.
I attached show ip route status for a branch router.. Why default route comes and why all branch's route come ?
I have cisco 2811 at branch and 3845 at Head office. Two link with 256 kbps bandwidthe each. I did as follows: [code]
When link 1 down, traffic change to Tunnel 2. its OK.I want when link1 flaxuate or latency high (more than 60 ms) traffice change to tunnel 2. If link 2 goes high latency automatically change to tunnel 1.
configuring policy based route for my cisco router?Basically, I have a 2811 cisco router with 2 ADSL ports. 1 port is for iiNet line and another port is for Telstra line.I want to configure a policy based route on the router so that:Any traffic coming from 1 internal IP (i.e. 172.16.x.1) will go through iinet line (i.e. Dialer 0) interface.Any traffic from rest of the office will go through the Telstra line (i.e. Dialer 1) interface. Is there any easy way to configure this policy based route?
I want to leak default internet route to CE VRF as common service.Since we having two ASBR, can I point next hop to PE itself instead of either of the ASBR?I tried to point NH to loopback of the PE itself but it failed.
I'm working on a practice lab and am having the following issue. I have a customer router connected to two different ISP routers. Each ISP router must advertise a default through BGP to the customer and one of the default routes must be preferred over the other. Given if the preferred route interface is shut down the other default route is inserted into the routing table and when the preferred default route interface it turned back on that path is used again. The catch is I cant alter the customer router only the the two ISP devices. I tried doing some route maps but I'm lost. I have deleted all my route maps and have posted the BGP portion of the ISP routers.
router bgp 300 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes [Code]....
I'm trying to get a 2811 router with a NM-AIR-WLC6 Wireless Controller Module to work with an c1200 series access point. The LWAP is connected to a 2690 switch which has a trunk connected to the router. My configuration looks very similar to example 2 on this page: [URL] . The LWAP does get an IP from the DHCP pool on the router. I can also connect to the GUI of the controller from a PC on VLAN 250 (which also is connected to the switch).
[URL]
The moment I join my Wireless network I get no IP and when I enter a valid static IP, I still can't ping the gateway. I also noticed that the controller could ping the gateway before I configured the interface. After configuring an interface with that gateway, the controller loses the ability to ping to it. I can't seem to figure out why. I've been working all week on getting this controller and LWAP to broadcast a fully working network.
I faced up with a strange configuration issue at my 2811 router running IOS C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M, Version 15.1(3)T. The configured Dynamic and Static NAT do not work (users can't go out to Internet and can't reach internal services via external IPs).The configuration seems to be very simple (one internal and one external interface, one address for dynamic NAT pool, and only few static translations -- see attached file).
Looking through the SPROUTE course material they state on several occasions that an ABR will announce a default route in to a standard NSSA area, same as a stub area, because LSA5 external routes are not allowed.
I bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point. Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway. Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error. To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now. I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?). Does any know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port .
I have an 877 router which has a DSL WAN interface. The DSL service at this site is unreliable, so the company have purchased a separate 3G router to be used as a backup. This device maintains 3G connectivity at all times and has a static IP on the internal subnet (for arguments sake let's say 10.0.0.253).
What I want to do with the Cisco router is to track the DSL interface and if it is up, install a default route pointing to it. If it is down, I want the default route to be the 3G router.
I am thinking the best way to do this is to set up a track and then set 2 default routes; one which is installed if the tracking is up, the other has a higher admin distance and points to the 3G router and thus should only be used if the track is down. For example:
track 10 interface Dialer0 ip routing delay down 30 up 30 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 10 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.253 100
Is this likely to work or is there a better way to do it?
Is it possible to send all traffic through site to site VPN using SRP521W (on the other site ASA) ? Lets say, traffic to Internet from branch through HQ - site to site VPN between branch and HQ. I've tried to set up destination crypto policy entry to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 but it's not accepted. Firmware version is 1.01.26 (003)
I am having a strange requirement. actually I am not sure it is strange or not. I am having ASA5510 with 8.4 sw version. Currently one ISP is connected to it. It is working fine. We have some servers that are directly connected to internet using another ISP connection. These servers having public IP addresses configured on their LAN settings. I need to move these servers in to the DMZ zone.
When i connect it to the ASA's DMZ zone,servers will get internet through the first ISP that is already configured on ASA. But i need to NAT the DMZ servers with the IP address provided by the other ISP, which even not configured on ASA.
So what should i do? In short my requirement is
1) need to NAT the server with the IP address provided by another ISP
2) Also note that the default route is configured for the first ISP only in ASA
so Do i need to configure another default route? Do i need to make it with larger AD? So i do it will act as the secondary route only.
I need to make the ASA up and running for two ISP, and servers in the LAN should be able to NAT with the IPs of first ISP and ,the servers in the DMZ zone should be able to NAT with the public IP of the new ISP.
VPN 1841, and static nat. I have to create VPN to connect to remote network, but problem is that they already use same subnet as mine. How to configure static nat on cisco 1841 so static nat will work and address will be translated in different IP when connection trough VPN.I have address 192.168.235.1 and I want to translate to 192.168.100.1,This 1841 is border router, and all VLNAs and VLANs routing is on 3650.
Basically I have a bunch of computers that are being routed through a specific gateway in order to access a web page that is hosted internally on a separate subnet. I set up static routes on all of the computers, and they all work... except one.Here's what a route print -4 looks like for a working computer (Windows 7):
Code: =========================================================================== Interface List 14...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Broadcom 802.11n Network Adapter 11...xx xx xx xx xx xx ......Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller 1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
[code]....
Both of these stations are running Windows 7.So essentially what I am trying to do here is route all traffic to the 10.zzz.zzz.0 subnet through the 10.xxx.xxx.147 gateway. Everything else should go through the 10.xxx.xxx.230 gateway. This is the intended behavior, and again it is working everywhere but that one station.
Does ip default-gateway have any effect on a L3 device such as a 2811 router? I always thought that on a L3 device the default route would supersede any such command assuming it is accepted.
We have a client device that cannot be reached for managment directly and wanted to add that statment only if it might work.
In case customers buy IP transit(there is a BGP session between ISP and customer), they often ask for default route and for example prefixes from local internet-exchanges. What is the advantage to have default route + certain smaller(for example /17, /18 and /24) prefixes?
I have this topology: ( I use OSPF instead of EIGRP for routing between PE CE. The customer vrf name is cusA, they have 4 sites: CE from site 3 have 2 links to 2 PE ( one for backup). CE from site 3 has exist point to internet and how can i choice 1.1.1.2 is next-hop for default-route
I config the routers with EIGRP and also write Static route between two PC before remove the link between router0 and router1 , destination is reachable , but when remove this connection , packet from pc1 to pc0 will drop in a loop and never reach to destination , is it possible to have a Link state routing protocol and static route at the same network like this scenario , how to prevent loop in this topology static route is configure as bellow :
I have a new Cisco 819 router wtih Verizon 3G built in. I want to use this router to provide 3G backup Internet access for a customer kiosk. The 3G is perfectly stable when I use it as a primary, static routed connection. When I use a floating static route, the link goes up and down constantly. The 3G link works for a about 20- 30 seconds, then goes to reset, down, then dials up and reconnects.
I have a nat and vpn setup on my Cisco 2801 router.Everything is working as expected except the NAT. I have a single static nat translation but it only works for inbound and not outbound. Going outbound, it uses the default overload nat address of the outside interface. [code] I want to add another mailserver. But I fear if one mailserver were to get black-listed, they would both be reporting there ip address as the same address (the one on the ethernet interface) which would blacklist both mail servers.Again, inbound nat works ok, but outbound is just using the IP of the ethernet0/0 address.
Got an ASA5505 Sec+ with ip 10.45.10.1 on inside interface. Firmware 8.3(1). Got another Cisco router (From my ISP) with ip 10.45.10.254 - This one creates an L2L tunnel - To the 10.45.20.0/24 net.
On the 5505 ive got "route inside 10.45.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.45.10.254 1", and trafic is being directed to 10.45.10.254 as it should.
I know cause I can ping everything one the 10.45.20.0/24 net - But thats it... Cant RDP, connect to fileshare... Nothing.
When i test a PC and set it to gateway 10.45.10.254 I can access everything on the remote network. Do I need some NAT command or an access-list? I've setup AnyConnect VPN on the ASA and I can connect to both networks without any problems.
In my Lab environment in GNS I have connected two 7200 series router through fastethernet on router A I have given IP adress 192.168.10.54 and router B I have given IP address 192.168.10.53 and default route as 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.53 and when I run the command on router A it shows result as follows "C 192.168.10.52/24 is directly connected ,Fast ethernet 2/0".
So I need to know why it's showing the result of .52 at last why not .53 or .54 at last what is the reason it's showing .52 which I have not mentioned in my IP address.
Each FW have a LAN behind it. The D-Link and the unknown device are both working perfectly and clients on each subnet can connect to the internet?However when I connect the ASA 5505 to the 2960 SW with a configued static route: Route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.202.1 1 is says it has no route to host?
If I connect the ASA5505 to the LAN of D-Link DSR-1000N and give it a static address and a static route match the D-Link LAN network, it works perfectly, however not when I connect it the the Cisco 2960 Switch
